2019

>2019
>not being a based Scaruffi drone

What's your excuse?

Attached: file.png (400x400, 174K)

Other urls found in this thread:

scaruffi.com/vol1/beatles.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>droning literally anyone and being proud of it
the absolute state

Do I qualify as a Scaruffi drone if my taste is similar but I also like The Beatles?

I'm able to make opinions for myself

fpbp as always, now fuck off OP.

Attached: 1466357685941.gif (210x161, 1.74M)

I can't not love Aphex Twin and Oneohtrix Point Never after all these years. Also not as big a fan of TMR as I used to be. Which reminds me that I gotta sell my copy of TMR. Or maybe I should keep it if I ever start enjoying it again.

Attached: pencil_skirt,x1000,front-c,468,0,701,935-bg,f8f8f8.jpg (701x935, 80K)

wow those are some rad independent views, kids. perhaps Yea Forums would be interested in them

>unironically defending droning
>having "independent views" is a bad thing
the absolute state

>having shit taste because you're too stubborn to learn from someone more knowledgeable and experienced
kek post your top albums please so I can laugh at you some more

Because the Beatles is objectively the greatest band of all time.
And his classical/jazz taste is completely awful.

>Because the Beatles is objectively the greatest band of all time.
bait

>the Beatles isn't the greatest band of all time
Huh?

no they were quite mediocre actually

see: scaruffi.com/vol1/beatles.html

Scaruffi isn't more knowledgeable than any random fuckwad avant-teen on RYM, he just pretends he is and retards like you buy it because he has a website
most of my top albums are scaruffi-core anyway

>the greatest band of all time is mediocre
Literally doesn't make sense.

I think Korn sucks.

His classical and mainly jazz taste is ridiculously bad. Hence why Scaruffi drones are plebeian individuals who only listen to rock music.

>His classical and mainly jazz taste is ridiculously bad.
I disagree. Unit Structures should be #1 though.

>I disagree
>entry level free jazz should be #1
Yes, of course you disagree. You're as plebeian as him.

Scaruffi is a hack.

i mean I like the Beatles but those
are a funny read and he has his moments of good taste

Attached: 3B372FA8-D7F9-4B65-9BE2-F611BDAD73A9.jpg (1242x1125, 1.15M)

>it's entry level so it suck!
Bet you're the kind of dude who thinks Kind of Blue is overrated also

what's a better free jazz album then? I've probably heard it.

>it's entry level so it suck!
Never said that. But it's clear that you haven't listened to a lot of jazz. Both the albums you just said are good. But you're literally
>I listen to jazz, heh. Kind of Blue, Love Supreme, Black Saint and The Sinner Lady, the list can go on...
And Scaruffi too.

>most of my top albums are scaruffi-core anyway
based Scaruffi drone

you're fucking deluded if you think Unit Structures is one of the first jazz albums normal people listen to

wtf

The Clifford Thornton New Art Ensemble - Freedom & Unity is probably top 3 free jazz exercises in the 1960's. Check out.
It's entry level free jazz. Not entry level jazz, definitely.

The dude has a rating for GYBE's first recording. Somebody did a calculation of the amount of hours it would take to listen to everything he claims, and it doesn't come out right. His shit is sometimes funny and good for the memes, but that's it, you can't actually take it seriously.

>The dude has a rating for GYBE's first recording.
no he doesn't?

>Somebody did a calculation of the amount of hours it would take to listen to everything he claims, and it doesn't come out right.
he's literally 63 years old he EASILY could have listened to ~30000 albums

post it, i'm calling bullshit

>But it's clear that you haven't listened to a lot of jazz
I've listened to over 400 jazz albums, some being large compilations such as Louis Armstrong's Hot Fives and Sevens, I've read books on the history of Jazz, seen Ken Burns Jazz, but yeah I know nothing right? Sometimes the most popular and acclaimed are the best. If anything you seem more like the one who doesn't know much about jazz, know it all contrarian really.

His 30's - 40's - early 50's is almost entirely worthless. Take here some good albums from this period.
9/10:
Machito - Afro-Cuban Jazz [1951]
Lester Young Trio - s/t Vol.1 [1951]
Stan Kenton - Innovations in Modern Music [1950]
Stan Kenton - Milestones [Compilation; 1950]
Charlie Mariano - With His Jazz Group [1950]
Stan Kenton - Encores [1949]
Oscar Peterson - At Carnegie [1951]
Ralph Burns - Free Forms [1952]
Johnny Hodges - Collates No. 2 [1952]
Gene Krupa - Dance Parade [1949]
Bud Powell - Piano Solos #2 [1950]
Sonny Rollins Quartet - s/t [1952]
Woody Herman - Sequence in Jazz [1948]
Stan Kenton - Artistry In Rhythm
Duke Ellington - Liberian Suite [1949]
Harry James - Dance Parade [1950]
Benny Goodman - Benny Goodman Sextet
Charlie Barnet and His Orchestra - Hop On The Skyliner!!

>I've listened to over 400 jazz albums, some being large compilations such as Louis Armstrong's Hot Fives and Sevens, I've read books on the history of Jazz, seen Ken Burns Jazz, but yeah I know nothing right?
Then you probably knows more than Scaruffi. The fact that you think his list is worthy definitely makes me think that you know shit and that you're LARPing.

Scaruffi has far more than 400 albums in his "best of jazz" lists alone, are you implying he hasn't listened to them?

8/10:
Dave Brubeck Trio - Distinctive Rhythm Instrumentals [Compilation; 1951]
Miles Davis - The New Sounds [1952]
Stan Kenton - City of Glass [1952]
Duke Ellington - Masterpieces by Ellington [1951]
Pearl Bailey - Entertains [1950]
Sonny Stitt & Bud Powell - s/t [1951]
Billie Holiday - Sings [1952]
Kai Winding / J. J. Johnson - Modern Jazz Trombones [1951]
Earl Bostic - Earl Bostic and His Alto Sax [1951]
Louis Armstrong - Vol. 2 Jazz Concert [1950]
Lee Konitz - The New Sounds [1951]
Charlie Parker - Bird Blows the Blues [1950]
Gene Ammons & Sonny Stitt - Battle of the Saxes [1951]
Stan Kenton - A Presentation of Progressive Jazz [1947]
Joe Bushkin - After Hours [1950]
Charlie Parker - Charlie Parker Sextet [1950]
Pete Johnson - Boogie Woogie Classics [1951]
Benny Goodman - Combos [1951]
PĂ©rez Prado - Mucho Mambo for Dancing [1951]
Les Paul & Mary Ford - Les Paul's New Sound, Vol. 2 [1951]
Zoot Sims - Tenor Sax Favorites [1951]
Art Hodes - Dixieland Jubilee [1950]
Stan Getz - Vol. 1
Baby Dodds - A Session With Baby Dodds [1946]
Tommy Dorsey - All Time Hits [Compilation; 1951]
Les Brown - Dance Parade [1950]
Gene Krupa - s/t [1947]
Stan Getz - Vol. 2 [1951]
The King Cole Trio - s/t, vol. 3 [1948]
Jimmy Dorsey - Contrasting Music [1941]
Jazz At The Philharmonic - Vol. 1 [1945]
The King Cole Trio - s/t, vol. 4 [1949]
Charlie Parker - s/t [Compilation; 1948]
Duke Ellington - A Duke Ellington Panorama
Amos Milburn - Rockin' the Boogie [Compilation; 1951]
Art Pepper - s/t [1952]
Doris Day & Harry James - Young Man With a Horn [1950]
Georgie Auld - The Most Versatile Saxophonist of Our Time [1946]
Django Reinhardt - s/t [Compilation; 1935]
Mary Lou Williams - Piano Solos [1946]
Duke Ellington - Black, Brown and Beige
James P. Johnson - New York Jazz
Carl Kress - Decca Presents Carl Kress in a Recital of Original Guitar Solos
The Capitol Jazzmen - New American Jazz
Charlie Parker - With Strings [1950]
Glenn Miller - s/t [1944]
Mary Lou Williams - s/t [1944]

I'm implying that his taste is garbage. 400 is a very short amount to assume he hasn't listened.
My point is that if you are really a jazz consumer as you said, you probably has better taste than him and recognize that his taste is shit. But the fact that you don't, makes me think that you also know shit about jazz.

Yes.

lol

I'd trust his taste over yours.