Why do liberals support someone who's against them? I mean, the Democrats rigged primary's to fuck Bernie over, ffs...

Hello real person. You seem to have not caught on that most people on Yea Forums are bots now. About 65 to 75%. You can watch as posting follows political trends. You should leave and find a site not infested.

I've been a life long republican but am considering voting Democrat because I don't support communism and I prefer neo liberals, and want to prop them. Republicans held the presidency, both houses of congress, and the Supreme Court for 2 years and did nothing to change anything. The only items on the republican platform that they actually believe in are banning abortion and banning trannies, neither of which I agree with

Not that guy but yeah I'm starting to see that more and more

Is they really cared they all would have voted third party. That's how movements start, but instead the voted for the side that fucked them over harder than any Republican could.

Tricking people into thinking they're already part of their desired class is anti-capitalist

God it's almost like these bernie supporters don't realize Medicare is already 36% of our budget.

Attached: 1647323186216.jpg (586x604, 100.22K)

Good, now tell us how much Americans spend in the pri ate sector and tally yhe compensation for the CEOs of all the Insurance companies.

Attached: 182F18F4-A77E-48CC-859A-C3A373F7A49B.gif (450x253, 1.88M)

Kek. WTF is this stupid shit

Support is a strong word. More like the left acknowledges it's lack of electoral representation and out of the binary choices offered the Democratic party is better than republicans.
They suck. Badly. But the right should never be allowed to manage anything.

The established rules of the US political system is that actual radical candidates will never exist again. No Teddy Roosevelt busting monopolies, no FDR using tax money for social programs that get people back to work. Ever since the Civil Rights movement, actually large and impacted change has been removed because the business leaders of the US don't want to have to spend money to adapt to actual social changes in legislation. Look at how hard the DNC tried to make Bernie look like a whacko socialist jew and then they put forth a textbook conservative like Joe "I don't want my kids to grow up in an integrated jungle" Biden. It's all a fucking ruse designed to make voters choose which will be the least shitty for them but will always favor corporations and lobbyists.

Same shit they've done since time immemorial.

Attached: (((judah benjamin - brains of the confederacy))).jpg (300x168, 8.17K)

Imagine still believing there's a difference between the two parties.

52% military, because we're most likely defending your shithole from becoming worse. I don't agree with it, but look at afghanistan. Trump was actually trying to pull out right, and Biden just ripped it out like fucking anal beads. It's almost like geo politics isn't as simple as you make it out to be, and by trying to simplify it, real world consequences result.

Trump was trying to bring the Taliban into America. STFU already, the Afghan army collapsing like that is exactly why Biden did it right - just get the fuck out.

You didn't answer user's question. Instead you brought up something unrelated. And anal beads.

Imagine still not being able to tell the difference.
They have the same lobbyists but they're designed to appeal to different values while maintaining the control of those lobbyists. Liberal values are more evolved than conservative values.
Not all shit is the same, one is gonna be grosser than another, and we're gonna be forced to eat one, so be an adult put on your shit appraisal monocle and determine which one has less maggots.

>Trump was actually trying to pull out right, and Biden just ripped it out like fucking anal beads
Kek the Biden withdrael from Afghanistan was based on the agreement Trump made with the Taliban. So either Trump's draw down was flawed or Biden lived up to Trump's word. Which is it?

The scam is the primaries include all states even though most of the southern ones won't go democratic. If Southern blacks in heavily red states didn't get a say, Biden woukd not be the president.

You are clearly retarded. Taliban being brought into america? You're almost as bad as the right wing conspiracy nuts. If anything, the left is trying to bring Taliban into america by leaving a big fucking hole in the mexican border. You think terrorists won't use that security risk to their advantage?

Attached: 1587065791120.jpg (1024x800, 91.19K)

I agree. Rural states hold entirely too much power compared to the overall population of the US.

>the Biden withdrael from Afghanistan was based on the agreement Trump made with the Taliban

Wrong. The original date in the treaty was in May, Biden fucked over the Taliban by moving the date to Sept 11th to make it symbolic. The Taliban got fucked over once again and retaliated.

>If anything, the left is trying to bring Taliban into america by leaving a big fucking hole in the mexican border.
Why would the Taliban have to shift people to Mexivo to thend be smuggled across the border? That's the most fucking retarded imaginary scenario I think I've ever heard of.

user. Terrorists use planes.

So Biden gave troops several extra months to withdraw and somehow that fucked up the withdrawl becausr he was too hasty?

Here comes the cope. He had months to follow through the the plan that was already laid out but refused. He just couldn't and wouldn't do it according to plan. You must not have watched the hearings.

Attached: 239581854_5437249103034766_982956875392604256_n.jpg (640x557, 125.7K)

Do you know what a treaty is? Ask a Native American, they'll explain it to you

I was unaware that the US should have to grovel to a bunch of sheep fuckers.

That was for negotiations you retard. The dumbest propaganda seems to work very well on you.

Attached: 1581365488789.jpg (761x545, 142.75K)

>the Republican platform
Hello, old person.
There is no longer a Republican platform. There used to be one, with some items based around conservative principles, small government, and moral values. But they scrapped all that, and in 2020 voted not to write a platform, but just sort of to embrace the previous one where it said "Yay Trumop" and let it go at thatj.
Or that's what they thought it said -- in fact, the previous platform said that the party was implacably opposed to "the sitting President" which by 2020, of course was Trump. So they accomplished that item on their agenda, I guess. Since Trump is out.

>still in highschool
>no understanding of a 20yr war
>no understanding what a treaty is
>enrolls in his first gender studies class for his first year of college

Because it puts into perspective the claim that BIDEN is the one against his own supporters.
Trump is also relevant because he's the main reason liberals "supported" biden at all. No one was excited for biden or thought he'd suddenly go far left(for america) like bernie. They thought he'd better appeal to, or it least not scare away, moderates and have a better chance of beating trump. And in hindsight they were probably right.

Attached: Caplan-BernieBro.jpg (2000x1375, 315.13K)

LMAO. Ok buddy.

No. If you read it, Trump laid out a proper framework. Biden said fuck it, let's just leave, leaving the country to fall to the Talliban

It's a verified fact Trump was going to bring the Taliban to America. Sorry you're retarded.

Meanwhile even aside from all the wasted donations for the election trump didn't spend a cent of donations "to stop the steal" on any of the audit BS. He just paid off previous campaign debts and pocketed over 600 million through a kushner-run shell company.

Removing the conjecture and hyperbole that really doesn't factually say anything bad. Try being objective, it's a good way to understand things.

Sorry you fell for some Yea Forums bait. I don't worship the guy, and I definitely think he should shut his mouth, but this has outrage clickbait written all over it.

Either of you could easily settle this by posting your source. Just sayin.

Possibly, but not in the primaries, where everything is weighted by factors like "How many members of the party are there in your state," and "how well does the party do in your state's elections?" It's not just by population. So a state that turns out a lot of support for democrat candidates, and has a lot of Democrats, will have more delegates than its mere population would suggest.

Lmao. Why do all sources in 4 chan look like this. Shitty jpgs with highlighter all over and fantastical words. I guess it's supposed to attract outrage, but they are so obviously bait to anyone in here that it's my first instinct to assume they are nonsense.
I mean, I get 4 chan ain't the place for any kind of real political discussion, but at least try to make good bait, rather than copying someone else's shitty bait

Yes, he was going to bring the Taliban who supported Al-Qaeda to the US to pamper them and their stay could have overlapped 9/11

No refunds for anybody.

Elsworth Toohey

>Shitty jpgs with highlighter all over and fantastical words

It's like construction paper and crayons to the. They can relate to that

And they were actively receiving Putins bounties for American soldiers at the time

>that really doesn't factually say anything bad.
It says he's a socialist. That may or may not be considered "bad." If it is not a bad thing, why do his supporters screech when people say he's a socialist?

Lmao. So true.

Attached: me smart.jpg (300x300, 16.13K)

>Putins bounties for American
Was that ever proved? I know it was claimed, but I never saw any strong evidence. Did I just miss it? I wouldn't put anything past that greasy bastard, but still, proof would be nice.

Because it's viewed as bad in the U.S. and they don't want negative press. It's also not true. He's a Democratic Socialist, which is different. The left was never good at naming and many people get confused at the minor differences.

The no regunds meme at its base is about money wasted on failed candidates but then trumptards kick it up a notch like to imply bernie is somehow pocketing all the money even thought that's much more accurate of trump.