/Classical/

Confession edition. Confess your worst /classical/ related sin.

>General Folder #1. Renaissance up to 20th century/modern classical. Also contains a folder of live recordings/recitals by some outstanding performers.
mega.co.nz/#F!mMYGhBgY!Ee_a6DJvLJRGej-9GBqi0A
>General Folder #2
Dead, rip papillons
>General Folder #3. Mostly 20th century/modern with other assorted bits and pieces
mega.co.nz/#F!Y8pXlJ7L!RzSeyGemu6QdvYzlfKs67w
>General Folder #4. Renaissance up to early/mid-20th century. Also contains a folder of Scarlatti sonate and another live recording/recital folder.
mega.co.nz/#F!kMpkFSzL!diCUavpSn9B-pr-MfKnKdA
>General Folder #5. Renaissance up to late 19th century
mega.co.nz/#F!ekBFiCLD!spgz8Ij5G0SRH2JjXpnjLg
>General Folder #6. Very eclectic mix
mega.co.nz/#F!O8pj1ZiL!mAfQOneAAMlDlrgkqvzfEg
>General Folder #8. Deutsche Grammophon stuff. Also there's some other stuff in here.
mega.nz/#F!DlRSjQaS!SzxR-CUyK4AYPknI1LYgdg
>Renaissance Folder #1. Mass settings
mega.co.nz/#F!ygImCRjS!1C9L77tCcZGQRF6UVXa-dA
>Renaissance Folder #2. Motets and madrigals (plus Leiden choirbooks)
mega.co.nz/#F!il5yBShJ!WPT0v8GwCAFdOaTYOLDA1g
>Debussy.
mega.co.nz/#F!DdJWUBBK!BeGdGaiAqdLy9SBZjCHjCw
>Opera Folder. Contains recorded video productions of about 10 well-known operas, with a bias towards late Romantic
mega.co.nz/#F!4EVlnJrB!PRjPFC0vB2UT1vrBHAlHlw
>Random assortment of books on music theory and composition, music history etc.
mega.nz/#F!HsAVXT5C!AoFKwCXr4PJnrNg5KzDJjw
>Jewish composers.
into the oven it goes
>Random assortment of books on music theory and composition, music history etc.
mega.nz/#F!HsAVXT5C!AoFKwCXr4PJnrNg5KzDJjw

Attached: 250px-Komitas_1902.jpg (250x294, 13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YdEhRYgxGRI
youtube.com/watch?v=OVBTUGvrRac
youtube.com/watch?v=jpT-k8qS5mw
youtube.com/watch?v=FtwrONu74PE
youtube.com/watch?v=wfqaVdVP9Fc
youtube.com/watch?v=F3q_HJN51uo
youtube.com/watch?v=rkhOgVWVVOw
youtube.com/watch?v=F1MvltMUmgM
youtube.com/watch?v=yxdYq-mlIk0
youtube.com/watch?v=EetslKqKm8A
youtube.com/watch?v=VNben8-KP5g
youtube.com/watch?v=DkiOVrA0L5U
youtube.com/watch?v=x-zVu1h8Ygg
youtube.com/watch?v=yoDYjBbzPCU
youtube.com/watch?v=1iefk8c8KWU
youtube.com/watch?v=exqlh5EYfQM
youtu.be/bC5rWZR5iZ4
youtube.com/watch?v=enPSZoOQI8w
youtube.com/watch?v=eaemzSc6dfw
youtu.be/ZF3p4pGd838
youtube.com/watch?v=nifUBDgPhl4
youtube.com/watch?v=YV-a_ixphQs
youtube.com/watch?v=mgLkT-LiemM
youtube.com/watch?v=uEceWMXRF9U
strawpoll.me/17493637
youtube.com/watch?v=08i-mbRdpHk
youtube.com/watch?v=BfOdWSiyWoc
youtube.com/watch?v=yoOqv9-zWzE
youtube.com/watch?v=LjgndGuy77o
youtube.com/watch?v=-hSoVLQ3SBc
youtu.be/wjD03GLuugk
youtube.com/watch?v=JJBUai5kvkU
youtu.be/lbe0NY1Q2Cg
youtube.com/watch?v=xe494ejokQ0
youtube.com/watch?v=B0Q7v8SWaV0&t=378s
youtube.com/watch?v=exMaWKVcCEs
youtube.com/watch?v=25Oo2rx8oX8
youtube.com/watch?v=YG-JnoIHUSA
youtube.com/watch?v=xkpRW6huHIY
youtu.be/MN2QaOcFS-w
youtu.be/t7xROpDzUMk
youtu.be/mV6rImP0LB8
youtu.be/krthNq7GhRE
youtube.com/watch?v=Pv-qGWv7Eio
youtube.com/watch?v=tXqJLhGOgNo
youtube.com/watch?v=7zvyIv7uwyE
youtube.com/watch?v=qulOpRB0O_c
youtube.com/watch?v=JO4UmbcBprw&t=5m20s
youtube.com/watch?v=XJq3jItducg
youtube.com/watch?v=r6V7fUDynG4
youtube.com/watch?v=uxMOKtRJdQI
youtube.com/watch?v=sOGUMOp5HFQ
youtube.com/watch?v=vI91d16FbRE&t=63
youtube.com/watch?v=lqOpIvljFRw
youtu.be/2GBwgNB0XVU
youtube.com/watch?v=EUyKTN6tyLM
youtu.be/xkrydS0MK28
youtube.com/watch?v=G9Uc3lPfuEY
youtube.com/watch?v=AkysYnjHePE
youtu.be/sK4dz6Gbcdk
youtube.com/watch?v=FQK3N3dED0w
youtube.com/watch?v=0wGj3URCZlQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Prev

Let me get the ball rolling.

I am HillDueceua

I can count on one hand the Beethoven sonatas I enjoy.
I prefer several of Beethoven symphonies in Liszt's transcriptions.
I think Chopin's orchestration in his first piano concerto is excellent.
I think Beethoven's Ninth Symphony is highly overrated, or at least lack of cohesion in the first two movements seems to be overlooked.
I struggle with counterpoint beyond two voices.

>I struggle with counterpoint beyond two voices.

You mean writing or listening? I'm pretty sure most of the general doesn't even write music, so this is hardly a confession. Inventions are a perfectly noble category of academic music.

What's some stuff like Sibelius? Specifically his fifth symphony. No bully pls.

Listening. This is especially problematic in fugues, where, however much I enjoy the music, I feel like I'm able to understand only the most prominent melodies that are perceivable in chaos.

Its always particularly hard to hear the inner voices. There really isn't much to be done other than reading the score.

Why would we bully you fren?

youtube.com/watch?v=YdEhRYgxGRI

Attached: 1550805849602.png (614x614, 31K)

modally augmented Chopin

youtube.com/watch?v=OVBTUGvrRac

I can't stand Wagner and am baffled by his strong appeal his music has had with various great composers and people general. It should take only a few minutes to realize his music is ear-piercingly bad, and that his stories are silly, yet both elements seem to have the opposite impression on some people.

Oh, well that's good to know, I suppose.

You're certainly not alone there. I think he's mostly regarded as a great innovator because of his ability to suspend tonality without leaving the conventions of his day completely in bedlam.

Attached: composer-insults-rossini-1381921439-view-0.jpg (940x620, 78K)

whoops, thought that was the Wagner quote.

If I ever have children, I intend to at least make the attempt to vicariously live my musical fantasies through them.

But I would very much encourage you to read the score.

I masturbated to Kiri te Kanawa

Attached: maxresdefault (32).jpg (1280x720, 42K)

I don't see the appeal of Berlioz either, lol. At least Wagner has some undeniable "hits." For Berlioz, I've never heard a single notable bar of his music.
For a mere connoisseur, is it worth learning to "read" music just to appreciate it more?

Berlioz's Romeo and Juliet is pretty good.

youtube.com/watch?v=jpT-k8qS5mw

Not a commie, but I suspect capitalism is ultimately at fault for the lack of great composers writing in the Classical tradition. However, it's not like the socialists produced any great composers either, as their best composers grew up in countries prior to the socialist revolutions or regime changes.

Well, it sounds much worse, that's for sure.

I enjoy Mozart's sonatas much more consistently than I do Beethoven's.

I thought it sounded better :^), PA

it's because there is nothing new to write

that's just being plain ol' BASED


My confession is that I regard Mozart's Sonatas as his weakest works for keyboard.

I disagree, but as soon as I mention pieces that clearly are new and original, people will mock me for liking incidental music.

No. People are just lazy and don't want to put in the effort. They would rather make simple new-agey shit based on basic arpeggios than write actual music.

I've spent numerous hours trying to learn piano, in which I started with insanely difficult pieces, (etudes by Chopin, Liszt, and Alkan), or pieces that bored me so much, I couldn't keep going.

I should say, new and original and good, even if they are familiar or hardly avant-garde.

>write actual music

what do you mean by this

There was some asian dude who was jacked and played violin and piano and composed music and posted his shit here years ago -- does anyone remember him? I can't find anything in my bookmarks. He had some good stuff.

I usually don't even bother with chamber music, even for composers I adore, as I've tried so hard to appreciate it, but fail every time.

I think beethoven's piano concerto 5 is his best work

The difference between
youtube.com/watch?v=FtwrONu74PE
and
youtube.com/watch?v=wfqaVdVP9Fc
How does this make you feel:
youtube.com/watch?v=F3q_HJN51uo

>The difference between

can you put this into words? there are many differences

Why put it into words when the words are just a poor attempt of describing the actual differences that exist between the pieces that are clearly heard upon listening to them.
That's like looking at a sunset and asking someone to sketch what they see on a napkin with two crayons. You're going from the pure essence to some distilled abstraction.

The most obnoxious opinion in music is that Haydn was better than Mozart.

Literally true though.

youtube.com/watch?v=rkhOgVWVVOw

Saint-Saens best work was his Introduction and Rondo Capriccioso, with his Dance Macabre in a close second. The symphonies and concertos are 90% filler, and the Carnival of the Animals is decent, but silly.

>For a mere connoisseur, is it worth learning to "read" music just to appreciate it more?

Of course it is. What a dumb question. If there are people in this general who can't read music, I invite them to fuck off for a couple months until they can.

Nothing ruins a recording more than recording a keyboard piece with a pianoforte.

No, that's hardly expressed by anyone. The most annoying one is that Beethoven was better than Mozart; usually expressed with the idea that he innovated more (which is a total fallacy).

What's the best way to learn how?

I don't hold that opinion, but I can see how somebody could believe it. Beethoven and Mozart's music is extremely different, so it could be a matter of taste, with Haydn and Mozart, however, they are at least very similar composers, only in every respect Mozart is different, he is superior, and Haydn's greatest contributions where the invention of forms that Mozart perfected, which perhaps makes music more original and perhaps important, but not better. It would be like preferring Field's nocturnes to that of Chopin's, just because Field invented the form.

The most consistently enjoyable composer was Chopin, even if he evolved too little, (even considering his short life). Beethoven is frequently too obscure, there is too much uniformity in Mozart's works, and so much of Bach's vocal music is a tremendous bore.

Just wondering what Paragraphautist would think of Richard Ratner's great work, the piano quintet.

youtube.com/watch?v=F1MvltMUmgM

Attached: 26585.jpg (192x192, 7K)

My friend wrote this work. These are the rehearses.

youtube.com/watch?v=yxdYq-mlIk0

It goes without saying that it sounds terrible, but who would be the composer whose style resembles it the most? It sounds familiar, but I can't place my finger on it. I sort of want to be able to discuss it at some point with him, meaning saying everything I can about it except what I actually think, so remarks on it would be helpful.

Any other composers like Prokofiev? I like how his music has a very whimsical feeling
youtube.com/watch?v=EetslKqKm8A

Attached: 1445754485097.jpg (645x773, 57K)

Keyboard instruments prior the piano seem mostly obsolete to me, at least for solo keyboard works, and keyboardists would be better off trying to imitate the sounds of those instruments on pianos than play on instruments which have incomparably less music.

With the advances of audio recording and playback technology, going to concerns has become a waste of money. The only time where it's worth it is if you what you see is important, like a ballet or opera, or when you want to be able to watch a virtuoso, which means you have to sit very close and spent a lot on tickets.

Man, with friends like you who needs enemies? I mean its not the greatest, but is it really as bad as you say? I wouldn't say so, especially in light of the Nico Muhly's and Max Richter's of the world.

I would say the music could be favorably compared to that of Ned Rorem. Maybe that's who you're thinking of.

youtube.com/watch?v=VNben8-KP5g

I don't even have a reddit account, but occasionally visiting r/classicalmusic/ when links come up in Google searches shows again and again that there are far more people smarter and knowledgeable there about music than almost everyone this general.

This performance is not only that great, but I don't see why this needs to be on harpsichord.

I should also say that the organ is the obvious exception this dislike of non-piano keyboard instruments.

Here's an example of Rorem's music

youtube.com/watch?v=DkiOVrA0L5U

I like it : )
I think the piano's softer timbre that doesn't work as well for baroque styles in my opinion although it's probably just a matter of what you're used to.

Well, this music and anything resembling it could never appeal to me ever, so I'm just being honest, but I would never tell him my opinion. It's especially disappointing because we used to have very similar tastes in music, and his has changed very much, while mine have stayed almost entirely the same.

No, this isn't it. Thanks for the suggestion though. This music is much better. It's closer than some music I've listened to to try to find similar music, but there's something distinct about the melodies and the thin textures in my friend's piece. Maybe I've just imagined similar music, or maybe the textures only seem thin when the music is being rehearsed.

I would have thought so too, but then I heard Gould's interpretations of Bach, and I am convinced there is nothing baroque that cannot be interpreted better on the piano.

Brahm's solo piano music is straight-up mediocre.

most wrong opinion of the entire thread so far

For your consideration
youtube.com/watch?v=x-zVu1h8Ygg

youtube.com/watch?v=yoDYjBbzPCU

Great rec, thanks

I say no bully because I already know /classical/ dislikes some of my favorites like vaughan williams and handel so I can't be sure when announcing what I like.

confession: ive never listened to Mahler or Liszt

Any other stuff like Perotin?

Nikolai Medtner is one of the greatest composers of all time, and deserves to be mentioned in the very highest tier.

I tried starting piano with Debussy's Études and wanted to kill myself after I didn't get past the first 8 measures of etude 1 in a week at a moderate tempo

Any piano bros have any pieces or études they'd recommend working on? Shite pianist but I have a good grasp on theory, looking to better my coordination and get more comfortable on the instrument (yes I know I will never be a virtuoso)

Holst, Mahler

Joseph Martin Kraus
youtube.com/watch?v=1iefk8c8KWU

Léonin

Walton gets compared to Sibelius. I'm not sure I hear it but I like both his symphonies.

youtube.com/watch?v=exqlh5EYfQM

i still tune to a=440Hz when playing pre 1750's music

j

Your opinion is straight-up mediocre.

>They would rather make simple new-agey shit based on basic arpeggios
You have no idea what classical musicians have been doing for the past 50 years, do you?

based and redpilled

Prove it. And name his best pieces and recordings of said pieces and I will check them all out.

>there are people on /classical/ right now who listen to Baroque music in an instrument with pedal sustain

>there are people on /classical/ right now

>Paragraphautist can't even read Music
Imagine my shock
And this is the person who gives you lectures about classical music

>It's especially disappointing because we used to have very similar tastes in music, and his has changed very much, while mine have stayed almost entirely the same.

Guess you have some growing up to do.

These are all very contrarian opinions, congratulations. Except for the last one, that one is because of your receptive channels; polyphony is a bitch and you can't hear melodic development and harmony at the same time so basically you don't know what the fuck you're listening to.

It should be well known to /classical/ users by now that paragraphautist is a fucking idiot. He's on the left hand side of the Dunning-Kruger graph - full of confidence, but with minimal knowledge on the subject. If he would learn more, he would realise that he doesn't actually know what he's talking about. But that's like expecting a fish to climb a tree.

Pianocucks will never understand

Of course this """"" person""""""" who can't even analyze a score would prefer being pianocuck
And now one of my many favs recordings in harpsi of the WTC played by Hans Pischner
Very controversial tempo and technique(HIP scholars were not that advanced yet in 60s so he goes on his way) very unique may i say the Glen Ghoul of the Harpsichord
youtu.be/bC5rWZR5iZ4

This is on rutracker
But his goldberg variations can be pretty hard to find

Attached: 1550539789910.png (600x600, 500K)

Concert virgin detected. The sound and dynamics are much better live in the concert hall than on your $1000 snake oil audio system. Also the seats in the front suck, the sound is better when you are seated in the back.

Just writing what I enjoy user. Sorry if the word 'fugue' gets you in a confrontational mood. I've wanted to write them since I was 14 when I tried to transcribe Bach's art of fugue by ear (nowadays I can just look at the score thanks to sites like imslp.org). Learned how to do them properly a few years back and have been writing them ever since. Can't seem to stop.

Attached: grand fugue.png (427x576, 310K)

>Glen Ghoul

Attached: IMG_20190205_223354.jpg (460x750, 155K)

what he mean by this

hes arguing that live performance is superior to listening via recording
im with him on this one

Why do you faggots keep on bashing Mahler again?
I really liked his 6th symphony.

people just dont have the attention span for an hour of funeral marches and death for 10 mins of some of the most incredible glory in all of the symphonic literature at the end.
obviously theres other shit to appreciate too

Most of us like Mahler
He is just very memeable Cuck memes, firetruck memes and Mahlerfags sometimes are very reddit and delusional saying things like he is a good contrapuntialist

He had one of the best orchestration games in history tho

But i think i prefer Bruckner i'm not sure lately

Attached: 1550831066686.jpg (888x894, 68K)

>negative opinions of a jew in a Yea Forums board, who could be behind it?!
Do the math

Mahler is great. Superb orchestrator and symphonist.

Bach

youtube.com/watch?v=enPSZoOQI8w

Well /classical/?

Listening to Scarlatti right now
Holy shit at this nigga using tone clusters like is the 20th century

Also please kys if you listen to Scarlatti in the piano

Attached: 1550887194338.png (3000x3000, 620K)

Here's your answer

Most of us like him. The haters just don't have the attention span or brain capacity to sit through 100 minutes of symbolism and jumping between the transcendental and traditional banal children's folk songs.

>Holy shit at this nigga using tone clusters like is the 20th century
Post this NOW

Attached: 1546695825609.png (2000x2000, 1.21M)

I... what
youtube.com/watch?v=eaemzSc6dfw

Attached: Ligeti.jpg (612x448, 164K)

i was just looking at pic related, and just realised i could be NEET as fuck as a preist, but able to sustain a life whilst doing serious musicology for church business.
am i delusional or is this the life

youtu.be/ZF3p4pGd838

I didn't find the recording of scott ross but this hobo looking faggot plays it even more violently

Also show me your powerlevel
Name your fav Harpsichordist

In the fall of 2016 I was listening to one of Mozart's serenades for winds every day. Then to my surprise I saw there was going to be a concert at the local music college where they would play that exact piece, and so I went. I was disappointed and actually liked the mp3 on my cheap smartphone with cheap earphones better. But I've been to a handful of concerts there and in general yeah the sound is better live. I think it was that particular venue they played in that time that had bad acoustics. It was one of their concert venues but it's probably not a very good one.

no one takes those vows seriously, so i think you're good user

>Name your fav Harpsichordist
I only know one so it's got to be him, Ton Koopman. If anything his body language is funny to watch. He was also the conductor of a performance of Haydn's drumroll symphony that used to be on youtube but was taken down, which was the performance that converted me from at the time mostly enjoying baroque and not so much classical era, to getting the classical era music and preferring it. Also, off topic, a bit disappointing that Bach would write a piece on such a mundane subject as coffee.
youtube.com/watch?v=nifUBDgPhl4

Why? If I resented him for it, that would be one thing, but it's something I just lament. I don't see how I could handle it any more maturely.

t.

Attached: classy.png (446x447, 86K)

If I had less confidence in the ability to defend my opinions, I wouldn't share that, but I have become so convinced that people here are so utterly incapable of making cogent argument that I am perfectly willing to express that deficiency on part. If it would give people here enough confidence to actually try to give argument, I would welcome it.
>He's on the left hand side of the Dunning-Kruger graph - full of confidence, but with minimal knowledge on the subject.
This is Marxist levels of robotic parroting.

I only wish I heard in Medtner what his warmest admirers do or did, (including Rachmaninoff, Tovey, and Hamelin).

I don't care for Medtner, but I would dare to call it music, unlike the second thing you posted, so based.

lol, how the fuck did you happen upon this?

youtube.com/watch?v=YV-a_ixphQs

Yes I do Clap between Movements!!
Is there a problem with that??

Attached: 1550016463029.jpg (722x666, 43K)

>Make a standing ovation and call for an encore right after the cadenza

Who /chaoticevil/ here?

Attached: kuk.jpg (209x241, 13K)

Nobody does that

I do

Attached: Eldritch.jpg (233x217, 11K)

No you don't

depends who you ask

how the fuck do you know?

youtube.com/watch?v=mgLkT-LiemM

>Puccini
Ew

Wagner

youtube.com/watch?v=uEceWMXRF9U

confession: I have no clue about classical music.

I just like to listen to it

arvo pärt is my man btw, even though you could not call him a classic

strawpoll.me/17493637

New poll

Attached: 1550852836190.jpg (300x294, 73K)

Just came in here to say Borodin is the GOAT

Considering he was able to become as distinguished as a full-time composer while working as a doctor and chemist, I'm finna have to agree with you, family.

Yay first vote! I voted after what I listen to actively. If you include music that's playing in the gym, at work etc. then it's way lower than the 99% I voted. Also, on the rare occasions I'm with a woman I listen mostly to crap music (i.e. nonclassical) because that's what they like.

Is there any way to pirate from Jstor? I keep seeing articles that look like they would be interesting but, really, what kind of cuck pays for academic papers?

Attached: 1487134407455.jpg (335x268, 25K)

Schubert

youtube.com/watch?v=08i-mbRdpHk

Listening Ligeti's violin concerto meanwhile masturbating

>almost

feel free to fuck off to that place then, Hans.

It really amazes me how you see people who are christian or muslim and then they like the most degenerate music. Like one woman who goes to church, her friend started playing latin dance music, and I could see the first woman seemed to think it was good, but to me it was degenerate garbage. Then another woman who also goes to church also liked degenerate garbage music. I think they lack the sensitivity to appreciate classical and also the sensitivity to perceive how degenerate their music is.

>unironically using the term "degenerate" to define music
You have to go back to

are you saying there is no such thing as degenerate music?

Yes

lol ok

Okay, define to me what is "degenerate music". I expect something more than just
>le jewish boogeyman XD
meme

Bet that guy who voted "

It needs no definition. If you have the innate sensitivity you'll just know when you hear it.
this is degenerate:
youtube.com/watch?v=BfOdWSiyWoc
youtube.com/watch?v=yoOqv9-zWzE
this is not:
youtube.com/watch?v=LjgndGuy77o
youtube.com/watch?v=YV-a_ixphQs

>muh feels

So basically you consider non-classical music degenereate.Right?

yes

Beethoven is in my top three alongside Schubert, I also enjoy Wagner's operas.
I haven't listened to anything past Stravinsky who I only absentmindedly lent an ear to.
I enjoy listening to old french folk songs and think they are on par to classical music.

Why single out Can't Stop of all things?

that mozart link is degenerate because it is not written in the baroque style and contains little, if any, counterpoint

heard a rhcp song at work and thought about how degenerate it was, not sure if it was that one

>Marxist levels of robotic parroting
muh marxism is not an argument. Shut the fuck up, Hans. You better stay away from politics because you're exactly the type of retard to go balls deep into it and misunderstand everything.

Oh and I can't read music either

>confession: I have no clue about classical music.
Don't worry, most people ITT don't. Especially the paragraph autist.

Petzold

youtube.com/watch?v=-hSoVLQ3SBc

>If you have the innate sensitivity you'll just know when you hear it.
HAHA holy shit we got another muh feels Pfitzner over here. Get the fuck out of here, /pol/tard.

Attached: [prepares long paragraph containing no coherent thoughts].jpg (661x760, 71K)

Pfitzold

Petzner

A cute harp player is introducing me to obscure works from my country

Herminio Giménez
youtu.be/wjD03GLuugk

at 3:59 the madman dropped the Beat HARD

Attached: 1545587043544.png (500x508, 61K)

what's the matter with that frog why does he look so rugged and sickly

actually libtards like you need to get the fuck out of here

reals > feels, /pol/tard. Nice (and wrong) assumption as well by the way.

Based as fuck

Embarassing

>libtards
this isn't funny anymore

better watch out, he'll call you le basedboy

That frog Is old and full of acknowledge
I used it when i'm going to post something insightful and not just shitpost

Attached: 1546663194015.png (1000x928, 165K)

I really doubt that was Hans. Hans was the guy who voted that "

Hans was totally about that muh feels crap. Let me redirect you to these old shitposts

Interesting.

Attached: 1548917990928.jpg (250x240, 13K)

This is poppy trash. You should be ashamed

Okay but this meme isn't going to work if we just call all the posters we disagree with "Hans". That title must be reserved for the autist.

10 year old oboist, good but doesn't sound flawless to me
youtube.com/watch?v=JJBUai5kvkU
no but I will call you shitskin, woman or gay because clearly you are one of those

*priests being exploded with dynamite together with their ungodly churches reflect in glasses*

Attached: 5a820e79cdebf.image.jpg (485x600, 41K)

It is reserved for the autist but the /pol/tard "proving" his /pol/tard theory with "muh feels" is as pseudo- bullshitty as it gets and he definitely deserves to be called Hans for that alone.

That frog desperately needs some Iodine.

>no but I will call you shitskin, woman or gay because clearly you are one of those
Oh you little incel /pol/tards, you really all do speak the same

My cute friend likes it so is a masterpiece for me
Also the jungle rhythms makes me feel my origins

Beethoven was a libtard, Pfitzner was a faggot, therefore libtards are better.

>I think Chopin's orchestration in his first piano concerto is excellent.
I could see thinking Chopin's orchestration is serviceable, but why excellent?

Paragraphautist can't even read Music m8
How the fuck is he going to know about orchestration

Attached: 1549492754135.png (1200x1080, 1.02M)

It really isn't. You might as well post Offenbach, Sullivan or Johann Strauss instead of this crap.

Very true.

Attached: karen-Pendergrass-paleo-journey.png (1414x1332, 234K)

Are you a 20th pseud?
Here's a Serial piece that she introduced me

youtu.be/lbe0NY1Q2Cg

Attached: 1549495689828.jpg (249x57, 3K)

This is pretty good, doesn't sound very serial to be honest.

>tfw my gf said Boulez and Messiaen are "not bad" and "pretty cool guys"
She dislikes Schoenberg and Stockhausen though. I guess she hates the G*rm*ns.

Attached: 1539802785037.png (554x554, 24K)

tbf orchestration is a lot easier to hear than tonality. Its easy to tell if sections are being under-utilized or if a texture is poor. And its not really something you can get more information on by looking at the score. I suppose good orchestration involves understanding the ranges of the instruments and their capabilities but I doubt that anyone knows about these technical aspects unless they are a composer themselves.

Now this is music! Always love when 12 tone serialism is used to romantic effect.

Greetings, gentlemen. Have you listened to any of my ecstatic poemes this fine afternoon?

Attached: 1536006125989.jpg (736x551, 23K)

No, I'm on a purely Classical era binge, trying to uncover the underrated and overloooked composers from this era.

Schmidt

youtube.com/watch?v=xe494ejokQ0

Schoenberg is Austrian, baka. Don't know about Stockhausen, don't care, don't have the real-estate in my brain for that fag.

Very good, Sir. I have always been loyal to the classical era periodic structures and have religiously used them in all my works, even the ones without tonal centres. You have my respect.

Attached: 1529158372656.png (957x648, 422K)

Listening to prometheus right now
youtube.com/watch?v=B0Q7v8SWaV0&t=378s

I meant Germanic.

This pic makes him look like Pastor Anderson

Schmidt is based

>Piano Quintet

Guess I'm listening to this now.

Then you should look up Joseph Martin Kraus
youtube.com/watch?v=1iefk8c8KWU

nondegenerate
youtube.com/watch?v=exMaWKVcCEs

Imao since i became a pseud i can recognize other pseuds
I give a beautiful work with folk influences
And "'"'" no this is crap"""
But then a serial work
""""" now THIS is Music""""'"


>This is pretty good, doesn't sound very serial to be honest.
Thats the trick m8 dont make sound like shit and even girls will like it

I'm the one who found him. Stop taking credit for my hard work! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Attached: db4.jpg (495x362, 17K)

Forgot my gif

Attached: 1550923248687.gif (286x400, 1.96M)

If you post Stockhausen or Babbit, I wont say the same thing. Obviously folk music is going to be prettier but less sophisticated than dodecaphonic classical.

I tried for a while to love Medtner. It didn't work, but I probably do like his music more than Schumann and some other big names.

Whom else StraussCHAD here?

Attached: Johann_Strauss_Jr_Paris_1867.jpg (1519x2355, 198K)

Fuck off with your shitty waltzes

me

youtube.com/watch?v=25Oo2rx8oX8

Who are some conductors who are serviceable for everything? I don't really want to fuck around with recording autism.

Why aren't you watching the Inside Chamber Music series with Bruce Adolphe?

youtube.com/watch?v=YG-JnoIHUSA

Attached: e0a2eb-20150522-bruce-adolphe-and-polly-rhythm3.jpg (1000x685, 50K)

So much coughing

ALWAYS listen to Karl Richter for Bach pieces

youtube.com/watch?v=xkpRW6huHIY

>Jazz cucks don't realize we're going to turn on them once we get the rabble out

Attached: 1550967650974.jpg (450x300, 72K)

RUHT WOLL UND BRINGT AUCH MICH ZU RUH

Attached: 1507542508880.png (354x286, 28K)

/jazz/head here, im actually actively looking forward to this. i want to join the cult

BASED

I only post here but I like jazz as well. nothing wrong with it

HERR! HERR! HERR! HERR!
UNSER HEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEEEEEerrscher

Attached: 1533823853100.jpg (358x360, 21K)

Kyuhee park playing

Scarlatti
youtu.be/MN2QaOcFS-w

Tarrega (tremolo intensifies)
youtu.be/t7xROpDzUMk

Mangoré (tremolo intensifies)
youtu.be/mV6rImP0LB8
FUCK you gook whore

Attached: IMG_20181228_013833.jpg (492x485, 113K)

Fuck it this jap tv version is better for Tarrega
youtu.be/krthNq7GhRE

Bach

youtube.com/watch?v=Pv-qGWv7Eio

/jazz/ thread's up come thru

>see thumbnail of cool painting
>fail to realize this has nothing to do with the quality of the music

Why do I always fall for this?

Attached: 1550800719694.jpg (1200x1496, 82K)

Mesple dunks so hard on all other coloratura sopranos, shit's like she wanted to let them know they wasn't nothing
youtube.com/watch?v=tXqJLhGOgNo

Attached: 10.10.1975._Mady_Mesplé_chez_Pierre_Privat._(1975)_-_53Fi2754_(cropped).jpg (497x601, 71K)

more Bach

youtube.com/watch?v=7zvyIv7uwyE

I already posted something in it, bump and start memes if you want it alive

Attached: 1550635546563.jpg (10x10, 682)

Bach was fucking crazy. Not in the retarded way, like Gesualdo, but in a good way, like Hieronymus Bosch.

Liszt

youtube.com/watch?v=qulOpRB0O_c

It is difficult to describe what Bach was. Perhaps he was just that - Bach.

gesualdo was based as fuck

Are there any composers who could be called Surrealists?

Attached: 26-De-chirico-ettore-e-andromaca-90x70.jpg (462x600, 45K)

I fucking hate opera
Wagner sucks
Verdi sucks
Rossini sucks
Puccini sucks
Strauss is ok

BASED but with the Caveat that it must be R.Strauss.

Can we create a Bach cult to save this board by posting his music everywhere?

No, I'd say if the goal is to convert people to classical then we should be selling the sheer variety within the umbrella of classical music. There's something for everyone. Well except maybe the """"""((((people))))"""""" who listen to these... things.

Attached: meme_rappers.jpg (1100x618, 77K)

It's not even his best piano concerto, that goes to the fourth. It's awkwardly constructed for a Beethoven work youtube.com/watch?v=JO4UmbcBprw&t=5m20s is painful every time I hear it.

Nobody asked you, Hans.

Deploying anti-Hans measure: Musique Concrete
youtube.com/watch?v=XJq3jItducg

Of course

I have a sad story to tell: I listened to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. And I enjoyed it.

Lovely story but entirely irrelevant

Listened Mahler's eight last night in a concert, what a tremendous experience!

Can anyone recommend a generic Classical era symphony that features most if not all the cliches of the time? I mean that there's that loud Ba Budadadada thing, that it modulates to the relative minor, tutti etc... I'm going to chop and screw it. Basically I just want a piece that isn't really good but does a lot of different things.

I had a good sleep last night too.

Attached: 1520380281696.png (817x656, 127K)

one of the Sor symphonies
i rate the guy and his symphonies are decent, but he should probably have stuck to guitar

you are not transcended

Attached: Wahler.jpg (746x960, 120K)

I don't get this meme

Its what stupid Mahler bakas think is funny.

Cuck

t. didn't get the symbolism

Explain me plz

I get it but I aint laughin'

youtube.com/watch?v=r6V7fUDynG4

I dislike cuck symbolism. I bet that if Mahler live today, he would be one of these BBC spammers

If you have the innate sensitivity you'll just know when you see it.

>bla bla bla his music has a symbolist I can't explain
Youre whorse than paragraphposter

>Youre whorse than paragraphposter

ah come on, you're just being unreasonable now

see retard

Based Komitas
youtube.com/watch?v=uxMOKtRJdQI
youtube.com/watch?v=sOGUMOp5HFQ
youtube.com/watch?v=vI91d16FbRE&t=63

unrelated
youtube.com/watch?v=lqOpIvljFRw

Listening to bruckner string quartets meanwhile masturbating with a text-based porn game

...

Schnittke gogol suite

>Bruckner
>String Quartets

sounds legit

Attached: 4yTiXURcphrN8Bipr8Si4E8a5blvIUeGP3BxQmWc8Xs.jpg (766x788, 71K)

Stravinsky 100%

I never listened to anything by Bruckner (suggestions are welcomed)

not really a surrealist, more postmodern, don't confuse these two

George Antheil and Darius Milhaud

You are technically right but I think that Schnittke sometimes has some surrealist vibes (I’m not the user you responded to btw)

Talking about Schnittke
youtu.be/2GBwgNB0XVU

youtube.com/watch?v=EUyKTN6tyLM

You are absolutely right. I really think he is one of the most underrated or at least neglected composer.

Although strictly speaking there are no surrealist composers, one that can sometimes give some surrealist feelings is Britten imo

Ok so how do i get into Berlioz?
Dont give me that "'"' good starting poin stuff""" i want the trascendental stuff

Attached: 1549495948875.png (840x700, 708K)

Check out his romeo and juliette symphony and benvenuto cellini if you want some depraved shit

If you have never listened to anything of his stuff, his Symphonie Fantastique is both things

youtu.be/xkrydS0MK28

I play nylon string guitar flesh

He's basically Mahler before Mahler. So only listen to him if you like Mahler. Like the other user said, Romeo and Juliette

youtube.com/watch?v=G9Uc3lPfuEY

Any recordings of personal preference gentlemans? i.e trascendental recordings

Attached: 1548456757818.jpg (125x93, 2K)

Les Troyens. 4 hours of pure transcendence.

>He's basically Mahler before Mahler.
Funny guy this one, so was Barlioz also a Cuck with trascendental symbolism?

Attached: 1549827328841.jpg (720x866, 117K)

Because he's cringe and jewpilled

youtube.com/watch?v=AkysYnjHePE

Attached: 1482562638449.png (556x430, 81K)

youtu.be/sK4dz6Gbcdk

>muh marxism is not an argument.
Remarkably, neither is muh Dunning-Kruger.

I think that Mozart is the Justin Bieber of classical music

Nah, it actually is because you fit on Mount Stupid rather nicely, Hans. Now fuck off already.

I hear numerous beauties that are perfectly adapted to the form, (which I would not say about Brahm's First Concerto), and beauties never or rarely found in previous music. If one want "serviceable" orchestration, one merely need to hear the orchestration in numerous of Chopin's contemporaries, or even in his Second Concerto.

So you're stupid. Weird flex, but okay.

Attached: 1371547586704.jpg (402x402, 42K)

Name-calling does not an argument make, no matter how fit you believe the epithets are.

Hans, shut up, you fucking pseud.

Shut the fuck up, Hans

Do you really believe that? From the very beginning, it sounds like a generic French opera. I won't even to begin to ask when it's supposed to get good, because if you think the beginning is great, you either hear something I do not, or we have very different standards of greatness.

We've analysed your bullshit and came to the correct conclusion which is seen here Now shut the fuck up, Hans.

>came to the correct conclusion
Rather begging the question, is it not?

Your mom is begging the question of you.

Shut the fuck up, Hans.

What vidya are you playing this night?

Bogbilly opinion

>HANS WAS THE BOGPOSTER THE WHOLE TIME

Attached: 1548903800608.jpg (600x600, 44K)

The transcendence comes from it's length, not from the musical quality.

My cock is begging for your ass hole

None.

>gurglegurglegurgle
I don't speak bog-ish

fucking hate people with straight white teeth

you posted this shit yesterday

I'm always posting a different lecture.

youtube.com/watch?v=FQK3N3dED0w

>muh feels
Sorry /classical/ only accepts reals.

>smokey bar
really says everything about jazz, but no "there is no such thing as degenerate music"
>nothing wrong with it
yes there is something wrong with it

Refer back to my original post, /pol/tard

I hate opera too. The ouverture for The Italian Woman In Algiers is great though.

Rossini ouvertures are so good, I wish he wrote more instrumental music

The thing that pisses me off about these kind of lectures is they only cover the first movement.

>Compose most of Carmen
>Bizet gets all the credit

Has anyone ever been more musically cucked than this?

Attached: 200px-Ernest_Guiraud.jpg (200x287, 10K)

Süssmayr by Mozart

Why are fifth symphonies always the best symphonies?

I can't think of a single 5th symphony that is anything but a meme (great but not the best) or else, totally insignificant.

I do not see anything much more real than what I wrote, so that's not true.

Beethoven, Mahler, Sibelius, Shostakovich

meme, meme, maybe, insignificant meme

>meme
>meme
>not meme but shit
>meme
Try again

(1, 4, 7, 3, 5)

>calling Sibelius "shit"

Get a load of this city slicker

Attached: sibby.jpg (193x261, 6K)

He's pointing at us, /classical/!

youtube.com/watch?v=0wGj3URCZlQ

Attached: Dallapiccola-Luigi-11.jpg (252x317, 16K)