DONT TAKE AWAY MY RIGHT TO MURDER BABIES

DONT TAKE AWAY MY RIGHT TO MURDER BABIES
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: 1651675210248.jpg (1000x1080, 116.08K)

Lmao here come the white knights and simps to defend wahmen

Quick question.
Do either of these look like they're humans able to live outside at all, feel any emotion, or even understand basic concepts like pain?

Attached: 5fd33f55c50528f42f68b0fc0e232228.png (738x414, 458.46K)

not at all. I'm pro-life, which is why I'm anti-gun and pro universal free healthcare.
How very progressive of the christians to join my opinion on being pro-life like this.

BLM is now captured.
Also, women have been shitting all over men for decades. They can go fuck themselves if they think we're going to lift a finger to help them now.
Sex robots will be here soon, and will will relearn that the only reason we even talk to them is because of their wet warm holes.

Attached: 73c882afaa8b8178.png (1284x1276, 77.43K)

please answer

So...bacteria is life on Mars, but a heart beat isn't life on Earth?
Weird.

Attached: 1651561510120.jpg (1079x1280, 130.1K)

You are none of these things and you choose to larp for reactions because your dopamine receptors have been blown to shit. You are a subhuman redditer looking for karma farm. You will find no bliss here.

You don't, so I guess we can kill you.

>Do either of these look like they're humans able to live outside at all, feel any emotion, or even understand basic concepts like pain?

by chance, do you happen to look like this?

Attached: e5yp7.jpg (288x234, 14.23K)

Attached: 011420_TrumpMKE_0809c.jpg (1800x1200, 112.23K)

So if I sneak up on you while you're sleeping and put a bullet into your brain, it's ok cuz you didn't realize what happened?
Fuck off groomer.

Attached: 1651350761693.jpg (677x542, 39.47K)

Attached: 00s0s_2EvKnCq7D1Hz_0bB0dW_600x450.jpg (374x450, 32.68K)

Why wouldn't I be anti-gun and pro-healthcare?
Wouldn't being against things that end lives and being in favor things that extend lives by definition be pro-life?
Lots of projection in your post, you should take care of that.

Then why do states like New Jersey allow abortions UP TO THE MOMENT OF BIRTH?

This is just the beginning, groomers.
We're putting you faggots back in the closet, where you belong.
We gave you the benefit of the doubt, and you failed to become good faith members of society, so back in the closet you go, never to be let out again.
You did this to yourselves with all your endless screeching, stupid parades, and recruiting innocent kids.

Attached: AAW0nMY.png (955x768, 444.01K)

There are more not-you cells in your body than cells that are strictly yours. You are a murderer every time you take a shit.
Being caught by surprise =/= being incapable of understanding what is happening because you lack a brain, nervous system, heart, and are smaller than the bullet.
I do not, by chance are you able to answer the question?
It's like you all know you don't have any actual argument against this.

Abortions should only be allowed (and strongly encouraged) for niggers and jews.

Attached: 1648155176936.jpg (460x418, 36.11K)

unsure, I'm not in favor of that, but rather for the stipulation set in place for roe v wade.
If you're against that why are you in favor of state-controlled abortion rulings? To me it sounds like you'd rather roe v wade be codified federally.

what does anti LGBT legislation have to do with abortion? Wouldn't you be in favor of more gays if it means less accidental pregnancies?

I dunno. Why if a 3 month pregnant woman murdered, they're still charged with double homicide.

We've got some very contradictory laws on the books

>It's like you all know you don't have any actual argument against this.

Just because you refuse to acknowledge the obvious answer doesn't mean you're right, faggot.

Attached: abortion-babykilling.jpg (1099x1025, 56.33K)

/thread

You aren't anti gun. You support the centralization if firearms to police and federal agents, who you continuously call "racist" and therefore cannot be trusted by your own ideology.

You are not "pro healthcare" or "pro free healthcare" as you are quickly willing to deny your political opponents access to healthcare for having opposing views. For your false ideology to work, you'd literally have to tax people into poverty.

When I said you were a larper, I meant it. You have zero understanding of politics. You aren't even pro life in any remote context. You just troll christians on an image board.

If I'm projecting, then you're a liar. And not a very good one.

It's almost like the Democrats should have codified it (as was also suggested by SCOTUS) in the many times they had all branches since RvW was passed.

that image is not this, though.
You're moving the goalposts and calling it obvious, yet you've refused to answer this question.

Attached: 6exhrm.jpg (500x1406, 221.39K)

Old style Christianity:
>I'm hungry. I will eat my son today and share with you if we eat your son tomorrow.
New age bullshit fake Christian:
>REEEEE NO!!!!!!! Sabe duh cells from stuff! It huuuuumannnn!!! Babbiez dey be precious! It iz lief!!!!!

The left cannot meme or win elections without fraud.

Until you're prepared to raise a child, keep your knees locked, or your dick in your pants.
This isn't complicated.
Fucking loser parasites just want to be bailed out over and over - gimme stimmys, college loan forgiveness, abortions, etc etc etc.
It never ends with these people.

Attached: liz-warren-eyes-pocahontas.jpg (880x534, 39.64K)

No, I am completely anti-gun. I don't want feds having firearms either. You are making baseless assumptions for the sole purpose of fitting more buzzwords in-between your reddit spacing.
I have never stated that I am against political opponents from access to healthcare. Healthcare should not be for-profit, and to attempt to profiteer on the sick and dying is fundamentally wrong.
Explain how these are not christian values.

please explain what
has to do with what you posted in the slightest.

Child support starts at conception.
Child birth is free.
Parents (both of them) are guaranteed paid time off to care for the newborn.
If you're against these you're not pro-life.

No you aren't. You're a liar. You hold no moral values other than to get a reaction out of others. You will deny people health care based on their opinions, as seen from the height of the pandemic. If you believe feds can't have guns then you can be the first to tell them to turn them in.You still support abortion, which is the complete opposite of pro life, dismantling your claims on how you're "more pro life" than christians. You cannot lie to me any longer. I am too familiar with your debate tactics, back peddling, gaslighting, and other garbage you throw in order to "win" an internet discussion. In the end you are an amoral mass of hypocrisy. All you do is follow the flow of generalized morality. If you were in the 80s, you'd support Regan and be fearful of aids. If you were in the 20s, you'd support the eugenics movement. Nothing to say comes from a genuine perspective, meaning that you can be easily swayed by the slightest political pressure or financial incentive. There's a word for people who have no coherent thought, who flips is morals with the decade and refuses to look outside his box.

The word is slave. You are a slave.

Attached: 1651641943775.png (700x733, 28.17K)

This is sad, you have completely given up on making any kind point in favor of baseless accusation and projection. You are completely broken if you feel that it's impossible for someone to think that something created for the sole purpose of killing people is bad.
I accept your concession. Go post a wojak about it.

It was just a simple guess, I am deeply sorry. Now I ask you to politely go off yourself because someone not being able to feel pain or live unassisted does not mean its morally defendable to just kill them. I mean, a headshot does only make you feel very little to no pain, and you are only able to survive because you are assisted by other people in your daily life (society), would that make it perfectly fine to kill you, since you also appear to not grasp the basic concept of emotion?

Seethe harder

>I am pro-life
>kill yourself because I can't understand your question!!

>If you're against these you're not pro-socialist.
ftfy
If a pro life group that actually cared for children really existed, there would be very few people in foster care. We don't need to go full blown socialist to prove these anti choice fetus lovers are anti kid.

>mfw the survey is from 2004
>mfw there's not the title of the study nor the names of the ones who conducted the survey, just a "Guttmacher Institute", which is as valid as the "scientists from Oxford University" or a graphic i could shit on PowerPoint in 5 minutes

Give me the study, then it'll be a valid argument

Attached: MonkaSSS.jpg (1200x675, 73.11K)

>Gaslighting
Why do you people always prove me right. It's tiring. I'm not even happy about it anymore. You're so predictable.

>Not your body

OK, so you are saying that the law should be able to force one person to sacrifice their body for another?

Should the law be able to force you to give blood, a spare kidney or bone marrow to another person?

Fuck off you utter pumpkin.

We need more dead babies in this world

>He thinks things change
They don't. They only get worse.

>The left cannot meme or win elections without fraud.
>HERP DERP I have no argument, so let's pretend Biden stole the election instead.

Nice one, conservitard.

ok, I'll rephrase in a way you should be able to understand and answer directly.
Are these clusters of cells pictured specifically in this post humans deserving of the same rights?

it's not full-blown socialist to have basic provisions of other first-world nations, it's just signs you're not a third-world shithole.

Oh there will always be abortions available but I've yet to meet a pro choice bitch get one. They'll say whatever to allude to: woman powerful or anything that sounds virtuous. They all end up single mommy status when they get knocked up all the same.

If they got worse that would be a change. God you're retarded.

give your balls a tug, then.

>DO WHAT I TELL YOU TO DO OR YOU DESERVE TO BE IN PRISON REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Fucking sad.

>Until you're prepared to raise a child, keep your knees locked, or your dick in your pants.

Until you're prepared to die in an accident, don't drive a car.
Until you're prepared to die in a war, don't purchase a gun.

Are you really this fucking stupid?

>This isn't complicated.
I agree. Stop trying to use the law to regulate women's bodies and stop pretending you give a shit about babies when all you really want to do is punish women.

SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP. simple.

>Fucking loser parasites just want to be bailed out over and over - gimme stimmys, college loan forgiveness, abortions, etc etc etc.
1.3T in tax cuts for billionaires - AOK
1.3T in loan forgiveness - OM LEECHES!

Fucking conservicucks really are this retarded.

>It never ends with these people.
Did your parents have any children without brain damage?

>it's just signs you're not a third-world shithole
There is a difference between """free""" doctors and paying workers enough to afford to pay doctors. By the way, doctors should get paid. And no, it isn't daddy government's job to pick up the bill.

Cost of living has increased by 35% since 2009, and minimum wage has increased by 0% in that time, so worked aren't paid enough to afford doctors.
Forcing pregnancies at the state level should mean that the price of childbirth is placed on the state's burden. Instead of sending a bill to the parent, it's sent to the state.

Holy shit, people want more NPC's on the planet coonsoming porn and simping onlyfans. The majority of aborted creatures are niggs, mutts, retards, etc... In conclusion: People not needed. I don't care if they kill high quality white kids from rich families too. We are full!

Attached: 1524736929780.gif (480x480, 375.16K)

If they go worse they're changing, retard.
And shit changes in 18 years

Numbers 5:11
Then the Lord said to Moses, 12 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If a man’s wife goes astray(A) and is unfaithful to him 13 so that another man has sexual relations with her,(B) and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act), 14 and if feelings of jealousy(C) come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure—or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure— 15 then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of an ephah[a](D) of barley flour(E) on her behalf. He must not pour olive oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for jealousy,(F) a reminder-offering(G) to draw attention to wrongdoing.

16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair(H) and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy,(I) while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse.(J) 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray(K) and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse(L) not harm you. 20 But if you have gone astray(M) while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse(N)—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water(O) that brings a curse(P) enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

Bible abortion instructions

>OK, so you are saying that the law should be able to force one person to sacrifice their body for another?

Weren't you fucking dipshits just screeching for two years about how everyone had to inject themselves with an experimental RNA vaccine whether they wanted to or not because, "It was for the good of everyone?"

Yeah, you can fuck right off. Your body your choice no longer applies.

>Cost of living has increased by 35% since 2009, and minimum wage has increased by 0% in that time, so worked aren't paid enough to afford doctors.
>since 2009
The downward spiral starts closer to the 1980's and most people on this forum weren't alive to see retail workers financially capable of renting their own house. My parents generation could and did raise a family by having just the dad work a McDonald's. Daddy government isn't going to fix this. Daddy government prefers you to be pleading for mercy, unarmed and penniless.
Honestly, things get this bad before people remember why we used to be so adamant about having gun rights. Collective bargaining can happen peacefully or not so peacefully, but it is always collective bargaining that alleviates the suffering of the working poor.

Reaganomics saw the first overall worker decrease in wages in US history and started the trend of wage stagnation.
Calling the government "daddy" while implying it needs to go MORE right isn't going to fix this.

Someone being pregnant or not won't kill me.
You having an infectious disease might.

If your body your choice doesn't apply anymore then forced vasectomies on all boys enforced at the state-level, then. They can be reversed and it's more effective than other contraceptives.

>implying it needs to go MORE right
This is your identity politics kicking in.
The right doesn't support collective bargaining either. Both your side and theirs has about the same goal and it isn't freedom.
Consider what the democratic party was before it became what it is today. It used to be beautiful. Well, after it supported slavery. There was still a window of time when it was beautiful. Now, it's just another power grab.

fr no cap

Attached: pm.jpg (372x483, 24.25K)

you're a very special brand of delusional if you think women are carrying a child for 8 1/2 months, and then decide to get it sucked out at that point.

NJ State laws for later-term abortions (in heavily regulated locations only after 14 week gestation) are there solely for the critical situations where termination of the foetus is essential to prevent the mother's death.

Nope. Still an unborn baby that the mother is responsible for nurturing not murdering.

>There is a difference between """free""" doctors and paying workers enough to afford to pay doctors. By the way, doctors should get paid. And no, it isn't daddy government's job to pick up the bill.

The problem with being an idiot is that you lack the capacity to comprehend your own stupidity, so you wander through life with delusions of adequacy.

>HERP DERP why should other people pay for your healthcare DERP HERP
Tell me, you fucking shitstain on the underwear of humanity, how _precisely_ do imagine health insurance works?

nope fuck you if its crowded where u live move theres tons of space on this planet left.

>health insurance works
oxymoron right there.
Talk to your doctor about what health insurance has become to see if health insurance is worthy of praise.

Women: Sex is not a right. No one is entitled to sex. Sex doesn't matter. Stop complaining incels!

Also women: I NEED TO BE FILLED WITH CHAD'S CUM EVERY DAY OR I WILL DIE OMG HOW WILL I SURVIVE WITHOUT DAILY ABORTIONS HELP ME PLEASE

Attached: iu[1].jpg (1800x1004, 260.47K)

"BUT THINK OF THE BABIES!

If it was about babies, we'd have excellent and free universal maternal care. You wouldnt be charged a cent to give birth, no matter how complicated the delivery was. If it was about babies, we'd have months and months of parental leave for mother and father, for everyone.

If it was about babies, we'd have free lactation consultants, free diapers, free formula. If it was about babies, we'd have free and excellent childcare from newborns on, for every baby, irrespective of race, creed, or wealth. If it was about babies, we'd have universal preschool, and pre-K, and guaranteed school placements.

But lets be honest. This isnt about babies, is it?

United states politics don't have a left, though. It should, because generally left-wing policies encourage education, wage equality, and accessible healthcare.
The democratic party is more right-wing than most other nations' extreme right, and the republican party is more akin to Captain Planet villains now. There are no political stances, just "us vs them" shit-sturring on twitter.

>I NEED TO BE FILLED WITH CHAD'S CUM EVERY DAY OR I WILL DIE OMG HOW WILL I SURVIVE WITHOUT DAILY ABORTIONS HELP ME PLEASE
and according to you, this is an ideal parent.

>an unborn baby
is an oxymoron.
Shame on you for trying to gaslight us.

Attached: HumptyDumpty words.png (889x1024, 635.35K)

The left is an elephant and the right is a dog, so I'm not sure you have any idea what you're talking about.

Attached: OTcoz6Z.png (441x479, 32.99K)

just use a fucking condom

Postnatal abortion is always an option!

and lets quote a Christian pastor: Dave Barnhart:

>"The Unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you, they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, or the chronically poor.
>They dont resent your condescension, or complain that you aren't politically correct. Unlike widows, they don't ask you to question the patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education or childcare. Unlike aliens they dont bring all that racial, cultural and religious baggage that you dislike.

>They allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born you can forget about them, because they cease being the unborn.

>You can "love" the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, or apologizing to anyone.

>They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe.

Nope its more about the murdering your own child to be free of any personal responsibility from your actions.
Unless you think parents shouldn't be obligated to provide for their offspring you have no argument.

Attached: allison gets it.gif (245x190, 978.14K)

Not my problem. She can raise her own damn stupid decision. Pay the whore toll.

and with posters like OP, abortion up till the 300th trimester would be a relief for their poor mother.

Ok? doesn't matter the species dumbfuck
Its an unborn baby that the elephant mother/dog mother is responsible for nurturing not murdering.
You aren't helping your argument in the slightest.

Reporting for duty.
Now you.

Attached: full-body condom.jpg (300x400, 11.09K)

you fuck the bag

>encourage education, wage equality, and accessible healthcare
Sounds like what my union encourages, but not what the democratic party or you seem to be encouraging. And no, gibs aren't really free.

>an unborn baby
< Even Tweety Amin knows the difference.
unborn = fetus
born = baby

Attached: wong.jpg (450x450, 53.88K)

>doesn't matter the species dumbfuck

Except it tends to show that you have absolutely no clue about the subject, and leap to conclusions easily and without actual facts of the situlations, making judgemental calls on people whose lives you have no idea about.

It matters an awful lot, because it shows you are the one who's a fucking ignorant asshole.