Having studied all of the evidence, having objectively given due consideration to both sides of the argument, I have concluded that Michael Jackson is innocent of all the accusations made against him.
Were his relationships with children inappropriate? No doubt. Was the man a depraved molester? Absolutely not.
Consider my verdict final. The case is now closed as far as I am concerned. Do not taint the reputation of this unmatched genius any further.
That is all.
Couldn't one of the children accurately describe his penis?
He raped kids. I don't care about the courts, OJ got off when he clearly did it too.
He slept with kids, locked the door and had alarms for when parents showed up.
Fuck off with defending him, you're a complete retard if you haven't known he's a pedo for the past decades
No, they described it wrong.
They claimed he was circumcised but he wasn't
The man was acquitted of all charges. The 2 accusers, under vigorous cross examination, defended him to the hilt. It was only after financial disputes with the Jackson family that these "repressed memories" materialised and then they suddenly remembered they abused countless times.
If you cannot see the financial motivations, you are blind. I watch the body language of those 2 accusers very closely. They are shady as fuck, both of them clearly gay and narcissistic.
>clearly gay and narcissistic
this why you don't ask spergs on Yea Forums about substantive issues
world class piece of shit
MJ defenders:
>court documents
>contradictory testimonies
>evidence presented to courts
>logic
MJ accusers
>he looks weird
>he likes kids while being male
>this legal book is strange
>internet myths
>old MJ jokes from 2005
>b-but the news wouldn't lie to me
that just says it all
t. pederast
>mj is guilty because this documentary told me he is.
he was a known toddler toucher long before the documentary
sorry you do have to add "compelling multiple corroborating testimony from victims" to the accusers category
your garden variety rich weirdo doesn't have decades of dozens of accusations, many settled out of court with financial compensation aka hush money. certainly not when they've admitted to literally sleeping with children as a course of habit
acquitted, dismissed, settled. but definitely not imagined and not questionable. shit stinks like prepubescent boipucci if you ask me.
Yes you forgot to mention that these two corroborating stories happened after the two "victims" met each other with their lawyers of the same law firm despite claiming they had never met until recently to share their pain. Lol
>Mj haters destroyed by facts and logic once again
this isn't all about the documennary user. it's been hushed up for 30 years.
Joe Rogan said he was chemically castrated before performing a short rendition of "Human Nature" in a womanly voice.
Is it true that Jacko was castrated as a child? If so, this would render him an asexual eunuch with no interest in sex with men, women or children.
The porn found at his ranch disproves that
Wacko Jacko was also arrested under warrant and was thoroughly searched and examined and the reports indicate that he had not only a penis (personally a shock to me) but also testicles. they also examined and photographed his anus.
the reason they do this (which btw they did last year with the now doomed cardinal george pell) is so if/when victims describe the sex organs of their predators details can be confirmed or dismissed.
anyway, apparently the rock spider had tiny white nuts
oh and he isn't a chemical castrati, that shit's gay frog retarded
>hey kid say this
>ok
man the left really needs a win right now...
>he was a known toddler toucher
according to...
oh come on user. even if he didn't fuck kids you 100% know he wanted to and probably tried
No, Joe Rogan is mentally retarded. Jackson had a baritone natural voice, you can measure it yourself in hz (unless they gave him testosterone again after castrating him, which would be pointless)
too bad no one has actual proof, it would settle this whole thing. until then, we just have to go with the facts.
One of them drew the patterns of vitiligo on the underside of Jacksons dick that correctly matched, but he also said Jackson was circumcised when he actually wasn't. So yes and no. The kid might've been confused about exactly what circumcision looked like or it was hard to tell with his erect dick. Who knows? So it's a yes and no. There's also pic related
>Consider my verdict final
MJ defenders:
>Centrist or right leaning
MJ accusers
>liberal or left leaning
This cultural war shit is getting tiring
the majority of people
Kiddie sex perpetrators/apoligists:
>Centrist or right leaning
Kiddie sex accusers:
>liberal or left leaning
ftfy
>There's also pic related
literally proven to be fabricated by the prosecution. that magazine was not released until after the boy and his family had left neverland.
youtube.com
Then you stop worshiping pop culture icons and then there will be nothing they can hurt you with. It's only gonna get scarier.
I wouldn't state it as a rule, user.
daily reminder this is what MJ gets for naming the jew. Anyone who gives the jew media trouble will be slandered and have their legacy ruined for decades after their death.
Who cares those kids probably had the time of their lives
kinda funny how people who don't instantly "believe victims" used to be labeled as woman haters, when right now they don't believe men accusing Michael Jackson either. huh, it's almost like they really do actually just want proof
What's the angle of digging up dirt on a man who's not alive to defend himself? That's the part that makes little sense to me to the point that I'm kind of annoyed.
MJ defenders:
>have to rationalize why a mid twenties to late thirties man would be sleeping in the same bed as specific prepubescent boys with very specific looks he favored over and over again while lavishing gifts, broken promises and attention on each every time while also cutting another one off
>have to explain away why the police found a photo of a naked blond boy and two books by pederasts in his closet in 1993
>have to explain why the police found underwear with semen of three different males at neverland in 2003
>have to explain why he had 4587854674 alarms and traps in and around his bedroom and hallways leading to any bed
>have to rationalize why four men who were specifically his special friends at each time period are accusing him of doing this (five if you count the british guy who claims michael masturbated to on the phone)
>/pol/fags obsessively defending a black man accused of molesting white boys for some reason
None of this means Michael molested anyone but it's definitely weird
>have to rationalize why a mid twenties to late thirties man would be sleeping in the same bed as specific prepubescent boys with very specific looks he favored over and over again while lavishing gifts, broken promises and attention on each every time while also cutting another one off
Realizing the blindingly obvious fact that Michael Jackson was a really weird, developmentally arrested person who didn't make normal decisions = "rationalization"? retard
Yeah he was just a based autist who wanted a harem of pretty little whiteboys to take to bed with him
MJ innocent AF
But the naming of the jew didn't happen until 3 years after the first child abuse scandal...
The kid was fed the information and asked time and time again until he gave the right answer
OP btfo
yeah michael surrounded himself with a rabbi for years. he did supposedly turn against them by the time he recruited the nation of islam or whatever though
Money and notoriety
relevant
youtu.be
Does ANYBODY have a link to the fucking doc? I can’t find it anywhere
The new documentary you can see just how uncomfortable they are speaking about Jackson, and how at some times they fear admitting how much they liked/still like him. A lot of children who been sexually abused by people they love/trust hold onto to these feelings. Sadly also why a lot of rape victims later on get sexually aroused by their rapists/thoughts about the rape. It’s so raw at times that it made me absolutely sick. Those boys were definitely sexually abused.
Make an HBOnow account and cancel it before the 15 day trial ends.
If Michael was innocent, then why did he settle and pay $25M for the kid's family?
The man was an absolute ghoul.
I don't know how the mere sight of him wouldn't be enough to set alarm bells off.
Everything about him screams "depraved child rapist."
Imagine leaving your child with this for a week.
Maybe the parents knew and were getting paid off from the start? Would explain why some fathers later offed themselves.
His insurance adjuster Jew pressured him to approve a settlement. The money was paid by his insurance company, not by Michael.
science20.com
At the very least MJ had a sexual fascination with the idea of being a young boy, so no his interest in children probably wasn't "pure".
You're dodging the question. If Michael was innocent, then why did his "insurance company" pay $25M settlement to the kid's family.
he was a saint sheltering kids from the horrors of "real life"
Honestly it's fucking amazing we're still debating this. If you can't recognize the guy was a villainous creep, you aren't open-minded, you aren't being fair and balanced, you're just a dimwit with no intuition and no perception of danger. You're a naive and confused dumb-ass and GOD I hope you don't have children.
>The 2 accusers, under vigorous cross examination, defended him to the hilt
It's almost like a couple of 22 year old guys might not want it out there that they did gay shit with some old pervert
Would you put millions more on the line, wagering that a jury full of retarded southern Californians would come to a truthful conclusion about anything?
cocksuckers
enjoy dat mmmmoney
nonce
Yes his relationships with children were fucking weird and so what if he didn’t have a proper childhood, neither do many children he should have just accepted that but I don’t believe he molested any kids.