Hey man. Typically I don't even read posts without images, so consider this an actually good response if you're around still.
A squier that holds you back is still a guitar. You know what would hold you back further? No guitar.
In addition, Rickenbackers, although expensive, are not particularly good instruments. They're unique alternatives to the Gibson/Fender model.
& to be quite blunt, I've heard almost big-box style acoustic sounds come out of modern solid state amps. It's like, the touch sensitivity of the acoustically played plank body guitar with the overtones created in amp make for a rather unusual visual/audio experience.
If I'm being fully honest with you, I would recommend you upgrade your amplifier before you go for a more expensive guitar. Your amplifier, even if it's with a, for instance:
I had a $1300 Canadian marked down factory special run Fender Princeton to play through. I used the Epiphone Junior that came with Rocksmith for about 6 months waiting for guitars I purchased to be brought from my brothers home in the States to my home in Canada.
tl;dr Comparing to a Rickenbacker is a flawed thought, unless you legitimately find love & want for a Rick'. Personally? I would want one of their standard scale, two pickup, single coil, single output jack [so none of their stereo guitars].
p.s. My girlfriend started playing guitar in September. She started on an HH Squier Strat. The new passive ones that are like, SuperStrat style. Through a Fender style amp, the pickups have a sterility during clean runs. There's a particularly unappreciated, or difficult to appreciate coupled piece of tones when the two pickup winds are so near while they cancel out frequencies.
>[and although it's not particularly a part of this talk, I just wanted to bring up the idea that a Fender Twin Reverb, with its dry channel & its effects channel, while they're wired to cancel out if you jump them, if you dial one to the lows, other highs, it works!]
Attached: johnny-mathis-open-fire-two-guitars-south-african-vinyl-album-ald6282.jpg (1901x1136, 444K)