Hunger Games Thread
RR sees if Corona-chan has left yet edition
GMG Code
24 please, sames by invite only
Hunger Games Thread
RR sees if Corona-chan has left yet edition
GMG Code
24 please, sames by invite only
Other urls found in this thread:
My mood
Kizuna AI
carlos
MaoMao
Corona is not that in focus anymore, war is the new hot topic.
Retarded Sakuya
Teto
Freddy Fazbear
I’m just a bird
Psycho-chan
Roxy Glamcock
>Afk at work
Loony Glamcock
Schrödinger
Doc Ock
>afk doing teto’s mom
Carl Brutananadilewski
>afk
Sin Botcha
Jacket
Floch
John Shepard
Stock corndog man
Kirby
Kirby's here and its been 15, lets have four sames to round it out
--RR
Why you got renamed
youtube.com
Donald Trump
Wango Tango
Lelouch
>samefag
Suffer Eternity
Okay, we're at cutoff
--RR
Other than Carlos, how do we look?
Pondering doing something stupid for commentary
Good!
Thank you for putting us together, RawR!
Let's get Loony and the greatest person in the universe!!~ She's the best~
WE LOOK EXCELLENT
Ready JA !
Okay, the stragglers had time, any lates will go into Alternate Reality unless I really like them, in which case I burn it down and start over.
For commentary, was gonna post cases from the "SHort Circuit" email newsletter, its like court cases and stuff.
We build!
For RR-273 we're doing a '73 Charger like the one my user's former brother-in-law had
Ready!
Newark.
Second Circuit: It’s fair to say that juror #4 in this criminal antitrust trial over alleged bid-rigging in international currency exchanges should not have posted a podcast during the trial in which he admitted that he had stopped paying attention. But it’s also fair to say that the conspirators should not have been sending instant messages that literally read “conspiracies are nice.”
Thanks Catra
Richard is probably smoking a fat cigar
Suffer Eternity, I love it when my enemies come with instructions
Heirs: Wise men say only fools rush in[to litigation], but [we] can’t help [seeking to terminate our 1983 grant of rights in our dad’s hit song “Can’t Help Falling in Love”]. Second Circuit: Like a river flows, surely to the sea, darling, so it goes. Some things [aren’t] meant to be [under the Copyright Act of 1976, which grants termination rights solely to authors].
Hmph, easy enough. All I must do is use my Geass to steal his bitch. This is child’s play.
No problem, everyone!
Oh c'mon! Can't I hum some tunes?
Holy shit
Yeah, that makes sense.
Well, at least he had some fun with bros.
Good job, Sak!
Now send Suffer my way..
Okay, I am very satisfied with the winner
Fifth Circuit: It’s one thing for a prosecutor to allow a witness to lie on the stand, but it’s quite another for a prosecutor to invent the witness’s testimony out of whole cloth. So a Livingston Parish, La. prosecutor who allegedly intimidated a witness, “barely a teenager at the time,” into repeating a false narrative at trial is not shielded from suit. Judge Ho, dubitante: Absolute prosecutorial immunity is probably “wrong as an original matter” (and so are qualified and municipal immunity), but it does protect this guy (and also his co-defendant, a detective).
I thought we were hunting down Suffer! Damnit Mimsy!
ARENA EVENT!
Hey guys! Head down to Sue's and get me a new interior
One hundred seventy-seven people walk into a bar. They’re later arrested for involvement in a deadly shoot-out—at Waco, Tex.’s Twin Peaks—and indicted by a grand jury. Many of the arrestees are now pursuing false arrest claims (and, others, First Amendment retaliation claims), alleging the officers omitted exculpatory evidence to secure arrest warrants. District Court: Even if they did, the grand jury was an “independent intermediary” that resolved any taint. Fifth Circuit: Not so fast. If the grand jury was also misled by the officers, then the taint was not resolved. Remand is necessary.
The best way to go
>dying to staple gun, not reapers
Not like this...
Time to Wango in the sewing maching with this cat
Damn you, nature!
Okay, that thinned the herd, but we still have a ways to go
Man is arrested, spends four days in jail, and has his apartment searched and his phone and laptop seized after making a satirical Facebook profile of the Parma, Ohio police department. His alleged crime? Using a computer to disrupt police business. But a jury acquits (and the internet awards the department the 2016 Censorious Asshat of the Year Award). Can the man pursue a First Amendment claim, among others, against the officers? Sixth Circuit: Listen, maybe the Facebook page was protected speech, maybe it wasn’t. Tough to say. But what we do know is that there was no clearly established violation here. Qualified immunity for the officers.
Two dogs down in one fell stitch.
Suffer needs to suffer
I swear to fuck, Carlos…you better not make any shitty puns.
I hope that giant pink thing is a girl…
Okay guys, Lunchtime!
Does it violate the Eighth Amendment to house male and female inmates together? The Sixth Circuit says no, so a woman impregnated by another inmate (who had prior violent tendencies) during her time in a facility for severely mentally ill detainees cannot sue Wayne County, Mich.
weenies hehe
Nothing cuter than a bird with a Bag of tacos
WEENIE HUT JR'S?!?!?!!!
my go to place
Almost betting time
The Supreme Court has (in)famously interpreted the Commerce Clause to apply to just about anything anywhere in the country, no matter how local and how unrelated to commerce. But that’s technically the “Domestic Commerce Clause.” There’s also the “Foreign Commerce Clause.” Is it as pliable? Sixth Circuit: Luckily the Supreme Court has never gone there, so we’re gonna say no. And the same should be true for treaties. However, the Supreme Court has gone there, so this defendant who sexually abused children abroad loses.
richniggafurry indeed
hes biting the weenie
Nikocado Avocado
I would rail the shit outta his pink bussy
If only I had a sense of humor.
Sorry Kirby, I'm too busy hosting right now
In 1990, the Supreme Court held that mandatory bar dues (the lawyer kind, not the public-house kind) do not violate the First Amendment. In 2018, though, the Court held that mandatory public-sector-union dues do violate the First Amendment. Wisconsin lawyer: Which means that 1990 decision about bar dues is no longer good law. Seventh Circuit: Which is above our pay grade. The Supreme Court doesn’t like it when we lower courts deem its precedent “overruled by implication,” so your beef is with One First Street in D.C., not 219 South Dearborn in Chicago.
0_0
Why was this edited?
Bird…please…I’m literally begging to a bird…why on Earth do I deserve life?
RULES OF NATURE
AND THEY RUN WHEN THE SUN COMES UP
WITH THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE
ALIVE
FOR A WHILE
NO CHOICE
GOTTA FOLLOW THE LAWS OF THE WILD
ALIVE
WITH THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE
NO CHOICE
OUT HERE ONLY THE STRONG SURVIVE!
I think Kirby wants the other type of hunger games
I think your unhinged nature and going to the Broomhandle solution early and often is quite funny Floch.
Over the last 30 years, Mexican national has been removed from the United States seven times. Hoping the eighth time will be the charm—and only 10 days after his most recent removal—he scales a border fence and is almost immediately spotted by a Marine Corps unit using night vision to monitor the border. The Marines alert Border Patrol agents, who promptly arrest the man. But wait! Did the Marines violate the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the military from assisting in civilian law enforcement? Ninth Circuit: No, the law provides exceptions for assistance authorized by Congress, and Congress in 2016 authorized the Secretary of Defense to deploy ground-based surveillance at the border.
Ive killed so many before.. Not again.
to g/fur with you!