Easily the more talented guy in singing, songwriting range, compositional ability, coming up with melodies, etc

>easily the more talented guy in singing, songwriting range, compositional ability, coming up with melodies, etc
>was the only Beatle to have a viable solo career
>his solo career got crapped on by critics who all instead jerked off John Lennon's mediocre Chuck Berry rock and dudeweed beliefs
Music journalism was a mistake.

Attached: Paul-McCartney-Hulton-Archive-630x420.jpg (980x653, 58K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5HeEwPoDGnw
youtube.com/watch?v=_LHeEwiQJsY
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

have sex

Paul McCartney sucks dicks in hell

telling me this like it’s something i don’t know?

I NEED A

Wings is the single most underrated band in history simply due to the fact that Beatles fans and music journalists shit on them for not being The Beatles. McCartney's run from 1970-1980 was phenomenal.

>his solo career got crapped on by critics who all instead jerked off John Lennon's mediocre Chuck Berry rock and dudeweed beliefs
Based, I totally agree. McCartney’s solo music actually progresses unlike Lennon who did exactly as you stated and Harrison who just made a Beatles album with Wall of Sound production

dirty woman

Based and redpilled.

Even to this day when it's widely acknowledged John Lennon was a dickhead and his solo music was terrible people are still too contrarian to admit Paul a best and just stan George instead.

Paul's the most overrated artist of all time. Not even second best Beatle.