Kid a beat banana

Britain wins again.

who cares about this shitty site for cucks?

RETARD
HE SAID "NO ONE CARES" AND IT'S BLATANTLY OBVIOUS THAT SOME PEOPLE CARE, MY ARGUMENT WASN'T THAT THE FACT THAT PEOPLE CARE ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING IN THE BIGGER PICTURE, I WASN'T IMPLYING ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT SIMPLY POINTING OUT THAT PEOPLE DO IN FACT CARE WHICH IS ABUNDANTLY FUCKING CLEAR GIVEN THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF RATINGS. UNLESS YOU ARE TYRING TO ARGUE THAT THOSE RATINGS WERE DONE CARELESSLY? DO YOU BELIEVE THAT IN FACT ZERO PEOPLE CARE?

Sunday Morning vs Radiohead's best album. battle of the century

>OK Computer, DSOTM, and Kid A
>"""""""""""""""""""""art rock"""""""""""""""""""""

Attached: DFW.png (1044x702, 1013K)

DFW was a huge Radiohead fan.

Literally the entire discography of both are way the fuck overrated and don't deserve any attention.

well if we're arguing about the semantics, then sure, many people do indeed care. but saying 'nobody cares' is not usually a real 'all or nothing' statement, it is jargon used to indicate that the person speaking finds the subject in question trite and insignificant

Kid A is better then TVU&N so it's not a problem

ALSO, how many of those ratings do you think were truly honest? how many people do you know that keep stuff like 'dark side of the moon' on a pedestal just because of its reputation rather than giving an earnest critique of it

>somebody doesn't care about overhyped radiohead
>"knuckledragging fucking caveman nigger mongoloid"

The Final Cut is better than DSotM

every pink floyd album is more interesting than dsotm

Ya, know most of the people who actually use rym on a regular basis don't give a shit about the top 100.

That might be a tad extreme.

based rationalposter

I don't like Kid A much, it's at 2 stars on my rym profile. Can someone tell me the appeal, aside from radical shift in style from the last album?

dada-inspired 'pulled out of a hat' lyricism, scott walker-esque strings on some songs, further explorations of ondes-martenot by jonny greenwood, considerably ahead-of-its-time production techniques, perfectly captured the particular flavor of postmodern existential dread of the period between y2k anxiety and 9/11 (and somehow, in hindsight, managed to capture the post-9/11 feelings of disillusion with modernity despite being released a year before). and personally, like a few of their other albums, gets better the more you hear it

its an atmospheric, cloudy, somber, dense record
it just has this aura of raw emotion that many people can connect with

When I was 13 I would just rate based on the consensus and not what I thought of it. I had to make a new account after a year when I realized how fucking dumb that was.

I'd give Kid A 3.5, maybe 4, stars. The only bad reason to dislike Kid A is because you think it's too scary and weird and no one on Yea Forums is that normie.

ummmmm....

As they should

WHO
THE
FUCK
CARES

no wonder he killed himself, he realized what a massive pleb he was.

based, redpilled, chad, happy person, etc

they care about the albums themselves, not the fucking rankings of them in relation to others. beat it

Personally I don't like Kid A or Ok Computer much because apart from a few songs, they really don't sound that great.

well yeah, being an idiot and following trends is what being 13 is all about

nah he killed himself because idiots like you exist

in rainbows has been known to be the thinking man's radiohead album of choice for a while now

more like 'middle of the roadiohead'

(i like the album i just wanted to make a shitty pun)

reddit

sick burn bro, just compartmentalize all the things you don't like into one generalization that makes less and less sense as time goes by, so awesome

zoomers have the worst taste.

reddit

trips confirm he farted

For me, it's In Rainbows

sick burn bro, just compartmentalize all the things you don't like into one generalization that makes less and less sense as time goes by, so awesome

reddit

sick burn bro, just compartmentalize all the things you don't like into one generalization that makes less and less sense as time goes by, so awesome

reddit

Attached: 50596050_422544341848161_8351394654789855299_n.jpg (480x480, 33K)

ok i'm bored now

reddit

final cut felt too claustrophobic (not in a cool radiohead way, in a sense that it felt neutered). dogs is the best for political thematic floyd, meddle was the most interesting in terms of texture

Suck a dick redditor

because it's just so interesting with choices that shouldn't work but do, while still being somewhat accessible. the string arrangement on how to disappear completely, the constantly but subtly changing beat in idioteque, the weird polyrhythms on in limbo and the strange, robotic mellotron choir on motion picture soundtrack. it's probably the best example of blending pop songs (i use that loosely to refer to songs with a reasonably traditional pop structure of choruses and contemporary instrumentation), idm, jazz and neo-classical music

reddit

fpbp

reddit

There is no jazz or classical on Kid A. Having saxophones or string instruments does not make your record automatically jazz or classical. Kid A is Radiohead listening to early Autechre and trying to jump in with that scene 6 years after the fact, and as a result ended up aging as poorly as that music as well.

I think many people misinterpret the message of this album in comparing it to electronic music. I think the general question with electronic is "What is the boundary to music? When does something become not music?", and while that's all fine and dandy, this album is not asking you whether it's music or not. If it isn't or is music, that's besides the point. Rather, to me, this album is specifically asking "What makes art human?" The truth is, I don't know. Nobody has ever posed this question so eloquently before. I can't tell what gives this album a soul, nor do I even really know if it has one. For everyone years ago saying that this album may be looked back on as a masterpiece for reasons they couldn't determine yet, this is my answer.
This album is a masterpiece because it poses questions rarely asked, in an extremely succinct and genius method, with such basic tools that it's actually ridiculous that it could convey so much with so little. It's easy to say that people who enjoy this album are reading too much into it; on the contrary, I think those who dismiss it with little reasoning other than "It sounds bad" are not reading into it enough. Stating that the album sounds pointless is correct, but you're not paying attention if you don't realize that it's intentionally pointless. In general I'm not a fan of experimental music because I find that too often it says nothing while being overly pretentious and self-congratulatory; This album cannot be either of these things, because it literally does not speak for itself or say anything about how it's meant to be taken. If it explicitly wanted to be dissected, it would reveal its intentions like every other experimental release - but Radiohead is too good for that: It incites a deep interest in its intricacies entirely though its own creation.

not really reddit