>more abrasive than Death Grips
>more experimental than Radiohead
>more innovative than the Velvet Underground
>more dark and depressing than Joy Division
>more heavy and brutal than the Swans
how did they do it bros? seriously how the FUCK did they do it?
They didn't know what they were doing, and you consider them geniuses for it.
9/10
I like this bait. Simple, not at all subtle, yet strangely alluring.
>using DG as a measure for abrasiveness
>using JD as a measure for depressiveness
What are listening to usually? Probably something normal and mainstream like QotSA, right?
I think he blew it with 'more innovative than velvet underground'. rest is really good
if fantano didn't give this a 10 you guys would not be talking about it
Were you even on Yea Forums when it came out? Fantano wasn't the only person or even the only critic who hyped it
Yeah this album was shilled like crazy by bots and spammers and people fell for it.
>give it a go
>it just sounds like Swans with no talent or creativity
>listen to Swans
>it's just easy listening Godflesh that goes on for an hour too long
>It's not italo disco
/thread
>Death Grips
>abrasive
>Radiohead
>experimental
>Velvet Underground
>innovative
>Joy Division
>dark and depressing
>Swans
>heavy and brutal
name one (1) band more innovative and influential than TVU
The Beatles. I know you Amerifats like to pretend TVU were more important out of some retarded national pride, but you're objectively wrong.
>The Beatles were more innovative and influential than TVU
none of these are wrong
They've always sounded pretty meh to me. They're loud but they lack intensity.
yea this lmfao. You can have your opinion that you dont feel they're the ""most"" of any of those descriptors, but they certainly are those.
i mean, not really, it smells from miles away, its the same as any 'ywgwyw is da best thing eva' bait thread
dude that was wack
none of those are true
also
>less abrasive than Swans
>less experimental than Swans
>less innovative than Swans
>less dark and depressing than Swans
>less heavy and brutal than Swans
>"Wow this is a Swans tribute! 8/10"
I always take two points off for anyone who uses "bros" personally
If we're posting the same shit over and over again:
Alexis Marshall is a poor man's David Yow and this album is straight up over-fucking-rated. People hailing this like it's the second coming or something clearly were snoozing on hell songs or canada songs when they came out. This is a fucking step way down into accessibility and mediocrity for them. It's not terrible, but it's not even close to hitting that same level of Skin Graft/Am Rep/Load shit that it's clearly aping so heavily off of.
But Daughters are good and Swans are shit