Why did the girls look so happy? if they were sex trafficked and raped?

why did the girls look so happy? if they were sex trafficked and raped?

justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/twenty-year-sentence-girlsdoporn-sex-trafficking-conspiracy

Attached: mfwraped.png (464x654, 374.29K)

Episode #?

>wanted to see a girl get assaulted

Do you know where you are. Hot girl, does porn. Yes want episode #

Drought is defined and used in many ways: There are meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, and socioeconomic droughts. The National Drought Mitigation Center defines drought as originating from "a deficiency of precipitation over an extended period of time---usually a season or more---resulting in a water shortage for some activity, group, or environmental sector. Its impacts result from the interplay between the natural event (less precipitation than expected) and the demand people place on water supply, and human activities can exacerbate the impacts of drought."

Common drought indicators evaluate the balance between the water that comes into the state, via rain and snow, and the water that goes out in runoff, consumption, and evaporation. By any measure, California's five-year drought, from 2012 to 2016, was extreme. Indeed, precipitation, runoff, and soil moisture in the Sacramento and San Joaquin river basins have been far below normal for a long time.

So far, this water year, which began October 1, is different. The chances are excellent that rain, snow, and runoff will be far above average. At this point in January, Northern California has already received almost its entire annual average precipitation, the snowpack is at 150 percent of normal, and reservoirs are filling up. The abundance of rain and snow so far this year led the National Drought Mitigation Center to conclude that the drought in northern California is over.

True, the wet parts of the water year are not over yet, but the firehose of moisture hitting us from the Pacific could also still dry up. And the relative abundance of water will bring calls to increase deliveries of water to cities and farms and to remove urban conservation restrictions.

But another key variable is temperature. Temperature determines, among other things, the demand for water by crops, vegetation, and people, and especially the ratio of snow to rain that falls in the mountains. The past five years were by far the driest and hottest in more than a century of recordkeeping---in part because of human-caused climate change---and those high temperatures played a key role in worsening the scarcity of water and devastating the snowpack. This combination of hot and dry led to massive groundwater overdraft, cutbacks to farmers, loss of snow storage in the mountains, reductions in hydropower production, and a range of voluntary and mandatory restrictions on urban water use. And while the wet year may end the "precipitation drought," higher and higher temperatures and a persistent "snow drought" are here to stay.

Worst of all, these hydrological and meteorological measures don't tell the whole story. Even in a wet year in California, nature's bounty of water is no longer enough to satisfy all the state's demands, recharge overdrafted groundwater basins in the San Joaquin valley, or overcome the massive deficits suffered by California's ecosystems and endangered fisheries. Far more water has been claimed on paper than can ever be reliably and consistently delivered to users. If the most straightforward definition of drought is the simple mismatch between the amounts of water nature provides and the amounts of water that humans and the environment demand, California is in a permanent drought.

Whether or not the drought is officially declared "over" and emergency restrictions are lifted, we must still face up to the fact that our water system is out of balance, even in a wet year. Demands exceed supply, disadvantaged communities don't have reliable access to safe water, ecosystems are dying, and our water systems are unsustainable and poorly managed. And in the context of a changing climate, these problems will only worsen.

>Before lawsuits GDP is hailed as "lol look at how chads makes them cum harder than you ever can"/female friendly porn"
>After lawsuits, GDP is evil, all of them were raped and traumatized

Such is professionally done amateur porn.

The good news is that the last five years have shown that California can still have a healthy economy and a strong agricultural sector if we work to improve our use of water, cut inefficient and wasteful practices, and expand the use of non-traditional sources of water, especially including better stormwater capture and expanded wastewater treatment and reuse. Relatively painless urban conservation programs, such as appliance efficiency programs and efforts to replace turf with drought-resilient gardens, saved more than 2.3 million acre-feet of water just between June 2015 and November 2016, enough to provide 20 million people with their residential water needs for a year. The California agricultural sector suffered only modest decreases in production and employment and saw record high revenues during the drought while becoming more efficient.

Ultimately, "is the drought over?" is the wrong question. We should be asking, "are we managing our water resources in a sustainable manner, for the long haul"? The answer to that is still "no."

The drought has forced us to think differently about water, to learn new lessons about how to make do with less water. Half a century ago, John Steinbeck wrote in East of Eden: "And it never failed that during the dry years the people forgot about the rich years, and during the wet years they lost all memory of the dry years. It was always that way." We now have an opportunity to prove him wrong, to remember even in wet years that the lessons learned in dry years can stay with us.

>why did the girls look so happy? if they were sex trafficked and raped?
Drugs, alcohol, manipulation by very well trained(by that time) parties

Assuming they were sold on the idea video was for an Australian billionaire sugar-daddy's exclusive collection, god only knows what other lies the dumb whores bought into.

Walk with a five grand check in a couple of hours? Do a good job maybe daddy takes you yachting for big bucks, pay for college!

Attached: 1581431395170.jpg (2843x1378, 792.02K)

Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is. Someone doesn't know what power fucking is.

Someone does know.

The sweet feeling of fooling a clueless bitch

THERE IS A stretch of highway through the Ozark Mountains where being data-driven is a hazard.

Heading from Springfield, Missouri, to Clarksville, Arkansas, navigation apps recommend the Arkansas 43. While this can be the fastest route, the GPS's algorithm does not concern itself with factors important to truckers carrying a heavy load, such as the 43's 1,300-foot elevation drop over four miles with two sharp turns. The road once hosted few 18-wheelers, but the last two and half years have seen a noticeable increase in truck traffic---and wrecks. Locals who have watched accidents increase think it is only a matter of time before someone is seriously hurt, or worse.

Truckers familiar with the region know that Highway 7 is a safer route. However, the algorithm creating the route recommendation does not. Lacking broader insight, the GPS only considers factors programmed to be important. Ultimately, the algorithm paints an incomplete or distorted picture that can cause unsuspecting drivers to lose control of their vehicles.

Algorithms pervade our lives today, from music recommendations to credit scores to now, bail and sentencing decisions. But there is little oversight and transparency regarding how they work. Nowhere is this lack of oversight more stark than in the criminal justice system. Without proper safeguards, these tools risk eroding the rule of law and diminishing individual rights.

Currently, courts and corrections departments around the US use algorithms to determine a defendant's "risk", which ranges from the probability that an individual will commit another crime to the likelihood a defendant will appear for his or her court date. These algorithmic outputs inform decisions about bail, sentencing, and parole. Each tool aspires to improve on the accuracy of human decision-making that allows for a better allocation of finite resources.

Typically, government agencies do not write their own algorithms; they buy them from private businesses. This often means the algorithm is proprietary or "black boxed", meaning only the owners, and to a limited degree the purchaser, can see how the software makes decisions. Currently, there is no federal law that sets standards or requires the inspection of these tools, the way the FDA does with new drugs.

This lack of transparency has real consequences. In the case of Wisconsin v. Loomis, defendant Eric Loomis was found guilty for his role in a drive-by shooting. During intake, Loomis answered a series of questions that were then entered into Compas, a risk-assessment tool developed by a privately held company and used by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections. The trial judge gave Loomis a long sentence partially because of the "high risk" score the defendant received from this black box risk-assessment tool. Loomis challenged his sentence, because he was not allowed to assess the algorithm. Last summer, the state supreme court ruled against Loomis, reasoning that knowledge of the algorithm's output was a sufficient level of transparency.

By keeping the algorithm hidden, Loomis leaves these tools unchecked. This is a worrisome precedent as risk assessments evolve from algorithms that are possible to assess, like Compas, to opaque neural networks. Neural networks, a deep learning algorithm meant to act like the human brain, cannot be transparent because of their very nature. Rather than being explicitly programmed, a neural network creates connections on its own. This process is hidden and always changing, which runs the risk of limiting a judge's ability to render a fully informed decision and defense counsel's ability to zealously defend their clients.

>Of age women willingly had sex on camera for money after signing a contract

Muh sexual assault

Consider a scenario in which the defense attorney calls a developer of a neural-network-based risk assessment tool to the witness stand to challenge the "high risk" score that could affect her client's sentence. On the stand, the engineer could tell the court how the neural network was designed, what inputs were entered, and what outputs were created in a specific case. However, the engineer could not explain the software's decision-making process. if she cannot understand its decision-making process? How could an appeals court know if the tool decided that socioeconomic factors, a constitutionally dubious input, determined a defendant's risk to society? Following the reasoning in Loomis, the court would have no choice but to abdicate a part of its responsibility to a hidden decision-making process.

Already, basic machine-learning techniques are being used in the justice system. The not-far-off role of AI in our courts creates two potential paths for the criminal justice and legal communities: Either blindly allow the march of technology to go forward, or create a moratorium on the use of opaque AI in criminal justice risk assessment until there are processes and procedures in place that allow for a meaningful examination of these tools.

The legal community has never fully discussed the implications of algorithmic risk assessments. Now, attorneys and judges are grappling with the lack of oversight and impact of these tools after their proliferation.

Echoing Kranzberg's first law of technology, these algorithms are neither good nor bad, but they are certainly not neutral. To accept AI in our courts without a plan is to defer to machines in a way that should make any advocate of judicial or prosecutorial discretion uncomfortable.

Unlike those truckers in Arkansas, we know what is around the bend. We cannot let unchecked algorithms blindly drive the criminal justice system off a cliff.

The real question is how has the producer been on the run so long

>The real question is how has the producer been on the run so long
That is like asking if local NZ kike community likes untraceable money, duh!

He must run out at some point if he no longer receives any revenue from his life's work, NZ is not an inexpensive place

Attached: 1640484735790.jpg (1080x1920, 162.17K)

Whait, there is even a CP charge involved.
Did these maniacs make a video with a minor?

>Whait, there is even a CP charge involved.
no they just talked to a girl before she turned 18

where do i watch this,

>where do i watch this,
there is a daft sex website that has what you seek,

but I would urge you not to patronize it, its Russian owners may buy artillery rockets with your ad revenue

Attached: 304 (2).jpg (1080x1920, 135.83K)

>watch

None of them were assaulted, you dipshit. They were promised their porn wouldn't be shown in North America, and they cried "rape" when they realized they'd been duped, as women tend to do because women are mental children. These women should be hunted down and raped to death for their assault on men, our legal system and the truth itself.

This. Whores will be whores. Also this goes to show what kinds of whore shit women will do when they think they can "get away" with it.

whats the website

>but I would urge you not to patronize it, its Russian owners may buy artillery rockets with your ad revenue
You had my interest, but now you've got my attention.

It's really not even that interesting. It's just normal-ass porn that happens to have some drama behind it that made the news. See , you aren't missing much.

>you don't know the website

if you were truly a porn-seeker you would know the website

She hot where can I watch?

>if you were truly a porn-seeker you would know the website
Ukrainian children not yet bombed by Russia thank you for your vagueness.

Attached: 1645912853766.jpg (720x1280, 45.28K)

This just proves that women are mentally deficient in the eyes of the law.
They sign contracts but then act against it cuz "women" and this was accepted, they did it to themselves, but naw we can't ask them to be an adult and own to their mistakes.

Yeah. From behind.
I don't understand who buys this shit.
They were filmed and put online. GDP is a site that existed for years. They made...what? Over 300 episodes? And after they fucked over 300 girls someone decided how they were
>raped
LOL

Might've changed identities. There is a black market for buying the identities of people that used to exist.

Learn to do a Google.

>Filming lasted up to seven hours,[15] in contrast to the 30-minute shoot that the women were told to expect.[6][37]

>During sex, some women reportedly experienced vaginal bleeding, while another said that she vomited in her mouth and began choking due to the violence of the sex.[6] Accounts of the women document that if they expressed pain or refused to continue, they were told that it was too late to withdraw, and in some cases the exit was physically blocked by the men.

>Some women were also threatened with cancellation of the return flight or being asked to pay back the flight and hotel costs if they tried to renege on filming or refused to shoot an additional scene.

>It has been reported that Garcia had sex with some of the women before or after shooting,[2] or in the midst of shooting, after asking the cameraman to leave.[23] One woman said Garcia sexually assaulted her after she said she could not film due to menstruation—he forced a paint sponge into her vagina—and she was then forced to film.[36]

>Former employee Val Moser testified that only 50% of women received the amount of money they were promised.[15] The court case found that women were frequently told that their pay would be reduced immediately after stripping naked, despite never being told that their pay was contingent. Another frequently used tactic was to cut pay after the scene was shot by citing body flaws even though the models had sent nude photos clearly showing whatever blemishes and tattoos they had.[3]

>One woman was paid $400 after having been promised $2,000, and also locked out of the hotel room where she was expecting to stay. After the shoot she left the room because she was feeling upset and when she came back most of the money they had given her was gone. The envelope of money contained only a few $20s and a stack of $1s, totaling $400.

Yes, there was both deception and also sexual assault.

FUCK THE UKRAINIAN CHILDREN, GO RUSSIA!!

im that big into porn

these whores ruined it for us bros

Attached: gdp.jpg (754x407, 57.14K)

See...
Sorry, who violated their contract?

also kek

Attached: gdp.png (1222x658, 590.66K)

It's called acting, user.

Out of the 300+ scenes they did, only a small handful were a little rapey. The rest was whores gladly being whores. Go back to redshit, you dumb little teenage faggot.

Attached: 1636051322505.jpg (1200x1200, 1003.97K)

Attached: e293.jpg (781x586, 122.94K)

>Unwanted sexual activity that happens when you are pressured, tricked, threatened, or forced in a nonphysical way. Coercion can make you think you owe sex to someone.

Alex, what is "sexual coercion"?

1. Why did you reply to me?
2. Why do you act like some kind of white knight for "models" who gladly fucked random men for money?
3. Are you, in fact, one of those girls who were """tricked""" into doing porn?

>Yes, there was both deception and also sexual assault.

Deception, yes. And for that, possibly some jail time is warranted.

The notion that "assault" happened, because they agreed to sex on camera but decided it was sex they did not want (but were not physically pinned down and forced into) is bullshit.

The guys should've lost everything money-wise, and probabyl done some jail time, but 20 years is absurd. That is more than people get for manslaughter. No way that is justice in this case.

Because 95% of them were happy about doing it. Sure some fucked up things may have happened but once the cat was out of the bag they all jump on board. These are all gold digging whores with fuck up lifestyles to begin with. They're just hot bodies.

Looked up my favorite one on facebook because she looked like my ex. Beautiful white girl, turns out she had 2 nigger kids, baby daddy left, and she was posting about how she wanted more. Degenerate.

a little rapey? kek

Attached: e374.png (1436x648, 1.33M)

This. Most of the girls were not raped, if any. They chose to have sex with men on camera for money and maybe regretted it at some point. That's not rape.

STFU with feminist bullshit. The government has no business playing referee in women's private lives. If they decide to get into dumb situations being hoes, that is their problem.

Holy shit, these are awesome, plz keep going

Love it

OP, can you tell me which girls you thought looked happy?

Before ever hearing about the rape and fraud allegations, my thought watching any of these was always, "Wow, why do 9/10 of these girls not look like they're enjoying this at all? Kind of a turn off tbh."

this

Attached: e337.jpg (1920x1080, 851.28K)

She is willingly riding the cock for money. Taking a big cock isn't rape, you fucking clown. Go back to redshit and sucking off Biden and niggers.

Attached: 1613778684939.jpg (1024x625, 131.96K)

There are a bunch who loved it and there are a bunch who clearly regretted it or figured out that this was a bad idea happening in front of them. Once again, this is not rape.

This girl is how I found out about GDP. They didn't even have that many scenes at the time if I remember correctly.

>Committing only a few rapes

>3. Are you, in fact, one of those girls who were """tricked""" into doing porn?

The real moral of this story, and much of modern life, is that women have NO BUSINESS having the level of freedom in their private lives that they currently do.

We have plunging fertility, #MeToo bullshit, everything is "harassment", and women play the victim whenever their bad choices have predictable consequences.

A decent society would legalize actual prostitution, make women get a license for it from local health authorities, and then prosecute slutty women as unlicensed hookers, while ignoring whatever stupid complaints (Chad raped me at a party!!!) they might have.

nigger if I cared about these whores I wouldn't have the pics saved, but yeah a little rapey in this scene look at 2-4 secs before they cut a scene and look how much the slut screams. imo makes it one of the best scenes for it

Attached: 1613767934315.jpg (1035x1035, 228.74K)

>There are a bunch who loved it and there are a bunch who clearly regretted it or figured out that this was a bad idea happening in front of them. Once again, this is not rape.

Women now thing any sex they regret, or might not have really wanted to have, is "rape".

Wrong- being pinned to the ground, or knocked out with drugs, is actually rape. Having a couple drinks and regretting that you jumped into bed naked with some guy is nothing of the sort.

In fact, that sort of conduct deserves shaming, if anything.

Didn't even bother stripping the wikipedia "reference" links. Great job maintaining your credibility.
>job lasted longer than expected
Not rape. Everyone has had to pull a long shift at some point in their career.
>"reportedly"
>"accounts"
>"It has been reported..."
>"One woman said..."
Not rape.
>women were threatened with flight cancellations and asked to pay back costs
Not rape. These women refused to perform their duties as laid out in their work contract, and they learned (the hard way) what happens to those who commit breach of tort. They wanted to scam a free flight from pornographers, but the producers were smart enough to predict and prevent it. Many such cases.
>they weren't paid as much as they were promised
Not rape, but kind of a dick move. At least they're being paid something, if they were real scammers they wouldn't have paid a dime to any of these ingrates.
>she came back
Not a rape victim.

Attached: dimmy.png (927x1919, 428.28K)

yep I found it torrenting this slut

Attached: e242.png (608x407, 538.17K)

>nigger if I cared about these whores I wouldn't have the pics saved, but yeah a little rapey in this scene look at 2-4 secs before they cut a scene and look how much the slut screams. imo makes it one of the best scenes for it

which episode?

>I only have sex if you're paying me
>Here are pictures of my (((beautiful))) body. Sex with this is worth a lot of money, right?
>I don't actually look that good in real life, but men just want to have sex with me, right?
>Ugh, this place sucks, and these men are greasy, old and have small cocks. Finish pumping me so that I can get paid already.
>He's finally done. I don't even like you, just pay me already.
>NOOOOO, YOU CAN'T PAY ME LESS JUST BECAUSE THE SEX WASN'T GOOD, I'M NOT AS HOT AS I THINK, I COMPLAIN A LOT, AND I HATE YOU!!!
>OMG!!!! THIS IS RAPE!!!!
>UGH, YOU CAN'T LOCK ME OUT OF THE ROOM JUST BECAUSE I HATE YOU AND PLAN TO ACCUSE YOU OF RAPE!!!!
>YOU CAN'T TREAT ME LIKE THIS, I'M PRETTY AND YOU'RE JUST AN UGLY SIMP!!!!!!!

Attached: roastie.jpg (1024x683, 220.32K)

>One woman said Garcia sexually assaulted her after she said she could not film due to menstruation—he forced a paint sponge into her vagina—and she was then forced to film.[36]

>Accounts of the women document that if they expressed pain or refused to continue, they were told that it was too late to withdraw, and in some cases the exit was physically blocked by the men.

In the eyes of the law, consent for sex can be withdrawn at any time. If you choose to continue, that's rape muh boys.

Good, they deserve it for being porn whores. Thats nothing compared to their ruined reputations after the men in their lives find out.
Suck a cock once you're a cocksucker for life.
Tell a lie once you're a liar for life.
Whore yourself out to do porn once? Guess what, you're a porn whore for life.

It should be common sense that doing this shit will mark you for life, but as with everything that can fuck you up in life, retards always think "it wont hallen to me".

A lot of brave motherfuckers at the morgue, a lot of courageous motherfuckers on a shirt.

You're so bad at trolling, it's not even funny.

kys. You're useless.

posting the facebook for you fags

Attached: gdplist1.jpg (2843x1378, 743.39K)

>Not rape, but kind of a dick move. At least they're being paid something, if they were real scammers they wouldn't have paid a dime to any of these ingrates.

I hate Jewish employers who pull these sorts of stunts, so I actually strongly sympathize with this one.

However, the rest of their complaints are bullshit. Frankly, even if they were coerced into some sex, after they agreed to be in a porno who fucking cares, they are literal whores and their recourse should be potential payment for lost wages.

2 on list is

Attached: gdplist3.jpg (2843x1378, 800.27K)

because now you understand "the law" is often abused. people with moral agendas against sex, or that have puritanical views about the innocence of young women, will abuse the law to persecute the men here using trumped up charges. no such thing happened like rape or human trafficking. the girls wanted to have their cake and eat it too, so they exploited the legal system to leverage the myth of young women are pure and chaste and are always taken advantage of by surly, depraved men during any sexual encounter, whilst the women have no agency whatsoever.

k0wvw

Uhhhm, from what I understand they were fooled and lied to, but how the fuck is this sex trafficking? Kek

>In the eyes of the law, consent for sex can be withdrawn at any time. If you choose to continue, that's rape muh boys.

The point is, we all know that is bullshit, and also inherently impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in almost every conceivable situation, therefore a bad law.

>You're so bad at trolling, it's not even funny.
>kys. You're useless.

Seethe harder, roastie. I am right and the entire thread supports my stance, and that infuriates you. Deal with it.

If those things were already contractually obligated, then it is illegal to withdraw that compensation.

Threatening withdrawal of compensation unless more services (not originally included in the contract) are performed.. that's sexual coercion.

>In the eyes of the law, consent for sex can be withdrawn at any time.
In the eyes of normal people with common sense, this is psychotic. Judges love throwing out "consent withdrawal" cases (yes, even female judges) because they're terrified of setting a bad precedent that could very likely end up biting them, their sons and their gransons in the asses.

the blonde is e239. the rapey is the chink e374 and also did 2 guys e406

What number? She is hot with big booba

Attached: gdplist4.jpg (2843x1378, 782.12K)

Attached: gdplist5.jpg (2843x1378, 1021.43K)

Episode 502