Can someone explain why the hell Jill Biden is in Ukraine while Joe Biden is hiding in the basement holding virtual...

Can someone explain why the hell Jill Biden is in Ukraine while Joe Biden is hiding in the basement holding virtual "meetings" with Zelensky? How the fuck is this normal? And before anyone starts with the "hur dur active war zone", keep in mind George Bush was on the ground AND visited troops during the Iraq War.

Attached: image.jpg (2000x1333, 266.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-09-21-mn-6104-story.html
nytimes.com/2018/12/26/us/politics/trump-iraq-troops-visit.html
nypost.com/2019/11/28/trump-makes-surprise-visit-to-afghanistan-to-see-u-s-troops-on-thanksgiving/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designated_survivor
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designated_Survivor_(TV_series)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

id fuck her

Grow a dick, juvie.

kill yourself

>juvie
Is this suppose to be clever?

Not our troops moron

Then why is the fucking first lady there?

you're gonna tell me you wouldnt fuck her ass?

Are you actually comparing the war in early 2000 to the current conflict in Ukraine?

Jill can talk without a script that's been written for her. Joe can not.

symbolism id imagine. US stands with Ukraine. That sort fo deal.

OP is a certified retard

I'm saying that liberals who use the excuse that it's too "dangerous" for Biden to go there are full of shit. Of course it's not surprising you completely missed the point.

Wouldn't it make more sense to have the sitting US president go there if that's what this is about?

Her crackhead son asked her to do his bribe collections for him.

Attached: vote democrat, crackhead hunter biden.jpg (540x960, 40.91K)

He is going for Father’s Day dumb ass. You do know today is Mother’s Day right? Have you gone upstairs to tell your mother happy Mother’s Day you worthless ingrate?

Attached: 4D045593-7416-4546-9E50-BD4AC4CA44B7.jpg (1280x720, 35.05K)

And visit who? First lady's dont do shit all day. Presidents run the country... why would he go there other than to talk with zelensky, which he could do through phone call.

>Is this suppose to be clever?
It means you're an insecure child, lashing out at things that no one cares about to stir up shit.

>He is going for Father’s Day dumb ass
According to who? Even if this bullshit were true, which it isn't, why would he wait that long? The war could be over by that point.

>I'm saying that liberals...
there it is.
full retard.

Attached: sj.png (240x160, 54.71K)

I mean you'd think if we're going to be funding half the war then presidents should at least meet in person.

What you mean visit who? How about the fucking people who are getting all this money and aid for starters. How about at least verifying it's ending in the proper hands instead of just sending it into a fucking black hole like we're doing? This is a ridiculous excuse. What is Biden doing that he's so busy he can't go to Ukraine, but somehow it makes sense for the first lady to do it.

Just a reminder that an Ed.D is about as rigorous as a Bachelor of Arts and should be treated that way

Nobody at the doctoral level respects Ed.Ds, even JDs or DCs are treated with slightly more respect.

He calls a lid on the day around 11am, after ice cream and right before nappy time

No you don't understand, he's "busy". Now that I think about it why isn't Kamala going there either? What the fuck is she doing that she can't make the trip?

He’s old as fuck. He won’t make the trip

I find it hard to believe that Biden couldn't take a day or two off. Besides that, what kind of work could he not do on Air Force One?

This is a lie.

And you're pushing a lie to devalue Jill and her pedigree. That's pretty shitty.

>IF I GIVE SOMEBODY MONEY, I WANT THEM TO SHAKE MAH HAND
You think like a poor person my friend. There would be absolutely no reason for the leader of the free world to get that close to hostile Russia.

You think that it's the president's job to verify and put eyes on who has what weapon? Do you not think that there are more apt entities meant to distribute weapons?

OP, are you pretending like you don't know that Joe Biden is a literal undead puppet in order to drive attention towards something that is totally obvious but to those playing along?

Attached: 1652028699758.jpg (479x435, 49.08K)

let's see your resume shrek

>There would be absolutely no reason for the leader of the free world to get that close to hostile Russia.
It would show that he actually cares. Plus it would show courage.

Lol. No it wouldn't. It would show that he's a dumbo trying to prove something. For any sitting leader to go to a warzone that doesn't directly involve them would only be a show of bravado, and serve very little in the long run.

That's why it's a hilariously stupid excuse. As far the job requires the president to be in the country 24/7. Which then brings up the question if he's so busy why does he go back to his house in delaware every weekend?

>There would be absolutely no reason for the leader of the free world to get that close to hostile Russia
Interesting, then why are we getting involved with this war at all? And why is it not too dangerous for Boris Johnson to go there?

>You think that it's the president's job to verify and put eyes on who has what weapon?
Yes? What kind of retarded question is this?

It's not really more dangerous than going to Israel, and it would reinforce the idea that the war isn't going to get so extreme that travel will become impossible, which would be reassuring to all who are directly involved as well as those who are only indirectly involved.

I forgot to mention that Justin Trudeau is in Ukraine as we speak, but apparently it's too "dangerous" for Biden for some reason.

Well to be fair if Trudeau died on a trip I don't think it'd be big news for more than a few weeks.

Israel isnt under imminent attack? are you trying to sound as retarded as possible?

it would NEVER be in our interest for russia to get so close to NATO nations. helping fund this war and imposing sanctions is absolutely in the west's best interest. also its not. It's the job of people under him. You know that the president doesnt run the white house on his own right? he has admin agencies for a lot of this little shit

jt isnt leader of the free world. more nations depend on us than they do on canada

Screenshotting this for the day Joe Biden visits Ukraine within the next few weeks

Attached: 1629985967900.jpg (580x450, 55.87K)

can someone explain why Ukraine is supposedly experiencing horrible "Genocide" and War and yet every world leader (including fucking Trudeau) can still just drop by for a quick photo op?

some war. kinda bullshit.

Attached: O356WE45MBJKRDODM5XY5PLTHY.jpg (2048x1367, 855.47K)

Well I guess random rocket attacks don't count as imminent. But it doesn't really matter because the point is that going to Ukraine wouldn't be much more dangerous. Unless you think the whole place is going to be carpet bombed with nukes, but that's pretty unrealistic, and also raises the question of why are we bothering to fund Ukraine?

The prime minister of Canada being KIA in Ukraine wouldn't be a big deal? Are you an idiot?

It's in our best interests but not enough for Biden to meet Zelensky in person. That's some pretty weird logic there bud. I don't get why you're making excuses for this stupidity. Biden can't be bothered to go when other world leaders can, meanwhile his fucking wife randomly shows up. What's the bullshit excuse for why Kamala can't go either? Because she would start laughing at all the dead bodies in the streets like a fucking moron?

Get real bud, the Ed.D is an ITT Tech tier degree. Shaq has one lmao

1) War is raging in the East, world leaders are meeting in the West
2) This is basically a big "fuck you" to Russia and its meant to show that they are going to double down with the support

Attached: 20220402_072514.jpg (320x237, 23.34K)

>The prime minister of Canada being KIA in Ukraine wouldn't be a big deal?
It was a joke, but if you want to be serious about it then why is it safe for Trudeau to go but not Biden?

Do you have a doctoral degree user?

Yeah it is weird. There's definitely some bullshit going on here.

>jt isnt leader of the free world
What the fuck is your point? So how can he travel there but Biden can't? And why are you assuming Russia would even WANT to kill Biden in the first place? That would be literal suicide for them.

>but if you want to be serious about it then why is it safe for Trudeau to go but not Biden?
I have no idea it makes no sense. I'm hoping some retarded liberal can explain this retarded shit.

Jill is still in relatively good health for her age, and she is in control of her mental faculties. When asked a question, she is capable of making a coherent, sensible response without days of preparation beforehand, even if you don't happen to agree with what she says.

This is not the case for Joe. Like many people suffering from age-related cognitive decline, he has better days and worse days. If he gets enough sleep, if he isn't under too much stress, if his handlers have drilled him enough, he can generally fumble through reading a teleprompter for

Attached: 4ag60a.jpg (640x480, 38.97K)

At least you get it. It's still sad we have hoards of people who don't see that Biden is mentally shoot, and even worse defend it somehow.

Not reading all that gay shit, but here

Attached: 1651810988288.webm (540x960, 1.96M)

are they in a war with an unstable leader who has access to nukes and has already stated a distain for the us leader?

i dont think that youre understanding.
let me try to break it down:
pres and vp of us>other world leaders and wife of world leader

Truthfully, us presidents visiting warzones would have been a great idea for trump, who was all about bravado, but biden is educated and understands that if he dies, the world is fucked

Russia has already proven that they're all about bravado>brains. why would the leader of the free world take that risk? also canada is NOT america.

You seem to be really stuck on the Israel thing. It's not the exact same situation, but it's not substantially more dangerous.

>Truthfully, us presidents visiting warzones would have been a great idea for trump
Except there weren't any new major wars when Trump was president, so how is he gonna do that? And how would the world be "fucked" if something happened to Biden? You understand the USA is not autocracy right? Again with the ridiculous excuses.

What risk? Are you implying Boris Johnson and Justin Trudeau aren't taking any risks being there? They're also funding this war last I checked. This is a stupid excuse anyway. As a leader taking risks is part of the job. If you don't want to take risks then maybe you shouldn't be president of the fucking united states?

Biden dying would hardly register as a blip in history. Kamala would take over, keep most of the same policies, then lose in 2024, just like Biden would have.
Also
>biden is educated
I don't know, user. Does graduating near the bottom of your class from a law school that's not even ranked in the top 40 count as educated? His class rank is one of the many things he has lied about over the years, btw.
latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-09-21-mn-6104-story.html

its our entire convo? what do you mean stuck on it? lol tf? you brought it up. my whole point is that, it is substantially more dangerous. neither ukraine nor israel are ideal for a pres to be at, but a country that russia is invading is obviously the worst out of the 2

Trump visited our troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
nytimes.com/2018/12/26/us/politics/trump-iraq-troops-visit.html
nypost.com/2019/11/28/trump-makes-surprise-visit-to-afghanistan-to-see-u-s-troops-on-thanksgiving/
The Iraq visit was for Christmas and the Afghanistan visit was for Thanksgiving.

I don't get it, it's dangerous for Biden but not for anyone else. Are you saying Biden is a pussy? Even nancy pelosi's old ass has been to Ukraine but both Biden and Harris can't be bothered, and you think this is somehow normal? Meanwhile they're using taxpayer money to fund this bullshit war that would probably be over by now if we weren't funding it.

There wasn't any war in Iraq and the Afghan war was dying down by that point

I've been trying to get you to move on from it. It seems like you've decided to, which is good. Now how dangerous do you actually think Ukraine is? As some have pointed out, Trudeau is there now.

UK and canadian gov'ts dont work like us gov'ts. people elect parties, not people. these two prime ministers are leaders of their parties. if anything happened to them, it'd be a smoother transition, than if anything happened to the pres. they are only comfortable doing that, bc they know that if anything happens, that the us will swoop in totsave the day. who swoops in if us is attacked?

>taking risks is part of the job
true, but taking unnecessary, stupid risks to prove to Yea Forums that they're not scared and that they're brave is a stupid risk. no reason for any of them to be over there.

what ranking were you in law school?

there are russian troops in ukraine laying seige to cities. you tell me how dangerous youd consider that. would you visit ukraine?

I finished my graduate studies with a 4.0. So I guess tied for 1st, along with the other people who also had straight-As.

If I had unlimited taxpayer money to go there (not to mention presidential security) I'd absolutely visit Ukraine. I'm sorry to say that if you wouldn't then you're just a pussy.

dubs of truth? must be true! kek, im sure you did user, but then again, what internet sleuth didn't?

>there are russian troops in ukraine laying seige to cities
Not Kiev.

I'd bring a planeload of barely-legal Ukrainian trim back on Air Force One with me. For, y'know, humanitarian purposes.

What the hell are you talking about? Our government is literally set up so that should the POTUS die it would be a VERY smooth transition. There are like 20 people that are in line to take over the white house if need be. The entire US government would have to be killed at the exact same time for any real problems to happen. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Also it's not unnecessary unless we stayed out of it. Biden insist on bankrolling the whole thing for them so yeah, him visiting at least once should be a top priority. There is no excuse for this at all.

>would you visit ukraine?
If I were POTUS and funding this war for them? Yea I would actually because that's what leaders are suppose to do. If Biden doesn't want to take risks or deal with the downsides of being POTUS then he should resign and let a real leader take over.

Ditto. Plus some AKs.

>The entire US government would have to be killed at the exact same time for any real problems to happen.
Theoretically, that shouldn't be able to happen.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designated_survivor
They even made a TV show about it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designated_Survivor_(TV_series)

calm down its ok.
shes a doctor