Louder than The Who

>louder than The Who
>more experimental than The Velvet Underground
>more dark and sinister than Bob Dylan
>more heavy and brutal than The Rolling Stones

If you look at it logically there's no way this isn’t the AOTS (Album of the Sixties). How'd they do it bros?

Attached: CAC706CB-08CC-4602-81FB-06FBC51E74D3.jpg (720x720, 23K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Y1Psx24n3rM
youtube.com/watch?v=SNdcFPjGsm8
youtube.com/watch?v=kb5mRBMZbYo
youtube.com/watch?v=vWW2SzoAXMo
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

it is odd how to Beatles manage to be simultaneously the most overrated and underrated band of all time

Underrated how?

>more experimental than The Velvet Underground
Because they went to India and learned how to play the sitting guitar?

Eh, probably hype backlash. They're so praised that loads of people these days take them for granted/don't listen even though they'd probably be big fans. It doesn't help that the first few albums sound like 50s rock as well.

George did not the others

Velvet Underground:
>let’s tune our guitars to ostrich tuning so they sound like shit
>great, now play the same two chords over and over again
>let’s add some screeching to that
>perfect!
The Beatles
>let’s add an eight minute musique concrete piece to our album to illustrate the true sound of revolution

It's harder than you think.

>>let’s add an eight minute musique concrete piece to our album to illustrate the true sound of revolution
You used buzz words to the point that I don't know if you're just a TVU fan fucking with me.

>Musique and concrete are buzz words

The fact that

>illustrate the true sound of revolution

Happy Autism Awareness Month

Attached: 250px-Autism_Speaks_Logo_Updated[1].jpg (250x274, 14K)

Are you the same schizo from last night that created a thread about why people might prefer TVU over The Beatles then proclaimed "THIS ISN'T A THREAD ABOUT THE BEATLES GUYS STOP TALKING ABOUT THEM."?

While my Guitar is the best song on that album. Happiness is second.

We will replace you

>louder than The Who
Objectively false.

It’s not musique concrete, it’s a sound collage. And a shitty one at that.

I didn’t create or even see a thread about why someone might prefer the Velvet Underground to the Beatles

That’s literally the point of the track. It is musique concrete, and Lennon said he was trying to paint a picture of a revolution using sound

Can you explain why it's "musique concrete" or why it painted "a picture of revolution"?

Buddy I’m just quoting Lennon here

>musique concrete
ah, the old looking at wikipedia for genre tags trick

Wait I ve never heard it disputed that Revolution 9 is Musique concrète. Of course I also don’t listen to that stuff. Why isn t it Musique concrète? I mean, it sounds like it to me
youtube.com/watch?v=Y1Psx24n3rM
youtube.com/watch?v=SNdcFPjGsm8
what does Revolution 9 do that makes it not like this

They’re just being pretentious, everybody knows Revolution 9 is Musique concrète

Your pseud is showing

They got four genius songwriters and had all of them write on it

>Ringo

I listened to this whole album, all the way through recently because a friend of mine said it is the best organized album of all time. Its got like 4 good songs on it, and then a bunch of retarded shit. Grant it, the 4 songs are really good.

this meme is so fucking annoying

>this
I avoided The Beatles for so fucking long because I thought they were just that black and white 'I want to hold your hand' style of music. Then I finally properly listened and they blew my mind.

I personally consider MMT, Revolver and Abbery Road to be better (in that order), because they're far more consistent. The White Album has some of the best music of The Beatles' career on it, but also a lot of skippable fluff.

>>louder than The Who
The Kinks were doing that in 1964 already

>Loud
>Experimental
>Dark and sinister
>Heavy and brutal
None of those things are indicators of actual quality though.

Yeah. I'm not really a Kinks fan, but their early stuff was basically punk rock 10 years early. It's crazy.

The Kinks are fucking amazingly spectacular. They're also incredibly underrated

Have you even heard a Bob Dylan or Rolling Stones song in your life?

>Objectively false.
Are you deaf?
youtube.com/watch?v=kb5mRBMZbYo
youtube.com/watch?v=vWW2SzoAXMo

>not actually knowing the music of The Who
>willfully misrepresenting VU
>bob dylan "dark and sinister"? literally what the fuck are you talking about
>rolling Stones heavy/brutal lol

you're a fucking moron dude. you literally don't know anything.

Beatles are the goat though

based clueless retard

because they were playing two and three-chord rock songs through a busted amplifier? That's rock music, dude. Punk is a fucking sham perpetuated by aging scenester boomers just like the summer of love.

Nice thread, bro. I think I'll make 5 more TVU vs Beatles threads.

lol by that time john cage made a 90 min manual on how to do dumbed down musique concrete
just because it was unheard of in popular music it doesnt mean that the beatles brought anything new to the table besides "dude stockhausen lmao"

No I m talking about the people disputing that it is Musique concrète at all, I don t think they were the first to do it

Also, what is this John Cage Manuel you speak of?

>not as loud as the mothers of invention
>not as experimental as the mother’s of invention
>not as dark as the mother’s of invention
>not heavy and brutal as the mother’s of invention

Holy shit you wanna be 60e fags are pathetic. Take the Beatles cocks out of your mouth for one second and just observe who they were inspired by and frequently tried (and sometimes succeeding) in ripping off.

If you look at it logically, any one of the Mother’s of Invention albums would be the album of the 60s.

Fuck right off musically illiterate plastic person.

Attached: E927BCFA-9D2E-493D-86CB-5E7E549E4060.jpg (500x500, 134K)

Literally the cover of the album is a ripoff of a Beatles album cover
Also stop taking the OP post so seriously, it’s obviously just a parody of those Daughters threads

into the Mothers, yeah? 10th grade ain't so bad. My patience for music that's a joke is...slim.

Yeah, and sergeant pepper was intended to be a rip-off and was directly inspired by Freak Out!
Oh yeah. You’re too serious. Too high brow for The Mother’s I’m sure.

If you knew shit about music you know the Mother’s is much more than fuckin Comedy rock. They’re so much more and if you think otherwise you have a pretty surface level understand of their shit. Frank himself has 62 albums just in his life time. Over 100 in total.

But, to be fair, if you have little patience you probably also have a small attention span and a small brain so you probably couldn’t enjoy the mother’s if you tried. It’s over your head.

Attached: 220B47AF-3CFB-466F-A5D3-430BE194A269.jpg (800x807, 395K)

>h-he good look how many albums he made!!
the residents must be the most important band of all time then.

That’s not the point.

The point was not all of his music has humor. If you would be bothered to thumb thru his discog then you could speak on his career.

>>more experimental than The Velvet Underground
stopped reading right there
sage

Right, but most of his output was shit or niche stuff for fans. There's some merit in the Mothers debut and even more in their sophomore effort, but We're Only In It For The Money is a fucking joke.

Freak Out is good, Absolutely Free is great, Hot Rats is great, and then throughout the 70s he had a few good albums too. Tons of it is disposable.