(1) Real music is created by humans, not by a machine or a computer.
(2) Real music has structure and consistency.
(3) Real music elicits real emotions — of love, loss, anger, fear, happiness, hope, inspiration, or anything related to the gambit of being human.
(4) Real music requires talent.
(5) Real music requires instruments and/or voices.
(6) Real music should be cross generational.
(7) Real music shouldn’t need gadgets or special effects to be enjoyed.
mods please sticky
blah blah buzzwords blah blah
top yourself footfag
Imagine the smell
Post some "real music" faggot.
what is she listening to?
Heaven
Me huffing those boots as I chunk in my pants.
Pretty much every band uses some kind of gadgets and special effects tho
Also techno/electronic is superior.
based
"buzzword" is a buzzword
this
Little Feet
cute male feet pls
guess i like fake music then
feet fetish is the worst fetish
embarrassing
>(4) Real music requires talent.
>(5) Real music requires instruments and/or voices.
Oh Please explain to me how easy it is to make an electronic song on the same level as Arca or Aphex Twin
You fucked up faggot
Rook
Aphex Twin and Arca aren’t even Hip Hop level.
post your music rn
...
rollan
yea aight
8. MatPat’s wife Stephanie is a cutie pie.
>(7) Real music shouldn’t need gadgets or special effects to be enjoyed
Reminder that every recorded song you’ve ever heard was mixed to perfection by someone using the available “special effects” at the time it was recorded
Can't tell if this is bait but I'm genuinely curious about how OP justifies his numbered points. Historical precedent/some kind of research?
HOBO WIZARD GET DAMMIT
Post this at the start or don't post it at all
I want to fuck them.
Ump
what if it’s electronic instruments combines with classic musical fare?
>he listens to music that elicits emotion instead of music that lacks emotion but engages the intellect.
8tea git pls
Shy
let me ftfy
(1) real groove is created when there's no quantisation
(2) Good music doesn't have a copypaste structure
(3) Good music brings new emotions or makes you look at them in a new light or gives you a slightly different flavour
(4) talent is real but overrated. It's easy to cope with being a pussy who can't be dedicated to anything by saying "I just don't have talent"
(5) Good music can probably be done with about anything
(6) Grandpas usually don't like new good music because their brains aren't as good in getting into new stuff
(7) Music can fuse with other arts and make more sense when listened with them. Usually this isn't the case and the video clip is there to get views
>(1) Real music is created by humans, not by a machine or a computer.
What of instruments?
>(3) Real music elicits real emotions — of love, loss, anger, fear, happiness, hope, inspiration, or anything related to the gambit of being human.
So if I feel nothing for a classical piece, it ain't music?
>(4) Real music requires talent.
how about the sounds of nature?
music videos with barefoot women
forum.literotica.com
You don't understand music or art as a whole if you believe this to be true. There is no such thing as "real music" and if you think there is, you don't understand music, or art in general.
Music is any collection of sounds presented as music. Period. No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
>b-but then I could just record myself taking a shit and call it music and it would be music!!
Yes, you could. And yes, if you presented it as music, it would be music. Although whether or not it'd be good music would be up to the critics and the public to decide.
>Hip Hop level.
Brainlet
I want to sniff the feets.
>Reply
Great post! I agree with everything you said except for saying, music is music as long as it's presented as music. I believe it must only be thought of as music by the listener.
Many would hardly consider this music, but I love it anyway.
""""real"""" music is boring normie shit then, get creative fucko
yeah stop using anything that's not human no drums no daw no guitar no orchestras just the sound of getting your head from that far up your ass
Shut the fuck up boomer.
Loona fucking suck
Now Twice, that’s a group with REAL talent (if you know what I mean)
>he doesn’t listen to music that is both intellectually and emotionally engaging
(OP is a faggot) REAL music is when I say it is REEEEEEEEEEEE
>Real music is created by humans, not by a machine or a computer.
The two are not mutually exclusive, and unless you listen exclusively to unamplified live accapella performances, you don't believe this either.
>Real music has structure and consistency.
Structure and consistency are not binary occurrences, nor are they necessarily interdependent. There is incredible consistency to white noise, but no structure, for example.
>(3) Real music elicits real emotions.
Limiting the scope of music to emotional expression (or impression, I guess) is just as harmful as limiting it's scope to programmaticism. There are plenty of functions music can serve and has served for thousands of years other than only the emotional - be they intellectual, or to do with the transmission and preservation of cultural ideas.
>(4) Real music requires talent
Plenty of the greatest musicians on Earth would themselves admit to never having an ounce of musical talent. Skill is a very different thing from talent, and appeals to talent is what keeps most people from really engaging with music. Aside from that, skill in an artistic endeavour comes in many forms - many of which you would likely not recognise.
>Real music requires instruments and/or voices.
An instrument is that which we create music with; to say that music requires instruments is tautologous.
>Real music should be cross generational.
Why? Why should something that is highly-valued by some parts of society and not by others be deemed overall to be of no value? Aiming for mass-appeal is exactly what is wrong with so much mainstream art - why would you want that to be a required factor for all art?
>Real music shouldn’t need gadgets or special effects to be enjoyed.
You are literally using a gadget to access a website, to find music which you will download from someone else's gadget, in order to store on a gadget into which you will plug another gadget that you put into your ears in order to enjoy that music.
Nice soi posting
OP destroyed on every single point
>techno/electronic
Only people who don't listen to electronic music would use "techno" as a synonym.
op totally ravaged
wew
>(1) Real music is created by humans, not by a machine or a computer.
electronic music is still created by humans
>(2) Real music has structure and consistency.
so does electronic music
>(3) Real music elicits real emotions — of love, loss, anger, fear, happiness, hope, inspiration, or anything related to the gambit of being human.
electronic music can do that
>(4) Real music requires talent.
electronic music requires talent
>(5) Real music requires instruments and/or voices.
no it doesn't, and electronic music can still have vocals
>(6) Real music should be cross generational.
what the fuck does this even mean?
>(7) Real music shouldn’t need gadgets or special effects to be enjoyed.
this is partly true desu
>t. Oldhead
>autistic teenage super strong opinions on music
>footfaggoty
figures