Did he really think that his music would be revolutionary for 100 years when it sounded terrible? He must've known.
Did he really think that his music would be revolutionary for 100 years when it sounded terrible? He must've known
Jeremiah Harris
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Carson Butler
lol whos that faggot
Henry Bennett
(((Schoenberg)))
Bentley Reyes
>Being this new
Cringe.
Jayden Price
Didn’t plato write about changes in music being a sign of a revolution or something?
Christopher Young
It WAS revolutionary. It's up to you to decide whether it sounds terrible.
I'm glad he did what he did. In a weird way I'm also glad that people still don't like it.
Dominic Harris
I mean, it was revolutionary.
Easton Wilson
>And what are the dirgelike harmoniai? You are musical, and can tell me.
>The harmonies which you mean are the Mixolydian and intense Lydian, and others similar to them.
>These then, I said, we must do away with; for they are useless even to women who are to make the best of themselves, let alone to men.
Based plato was a poptimist
Colton Robinson
It's interesting that him pushing for serialism further and further eventually lead to its own collapse when it turned out to be something of a dead end. His music is very beautiful, though extremely fragile. And it's not modern, Pierrot Lunaire is over a 100 years old.
Adam Cruz
fuck plato.
Ryan Evans
Greek philosophers were nothing but cock-worshipping faggots
Robert Reed
>It's interesting that him pushing for serialism further and further
Webern and his fangirls were the people actually pushing serialism further and further. Schoenberg created serialism, yeah, but he was more, uh, conservative with it.
Jordan Taylor
I wouldn't put it on Webern, but I can definitely see that on his fanclub.
Luis Evans
Based greeks
Gabriel White
Show me an actually good atonal piece.
Nicholas Moore
Take the noise pill
Zachary Russell
check out Schoenberg's compositions
Eli Kelly
I was listening to Pierrot Lunaire earlier but I was bored. May check other stuff later
Brody Wright
Isaiah Rogers
Schoenberg's music is beautiful. There's something so intense and emotionally powerful in it while he was working within a restrictive framework. Like with Wagner, there's this metaphysical quality to his music that I just can't wrap my head around, but it leaves me in awe every time I hear it.
Joseph Lewis
lol, fuck off Hill
Mason Gutierrez
>it's another butthurt about schoenberg episode
Isaac Sanchez
Stop being tonal babbies already, brainlets.
youtube.com
Zachary Hernandez
Music never went to shit, people's tastes did. There's some absolutely wonderful non-tonal/20th century music.
Owen Martin
No, you stop. It even has key signatures, dummy.
Robert Smith
>key signatures always mean functional harmony/tonality
retard alert
Sebastian Hall
cuck
Austin Cooper
not an argument
Angel Morales
>functional harmony = tonality
>modal music is atonal
>music that often changes key is atonal
Good thing I have a lot of these
Jace Bennett
Tonality a cute a CUTE
Jaxson Ramirez
>>functional harmony = tonality
Yes. How does it not equal?
>>modal music is atonal
Never said it was, retard.
>>music that often changes key is atonal
Good thing that Scriabin piece never changes keys because it's keyless, you ass.
David Young
>keyless
>has key signatures
Isaac Mitchell
This video is interesting, thanks