Why are Americans cut?

Why are Americans cut?

Attached: AmericanCock.jpg (422x750, 25.27K)

Why do you care so much about the shape of another mans dick? You gay bro?

John Harvey kellog and the 7th day Adventists

Explain

Its a newish practice so no, jews, actually.

He was a medical profressional and devout Christian who heavily influenced modern understanding of the importance of hygeine and sex. Some people point to him as the reason for later prevelance of circumcision. In reality, he actually never actively promoted the practice, despite being cut himself.

America has been relatively religious. Protestant sects flourished following the second great awakening. The seventh day adventists, so named as they believed that the prophesied return of Jesus was to be soon, and their holy days were on Saturday rather than Sundays, was one of these sects. The SDAs had a belief in promoting physical heal teeth and cleanliness as well as moral healthy and cleanliness. Even today they run hospitals. John Harvey Kellogg was a member of this church and a health professional in 19th century Michigan. He ran the Battle Creek Sanitarium; a hospital/retreat.
Kellogg believed that all sexuality that was not explicitly procreative was morally evil, and blamed masturbation as being particularly pernicious.
Kellogg experimented with various bland foods, following the principles of Sylvester Graham, inventing granola. Kellogg believed that bland, pleasureless foods would keep people from seeking oht too much pleasure and stimulation. (His brorher, Will, invented corn flakes and added sugar to them, causing their relationship to break apart.)
Anyway, John tried various merhods to precent masturbation, and settled on circumcision, promoting the procedure to be done without anaesthetic so that thr trauma would make people never want to touch their penises again. He also promoted putting carbolic acid on clitorises.
Masturbatioj took off as prients tried to prevent masturbation. Doctors promoted the procedure as they got paid for performing it, and claiming hygienic benefits. This has been widespread since the 1890s, but has been on the decline since the 1960s.
>tldr: christian cultists wanted kids not to fap, so everybody got punished.

research shows it significantly reduces the spread of many STDs and my even reduce the risk of penile cancer and reduces the risk of urinary tract infection. Its an ancient practice, likely started because ancient people understood the hygeine benefits

Whoever says shit like how its a purely religious ritual designed to stop you from masterbating is a moron and a conspiracy nut. The reason humans are born with the extra dick skin is to reduce friction and allow easier penetration of the vagina. But humans also invented lube for that

Oh, i might be misinformed.

Hardest COPE of the century user. i am uncut and have never had any hygiene or STD issue in over 30 years on this planet......

I'm not saying the practice is necesarry, just that it has some level of merit behind it.

Well, i suppose having less surface area on the penis means less opportunity for bacteria to grow, but i guess soap does the job just fine.

It was introduced in Anglo countries in the late Victorian era for alleged health benefits. It fell out of fashion in most Anglo countries in the last 60-80 years but remains common in America.

I know America is sexually repressed but wow lol. The cereal is full of sugar so that didn't work. Women still have their clits but men don't keep their foreskin. Does it dampen masturbation?

I can fap and i do it way too often, but i assume it would feel much better if i had a foreskin.
Some people are cut tight enough that getting an erection is very painful.

Only in the sense that some guys need lubricant to do it. I don't know if orgasms would feel any different since they're in the brain.

Cut dicks have always been the trademark sign of anti-pleasure religious fanatics. And the US are founded on anti-pleasure religious fanaticism.

>Does it dampen masturbation?
No, not at all.

There are fewer nerves, but you’re right that we cannot determine how a person perceives pleasure

In the brain in a response to physical stimulation,
of course they are.

Skin stretches, ask fat people.

Obviously you that the hygiene thing is a complete lie. Nice try though Mr Goldstein

I read that the actual feeling of orgasm comes from muscular contractions deeper inside the body though

I'm cut and I masturbate constantly and I'm always horny. If getting cut does remove nerves down there, its definitely not enough to make any appreciable difference. Would still rather just have my full dick though

Ive seen cut dicks with hair on their pearl necklace, it looks fucking weird as hell, imagine having hair on your actual glans lol

>The World Health Organization is a lie
okay retard

>ancient people understood the hygeine benefits
People didn't even understand germs until the 19th century.

Not him, but circumcision isn't considered medically beneficial enough to be routine in most countries.

...thats not true...we just didn't understand the importance of regular hand washing until the 20th century. All ancient cultures understood the importance of hygeine to a degree. Rome didn't have bath houses and running water for no reason you know...

yes

That's how the story goes but some say it's to mark them as slaves to jews

I mean, smell and relaxation certainly had something tondo with it.

To be fair, not that much sugar was added until the 50s or 60s.

I doubt it was enough of a problem to the point that people were willing to risk an infection after surgery.

Read any ancient medical text and it will mention shit like potions made to clense your humors or purge melancholy and the like. Ancient doctors were misguided but they certainly understood hygeine to a degree

Bruh, it's not all about the climax, you would know that if you had foreskin.

Poor boys. What a terrible thing to have happen and endure.
So that's why lotion is a joke in movies. That isn't a thing with foreskin.
Hygiene isn't difficult. If that was the concern, it wouldn't be a good idea to create a wound where infection could enter.

Yeah but I was talking about orgasms in

I also thing uncut looks better. My dick looks dry.
As for the lotion, its garbage. Real lube is better, but i find it too slippery

It's more of a cultural norm in America and is done for looks.

It’s because the jews figured out a way to make quick money off the insurance companies. That’s why they publish studies, data etc, even if it makes no sense. The same thing is done in the Middle East with clits. Bottom line is jews and their need for money

Kek imagine thinking fapping is only about the climax, I am in heaven for 10 minutes straight and the orgasm is just the cherry on top

The vast majority of Muslims are also cut. The truth is that its a cultural thing that has some basis in medical reasoning, however little it is, so medical professionals are reluctant to discourage its practice. Thats it.

That’s just the beginning. Guys with cut dicks have sensation problems and ED before they even turn 40. That’s why the US consumes so much viagra

It’s not like old dudes need to have sex anyway.

>because I myself haven't experienced an issue means there isn't an issue
ok user.

Sample size 1 indicates some pretty in-depth research.

Because of jews.

No seriously it's because of jews.

The practice can actually be traced to ancient Egypt

Shhh! You're interrupting his daily blame the Jews quota

Attached: 1649900133503.png (1280x720, 180.56K)

Step away from the baby's penis

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Lmao?? No

Why are eurofags obsessed with our dicks?

They are jews

I think it's to feel superior over the cut-fags, I do it too sometimes.

Having foreskin is better in my opinion, and it's fun to see some amerifags seethe over the topic, it's really easy bait, ngl.

I guess in the US with such shitty self care someone in their early 30’s would be considered old

> World Health Organization
Someone get me the newspaper...there's an elf that needs swatting.

Americans grow up thinking this is normal

Attached: 074035.jpg (472x629, 244.49K)

Jewish doctors

If you cut your feet of you don't have to worry about Athlete's Foot. Some merit behind it, so you won't mind if I take an axe to the maternity ward?

>research shows it significantly reduces the spread of many STDs
which is why of course std rates in europe are no higher than in the US, even though europe has an order of magnitude lower circumcision rates

> WHO
is an obviously highly political organisation. outside the US, the idea that circumcision without an individual medical need for it is a net benefit is a fringe idea in the medical community. its culture that keeps it in place in the US, not medical facts. we could go cutting all kinds of things off kids so they dont need to wash them and cant get them infected, or for religious reasons; but other than little boys' dicks, everything else is rightfully taboo to cut away at

>>People didn't even understand germs until the 19th century.
>...thats not true...we just didn't understand the importance of regular hand washing until the 20th century.

i guess you live on a different timeline than everyone else? before the 19th century, the predominant idea was that disease spread through bad air, and while germs had been thought of in the 16th century, it was considered a cook superstition, not a basis for medical practice

cutting the labia off little girls could have some merit behind that too, should we give that a try under surgical conditions with professional aftercare and see if maybe this reduces urinary tract infections or some other health issues?