Furfags and Indie Music

How high are you dude?

we already know about your music Will, we were looking for other artists

not high enough evidently to have broken myself out of a cooler timeline revere of sick sword katas, druidic animal communion, and bestial shamanism.

You are never going to make an indie rock masterpiece as such a young age. Seriously. He made possibly one of the most underground discussed albums of the 10's. And we will never achieve that. Whether you hate him for his furfag roots or just in general, you can't deny the talent. Come on.

Fuck you I'm gonna be the greatest furry musician of all time and bang all the fursuiters at cons

ive found a weird connection between furries and liking Swans, Tim Hecker, and Car Seat Headrest (the last one isn't so weird)

Did you even read my post at all?

I'm furry trash - and I am absolutely fascinated by CSH and Will. I do have to admit that I haven't listened to much of his work at all - but I'm waiting for the perfect time and moment to listen to his discography. Based on my prior knowledge, he is my 'spirit animal' if you catch my drift. Resonate too much.

I'm just baffled as to why there are very few other furries within the indie community at all (musicians and fans)

I do feel left out for the most part - Some others within the fandom I've known are the coolest people around that I resonate with far more compared members of other subcultures; but too many furries are mentally stunted creeps who obsessively spam OwO and :3 every five seconds.

If only I can find other people on the sweet spot between normie and weird; with a touch of artistry, twinkfuckery and intellectualism.

Not really, just saw the album cover and the general tone and responded. I am very drunk, so I apologise. I think it is as simple as furries still being heavily discriminated against on the internet. Simple as that. Will Toledo's furry themes on Twin Fantasy is vague and sublte enough that people who don't identify as furry can still identify with the general themes of heartbreak and melancholy within the album. Will also just has a general knack for melodies and pop writing. He's going to become one of the greats.

hey im not a furry but im a twink, wanna listen to CSH and fuck

Hey I'm a furry no thanks I'm only into baras and hairy daddies

not if I fuck them first

understood chief, carry on

what's will's fursona

You wouldn't dare

this is the best thread on this board in awhile; keep going you troglodytes

Attached: 1538412713322.jpg (195x293, 60K)

dog

s'gotta be an anubian jackal

all of you will die in righteous fire

good thing im fire retarded

no you’re just retarded

set me on fire then see what happens

you die, retard.

some lizard thing. check his furaffinity favorites, someone drew it i think

nope

expected no less from someone who thinks he’s a dog in a human body

wrong

when did i ever imply that, nice projecting kid

ok retard

youre the dude spouting "you die" to strangers on the internet and you wanna call anyone else a retard? wow what a biting intellect

anyone who immediately resorts to the word projection as a deflection is probably exactly what they were just called

just admit it kid, you got beasted on by a beast, it's what it's

well yeah, when you get lit on fire chances are you’ll die. talk about stupidity.

ok retard

>thing present in one scene is almost never present in another
On the note of this thread, why aren't there any good shitty musicians today? The Residents are this to an extreme (and not even shitty after they were around for a while) but there's like not even anything less than that that's like this. It's like anyone good is super good but is super trained and trapped in technicalities and theory at the expense of spontaneity and need everything spelled out and making sense, and anyone that isn't a theoryfag does not know any theory whatsoever (which is essential) and can't even play by ear or repeat what they hear and don't grasp song structure or order of parts in songs. And for the latter, people like this at best are punk/no wave/etc maybe but even then these people never have a songwriter mentality. Fucking why?

ok retard

keep fucking dogs buddy, i’m sure your cellmates will treat you well.
ok retard

>projecting projection
ok retard

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

>projecting projecting projection
ok retard

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

>fucking dogs
Ok retard

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

>projecting
ok retard
epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

>projecting
Ok retard

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

>projecting
ok retard
epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

here come the ad hominems, looks like i've won this debate

ok retard

so is this in like 4/4 time eighth notes or a more experimental shifting time scale with pregnant pauses before a rapid breakdown

epic, make sure to mark it on your wall of internet debates won this week

sorry dude i am not into pregnancy fetish

>no wolf bf to fuck my hole
Pls respond

i will pop a 9mm shell into every orifice in your body

If by 9mm you mean semen-crusted dick then pls do

ew, semen crusted? that means that semen has been on the dick in open air for so long that the mucus has dried out and caused it to turn solid and flaky

but if you insist, i'm not gonna shame that fetish

by 9mm i mean bullets, and by every orifice it includes your nostrils, urethra, ears and tearducts

can't even be clever about it, huh? this is why more people want to fuck their wolf bf instead of you

you’re not clever and you are destined to die a painful gory death by firing squad

ew you sound like a christian

ew you sound like a faggot, because you are one

wow, you figured out the one thing about myself I volunteered an hour ago in this thread

nothing gets past an intellectual Christian on the prowl

>dissing semen
Ewwwwwww

If by bullets you mean bullets of cum, then pls by all means fill me up daddy uwu

no problem faggot, have a nice eternity of burning in hell
by bullets i mean solid lead rounds designed to remove homosexuals from existence.

Watch out, this Yea Forums hotshot is gonna start dropping Leviticus quotes on our asses like flaccid wolf dicks

I prefer fresh, wet semen. Crusty semen is gross, gross, gross.

What a beautiful polyrhythm thing going on-- I see what you're seeing, user

>by bullets i mean solid lead rounds designed to remove homosexuals from existence.

can you clarify further you intellectual powerhouse?

watch out, this homo cocklord is gonna start contracting AIDS like a real pozmaster

Idiotic OP.

I'll crust my semen on your face and make you lick it up nerd, nerd, nerd

sure. our anti-faggot rounds are coated in pussy juice in order to ensure 100% faggot purging efficiency. in addition they are often engraved with STD statistics and pedophile-homosexual statistics to further bless them against the unclean. only the finest of materials are used.

Could you imagine being a homophobe reading this thread and realize these are the people representing your bigotry?

Now this is embarrassing because it's obvious you're trying. Sad.

yes, daddy~

now this is embarrassing because it’s obvious you will die at age 40 from an infected prolapsed anus

you were better off not trying, now youre trying and failing.

you were better off not living, now you’re gay and pozzed.

ohhh daaaaamn, this guy is saying naughty things and that's almost as good as being funny or clever :(

>"Hey, you should try being clever"

>"Oh okay, I don't know how to do that, so I'll spout crude nonsense instead"

imagine how impressed he is with himself

ohhh daaaaamn, this guy is saying stupid things and that's almost as good as being an actual retard :(

autobiographies are written in first person, not second person.

I'm not the one trying to impress anybody, kiddo ;)

cmon, you just know this guy was patting himself on the back with this one, when in reality he's just saying "no u"

I'm rubber, you're glue! Ha!

it's sad because everything about you emanates "40+ fat old white dude who has nothing going on in his life" but you sound like a bratty middle school kid who thinks he's a class clown but no one finds funny

you’re a fag and i’m not, ha!

oddly specific. is there someone you had in mind while coming up with this descriptor?

i know, i'm the one who informed you, so why you reiterating it bother me?

you're not the brightest bulb

>american education doesn't teach sex ed
Big ytikes from me friend

Imagine being a fat old christian on the internet telling gay people "you're gay" and patting himself on the back. The cringe will never die.

You. I said so, but why would a christian be able to read?

all of those are pretty generic descriptors, most people will meet people who are fat, old, white, christian, or male, and be able to reach conclusions that others might also be one of those things

how stupid are you?

>u dum me smart
epic
tell me more about your islamic sex ed
hmmmmm, i dunno mate, maybe a little too specific to be referring to someone you’ve never met. something tells me you have some stories to tell.
it’s almost like if you combine generic descriptors they become specific.

>"You sound like a man"
>"a PARTICULAR man, perhaps?"

oh no, Freud figured me out again! :o

>it’s almost like if you combine generic descriptors they become specific.

yeah, how many fat old white christian men actually exist? like 2?

>islam countries teach better sex ed than america
Ok??? Is that something to brag about? lol?

I've never seen a fat old white man ever, let alone one who turned out to also be christian

We're really striking oil here with this revelation

why do you keep making these seperate posts that basically just reiterate parts of the conversation in a mocking strawman manner?
of course, because specific terms cannot refer to demographics of people.

>it’s almost like if you combine generic descriptors they become specific.

You caught me, I was envisioning John McCain. The only fat old white christian man to ever exist.

>specific terms cannot refer to demographics of people.

Only vague terms, like "possibly unskinny" of course

well, go on, tell me.
do you think that making these extra posts on cooldown makes you extra cool or something

Tell you what? You're the one acting like no sex ed in your country is a good thing lol?

i’m not even sure what you’re referring to anymore. combining vague terms into a single entity makes it a specific descriptor, yes, but it definitely doesn’t mean said specific descriptor can’t apply to multiple people. you come off as an autist having a seizure over absolutely nothing.

>makes you extra cool

I absolutely 1000% guarantee you are a fat old white christian man.

tell me more about the islamic sex ed you have in europe of course. do they teach you about FGM?

I can vouch for the guy making the generalizations of fat old white Christian men. My grandfather was one. Stereotypes like that are true. He sat around watching Fox News and went hunting all the time, used racial slurs, homophobic slurs, supported George W. Bush, believed Obama is a Muslim, everything. He used to live in Los Angeles in the 60s, but when schools began racial integration policies, he fled to the rural part of the state because he didn't want his son going to high school with Black students.

Oh, so you're stupid is all. Ok. Typical republican, only copies what someone else types, lol

that’s cool and all but you haven’t told me who you had in mind when you created this description. a family member or friend? teacher? community member? give me the rundown.

>My grandfather was one

Stop exposing me, now he's gonna know that's who I was referencing in particular ;_;

I never made the claim that Islamic sex ed was better than US sex ed. Try harder next time, lol

You, because you are fat, old, white, Christian, and a man, and you haven't denied ANY of it. It's all true. You are one. I am right.

and the whole room stood up and clapped
hm?
see, that wasn’t too hard was it? perfectly fine to admit that your grandad thought you were a godless degenerate and deserved to be burnt at the stake like the good old days and this left a lasting impression on your psyche.

i’m not saying you did, i’m asking you about your islamic sex ed.
i don’t really need to deny the blatantly untrue, not that anything that you said is offensive to anyone of course.

No, people like that are trash. Nothing but hateable lowlives. I have absolutely no respect for my grandfather.

Alright, I was referencing that other user's grandfather. You caught me.

>your grandad

Oh, no, not my grandfather. His grandfather. My grandfathers were not white, as I am not white nor is anyone in my family.

You're the one who claimed US was worse than Islam countries in sex ed, you tell me why US is so shit lol

Everyone in my family is atheist too. Old, some of them, of course. Can't prevent that. Fat? Maybe, but who am I to judge? Male, god forbid, but they claim to be.

White or Christian? Not even close.

He's a fat old white Christian male, he doesn't know anything.

it’s fine, knowing that your family views you as a disgusting failure can be tough.
ah, so a shitskin. interesting, the plot thickens.
i haven’t mentioned US sex ed at all actually.
hmmm, thank you for the demographical rundown. i will make notes of this.

This sad old fat white Christian dude just accused my grandparents of being white. How sad.

Then why are you replying to me? Lol?

hey, i was giving you the benefit of the doubt of having an IQ above 80 but i guess not. your loss.
who are you? why are you replying to me?

They're not my family. I don't believe in family units. We've never had any cohesion. There is no special relationship between me and those people.

>hmmm, thank you for the demographical rundown. i will make notes of this.

Yes, my family has people of both genders, and various ages, and some of them are marginally overweight. You will clearly dox me before sunrise, I can sense it.

>i haven’t mentioned US sex ed at all actually.

Or education of any persuasion, for that matter.

Watch out, the fat old white Christian man isn't gonna want to hear that.

ah, so this is how you cope with being a disappointment. would explain your complete disattachment with reality as well.
well no, this conversation was never about education, so i haven’t had the need to bring it up.

>this conversation was never about education

True, this is about the sad fat white old Christian man and how unfunny and stupid they are.

hear what? you know this is a forum yeah? no hearing involved?

There is nobody I am trying to impress. I feel no pressure. I can only disappoint myself, and I never have. I love life and I see no reason to hold anyone who isn't hateful themselves in any sort of contempt. You are hateful and contemptuous though for trying to foment feelings of inadequacy in me.

no, this is about homosexuals and how they account for the majority of pedophiles despite being somewhere between 1-3% of the (american, which has a significantly higher homosexual population than say china or africa) population

No such statistic exists.

the fact you had to write this out to me like some sort of mantra implies that not a single word of what you just said is true, you just wish it were.

People use terms in a colloquial sense. To hear is to receive information such as verbal communication, and on a forum we are communicating through speech. Hence the colloquialism being employed.

Watch out, the sad fat old white Christian man is gonna link you to his 700 Club newsletter,

of course it does
wnd.com/2002/04/13722/

No, I am just fully in control of my emotions and entirely rational in my worldview and I know a pathological bully when I see one.

very informative, thank you.
what newsletter?
i don’t think people who are “fully in control of their emotions” need to repeat out loud and tell everyone around them that they are “fully in control of their emotions”.

Oh thank God, the sad fat old white Christian man has a 17 year old article on a website whose frontpage headline is "U.S. KIDS: ALLAHU AKBAR, WE ARE YOUR SOLDIERS"

Why are you replying to me? You know US doesn't teach sex ed right?

>very informative, thank you.

While we're on the subject of informing you personally, here's a nice infographic for your consumption.

Attached: xsJuokb[1].png (825x523, 466K)

i mean i just pulled that off of googling “homosexual pedophiles”. and either way the point is that the article itself cites statistics which come from actual studies, so you’re free to refute the studies instead of complaining about the website.
it doesn’t? interesting, thanks for letting me know.
very nice, is this what you plan to do later today?

>very nice, is this what you plan to do later today?

You already did the "no u" remember? The dumb one about an autobiography that nobody found clever or funny. You're recycling the premise in a weaker manner.

no u what? it was a genuine question. no u implies that i would hang myself later today, which is unfortunately for you not true.

>i mean i just pulled that off of googling “homosexual pedophiles”

You have to be a fat old white Christian man. There's no way you're just playing on Yea Forums for us tonight. This is too genuine.

>"I searched 'Google pls tell me i'm right' and this is what came up! Don't blame me that you hate my hot facts!"

Yeah no problem dude, hope you include that in your next few shitposts lol

Misattributed unrelated statistics, posted on some trash right-wing conspiracy tabloid, which are easily refuted by federal crime statistics. Great evidence. When there's a peer reviewed sociological journal that says something about it, we can have a discussion. Until then, enjoy that creepy paranoia in your freak brain.

Do you hear Yea Forums posts out loud? Because I didn't say anything out loud, man. That sounds like some kind of schizo disorder.

very interesting, tell me more about your thesis sherlock.
no problem, thank you very much for your fan letters.
well you’re free to prove that they’re misattributed, unrelated and conflict with federal crime statistics.
>Do you hear Yea Forums posts out loud?
i honestly didn’t until you said that, then i started reading your posts out loud in my head because it’s such a silly notion.

>you’re free to refute the studies

Yeah fags! Refute these 17 year old studies I didn't even know existed before today! Have my critical thoughts for me!

>sherlock.

You might be the most witless dolt I've ever met. You actually, literally, just called me "Sherlock." I'd rather catch my son sucking dick than growing up to call another man "Sherlock" as a diss.

Nah, I'm not into your little games. You're free to provide a peer reviewed sociological journal that verifies the original research in that article. Don't waste my time.

>You're free to provide a peer reviewed sociological journal that verifies the original research in that article
can i find that in 5 seconds with a google search?

If it exists, yes. Google provides tools for finding scholarly information. But I don't think it exists, so...

I can't wait until this sad fat old white Christian man goes to church and brags to people about calling a grown man "Sherlock" on the internet.

you’re the one claiming they’re false. i posted them as refutation to prove that these statistics do indeed exist, so it’s your turn to prove their illegitimacy.
>I'd rather catch my son sucking dick than growing up to call another man "Sherlock" as a diss.
yeah, because you’re gay, duh.
but that wasn’t the original refutation. in it was claimed that the statistic did not exist. i’m just proving it does. you’re free to back up the original statement by proving the illegitimacy of my statistics but until then it is true that these statistics exist.

Also, I should mention that the website you linked has pop-under ads, which suggests to me that it is really nothing more than clickbait, which explains the sensationalistic, misleading headline. Pic related, it's the pop-under ad that appeared.

Attached: ss (2019-03-25 at 10.58.24).jpg (956x617, 216K)

>i posted them as refutation to prove that these statistics do indeed exist, so it’s your turn to prove their illegitimacy.

That's exactly what a fat old white Christian would say

Yea Forums has pop under ads too, you know.

No, that fact still stands. No such statistic exists. Original research doesn't count because that data cannot be verified. That alone is grounds for dismissal.

Never seen one before.

Shouldn't you concern yourself with the legitimacy of the information before you purport it?

I'm talking about your religion btw, not the article.

Hence why no one links it as a factual fucking article.

I never even listened to this CSR album and I want all the wolf dicks in the world.

is it? thanks for the input, i’ll keep this writing style because it seems to reinforce your belief that i am some sort of oppressive white devil.
the statistic does exist. you haven’t provided a single legitimate reason that this statistic is unverifiable.
on devices without adblock and especially on the mobile site they appear whenever the gook that runs this site feels like adding them.
well the argument was never about how legitimate my information was, just the existence of it.

>oppressive white devil

Oh no, you're not oppressive or a devil. You are fat. You are old. You are white. You are Christian. You are male. Don't editorialize.

>well the argument was never about how legitimate my information was, just the existence of it.

You are beyond fat old white Christian male. You are starting to sound like a fat old white Christian woman.

>Nuh-uh! See? Someone wrote on a piece of paper once "gays r bad" so technically I am right!

Why are fat old white Christian men this embarrassing?

yes, and all of those are good things, thank you very much
>You are beyond fat old white Christian male. You are starting to sound like a fat old white Christian woman.
very interesting, explain to me where the boundary between male and female lies here. i thought gender was a spectrum?

It's original research. The very nature of that fact makes it unverifiable. They don't provide their data, so nobody else can analyze it. Not helping your case with the Asian racial slurs by the way.

>i thought gender was a spectrum?

Thinking isn't your strong suit.

>all of those are good things

What's good about being fat? Only a fat person would say that lol

Hey everyone, look at this fatty! What a fat, fat fatty, fat, fatty. Enjoy your diabetes and lack of self-respect, fatty.

perhaps if you dislike fishy statistics, you should have asked for a peer reviewed study, rather than just a statistic in general.
they do provide their data though. they cite multiple studies by a certain Steve Baldwin on top of multiple other sources regarding groups like NAMBLA or child trafficking rings in southeast asian countries. perhaps you should actually read the article and not simply dismiss it due to association.
well is it?
now that’s fatphobic isn’t it? body positivity and all.

>now that’s fatphobic isn’t it? body positivity and all.

Wow, you're getting awfully specific in the "body positivity" and "gender is a spectrum" shit, do you have someone in mind when you bring that up out of nowhere, Mrs. Fat Old White Christian?

well i’m essentially mocking you by associating you with stereotypical tumblrites. not much to it.

>multiple studies on the same topic, with identical conclusions... all by the same person
Again, this is original research. Unverifiable. The data set is not included. You've already lost here, you might as well go jerk off to your lolicon porn.

Perfect, verification of your hypocrisy. Which is funny, because you were trying to illustrate me as a hypocrite, Mrs. Fat Old White Christian.

not all by the same person. there’s a judith reisman mentioned as well. but of course the fact you weren’t aware of either of these names tells me you never actually read the article, you just dismissed it based off of the dubious site it was on.
hypocrisy how? explain.

If you guys listen to an album that ends with a track called "The Strong" it's me lol

>hypocrisy how? explain.

Getting pissy because it's too specific to call you a fat old white Christian woman, but then getting this specific about gender spectrums and fatphobia. You're a stupid fat old white Christian hypocrite.

Yeah, she works (or worked seeing as how this article is ridiculously old and she's probably worm food) for a conservative think tank, which basically funds think pieces without any peer review process. Nothing scientific about it. The article claims her blog post verifies the data. Of course, there is no peer review so again, the so-called statistics go unverified. Gosh, you'd think in the 17 years since that article was published, the data would be verified by future studies and you'd be able to find something more contemporary.

>you never actually read the article

You admitted you didn't read it and you're the idiot linking it.

Also, she actually works for WND, so there's a conflict of interest. Digging that hole deeper and deeper.

i was never pissy about it, i was just curious as what the reference was to. if anything i’m being conistent because i managed to state what kind of or specific person i was referencing.
i did read it. how else did i know the statistic was in there?
do you have any proof of employment to back this up? any funding or financial records to prove that these papers were funded by the site? and again, you haven’t even read the original study, how do you know that it wasn’t peer reviewed?
does she? link?

>specific person

"tumblrite" isn't a specific person you Christian

>how else did i know the statistic was in there?

It turned up as a Google result. You searched in Google for articles containing the statistic. What awful reasoning skills. You make all the fat old white men embarrassed and the Christians proud

it’s a kind of person yeah? i mentioned that in the same sentence right before “specific person” yeah?

Oh, one more thing. Judith Reisman believes in something called "erototoxins", which she claims are endogenous chemicals produced by the body when you view pornography, and she believes she knows what they are composed of. However, there is no physiological basis for this, and it's pure pseudoscience. She believes pornography is trying to subvert American family values by exploiting this supposed chemical release. Imagine being this psychotic. Oh wait, you are.

Huh, so the only way to get a thread past 10 posts on Yea Forums is infighting
Fuck this board

Attached: 01eaf8cae22033991d6afe8a3d02b42ca701a22d9586ccd94cc5d4ec7549baaa4e.png (215x232, 67K)

>it’s a kind of person yeah?

Yeah, that's why it's a kind of person and not a specific person, you dumb motherfucker.

How fucking dumb can you get?

lots of other unrelated stuff turned up in the search. as a matter of fact i didn’t even search up the statistic, i searched up a general term (pedophile homosexuals) and filtered through webpages from there.
does she? very curious for links to this.

yes, and thank god i mentioned both kinds of persons as well as specific persons in the same sentence when talking about what specific characteristics or opinions was in reference to. thanks for playing.

>lots of other unrelated stuff turned up in the search. as a matter of fact i didn’t even search up the statistic, i searched up a general term (pedophile homosexuals) and filtered through webpages from there.

Congratulations, they taught us how to do that over a decade ago when I was in public schools, and here you are bragging about it on Yea Forums. Oh 733t haxorz, this user GOD read articles and filtered through results :o

i bet he's 97% done downloading my dox :(

>specific persons

Who? Specify which specific person you specified.

thank you for praising my google search abilities, much appreciated.
>Specify which specific person you specified.
i didn’t specify specifc persons. i said that both specific persons and kinds of persons counted when specifying who a specific reference was made to. are you being disigenuous on purpose? you wouldn’t lie on the internet now would you?

>
Wow, it's almost like people with juvenile and mentally/psychologically stunted outlooks on life listen to music for underdeveloped teenagers or something.
You're describing psychology behind the birth of rock and roll and everything that has taken place musically outside of academic music since basically the 1960s

drjudithreisman.com/archives/The_Sex_Industrial_Complex.pdf
Imagine spending the time to write this much psychotic word salad. She's one of the real crazies. Endorsed "The Pink Swastika", which is a book about how gays supposedly started the Nazi Party in Germany and were responsible for the genocide.

>Who specifically?
>Anyone who uses this website used by millions
>That's not specific
>Yes, huh! It's so specific!

You are specifically the biggest faggot in the thread

>Endorsed "The Pink Swastika"

Lmao I haven't heard that in years. That awesome book about how Hitler and the Nazis were some gay cult. Funnier than anything George Carlin put out.

is cringier than furries

>Pornographers and “sexologists,” two powerful fringe groups historically hostile to Judeo Christian morals, values and laws, have joined forces with the monolithic drug industry which commands more lobbyists and a greater ‘persuasion’ budget than any other industry

whoo boy

well not really anyone, it was a reference to a stereotype, which of course applies to some people on that specific website but certainly not all of them.
very interesting, thanks for the link. i’m glad to let you know that citing one person’s study does not necessarily mean you align with all their beliefs, nor does their beliefs being ridiculous or silly discount their research automatically.

>it was a reference to a stereotype

the fat old white Christian man stereotype?

She also sued the Kinsey Institute for "defamation" and "emotional distress" in 1991, because she believed the Kinsey Institute tried to "censor" her book, "Kinsey, Sex and Fraud". Her case was dismissed.

>i’m glad to let you know that citing one person’s study does not necessarily mean you align with all their beliefs

Can you believe that this asswipe is gonna come away from this feeling like some misunderstood intellectual who graced us with his presence? What a dunce.

is that a stereotype?
yes yes, the woman has some crazy beliefs. certainly does not mean that the research is wrong. you haven’t actually addressed that yet.

who? oh? you’re still writing that autobiography in second person huh.

You still think that was clever, huh?

You don't think it follows that because she has such crazy beliefs about sex in general, that her views on LGBT people are also crazy?

not really, i just find it funny how you freak out over an elaborate way of saying “no u” when you’re well aware it’s just an elaborate way of saying “no u” and would probably ignore it if it was simply just “no u”.
not really. at the very worst case scenario the old saying of broken clocks being right twice a day always applies.

Oh yeah? Well, what you wrote about me? Yeah, that is actually an autobiography. Whoa ho ho, I'm not done there! You wrote it about me, so, were you writing that in... second person?

Oh man, when I repeat this in 45 minutes, you guys are gonna find it so funny

>i just find it funny

I find your reliance on "just," a word they teach schoolchildren not to rely upon, pathetic for a man who obviously finds much amusement in himself.

you see this? you’re so angry about a dumb joke that your impotent rage becomes the joke. thanks for proving me right.

>the old saying

You mean the fat old white Christian male saying.

This isn't anger. Autism can be regonized by the inability to properly determine the emotional reactions of others.

and now you’re freaking out over the usage of a word in the english language. you’re a very special little man. no wonder you managed to create some sort of boomer character through my posts.

bruh p sure he was mocking you, and you seem mad about it now not him

you’re still seething so hard, goddamn. you’re absolutely mindbroken by literally nothing. it’s impressive how a little time and some incorrect opinions can blow some peoples’ minds.

why would i be upset over someone writing like 10 posts losing his shit because i made a reddit joke lmao

>you’re freaking out

I'm vociferously mocking you but it's a leisurely exertion. I don't need to wrack my brain to come up dry and resort to "Sherlock," I can derive pleasure from belittling your intelligence.

This is fun, not angering. If I was mad, I could close the tab and move on lol, sad old man doesn't understand technology. Close the tab and it's gone.

look at him go, still chugging along about being called a middle school insult. this, this is entertainment.

Imagine being so thoroughly mocked and ridiculed you have to resort to "u mad" memes to try to save face.

It's fun mocking you, I'm enjoying this experience lol, if I wasn't I could go away immediately.

I enjoy this because I get to hurt you. You enjoy this because you get attention. Not a single person on the planet has seconded anything you've said. Pretty sad, you fat old white Christian male.

it’s not even resorting, it’s more of not having anything better to say. you’ve gone ahead and said it all for me, going absolutely bonkers over some really lousy jokes and insults. you know i intentionally picked shitty humor because it clearly drives you up the wall yeah?

do you actually think any of your posts are vaguely offensive or insulting

It doesn't drive me up a wall, it's easy to mock and ridicule. You are really easy material for people who like to laugh at idiots, yes. Thank you for being so stupid, whether you find it genuine or not.

Yeah, they all come from a homosexual, so they're inherently offensive. You are really easy to point at and laugh at for being stupid. Thank you.

i dunno if you’re actually mad and using “haha i’m an intellectual mocking you” as some sort of cover for it or if you type in such an aggressive and forced writing style at all times that you eternally come off as butthurt but goddamn dude, the way you write in response to a fucking middle schooler sherock joke is just so funny. are you by any chance the nonwhite homosexual furry from earlier because that would just wrap this up in a nice bow tie for everyone.

>i dunno if you’re actually mad

I'm not. I'm actively enjoying mocking you. I am not superior, but you are clearly inferior.

i dunno mate, when i see a downie coming up to me and saying “you dum dum eat poo” i don’t really get offended. it’s more of pity, you know?

did anyone in this thread manage to actually list any furfag indie music

Attached: a0941477525_16.jpg (700x700, 133K)

that’s nice to hear and all but kindly answer the question. are you the nonwhite homosexual dogfucker?

>the way you write in response to a fucking middle schooler sherock joke is just so funny

tbf One of us should be funny here if you can't pull it off.

I guarantee this is just you and me here. No one else on Yea Forums could possibly give a shit. They all collapsed the thread 100+ posts ago and gave up on us.

It's hilarious because you still think you can try to be funny and someone will read it and find it funny, but it's just you and me and I will never, ever, not even in an ironic way, find anything you say funny because it's derivative unimaginative bullshit, SHERLOCK! Ha, I said something dumb on purpose, because I am just so damn smart. JUST.

I am homosexual, I am non-white, and I actually have fucked a dog. I'll admit it, and yet, you are still too ashamed to admit you're a fat old white Christian woman.

well i’m mostly here to entertain myself while i’m bored at work, so entertaining other people is mostly an afterthought.
thank you for putting the cherry on top of the kek cake.

>well i’m mostly here to entertain myself while i’m bored at work

No one cares, this isn't blog.

you’re right, it isn’t, so why are you going on about how funny you are and how unfunny i am?

Yo everyone, you might remember me as the embarrassing fat old white Christian male, I wanted to let you guys know, work is normal tonight. Alright, I will return tomorrow with another update.

Because I am funny and you are not and we should let everyone know in case they want to read something funny (me) or something cringy (you).

woah, now i’m male? i thought i was a woman! am i like a genderfluid or something?

You're unfunny in every gender.

you are funny but definitely not for the reasons you think you are. here’s a hint, people are laughing at, not with, you.
so am i genderfluid or?

okay im bored, it's all you fat old white Christian man because I'm gonna go have sex with my dog and then be happier than you.

have fun, don’t let the AIDS bug bite!

>what are condoms and PREP

weren’t you leaving?

No, I'm gay and staying up late lol

your STDs keeping you up?

>what are condoms and PREP
Boy, american sex ed is in a sad state, isn't it?

hmmmm? condoms aren’t going to help you get pozzed though.

>american sex ed in action

i’m unsure what this has to do with sex ed or americans but sure.

>american sex end in action

is sex end some new sort of sexual act?

oh god
>american sex ed in action
It's sad really

i honest to god have never heard of any sex act called sex end. please explain.

>this is the power of american education
Very sad if I'm being honest

yes, america bad. can you tell me what sex end is now?

Fuck furries, Fuck CSH, and Fuck music

Attached: 1552874843841.jpg (512x411, 135K)