Post terrible Pitchfork reviews

Post terrible Pitchfork reviews

Attached: AAAAAAAAAH.png (1012x366, 67K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pitchfork.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Attached: topographic.png (448x310, 190K)

that's actually accurate tho fuck Tool

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Why Pitchfork hates prog?

cause gay

Most critics dislike prog, metal and other technical genres, because from the standpoint of someone who's listened to shitloads of albums of different genres, expanding a decades-old genre instead of making something radically new is wankery. This has some truth to it, but isn't entirely true, of course.

yikes what a dumb post

Attached: 4B8DE2CD-41F7-4D94-B696-39E7C5A34747.jpg (750x1143, 388K)

last time I checked henry cow had good scores on there though... oh what, you mean like tool and devin townsend? because that's as much prog as shitting into a blowing fan lmao

That's one of the best reviews they've ever posted.

One of the few times I agree with them.

More like No lol

>Pitchfork is one person
>Tool and Mars Volta represent all of prog

>Pitchfork is one person
But it's one entity. What one person says on behalf of the site can and should be held against the whole entity.

Pitchfork? More like bitchfork

Attached: 40CC42CE-ADB7-4906-900E-4AD315E2C08B.jpg (4032x3024, 1.64M)

They made the right call here.

>only avant shit is prog
Retard

this one is pretty bad pitchfork.com

pretty much whenever they give some shit rapper a 7+ because muh diversity

>Giving a 1.0 pile of dogshit an 8.7

Attached: NMHPitchforkOriginalReview.png (708x1193, 381K)