Does anyone actually like this guy?

typical chad

Hell yes

The only person who isn't gonna like Joe Rogan is some little fag who can't deal with people who have different opinions

>does anyone actually like this guy?
Liked better when he was feeding cockroaches to the wannabe famous, washed down with a quart of Donkey semen (in front of family, the world, kek)

Attached: joe-rogan..jpg (1068x1068, 130.68K)

No. He's an idiot who took horse medicine to try and cure his covid. It didn't work and now he's been on his deathbed for over 6 months wasting resources until his covid finally ransacks his body and kills him.

He's ok.

He's a meatheads idea of an intellectual so yes, many people like him.

lmao covid who cares anymore
ukraine is the new covid you fucking groomer

Attached: 1649543358939.jpg (907x1360, 732.51K)

Hit and miss.
I never believe any one person or source 100%.

Attached: 1649296858354.jpg (500x500, 101.43K)

He's delightfully informal but a retard and nobody should take hi seriously more than u do a friend

12 million people every day. Cope.

Dude's a meathead, but he's aware of that and open to learn. He went a very long way, admirable guy.

Attached: stupid jet.jpg (432x343, 15.43K)

He has some decent guests.
But Rogan isn't smart or even a good interviewer.

>He's a meatheads idea of an intellectual so yes, many people like him.

vs Alex Jones, a mongoloid's idea of an intellectual

Attached: 1594272574405.png (985x914, 1.3M)

I like him

he's like an 80 iq jock spouting politics to a roomful of 60 iq jocks

Attached: you.jpg (355x355, 7.6K)

single handedly boosted Shure's bottom line 100 million or so with all the wannabe podtards buying the Joe Rogan Shure SM7 mic, at 450$ a pop not counting the 200$ preamp required because the damn thing only puts out 0.2 nanovolts peak, and Joe Rogan still cant point the damn thing correctly to prevent popping plosives after 20 fucking years of using it,

A 50$ Behringer Neodymium Shure SM57 knockoff dynamic mic sounds way better for 1/10th the price

picrel, best lineup

Attached: Screenshot 2022-01-14 at 21-35-05 Joe Rogan Experience #1555 - Alex Jones Tim Dillon - YouTube.png (1090x712, 851.88K)

Disagree. Joe gets people to talk, and at the end of a podcast, you'll have learned a lot about that person. That's exactly what a good interview does -- get the person they're interviewing to talk.
Granted, Marc Maron on WTF *really* gets people to open up; he gets people talking about their childhood in minutes, but just because someone is better at something doesn't mean you're bad.

He's cool with me.

Yeah hes cool and a good interviewer. You mad OP?

He does minimal research and has almost no push back when the person he interviews says something insane.
The interviewee is basically giving an lecture while Joe mutters in the background. His reaction questions are surface level, or just saying "really? thats crazy."
Basically he serves almost no purpose in the interview. Which makes him a bad interviewer.
If the podcast was a platform for lectures, then it he would be a good lecture host.

He's like one of the people I know that didn't go to college because it was probably too difficult for them. He probably has a lot of trucker fans as a result.

He gets suckered into these cons by Alex Jones and other UFO nuts because he doesn't know any better.

He does have good guests on that tell great stories, so I do like that.

Overall I give him a B.

You missed the part where I said what I said.
Maybe read it again or kys I dunno.

No.

My point is that a good interviewer isnt someone that just lets the person say things without any back and forth.
A good interviewer does research of the guest and asks prodding and interesting questions that makes the guest expand on their ideas.
Just letting a guest speak without any contribution of the host isn't a good interviewer, they are just a part of the audience at that point.

I've hated that faggit ever since he ruined the man show. And the sexual tension between him and jordan peterson is...idk. I don't have the words to describe it

People that aren't sheep

just a different type of sheep.

Your point is incorrect.
A good interviewer gets their subject to speak.
It isn't their job to change the interviewee's perspective.
Political newscasters do that.
That's not what Joe is.
Some of the best documentaries and interviews don't even have the interviewer on camera. It's just the person being interviewed, going on about their views, and it's up to the audience to decide how they feel.
If Joe pushed back the way you think he should, he wouldn't be able to get the guests that he does, because people would expect a fight.
Plus, the audience wouldn't get to hear Joe's guests' true perspective, because they'd filter themselves to avoid an argument.
This isn't a debate; I'm informing you why you're wrong.

youtube.com/watch?v=jaIzP-ZTVBI

What you don't wanna see some Rogan on Peterson action? You some kinda homophobe?

Jamie, look up Behringer Neodynium.

why do you care? why don't you think people like him.

I love how that retard will get some half-witted conspiracy theorist to dispute proven science to get an opinion from "the other side".

I'm not even talking about specifically pushing back, although i think he should when his guest says something ridiculous.
Asking a guest introspective questions and making them further expand their viewpoints to different situations is the job of an interviewer.
If I wanted to watch a one sided interview, I would just watch a lecture or a TED talk from the person he is interviewing.
Like I said, he's a good host for a one dimensional lecture, but a bad interviewer.
He doesn't need to be contrarian to the guest to be a good interviewer.

Google "argumentum ad populem" or enroll in your nearest junior college.

Only tinfoil hat people listen to him.

You simply wish Joe was a different *type* of interviewer.
That doesn't mean Joe is a *bad* interviewer.
This is what I'm trying to help you see.
You are the type of person that would hate a pizza because you expected tacos.
You fail to value things for what they are, because those things fail to be what you expect.

>washed down with a quart of Donkey semen

apparently that was what killed 'Fear Factor', I wonder if Joe has any guilt about being a part of that, or if the contestants ever sued

He's not an interviewer at all if he is hardly engaging.
He's a great lecture host as I've reiterated enough now.
Letting people speak without any meaningful follow up isn't an interview, its a showcase of the guest's ideals.

Tesla, Elk, Horse dewormer, Homelessness, Jujitsu, Free Speech, Bret WHINESTYN (NOT “STEEN”)
“Jamie, pull up”
“L.A. has turned into such a shithole”
“Douglas Murray’s book”
“You should move out to Austin”

Basically just 3 hours of that

>And you'd better get used to him. With his diet of elk meat, cannabis, and supplements, he's probably going to live to be 150. Can't wait for JRE episode #12,000.

haha, good chance of getting BSE madcow from eating wild meat

he has had some real scientist experts on at the start of Covid which was really interesting, and Jamie Metzl about the Wuhan Lab Leak, but crackpot Robert Malone caused a shitstorm

yes

>You some kinda homophobe?
No. I just think gay ppl should come out

I’ve met a lot of people who finished college, and most are not intelligent or wise, they just have knowledge that any retard can get by reading the same book.

And with their low information retention, most people who finished college aren’t much smarter than someone who skipped college to do something else like comedy or even sales.

I paid $1200 to watch him and Dave Chappelle do stand up in Vegas. Fucking awesome! Ashy Larry from Chapelle show was there and he was fucking hilarious too

>Uses anecdotes to make his claim
You know how I know you didn't go to college?

OP's question wasn't whether Joe is right but whether anyone likes him. And I simply pointed out that lots of people like him, not that he's right because he's popular. Enroll in your nearest elementary school and learn to read, you stupid motherfucker.

He's alright

college and other higher education isn't meant to make you "smart"
it teaches you how to do white collar jobs.
people associate white collar jobs with smart people for some reason, but its just a meme.
people who dont go to college develop insecurities about their own intelligence so they rag on college and think its a liberal hivemind while ignoring the fact that its a requirement for becoming an engineer or doctor etc.

What makes you think he's alright? Do you have any proof to back up that he is alright?