Remember that time Pitchfork gave this super basic ass album a 8.5/10?
Remember that time Pitchfork gave this super basic ass album a 8.5/10?
Other urls found in this thread:
pitchfork.com
twitter.com
>Pitchfork
Kill you'reself.
>Tripfagging
Why don't you?
I'm objectively superior to you. It would make sense for you to go first.
I don't get how anyone can enjoy Kiss. It's such a basic band, and the way they paint themselves is cringe as fuck.
Meh, I guess it was cool enough for the times
imagine thinking you're so much better than anonymous users that you deserve a tripfag username. Kill yourself you deluded grandiose schizoid.
and fuck kiss
>not thinking paul stanley's was the best of the bunch
who the fuck are 12Rods and Walt Mink?
Lmao is that "I'll lose the weight Boogie2988"?
makes sense
they love that shit
imagine being able to farm (You)'s this succulent but choosing to post user
OP here, I would unironically argue GnR deserves that score though
You're actually not bad, your imitators are cancer though
dumb phoneposter
isn't this review like 20 yrs old, back when p4k was run for shits and giggles
>Calls me dumb
>Can't look it up
i farm (you)s all the time and don't need a name
eat shit
I thought they gave all Kiss albums an across the board 1.5 or something like that
Pretty based honestly
still mad
ircc they gave another Kiss album a high 9
Holy shit is this real?
The written review is even cringier.
pitchfork.com
Holy fucking shit, this review is straight trash. Whoever wrote that is such a huge fucking tool, I cannot actually believe it. For once, I am glad they deleted a review.