Imagine coping this hard over a gut buying a private company that was dying

Imagine coping this hard over a gut buying a private company that was dying.

Attached: it's over.jpg (1039x636, 249.33K)

Other urls found in this thread:

snopes.com/fact-check/trump-child-rape-settlements/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Here is a reoublucan making freedom of speech stronger

Attached: 1650431820310.jpg (1003x947, 98.99K)

Here is another

Attached: 15548643010-1080pnbcstations.jpg (400x225, 23.6K)

And another

Attached: poster_fd3344deb80e4cdca3c8f6d581a41b9e.jpg (1280x720, 74.63K)

>intentionally spread misinformation
>government says stop
>mald
gaslight
obstruct
project

And another

Attached: 1615335301543.jpg (3840x2880, 913.61K)

Fuck wrong pic

>grooming is free speech
kek

Why are you so surprised? I was banned from one site because I said that
>holocaust denial
is not just about denying the whole thing, but arguing how the numbers of victims was less than 6 mil. That's why I was banned. Because I said that the number is lower than 6 mil.

Also, why should children learn about sex and gender...before (their) puberty?

You can still say fuck jews and kikes faggot.

Will they take down NYT, WP, Vox, MSNBC, CNN and Fox News?

Attached: Screenshot_20210521-220233_Opera.jpg (1440x2295, 806.68K)

Attached: EbtxhWfXgAAs3f2.jpg (750x500, 68.28K)

Attached: 6bvahy.jpg (500x750, 131.32K)

don't forget using the government to punish disney for speaking out against it

Attached: 1609350333068.gif (480x314, 587.91K)

hahahaha faggot!

such turntables

>he had a le pic next to le Epstein
>must be a pedo
lol

Why do republicans love fascism and book burning to the point that they use threats of it in campaign speeches?

>I made shit up
kek back to plebbit

>book burning
Like when Amazon bans right wing books?

>best friends for decades
>live within walking distance of each other in 2 states
>acused by a 13 year old of being raped by both
Republicans retards: Nothing to see here

>>acused by a 13 year old of being raped by both
this was deboonked

>buy twitter
>twitter gets fact checked
>Oh, shit. I own twitter.

Fuck you, republican liars.

HAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

This gun-banning pedorapist sure is popufur with the redneck NPCs.

Let's hear it for the FIRST one to make firearm accessories FEDERALLY ILLEGAL!!!! YAY!!!


What stupid non-humans we share this rock with

Attached: Miss-Dixie-dixie-from-the-fox-and-the-hound-2-41151255-1920-1080.jpg (1920x1080, 155.14K)

stfu

You shut up fucking satan-worshipping cuckshitstain


I want my full auto back

Hellraiser: Inferno

>democrat establishment openly and freely silences dissent through “private” company
>democrat establishment loses control of dissent-silencing apparatus
>institute new department to silence dissent on previous dissent-silencing apparatus

It’s a pretty desperate move. Leftist politics cannot subsist without censorship of dissent.

Attached: 1650739953333.gif (480x270, 1.05M)

>It’s a pretty desperate move. Leftist politics cannot subsist without censorship of dissent.
And almost the entirety of the media and billions of dollars.

>Imagine coping this hard over the President setting up an agency to ensure that the most popular social media site in the world adheres to a strict regimen of ensuring only verifiable, factually true information is made available for consumption

FTFY

He shouldn't have to, but thanks to Twatter's immense global reach and the fact that idiots like OP are easily swayed by confirmation bias, Biden's doing this because he doesn't trust that Musk will keep the "anti-lie/anti-bullshit" guardrails that are currently there in place.

And for good reason.

Bottom line: anyone who isn't appalled at the idea that literal LIES are now going to be rampant and who defends the right of LIARS to spread their LIES (further contaminating our public discourse worse than it already is) has no concept of democracy and should get it over with & just move to Russia already.

After all, the media over there is nothing BUT conservative confirmation bias, and anyone that contradicts that message is immediately jailed. Sounds like fucking heaven for you cretins, don't it? Oh, excuse me:

Sounds like fucking нeбeca for you cretins, don't it?

Attached: 1650752497557.jpg (972x664, 60.66K)

we need more trump truth.

We get it. If the deck isn't stacked significantly in your favor then you would never win elections.

It wasn't.

Attached: 1641538826288.png (806x539, 225.49K)

Actually,trying to overthrow the government and aiding the enemy are not protected speech.

So, sorry, the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to russians or triators.

Attached: 1651216508403.jpg (583x484, 78.2K)

>censorship of dissent.

Dissent is one thing. Utter fucking LIES are something else.

That's what you Reich-wing fucktards can't seem to wrap your heads around. Nobody has any issues with conservative points of view. What we have issues with is fucking LIES and the refusal to accept verifiable FACTS when they contradict your talking points.

TL;DR
>keep your rhetoric strictly confined to facts and logic, like your opponents do, and nobody will silence you

Attached: Goering.jpg (960x720, 80.57K)

Insisting on the Reich Wing not being allowed to fucking LIE about EVERYTHING they disagree with = / = 'stacking the deck in our favor.

Also >you would never win elections

Picrel. Lotta guts you have making that argument, Klaus.

Attached: Gerrymandering.jpg (600x480, 50.94K)

Words words words

Deboonked!

snopes.com/fact-check/trump-child-rape-settlements/

Attached: Screenshot_20220430-185910_Opera.jpg (1439x1720, 532.62K)

Attached: 1649533570977.jpg (720x656, 47.54K)

>I made shit up
kek.

>we need more trump truth.
Translation:
>facts scare me, so I need my Big Daddy Chieftain to tell me lies that make my feefees good in order to get through life

You're like Lenny at the end of Of Mice And Men; you've gotta be bullshitted all the way through to the end. Because the reality of the world that the rest of us reside in would just fuck you up.

"Free speech" is an irrelevant, antiquated idea like Marxism and classical liberalism

>You're like Lenny at the end of Of Mice And Men
>Of Mice And Men
Nice jewbook

>NYPost

hahahahaha


ah hahahahaha

I believe you believe what you’re posting

Attached: 02BA0CC7-A2D9-4D3A-853C-15121213AD07.png (345x336, 135.55K)

You will accept the government's version of truth or you are a bigot!

You niggers need a dystopian disinformation bureau. No questions. Y’all fuckin’ retarded.

>obsessed with jews
>anti-books
nazi
hahahahaha

ahh hahahahaha

No relevance to anything I've said. Besides, aren't you homophobes the ones constantly saying that males that are transitioning to female "will never be a woman"? Kinda hypocritical for you to post that particular image, ain't it IvanCletus?

Booing it doesn't make it any less true. And no, I didn't make a fucking thing up. Your response here is precisely the gaslighting I was expecting, so congratulations on being the ignorant fucktard I knew you were. You didn't disappoint.

Attached: Stupid.jpg (300x218, 12.95K)

I'm the one that posted the second link you posted.

And we're both factually correct. So yes, we believe what we posted because we have good reason to. Picrel

Attached: Facts lib vs con.jpg (800x450, 42.53K)

>who defends the right of LIARS to spread their LIES

Everyone has the right to lie. That is the very nature of free speech. We do not get to pick and choose which speech is acceptable, for if we do, there is no longer a right, just a privelige granted to chosen individuals. The problem there is that once the precedent is set, we open ourselves to a situation where those in charge of deciding what is acceptable speech could decide that the truth is unacceptable, and lies are acceptable, effectively eliminating all truth. The amount of misinformation and disinformation is appalling, but if we don't acknowledge that silencing any speech that isn't in violation of the law is a dangerous choice, we could end up with an administration that has been granted the power to legally silence those who speak the truth.

tldr: rights are only rights if they are universally applied, and giving a government organization the power to restrict speech is a fundamentally terrible idea.

There’s an old unspoken rule of internet discussion - people who incorporate laughing or emojis in their responses generally realize they’re wrong

You have a distinctive style, and I’ve seen others mention to you that you’re making a fool of yourself

I know you're being facetious, but you're actually not far off

Well, isn't that peak russian shill irony?

Attached: 23.jpg (1400x933, 322.55K)

>everyone who hates jews is a Nazi
Remember Hamas vs Isreal?

>you're making a fool of yourself
>hay y r their j00s mommy i mad waaa

hahahaha

hahahaha

You’ve been offering unfounded judgmental opinion and calling it “fact”

Only someone playing troll games would think this is a valid approach

Laughing at your own shit is for 3rd-worlders.

>durr i'm not a nazi
>j000000s
oh goody a useful idiot I can bat around for the rest of the thread

>stop lafing at me i rite i mad

hahahahaha

hahahahaha

ahhh hahahahaha

Why do peyote expect private companies to be bastions of free speech?

imagine thinking you can just say things against President Biden without any response. Thats not how it works. If chuds are going to lie, it only makes sense for the government to set up an agency that will let the American people know what the truth really is.

I didn't realize peyote was sentient user
are you on some?

Holomodor

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

Who defines what is a lie? There are ludicrous irrational lies, and things the government said for decades were "lies" until the truth everyone already knew was declassified. Such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Serial liars are incapable of being fair arbiters of truth, much like a theif makes a poor accountant. Any investigate journalism that uncovers any incident they try to hide which embarrasses them they always deem a lie. It's not even a partisan issue, it's immense foolishness to anyone who dares make such a thing.

>We do not get to pick and choose which speech is acceptable

Actually we do; pardon me for using a well-worn trope, but is shouting "fire" in a crowded theater protected speech? No it's not. Child pornography is a type of speech just like adult pornography, but the Supreme Court has decreed that it is not protected speech under the 1st Amendment (which is why laws against it exist; because it's not protected). Westboro Baptist Church is protected speech. The difference between their disgusting bullshit and Trump's disgusting bullshit is that the only way you could make the argument that WBC is spreading lies with their speech is if you believe that "god" exists (because I have to believe that any righteous "god" would be just as appalled at what WBC says in his name as I am). Without belief that "god" exists, the bullshit they trowel out is only designed to inflame passions against them.

With Trump & his enablers, however, unfortunately, people with no critical thinking skills and a heavy dose of confirmation bias are very likely (like high 90% likely) to take what he says as true, when actual verifiable FACTS contradict him.

The question I'd like to know the answer to (and that you gotta ask yoursel) is: why are you defending the right to lie? Lies do nothing but hurt other people and benefit only the liar (and, in a political context, the people who side with the liar).

>giving a government organization the power to restrict speech is a fundamentally terrible idea.

Tell ya what: how about instead of setting up this gov't watchdog group to police speech, why don't we enact a Constitutional Amendment that says that any news media outlet will face license revocation for any instances of their writers or anchors knowingly spreading untruths on their networks, to include showing footage of a politician speaking if that politician is lying in the cited quotation. You agree with me on that, I'll agree with you on Twatter being free.

Libtards sure as hell ignored all the facts in the fentanyl floyd shit show

>facts
we knew you were trying to cover up a murder user
that's why Chauvin had to get convicted
to give us a victory
for once

It's the avatar posting furfag who is such a fucking failure in life that his mum was talking about making him homeless so he would get his 20something ass out and do something with itself

Did you an hero yet furfag?

Report avatar postersfor great justice

The only opinion I proffered was that I wouldn't have a problem with a conservative pov provided it was grounded in facts. Otherwise, nothing I said was factually incorrect.

Unless your whole point was to prove MY point (that you hate facts), in which case, congratulations again.

>still going with the russian thing although it was completely and utterly proven false on all accounts

neat?

except he's right
if you took facts like climate change is real and gender is a construct you wouldn't be conservative anymore

Masterful bait

ok boris

It was called the Smith-Mundt Act, from the 1940s. It prohibited the government from propagandizing to citizens via media companies of any type, from written on up.

It was altered in 2012 and signed in by Obama to allow the US government to “make available, domestically, materials meant for international dissemination” (paraphrased but pretty close to the actual wording, too lazy to search copy paste)

>Who defines what is a lie?

First off, let's get one thing clear:

Facts > "truth"

"Truth" is subjective, whereas facts are incontrovertible. That's why conservatives have such a huge problem with facts; they contradict so many of their talking points, it's gotta be frustrating as hell. So as long as we're straight on that, I'm good.

>Serial liars are incapable of being fair arbiters of truth

I agree. Which is why I find it both amusing and smashmyheadagainstthewallbecausepeoplearefuckingstupid when Donald Trump tries to pass himself off as the only source of facts regarding, well, anything. So if you can make the statement you just made and then in the next breath say that you believe Trump whenever he says something, then I guess it really is true that 2+2=5

>Libtards

Picrel

Attached: Saying Libtard.jpg (600x450, 59.51K)

2/10 bait (You)’re both awful at this

>It’s a pretty desperate move

Spending 40 billion dollars buying a company because you don't like the scrutiny you're getting isn't desperate doe

why are you racist against russians? Is it because you're a racist but you've been indoctrinated to shill for nigs and jews but really learned nothing about that equality trash after all those commercials?

russia sucks shit and so do you.

Attached: 1645866973031.jpg (1024x664, 56.73K)

Imagine thinking that Elon Musk is a right winger or a Trump guy. You guys are furious because it looks like one social media outlet won’t be completely controlled by far left partisan hacks.

So you're saying I'm a master baiter?

I see no lies here

Holomodor

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

>I can be conservative and respect tranny rights
>conservatives believe climate change is real
not b8 trumper

do you print that off
stick your dick thru it
and spin it like a pinwheel?

When? When does that happen?

Deflect as you will, the point remains. Leftist politics cannot subsist without censorship of dissent.

Attached: its the state and capital stupid.jpg (680x522, 93.85K)

Yeah it's not just the right that know you lot are fucktards but seeing as you have 1 insult and below room temp iq we'll leave you to your crayons

Sure thing, Ivan.