Untitled

No Led Zepplein in the 70's or U2 in the 80's or 90's.. Lost is weak.
60's - Beatles
70's - Led Zeppelin
80's - Roth era Van Halen
90's - U2 ( ZOOTV era U2)
00's - Who cares.

>00s who cares

ok g r a n d p a

beatles
queen
wham
blur
rhcp

The Beach Boys
Pink Floyd
The Clash
Oasis
Arctic Monkeys

By the way, why is Red Hot Chili Peppers classified as a 00's band when most of their albums and songs were released in the 20th century?

kinks
the who
wham
blur i guess
blink 182

60's - The Kinks
70's - Pink Floyd
80's - The Cure
90's - Blur
00's - RHCP

Okay I had sex but those bands are still garbage :(

This is how people actually see music history. Fuck me.

>60s: The Kinks
Judging by the photo, it seems to be early Beatles which I'm not keen on and I imagine a festival crowd at that era would be intolerable. Never been impressed by live Beach Boys either so it's The Kinks.. they seem fun live

>70s: Pink Floyd
Say what you want, but they were great live. Especially if it's pre-animals era and more like the pompeii gig. Queen are an obvious festival choice, but this is about me so fuck those guys

>80s: The Cure
Have they released Disintegration yet? They're great live anyway and play for years, especially if they do some stuff from Pornography which is a favourite album of mine

>90s: Oasis
The Cranberries were fucking obnoxious, but Oasis would be fantastic in their heyday especially at a UK festival

>00s: Arctic Monkeys
Why are RHCP there for 2000s? I don't like them, but AM are a favourite of mine and did great shows before they became americanized (although their t b h performances are good)

The Clash is in the wrong decade, but you did put The Who in the correct decade.

The Beach Boys
Pink Floyd
The Cure
I prefer not to pick anyone here (Oasis are the least painful)
I prefer not to pick anyone here (Blink 182 are the least painful)

The Beatles
Pink Floyd
The Cure
Blur
Arctic Monkeys

beatles
who
clash
oasis
arctic monkeys