This is gonna suck

m.youtube.com/watch?v=b8m9zhNAgKs

youtube.com/watch?v=2INrQHCYuog

>Is the main character TheHollyHobbs?
heh

Attached: 1553126605794.jpg (590x519, 65K)

>dude, the beatles

that's the funniest film concept i've heard in a long time

it's a Beatles commercial, so blatantly

No bruh, you don't understand. Their music... it's just TIMELESS. Like, it's so amazing, remember the first time you heard Yesterday? I do, it was in the Bean Movie, I saw it in theatres and the first thought in my adolescent brain was... "what is that enchanting melody? That bewitching drum beat?" If they never existed and they came around today,.. people would be AWESTRUCK, DUMBFOUNDED, and GOBSMACKED. They are, without a doubt, the single greatest band, who made the best music of all time. God Bless Ringo, John, Paul, and the Other One.

Attached: 1499217553865.jpg (361x441, 17K)

this

The beach shots were filmed not far from where I live (Norfolk coast, UK). Could have had a part in the beach concert scenes as a extra playing a security guard but the realisation I’d spend all day listening to Ed Sheeran on a loop made my blood run cold, so turned it down. Only applied for a role as at the time Danny Boyle was still linked to the next Bond film, didn’t realise it was going to be this turd.

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved. In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.

>the controversial beethoven
kek

this but unironically

>bump

Based
Now go listen to Popol Vuh

Attached: Piero_Scaruffi_2.jpg (600x586, 33K)