What the fuck is his problem?

>mixtapes
>good

Attached: headphone.jpg (500x374, 24K)

Correct me if im wrong but im pretty sure with mixtapes sample clearance isnt needed. At least, if your not a big rapper

So if he were to take the mixtape route he would or wouldn't get sued?

????
No that’s a successful sample clearance. Logic is complaining that the process is too expensive and he’s getting rejected for no reason.
You can get sued even if it’s free, it’s just not worth going after a small rapper. But if Kanye or Jay-Z just used your sample? You bet they’re getting sued

Logic is acting out because someone who actually wrote their shit is claiming ownership and is saying you can’t just take a piece of an artwork for your product. Sometimes companies can be dicks about it but you don’t have any grounds to argue, it’s their property.

Maybe if it was made for free then you could argue that there’s no monetary incentive but if you’re making money then this is a business move

artists who put business before art are scum

>You can get sued even if it’s free
Don’t believe this is true

You can’t use another persons artwork without crediting and compensating them for their contribution no matter how minute and redundant it is

Frank Ocean - nostalgia, Ultra was free and he had to remove American Wedding because of the asshole from the Eagles. Copyright law is vague but generally you are NOT allowed to use someone else’s work without paying them, free or not

yeah what a dick for defending his intellectual property. fuck wypipo.

t. bootlicker

yeah, a complete idiot

trying to pivot out of his corny image

>fuck the money
then make a mixtape you fucking retard

Good boy, believing what big daddy braunberg wants you to

(((intellectual property)))

>free or not
wrong

t.

>hip hop production will never go back to Man Parrish fucking around with synths and Davy DMX playing sick original basslines

What the hell happened?

wait, so you're saying, you'd be fine if Universal took an album you made and released as its own, getting all of the money?

he's right for once

Attached: 1530413468494.gif (554x400, 122K)

boomers are fucking faggots holy shit

ITT niggers steal from white people and white cucks are surprised why don’t they let them steal that shit

they got lazy

no, I don't think it's fine to make money off art, especially not if you're a company and not an artist

>WAAAAH REEEEE GIVE ME FREE SOUNDS THAT YOU WORKED HARD TO ACHIEVE SO I CAN GET MONEY FROM MY RETARDED FANS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Led Zeppelin did nothing wrong, soiboi

>especially not if you're a company and not an artist
agreed, in a way.
but if you don't make any money from art, how would you have any full-time artists?

I just proved you wrong retard. Saying “wrong” isn’t an argument

wtf is YOUR problem. He's right, and any sensible producer would agree with him

>saying random stuff is proving something
sasuga Yea Forums

i honestly have no idea what you're referring to

It is. Copyright law doesn't care whether you are profiting off of the work.

Entitled faggots like you have ruined the arts forever

>Copyright law is vague but generally you are NOT allowed to use someone else’s work without paying them, free or not
Didn’t know if it applied to works that were free but if you’re using SOMEONE ELSES ART for your use, as a promotional means or any means that can make you money then yea I want to be compensated. This isn’t a simple, I want to rework your art to make a song with no financial consequence to me, the artist who sampled will benefit tangibly and intangibly from my sampled work

>steal music
>get mad when people demand to get paid for music they made
Black culture was a mistake

or not benefited at all, considering now he's art is tied to something that negatively reflects his original work or puts him in a bad light.

You’re fucking retarded sampling originated with experimental music from the 40s-50s possibly earlier, most of which were white

You're right, that stuff is very much comparable to Kanye copy pasting a Daft Punk song and rapping over it.

It actually is, similar techniques are used but it wasn’t commonplace and there was little money to be made

or not benefited at all, considering now he's art is tied to something that negatively reflects his original work or puts him in a bad light.

LZ copied a good amount of blues bands and every now and then they get hit with lawsuits as people continue to find more of their plagiarism

Lmfao, if you’re going to insult Kanye at least use a better sample — go back s the YouTube comment section kiddo :^).
Daft Punk are better examples of copy pasting: by far the most uncreative users of sampling.

sounds to me like they did plenty wrong then

Fuck you logic, is not that his fans can even tell what is a sample or something.Go back to VST's. I don't even think that he even makes his own music, he's the typical autismo with producers who might ask him for more money everytime.

Long live The Avalanches tho.

Ashkenazi are proven to be just as European and Europeans, therefore just as white.

copyright should run out after 10 years

most sampling should be free

If you sample you're a hack plain and simple. An intelligent culture would know this, but we've degenerated to the degree that we tolerate someone singing kareoke tier nonsense over stolen art. In fact we pay them millions of dollars to do it. Neck yourselves faggots, can't wait till the revolution.

Only white artists can properly create sample-based music

Attached: 70a68992.jpg (600x600, 74K)

Most people don't know this but technically, sampling literally any copyrighted piece of audio without clearing it is prohibited. It doesn't matter if you release it for free, since it could be argued that you're still benefiting from the views/popularity that the sample brings. So technically, every bootleg soundcloud remix is illegal. The catch is that it's impossible to go after every artist doing this, so unless you are really popular you probably won't face consequences. Even with someone like Vektroid, who's arguably the most popular vaporwave artist, it wasn't until last year that Sony filed a claim for her using a Diana Ross sample

I think where they lose me is when rich artists sue young, non-affluent artists. It depends on the level of sampling too. Frank Ocean's American Wedding and Juice Wrld's Lucid Dreams heavily rely on the original songs they are sampling. Other examples of samples are a lot more hidden and you might not even notice them when listening.

I often wonder if 40 years from now their original songs get taken and re-used for a new genre and if they'll be okay with it.