I'll be honest I'm no classical aficionado but I've been listening to these two a lot recently
Which do u prefer and why?
Satie vs Debussy
Cameron Thompson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Asher Sanchez
Satie because maximum comfy
Gabriel Davis
more like Shitie and Depussy
Elijah Russell
for me is neither, I dont like slow pace "classical".
Kayden Davis
:'(
Brayden Gonzalez
Debussy because Satie wrote music for babies.
youtube.com
Jaxson Ortiz
you don't do "vs" just like that with these guys
without Satie there wouldn't be Debussy
Gabriel Rogers
>that part at 7:28
Yo, that's Ravel's Scarbo -- who ripped of who?
Owen Long
i wonder how many people on this board pronounce them
SAT-tee
DEH-buhs-sy
Andrew Scott
say tie
dee bus sigh
Leo Wood
whos this absolute unit
Jace Bennett
sa tea aye
deb you see
Leo Bennett
Debussy because at least he has those piano chops. But they are both retarded noodlers at the end of the day. I'll take Faure, D'indy, Lalo, Ravel, Francaix over either of them any day of the week.
Nolan Wright
Satie is the most overrated hack ever
Lucas Robinson
>Faure
GOAT
Did D'indy, Lalo, and Francaix even really compose for solo piano?
Jeremiah Cook
>I dont like slow pace "classical"
Listen to nightcore versions. Or listen to MIDI versions and increase the tempo.
Blake Rogers
>retarded
speaking of their intellect, they make Faure, D'indy, Lalo, Ravel or Francaix look like insects
You just like nice musicians, there's nothing to be ashamed of. It doesn't make them particularly intellectual.
Nathaniel Cooper
i know I've tried to get into it but it's just not my for me, I like more energetic music, prokofiev , mussorgsky etc...
Jace Myers
Those composers I listed had better structure and development in their music. Debussy just fucks off and does whatever he feels like (he even says this, its a famous quote). Satie is basically that guy in the /prod/ thread talking about how he's just innately gifted because he can string random chords of uncertain slightly dissonant character together.
Brody Adams
But Ravel literally ripped off Debussy.
Robert Jackson
That's okay. Its not like Scarbo is his most interesting piece anyway. In fact I much pressure Le Gibet myself. But Ravel develops his themes and that's something Debussy does in only a few of his works.
Christopher Johnson
>better structure and development
>impressionism
Oy vey.
>Satie is basically that guy in the /prod/ thread talking about how he's just innately gifted because he can string random chords of uncertain slightly dissonant character together.
Basically speaking, every basic analogy here is basically false and uninformed.
Easton Young
I'm not saying that's what Satie does (sometimes tho) but we all know that guy.
Joshua Barnes
I pronounce Debussy as Day-boo-see
Chase Hall
>implying classical can't be slow
you probably don't even like Tchaik 6 or every second movement to every concerto
I mean, Debussy also wrote for babies (Rêverie, Claire de Lune, etc)
/'sɑti/
/dɛ'bysi/
>classical nightcore
I never knew I needed this before
Nolan Perez
>I mean, Debussy also wrote for babies
He did, but he also wrote the Images and Estampes which aren't for babies.
Jayden Gonzalez
it's not just Debussy though, Satie also has a few masterpieces under his belt like Je Te Veux, and... ummm...
oh wow I can only think of one good thing he wrote. never mind, carry on
Brandon White
This is like comparing Yanni with Raul di Blasio
Robert Cooper
>>implying classical can't be slow
>you probably don't even like Tchaik 6 or every second movement to every concerto
what I meant was that some people only consider "classical" as a specific period not the whole genre that's why I put the ""