Why are Velvet Underground fags so insecure about the Beatles...

This isn’t a thread about the Beatles

Blame punk rock. The Velvets are only remembered in hindsight by aging punk rockers who thought "Waiting For The Man" was the coolest song of all time.

you're right your mothers coming over tonight, gotta go

*two album run.
and also cringe.

There's no insecurity, but TVU&N gets posted whenever people start giving The Beatles too much credit for their influence over popular music.

I’d get that if it was posted in responses to Beatles threads, but it’s the OP of almost every single thread I’ve ever seen about TVU

this post was def made by the beatles chart fag

See this is what I’m talking about, how many times have I said now this isn’t a thread about the Beatles? This is a thread Velvet Underground fags and their incapability to discuss their supposed favorite band except in terms of comparing them to other bands. The reason is obviously clear: it’s cause the Velvet Underground are shit. A discussion about the Velvet Underground alone would sound like this
>You hear the Murder Mystery?
>Yeah, it sounds like shit. You hear Heroin?
>Yeah, it sounds like shit. But damn, weren’t they innovative?
Let’s talk about their great innovation. Lou Reed invented a new form of tuning called ostrich tuning, where you tune every string to the same note. The effect of this tuning? It makes the guitar sound like shit. Nobody uses ostrich tuning except him, cause it sounds terrible.
So the only way to discuss the Velvet Underground is by finding another band and declaring TVU better than them. That way, you can just insult the other band without saying a thing about the Velvet Underground aside from “and they were better
If a Yesterday-tier event where everybody forgot the Beatles happened, Velvet Underground threads would be identical, except they would be about The Rolling Stones instead

I like the Beatles and velvet underground. OP is a faggot.

"The Beatles" were mentioned 5 times in OP's post.

Alright, let me remake this thread. Hold on

Thread over everybody! Go here

I prefer this thread

Bump

me as well

it's not a boy band if it has a girl in it you incel

It doesn’t have a girl in it. If you mean Nico, she’s not a member. That’s why it’s called The Velvet Underground and Nico, because they are two separate artists. The Velvet Underground went on to have albums without Nico, and Nico went on to have albums without the Velvet Underground.

Though I do agree they weren’t a boy band. That’s just retarded

That was a Warhol design, he paid for the production of the album too

Mo Tucker is female

maureen tucker you stupid fuck

That’s a tranny. He’s literally named “tucker”

>Every post about them is just “waaah! The Beatles are popular but I like the Velvet Underground! Waaah! The Beatles weren’t as innovative! Waaaaah!!!”
Who the fuck even ever posts this? No VU thread I've seen has ever said this, most of them have all just been legitimately discussing the music.
If you're asking seriously it would be because of that
>Velvet Underground didn't sell many records, but everyone who bought one went out and started a band
shtick. People just see them as a "non-sell-out" version of the Beatles, who existed around the same time. Anyway Velvet Underground is better than the Beatles and if you don't think so I'm going to have sex with your mother.

This is what inspired me to make this thread, also
rbt.asia/mu/thread/86912415
rbt.asia/mu/thread/86739299
rbt.asia/mu/thread/85884915
rbt.asia/mu/thread/85843946
rbt.asia/mu/thread/83160980
rbt.asia/mu/thread/87206454
rbt.asia/mu/thread/87020644
Little a little bit of searching on the Rebecca Black Tech archive

Every band fan is a little insecure about the Beatles

>waaah!
>Waaah!
>Waaaaah!!!
OP, fuck off

Too close to home, Velvetfag? I can hear you crying from here

Jaaaaaaaaaaaanitor of LUNAcy

Autism right here

?

beatles is just a boyband that reached much more success than what it was due because Ringo's father was a Jew that controlled the media in several countries and shilled them into oblivion

IIIIIIIIIIIDENTIFYYYYYYYY MYYYYYYYY DESTINYYYYYYY

Both bands are great. If VU fans want to complain that they should be more popular, at least pick on AC/DC or some shit rather than the Beatles who actually justified their fame by making some great albums

I’ve been an insecure VU fan and beatlemaniac for years. both are essential for shaping the music of decades to come and comparing them let alone their fanbase is retarded.

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.