Eh, it was kind of underwhelming

holy shit this jesus christ
beatles apologists btfo

Show me a Dylan song like Tomorrow Never Knows or Love You Too

dylan didn't go for exotic indian instrumentation ever, so if that's your only metric for the quality of music get fucked

bob dylan apologists btfo

really? that's your argument? "the beatles are better than dylan because dylan never had a sitar player"?

It's literally the most overrated music production in history.

really? that's your argument? "bob dylan is better than beatles because beatles didn't have overly long word-salad faux blues"?

Cringe

This is the best album of all time

All Beatles albums are underwhelming. They’re the most overrated band there is.

t. non musician

You don’t like music for the right reasons.

If you dopn't know music theory, then that absolutely applies to you

Fucking wew

Cringre not even best beatles record.

You OK there wheezy?

Of course, why?

Well you seemed to have trouble catching your breath.

In what world is wew a sound associated with wheezing?

How isn't it

How do you pronounce it?

The worst argument ever

"wew"
>you're right, I can't do that!
>so that means the argument is bad
OK

The sound a human makes when they are catching their breath isn’t close to wew at all. Of course, I wouldn’t expect someone who thinks that the Beatles music sounds good to know anything about sound in the first place.

>Of course, I wouldn’t expect someone who thinks that the Beatles music sounds good to know anything about sound in the first place.
We already established you are not a musician nor know music theory though. So this is backwards.

>implying there's a song in their discography better than for no one
:,(

>knowing theory magically changes the way sound resonates

So that means every single thing that you can’t do is good, and I’m sure that’s a lot of things

>resonates
With what?
2/10 Strawman, try harder

>when the same retarded argument is used against me I have no rebuttal
Come on man just stop

What do you mean? My argument was never properly refuted in the first place

Thanks for copping out of the argument.

How so?

Answer the question so I can show you how your logic fails.

illiterate

I’d say you don’t know what resonate means since you ignored the context of its use, but clearly that was intentional. Otherwise you’re just stupid, which is still my impression, but you’re trying too hard to be entirely stupid.

Not an argument.

Not an argument

>eh, it was kind of underhwleming

This is the Beatles in general, except Lovely Rita, which is one of the GOAT songs of the century

Attached: anton with a gun.jpg (600x450, 49K)

>I’d say you don’t know what resonate means
Well, what did you mean by it?

Because if you mean "resonates with me personally/emotionally/etc", then obviously knowing music theory will change your context and how you perceive music, and how it RESONATES with you.

That's because I already made it.

Read the thread if you are confused.

Resonate is a word used to describe the production of sound.

Oh, in that case that argument is irrelevant.

Sorry

Fucking wew

Is that the sound you make when you are out of arguments?

Listen to the mono version instead

Nice music discussion you've got here.

I’ll tell you when you actually demonstrate any rhetorical ability.

Not an argument

It's muddy tho
I'm trying but the other guy is a fucktard

Oh you didn't read the thread before posting?

The production on it seems underwhelming compared to Sgt. Peppers and Abbey Road.

it sucks, most overrated band in history

You mean the earlier production is not as impressive as their later works?

No it isn’t you fucking retard. The songs annoying as fuck