Why aren't countries like the United Kingdom or Australia doing more to pressure Japan into banning these?

Why aren't countries like the United Kingdom or Australia doing more to pressure Japan into banning these?

I support freedom of artistic expression as much as the next person, but there are limits.

These could be used to groom children, not to mention they normalise the thought that these kinds of acts are perfectly acceptable.

They have absolutely no place in the world; and there should be stricter penalities for people who draw and look at these.

More should also be done to pressure Japan into banning self-gratification works containing rape, bestiality and incest as well, since those are also crimes too.

Attached: 8c462e1c637e578c8c1b554f140bfebfb.png (689x828, 616.93K)

(You)

fuck off

Attached: 1646076488467.jpg (350x427, 47.31K)

>In my opinion

OP is either a faggot redditor or pretending to be.
sage

>pressuring Japan
>when the real threat comes from China

Attached: Chinkety China.jpg (355x510, 30.23K)

the more retarded pedo weebs that move out of straya and into japan the better bra.
also fuck everyone calling Australia Day fucken Invasion Day fucken Invasion Day is when the fucken japs invaded us and dropped fucking bombs on us mate fuck right off ya fucken triple J drone fucken hipster

>there should be stricter penalities for people who draw and look at these.
Where is the victim that is harmed by this? I agree that it's all sorts of fucked up but that doesn't mean it should be illegal. I think that it does suffice as a means to obtain a warrant for the FBI to scan your PC for actual CP though

Attached: www.opindia.png (941x481, 766.35K)

> wants countries with higher rape %s to "pressure" a culturally different nation with the some of the lowest rape % in the world
whew lad, gr8 b8, I fell for it

>Where is the victim that is harmed by this?
Self-harm is still harm.

Also there's more important issues like kikes legally being able to suck baby dick because "muh tradition!".

Attached: Suck the baby boy penis.jpg (1080x1130, 177.11K)

>Self-harm is still harm
Not a valid enough reason to make it illegal, may as well ban sugary foods too

>may as well ban sugary foods too
We are doing that.

>I support freedom of artistic expression as much as the next person, but there are limits.

You just contradicted yourself.

No, I did not.
Americans have "free speech," but they can't yell fire in a crowded theatre.

>Americans have "free speech,"

Attached: Jameson.gif (245x180, 1.57M)

>We are doing that.
No we aren't maybe just from school lunches but we have entire aisles dedicated to junk in every grocery store

It's a slippery slope of censorship.

>Why aren't countries like the United Kingdom or Australia doing more to pressure Japan into banning these?
It's not the job of the UK to be world police
>I support freedom of artistic expression as much as the next person, but there are limits
so you don't support artistic expression, got it.
>These could be used to groom children
none of you retards know what "grooming" means anymore, it's just a right wing buzzword at this point.
>there should be stricter penalities for people who draw and look at these
bootlicker
>More should also be done to pressure Japan into banning self-gratification works containing rape, bestiality and incest as well, since those are also crimes too
right, because western porn never contains rape or incest lol.

We have the sugar tax, which is a start.

>right, because western porn never contains rape or incest lol.
Those should be illegal too.

Though thankfully those are illegal in the UK thanks to the extreme porn act.

Firstly, I would kill all pedos with a hammer. I’d torture them. But the problem here is

>I support freedom of artistic expression as much as the next person, but there are limits.

You’re nobody to decide those limits. At what point does it go from drawings and animation to pedo shit, then where do you draw the line. On one hand, you have lefties that won’t stop, they’ll keep going. Then you have pedos going out of their way to walk the line and nudge it further to satisfy their perverted interests.

>You’re nobody to decide those limits.
The government decided the limits.

as if we need more thoughtcrimes. Why are you so sensitive that you need strict laws to make you feel safe? You're a statist cuck.
Rape kinks have always existed and are often used as a coping mechanism for victims. You're not helping anyone except pearl-clutching christfags who can't stand the thought of someone somewhere having perverted thoughts.

(you)'re still a faggitor.
Everyone see

Attached: Edgeworth shrug.gif (498x373, 1.39M)

The existence of rape porn triggers rape survivors.
The existence of incest porn triggers those who suffered sexual abuse at the hands of their father.

The government shouldn’t be allowed to set them either. So who does….. and that’s where the problem lies.

It should be community based justice. Do something the community you live in, doesn’t like ? They punish you.

The government should be allowed to decide limits. That's what they're voted in for.

Fuck off (you) cunt.

>The existence of rape porn triggers rape survivors
and?
You can't uninvent something. If you don't want to see something then don't seek it out. We don't ban flashing lights for the sake of epileptic people or ban war movies for the sake of soldiers with PTSD. Many people with hard kinks online have content warnings and let you know in their profile the kinds of content that they post. If you ignore those warnings and whine anyway then you're just stupid.

>You can't uninvent something.
True, but you can prevent people from ever seeing it again.

Shold have just said- 'fuck off' but still- everything you said is right.

Key decisions should require a referendum, because as we’re all well aware, they govern how they want, not how the people wanted.

>Hey people, we’re thinking of creating laws so that we can walk into your US based accounts without you ever knowing, vote yes or no
>Actually, we’re doing it anyway, you voted us in to make decisions line this okay

>Have an injection every 6 months and let us track you, otherwise we’ll deny you access to employment and education
>Vote yes or no
>Actually, forget about that, you voted for us to make this call

How many times a week do you make this thread?

>Key decisions should require a referendum
Be realistic. You cannot have a referendum on everything.

People don't like child porn, hence why these were rightfully made a crime.

no you can't, laws don't work that way.
Laws don't "prevent" you from doing anything, they just feed the prison complex and to satisfy some sadistic (and meaningless) desire for justice.

(you) trigger me, so therefore should be b&, removed, set on fire and never seen again.

>Laws don't "prevent" you from doing anything
Not true. Guns were made illegal here in the UK in 96, and we're one of the safest countries in the world because gun crime doesn't exist.

I'm so fucking triggered by women. How do i never see them again?

Still he is right that democracy is just a sham voting doesn't do anything if your only choice is between a corporate cock suck and a corporate ass licker

>laws don't work that way
You mean there ISN'T an 'uninvention law'!!??!!1 Wow... you must a super smart guy! I wish I could be like you. Maybe one day.

knife crime is through the roof, you've just succeeded in increasing the amount of pain victims feel before they bleed out.

kids masturbte constantly and you won't do shit about it bitch

I’m sorry, did you say the UK was one of the safest countries in the world?

Attached: 2502E648-D63D-4AFB-8876-0AF5D8DF50D7.png (347x288, 80.64K)

>got kicked of twitter for dropping an n-bomb
>thinks this violated his rights
cry harder

Simple, frien, just scoop your eyes out with a spoon. It's the right thing to do. All the cool kids do it.

puritanfags GTFO
go be afraid of dancing and smiling in your sad lonely hovels

I said, I wanted a referendum on key decisions, not everything.

We’re talking about loli aka artistic freedoms, not child porn. Where is it going to stop, are we going to start hanging loli artists like Islamic countries do with allah artist fags.

Keep on topic. Government: we’re going to start controlling your consumption of information or access to material. That warrants a fucking referendum and it should be specific.

>Twitter
I'll never touch that shit.

>We’re talking about loli aka artistic freedoms
And there are limits to those.

As you said, people don't like people drawing pictures of the prophet Muhammed. That's a valid complaint, and it should be a crime to do that as well.

Japan still in the Top10 Coumtry for safest child enviroment

Who are you quoting? Unless you're making fun of yourself, that's not how you greentext/
>n-bomb
There are A-bombs and there are niggers.

It doesn't suffice for a warrant you goober fuck. Innocent until proven guilty, you don't get to take privacy away from innocent people faggot.
>inb4 u must be hiding something
I'm good, and my magic electric wizard box is secure from glowing retards. It literally doesn't even affect me if something like that was used, just need to point out how fucktarded you are for casually accepting rights being arbitrarily taken away because of suspicion alone, regardless of what it's for.
Fuck your witch hunt bitch

>Government: we’re going to start controlling your consumption of information or access to material.

I'm assuming you're referring to the Online Safety Bill? There's far too much pornography on the Internet that children can sadly access.

We have a Watershed for TV, it only makes sense we have one of the Internet as well.

I bet there are very short limits to the patience people have with you.

nah. only complete retards support thoughtcrime.
if you can't stand living in the world, by all means stop.

With your attitude, we’d be living in a world that resembles the film equilibrium in our life time.

Fuck that. There is a serious problem in law where things are restricted due to being 'offensive', especially today where it seems to be a favorite zoomer past time to go looking for things to be offended by. I could be offended by people writing with poor grammar but it shouldn't be illegal

>>Who are you quoting?
>doesn't know what greentext is
>is unfamiliar with the concept of an aside
>doesn't understand rephrasing others to mock them
kind of stupid, aren't you?

>sadly
I would've happy as a pig in shit if I had internet porn as a kid. I had to jack it to bra adverts.
Also- fuck off.

Why is that falling under a bill rather than parental responsibility?

>You don’t know what’s good for you
>I do

Yes you can you dumbfuck. If you do anything that can be directly linked to your actions that causes mass panic and subsequent harm, you can be held liable regardless if you used a magic word or not. But you can 100% yell the word "fire" if it doesn't cause issues. Fix your autism retard.

>Why is that falling under a bill rather than parental responsibility?
Parental responsibility can only go so far...

Fuck off aussie faggot, go back to banning A cup adults from doing porn lmao

You were wrong. You made a mistake, it's ok, just try harder.

you posted this shit yesterday... on a board that has lolli threads.... alright, majority of us incels aren't lolifags but if there was ever a place where they'd be... know your audience user

>I support freedom of artistic expression as much as the next person, but there are limits.
no. no you don't.

we need the child porn comics

Attached: 5BBFA1E3-AE11-4A69-B05D-D1DABCCA67BB.jpg (700x394, 161.68K)

Oh yeah! I forgot about that. Thare are some fantastic tits on Aus birds tho. I remember fapping, close range on Bondi beach.