Start listening to Korn

Start listening to Korn.

Attached: file.png (600x586, 442K)

Why would I start?

Attached: 1555808444544.jpg (554x554, 51K)

that is fucking horrifying

I'd have to stop first

ARRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
YOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
REEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Reminder this is literally better than any Beatles, Beach Boys, Death Grips or Radiohead album.

Attached: file.png (1500x1500, 3.48M)

>i honestly used to believe only females had bad music taste

based

if you say the beatles are the most influential band of all time this is what you see at night while you sleep

based

Already do. Just not all the time. Korn is a great October band.

>"yeah music peaked with the beatles"
>be striken with the patrician curse by scaruffi's final form

Out of the countless talentless, obnoxious and unintelligent hacks in the art critic scene, Piero Scaruffi has to be the absolute worst contender. It speaks a lot that a man who has reviewed the works of over 8600 musical artists for more than 30 years is so incompetent when it comes to his alleged 'craft'. Not only does Scaruffi have the lowly musical intelligence that is easily overshadowed by any first-year music student at your local university campus, the man is also an inadequate writer. His critiques are often mediocre, lack true depth or substance, as if he had listened to most of the music as ambience noise while he performed other trivial tasks around his small apartment. He often spews out what more capable critics have already been saying years before him, displaying no originality or free thought of his own. Whatever minuscule level of content Scaruffi manages to say in his writing is completely made to irrelevancy by the totally arbitrary numerical values he assigns at the end of his reviews, as if "5.5/10" means anything in the context of artistic value. To make matters worse, he seems to ignorantly misuse the most simple adjectives as if he is still learning basic writing skills despite three full decades of professional writing, and a number of published books. This is the same man that will claim the widely famous rock group 'AC/DC' as: "one of the greatest heavy-metal bands of all times", and yet one can find a sea of 5-6/10's on their page. Either Scaruffi is humorously unaware of the meaning of the word "best", or he has a clear bias against certain musical styles that don't fit his particular taste. Regardless, the average high school student could likely compose a more thought provoking music review than Scaruffi could even dream of achieving. The ultimate gift to the music industry would be to see this tired elderly man pack up his pencils and disappear off the net for good. Not worth reading his embarrassments of critiques.

Out of the countless talentless, obnoxious and unintelligent hacks in the art critic scene, Piero Scaruffi has to be the absolute worst contender. It speaks a lot that a man who has reviewed the works of over 8600 musical artists for more than 30 years is so incompetent when it comes to his alleged 'craft'. Not only does Scaruffi have the lowly musical intelligence that is easily overshadowed by any first-year music student at your local university campus, the man is also an inadequate writer. His critiques are often mediocre, lack true depth or substance, as if he had listened to most of the music as ambience noise while he performed other trivial tasks around his small apartment. He often spews out what more capable critics have already been saying years before him, displaying no originality or free thought of his own. Whatever minuscule level of content Scaruffi manages to say in his writing is completely made to irrelevancy by the totally arbitrary numerical values he assigns at the end of his reviews, as if "5.5/10" means anything in the context of artistic value. To make matters worse, he seems to ignorantly misuse the most simple adjectives as if he is still learning basic writing skills despite three full decades of professional writing, and a number of published books. This is the same man that will claim the widely famous rock group 'AC/DC' as: "one of the greatest heavy-metal bands of all times", and yet one can find a sea of 5-6/10's on their page. Either Scaruffi is humorously unaware of the meaning of the word "best", or he has a clear bias against certain musical styles that don't fit his particular taste. Regardless, the average high school student could likely compose a more thought provoking music review than Scaruffi could even dream of achieving. The ultimate gift to the music industry would be to see this tired elderly man pack up his pencils and disappear off the net for good. Not worth anyone's time reading his embarrassments of critiques.

CRINGE

Not an argument

wtf is that pic

thats uhhhhh...pretty terrifying....

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

cunnyruffy

Scaruffi is a hack

Attached: 1525664985139.jpg (250x229, 53K)

BASED. NICE DUBS

my favorite band :D

I've liked Korn since around the year 1999. Emotional but not wimped out like , aggressive but not toughguy, dark but not gothic, catchy but not bubblegum, funky but not too urban focused. They're just a good blend.

Attached: korn-band.jpg (460x354, 36K)

The pre-Issues stuff is okay-to-good if you don't take it too seriously. It's good for the gym and I really do love the bagpipes. Johnathan should have retired before he became depressed enough to gain 100 pounds.

Issues is the shit though

Why would I listen to that shit.

Why tho?

Thats fucking freaky

You know what I actually really like scruffy. Fuck you guys... :,(

wow based

Attached: file.png (690x375, 46K)

That is pretty based. I hate all critics because of principal, but you can tell this guy at least doesn't give a fuck, unlike Cuckgau who is a hipster crowd pleaser

based

>untitled only 3/10
wtf i hate scaruffi now

If Korn meant Untitled (2007) to sound modern, they really missed their target: it sounds like a band of middle-aged amateurs who have never heard what was being played on the radio in 2007. These have gotten to be albums made only for contractual obligations. Were they really such mediocre musicians? The core of the album was, by comparison with Korn's heydays, gentle atmospheric and even spiritual.

So is this a meme or is korn actually good

take the korn pill faggots

That's a big of an overstatement, but Korn's s/t is probably an 8/10.

when did scaruffi become a demon from the 7th circle of hell

I don't think it was meant to sound modern, I think it was meant to sound "mature"