Why do liberals want to ban guns?

September 8, 2019 Alexandria, Louisiana 1 3 4 A woman shot and killed one woman and injured three others after a continuation of an argument escalated.[23]
September 8, 2019 Sumter, South Carolina 2 3 5 Two men were killed and three other individuals injured at a local convenience store, in the early morning.[24]
September 7, 2019 Whiteville, North Carolina 3 1 4 A husband, wife and their five-year-old son were killed while the grandmother was injured in a targeted attack.[25]
September 4, 2019 Marrero, Louisiana 2 2 4 A man and a seven-year-old girl were killed, and another man and a 11-year-old boy were injured after an argument apparently escalated.[26]
September 4, 2019 Jacksonville, Florida 0 4 4 Three adults and a child were wounded in a shooting.[27]
September 2, 2019 Elkmont, Alabama 5 0 5 A 14-year-old boy shot dead five family members – two adults and three children – in an Alabama residence. He confessed the crime to the police.[28]
September 2, 2019 Chicago, Illinois 0 4 4 Four men were wounded in a drive-by shooting outside of a CTA Green Line station in Washington Park.[29]
September 2, 2019 Greensboro, North Carolina 2 2 4 Two men were killed and a woman and small child injured during a home invasion.[30]
September 1, 2019 Rocky Mount, North Carolina 0 4 4 Four people were shot at a private party at a Moose Lodge.[31]

Looks like we have a nigger problem, not guns

September 1, 2019 Valley, Alabama 0 7 7 Six adult males and a 15-year-old boy were wounded outside a kindergarten after an argument over a Lanett vs. Lafayette football game escalated.[32]
September 1, 2019 Hartford, Connecticut 0 4 4 Three men and a 17-year-old boy were wounded in a shooting.[33]
September 1, 2019 Toledo, Ohio 0 4 4 Four people were found shot in the early morning.[34]
August 31, 2019 Odessa and Midland, Texas 8[n 2] 25 33 Midland–Odessa shooting: Eight people were killed, including the perpetrator, and 25 were wounded when a gunman opened fire on police and civilians after fleeing from a traffic stop.[35]
August 31, 2019 Charlotte, North Carolina 1 3 4 A man was killed and three others were injured at a University of North Carolina at Charlotte off-campus apartment complex.[36]
August 31, 2019 Frederick, Maryland 0 4 4 Four people were injured after an argument escalated.[37]
August 30, 2019 Mobile, Alabama 0 10 10 Ten people, ranging in age from 15-18, were injured at a high school football game after a fight escalated.[38]
August 30, 2019 Baltimore, Maryland 1 3 4 A woman was killed and three others were injured in a possible retaliation to a previous stabbing.[39]
August 29, 2019 Baltimore, Maryland 1 3 4 A 16-year-old boy was killed, while two teen boys – a 14-year-old and 15-year-old – and an adult woman were injured.[40]
August 26, 2019 Pembroke Pines, Florida 4[n 2] 0 4 A man killed his wife, mother-in-law, and one of his three-year-old twin daughters before committing suicide.[41]
August 25, 2019 Chicago, Illinois 1 3 4 A 17-year-old boy was killed and three adults were wounded after a large group was fired upon.[42]

because you US dumbfucks shoot yourself

Because it's their job to disarm the proletariat, while it's the job of Conservatives to dumb them down. Fuck both parties. Only Socialists and Libertarians actually support the right to bear arms.

Where are you from?

Right so because some people fuck up we're just going to punish people who dont fuck up? That makes perfect sense, hitler approved.

Some are uninterested in a free populace that has the means to defend themselves. Most are simply very emotional, not thinking rationally or studying history but seeing tragedies carried out by the mentally ill and blaming the tools they use.

Not from US

You want me to make one of these about Islamic terrorism? You gonna accept that as proof we should ban Islam?

Partially.

But it is also just part of the general mindset. They tend to see an issue or problem, assume direct coercive state action is always the best way to deal with things, and start working towards banning something, or start making something mandatory.

Are you a spic?

Nope, but thats not the question and you got your answer.

I only appreciate the SA Army. the rest is made better by other companies.

>>banning precisely manufactured physical tools is the same as banning an idea

topkek

They didn't ban. They've temporarily suspended manufacture of AR due to market saturation

You're right, it doesn't matter where you're from. You're just another dipshit foreigner who can't get America's cock out of your mouth. Don't you have an afternoon mosque prayer session to go too?

No. They only make them for LE/MILITARY now.

I am not moslem.
but your aggression and your lack of arguments point that you are a dumbfuck too

Current day colt is a pile of shit compared to Colt of the past.

More people died from firearm injuries in the United States last year than in any other year since at least 1968, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

There were 39,773 gun deaths in 2017, up by more than 1,000 from the year before. Nearly two-thirds were suicides.

Attached: 1550338139431.jpg (529x896, 303K)

Attached: gun-control-experts.jpg (573x364, 207K)

Cool, meanwhile hundreds of thousands die from car accidents and heart disease. Are we banning cars and fast food anytime soon?

>he doesnt know that america has a huge gun violence problem

obviously its not the gun that kills people, but taking effective ways of killing people away will result in less lethal violence. If you put your personal freedom to own a gun over the general well being of your population thats fine. but individuals usually always profit from an improved society.

So all the dead are killed by weapons accidents or poor nutrition

>he doesnt know that america has a huge gun violence problem
You don't you dumbass foreigner. Gun deaths aren't even in the top 10 causes of death per year. If we got rid of niggers the number would drop by 95% most likelly.

cars are needed in our current environment.
fastfood should probably be limited in some way.
the benefit of private gun ownership doesnt outweight the cons, as it does with cars

You must be a smelly Frenchman

Yet my point still stands. They've had more success remove access to firearms than the liberals have.

to trigger you butthurt cuckservatives

Is that all you have?
puzzle around the globe?

Yes it does, because niggers and spics are violent apes and the democrats want everyone defenseless against their pets. But this just shows how much of a hypocrite you peple are. Oh it's okay for people to die, so long as it's not by guns. Fuck off.

Do you forget about bitch McConnell?

Why did Hitler take away gun rights from the jews? Didn't he know that having guns is a life threat? He sure did a favor to them on that one

Corporations own everything and they can do what they want pretty much. They will probably limit ammunition sales and that's how they regulate what the people can have.

Dems own guns as well, user.

>They've had more success remove access to firearms than the liberals have.
Sure, meanwhile liberals ban "assault" weapons in blue states years ago. Funny how kikes like yourself don't say shit about that.

I really don't care. You can keep talking your trash. You're good at it.

who cares if its in the top 10 as long as its tenfold the ratio of other countries? chemical weopons are probably also not in the top 10, does that mean they should be allowed?

also ur retarded, if you wanted improve the violence problem by getting rid of people, u'd get rid of people judging by their cromestatistic and not by their skincolor. ur racism is showing

because that is the only way to force unpopular political ideologies w/o provoking a civil war

Attached: 1566610665560.jpg (750x702, 60K)

Because they want to do something we'd shoot them over.

Attached: 1569004861242m.jpg (834x1024, 80K)

All I see in here is your offensive trash and lack of arguments.
So long!
You bore me!

They don't

So countries in Latin Amercia and Africa, who have already banned their evil guns you hate so much, don't have any gun violence? The same fucking apes who are committing all the fucking gun violence in this country. But the slave masters in the DNC want us all to ignore this fact.

>Hur dur skin color

Try reading what the fuck I said you stupid fucking monkey

Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya...... bitch.

im sure this isnt based on ur subjective feelings at all. please show me that private gunownership prevented more deaths than it enabled. this obviously wont happen, so show me atleast some relevant statistic.

Samuel Colt was such a strong proponent of a personal right to own arms, including those intened solely for waging war, that during the Civil War he as brought before congress to explain why so many Confederate soldiers ha weapons made by his company

>im sure this isnt based on ur subjective feelings at all
No it's not. And I don't have to show you shit. The fact it happens even once proves your slaves are violent subhumans. Even if I bothered to show you hard evidence your nigger loving ass would likely just run away anyway like the fag you are.

Propositions =/= actual results.
We're beyond state level now, son.
>kikes like yourself
German/Irish American gun owner here. I know you'd prefer to stay in your bubble world though. You really should look at the facts though, it's not serving you to believe what you'd like to believe.

I know it's sad too. Faggots here think I'm anti-gun or something but they seem to be ignoring basic facts as if ignorance is somehow preventing the reality of what's actually happening.

you mean people in shithole countries have different problems than people in the usa and other first world countries? who would have thought. try comparing it to europe or developed asian countries.

>hurr durr skin color
yep i read what u said and it was exactely this.
you just reassured me that u cant differenciate between skincolor and people living in problematic conditions. try reconsidering

Unfortunately, he has not equipped you with intelligence

I thought you were leaving. You are not an user of your word.

>that's just gay

im pretty sure you are the one running away right now.
also no, something happening once is anecdotal evidence and doesnt matter at all. if u believe otherwise u should off urself

I get it. Fools can't see what's happening but it's been going on for a while. Bow all big corporations are starting to turn political and go after our rights.

>You really should look at the facts though
I gave you facts already you dumbass jew. So again, why aren't you crying the democrats banning guns at the state level? Because they're on your team most likely.

>I own a gun
Yeah right, the only thing your faggot ass owns are fucking dildos you shove up your ass every night

No I'm going to compare it to the monkey ass countries your pets are coming from, because those are the same fucking people who are causing the vast majoritiy of gun violence in the US. Any reason your slave masters don't wanna talk about this? Instead they expect the rest of us to be soft on crime and give up our rights to self-defense when one of their slaves act out violently.

Your retardation is why we will lose this. Keep your head in your hole then, you're useless anyway.

>Your retardation is why we will lose this
Yes, your team is absolutely going to lose in 2020 after Trump wins. No worries there my friend.

You can't even identify your own enemy, son. I told you already, you're useless.

Not to mention over 60% of gun deaths in America are caused by suicide... noone ever brings that up...

well while u can compare what u want, i hope u understand that ur comparison is worthless atleast. ofc those groupes have a higher crime rate due to worse living conditions, but not due to their country of origin. how comes mexicans and black people (prior to the immigration crisis) didnt have higher crime statistics than the average person in countries like germany? oh your right, because they had the same living standard as everyone else and it had nothing to do with skin color. please try to refrain from throwing useless insults around. instead let have a real conversation.

>Any reason your slave masters don't wanna talk about this? we can talk about it all day. who told you that u cant talk about it?

Over 60% of those gun deaths were suicide FYI.

>ofc those groupes have a higher crime rate
Oh good, you agree with me that spics and niggers are violent monkeys. Glad we cleared that up. You can leave now, class is dismissed.

>imagine being this ignorant about the origins of socialism

It's going to be great when you discover books.

Lets just say for the sake of argument that what you said is correct. Then how do you explain the fact that poor whites don't commit anywhere near as much crime as niggers?

we are talking about gun violence tho, not about the overall number of deaths due to guns

The vast majority of the incident list locales are urban. So, one can assume the trigger men are, in most cases, black.

he clearly doesnt want to engage in a conversation, guess ill have to live with that

probably due to the fact that this problematic behavior manifested itself in black culture due to a long problematic history. id also have to look at the living conditions of poor white people vs poor black people. blacks are probably more likely to live in ghettos.

>as much crime
We're talking gun violence here not general crime, so that statement is objectively false. The actual correlation and the overall pattern for the highest rates of gun victimization is consistent for both whites and blacks in poverty.

>probably due to the fact that this problematic behavior manifested itself in black culture due to a long problematic history. id also have to look at the living conditions of poor white people vs poor black people. blacks are probably more likely to live in ghettos.
In other words, it's because niggers are violent apes. Just like I've been saying this whole time.

Except it is not. You pussy ass liberals love to say this to defend your pet chimps yet never have any proof of this.

Except that it is. Go ahead then and post your favored myths about crime rates.

>In other words, it's because niggers are violent apes. Just like I've been saying this whole time.
no thats not really what i said. im arguing that violence is not intrinsic to their nature but the environment helps spawn violence in their ranks. i imagine that u believe black people are violent by nature when u say the stuff that u are saying. correct me if im wrong.

Attached: 255-1000t22.jpg (500x361, 48K)

Nigger you're the one who needs to back up that fake ass news you dropped in here. The fuck are you talking about? The FBI themselves have stats proving niggers and spics are violent monkeys. Are you saying the FBI is lying?

Oh right, they're not "violent by nature", even though tons of areas in Africa are literal lawless states and war torn countries. But as usual the democrats, again, want us all to just ignore this fact.

I know we are but the statistic the majority of leftists bring up is the gun death numbers, not gun violence numbers.

Very important to differentiate. 24,000 of the 33,000 gun deaths in 2018 were suicides. Gun violence is an incredibly miniscule issue in the grand scheme of things. Far more people are stabbed to death each year.

Everyone just needs to relax and do some research before making reactionary statements about shit you know nothing about.

Exactly as I thought. Nothing of substance at all. I can't prove a negative, you prove your original assertion. Which you can't. So you won't. Again, nothing of substance. So go ahead and keep making things up. Go on now, be a good cuck and do it.

this guy already answered for me, nice

>you prove your original assertion
That you're a kike? Yes, yes I did prove that

thats a fair assertion. i still think you can work on multiple projects at once and that means limiting guns is a valid consideration even if its not as big of a problem as people make it sound. also i didnt check ur numbers so ill just believe u here

also, yea media throws around with retarded numbers independend of their political tendency. unfortunately they just use what swayes the most people even if its not as relevant

Because they want to take away our ability to resist being robbed, enslaved, and murdered. They have some really bad things in mind for us, and know that they deserve to be shot for trying to put their plans into motion. The person most eager to disarm you is a person who plans to attack you.

Blacks make up 13% of the population in the USA, the males commit over 50% of violent crime in America. The means 6% of the population is responsible for over 50% of violent crime. Astounding numbers.

The USA does not have a gun violence problem, it has a gang problem and on a deeper level a cultural problem. Black culture in America is a massive issue. They need father figures and education specifically.

There's a difference between banning guns completely than controlling the sales of them to lunatics who shoot up innocent civilians you dimwitted conservacuck.

>Because they want to take away our ability to resist being robbed, enslaved, and murdered.
That's what I've been saying this whole time. Hence why the democrats want to get rid of castle and stand your ground laws, calling them both "racist".

>Blacks make up 13% of the population in the USA, the males commit over 50% of violent crime in America. The means 6% of the population is responsible for over 50% of violent crime. Astounding numbers.

But user, the liberals expect us to ignore this fact. Notice how they get upset when you point out that Latin America and Africa have high rates of gun violence, the same subhumans doing it in this country.

this is a way better take than the guy screaming "blacks and spics are apes"
the thing is, offering guns is a catalyst for that problem. your solutions are really important additions as well

please dont believe that u can associate with this guy. ur really far apart

>this is a way better take than the guy screaming "blacks and spics are apes"
They are fucking apes. Of course your kike ass doesn't know that because you live in some suburban bubble. But if a hoard of those monkeys moved in your parents would start the fucking packing right then and there.

Of course you can work on multiple projects at once, but taking away resources, time, manpower, publicity from the bigger issues is very damaging.

The only reason gun restrictions are talked about at all is because it appeases liberals and every election season they cycle in new promises of restrictions to gain votes from individuals too weak minded to think for themselves and do their own research. The last thing we need is for the US government to have more control over the people.

I live in Canada and don't have the right to free speech. Especially with bill C-16 where I can now be charged with a hate crime for mis-gendering someone.

When the government takes an inch, inevitably they will gain a mile. Where does it stop?

Yang was talking about how he for-sees a future where the government will regulate cars because of the pollution the admit. This is really scary stuff.

The less control they have the better.

Sorry I got off topic, and yes my numbers are all right.

i live right in the people of city with over a million people, but nice try

Sure you do, fag. You're one of those people who love to say "DOOD I live in LA/NYC/Some other city" but in reality you actually live 20 miles outside of it in a 99% town.

we can probably agree that gun control is not as important as it seems. i feel like 10000 still is a problem but it feels like it can be put behind an array of other problems, yea.

afaik the C-16 stuff is a big meme. last thing i heard was that there wasnt a single conviction for someone misgendering another person. atleast not on purpose. can u give me numbers on that? i guess we kinde live in the same situation since we in germany have some limitations on what we can say as well. like doing the hitler salute in public but while i dont like being limited in some cases i dont feel like we dont have free speech. i also dont think its a slippery slope since there are constitutional rights that prevents this from getting out of hand.

i think we disagree on the government/power thing. i firmly believe the government needs some sort of power since there are problems that the free market wont solve on its own. ofc it mustnt spiral out of control, but thats where ethics and democracy come into play.

feel free to believe that

I know it for a fact

It's not about the amount of convictions that have come from that bill being passed. It's the fact it's now under Canadian law, and the possibility is there for someone to take action against you if the really want to. It's insanity.

Germany has a lot of issues too. Even more so when it comes to your immigration practices.

And you dont have free speech, you are lying to yourself. I don't necesarily like it when people say nigger, faggot or any other racist term but I think I should be allowed to say them, I just choose not to. The fact there are laws against speech at all is unconstitutional. How far will they go? That's what scares me.

because gun ownership is a mental illness

Also I totally 100% agree that the government needs a level of power, obviously your entirely correct. It's just when they start taking the power away from us in terms of self defense and speech things start looking really dicey... if history repeats itself that is.

The want to defend one's self and one's family from any threat foreign or domestic is a mental illness?

Attached: 1563402654985.gif (227x221, 980K)

The guns are not the catalyst, the catalyst lies within the hearts and minds of men.

i guess if free means absolute then ur right. i see it more as in its "free-er" than most places. but there is a reason why the word i just used doesnt exist. the thing is, sometimes a word can have as much impact as physical violence, and the latter is also forbidden. so i think its fair to put up the option of punishment for those things. i get where ur coming from tho, its also a very scary thought to me that the system could be abused. altough i think the existence of the system is as fair as the one for physical violence. it just needs to be implemented in an extremely fair way.

also, the problems that we face in germany are blown way out of proportion. no doubt that there somewhat is a problem, but its not as if there are people gettings raped left and right as many americans and unfortunately germans as well seem to believe. the latest stats show that violent crime, while on a rise, is still way below the point that is was in 2008. and noone said 2008 were problematic times, apart from the economic crisis obviously.

i understand, and the only thing i can do here is point to countries like germany which function well even tho the things that u question are in place. obviously they are still different countries with different problems. but it shows that just the thing itself is not intrinsically harmful.

Socialists are not the same as Libtards, most socialists (including the derivates of it and anarchism) are pro-guns and fucking hates liberals (Yes, everyone hates liberals)

>Most socialists are pro guns

ROFL no they fucking are not

your government has been caught hiding and not reporting statistics. you might want to investigate further.

can u point me to that so i can judge how it happened and which implications it has?

i dont even question that shit like that happens, but usually its not institutional or systematic but the failure of certain biased groups. if it had big implications thered be an uproar. ofc not if the censorship engine works perfectly but thats why ull point me to an article i guess!

>"Sometimes a word can have as much impact as physical violence"

See, this right here is a terrifying mindset to have. If you truly believe that, and if a word has as much impact as physical violence, should I then be allowed to physically "defend" myself from an individual that calls me a racist or homophobic term?

Words are just words, simple as that. People need to toughen up and move on, there is NO fair comparison between being assaulted and being called a faggot. That is absolutely ridiculous.

... you do realize all examples of socialist and communist countries have either heavily restricted firearms or completely stripped them away from the population right?

You are so far off base.

Attached: voGMGTr.jpg (400x300, 47K)

Attached: 1568463967529.jpg (560x572, 56K)

I think you're a closet conservative... socialists hate guns, it threatens the government's control. Why do you think Hitler, Stalin and Mao outlawed all firearms to the general public.

i can promise you that i can take a hit to the face better than some ptsd trainwreck can take really destructive words. or telling a depressed person repeatedly to kill themselves. stuff like that can end in actual suicide. personally im also of the mindset that i have to toughen up about those things, but i realized that not everyone is as "strong" as we are in this case.

and yes i think while violence should never be the solution if someone was hardcore bullying another person, even if its only with words, the victim has the right to physically defend himself

Because they’re blue authoritarians. The red ones want to ban abortions and make everyone follow church morality.
Basically, they’re both shitheads that know dick about Constitutional rights.

Anarchy has nothing to do with socialism, the Social-Anarchists are uneducated individuals that dont realize that term is an oxymoron . Socialism is BIG government, Anarchy is NO government.

Of course he doesn't, he's likely a fucking child

>The red ones want to ban abortions and make everyone follow church morality
LOL!
You're so delusional.

someone calling u a racial slur once should obviously not be enough to justify physical violence. everything needs to be put in proportion. im just saying its not impossible for words to have a more harmful impact than physical violence

>The red ones want to ban abortions and make everyone follow church morality.
What the fuck are you talking about, you motherfucking jew?

I love how you just imediately go to the extreme. Good troll move. Almost took the bait.

Attached: +_e033b4830894bf0c385f1806c3390ee3.jpg (289x292, 24K)

rewire.news/article/2019/08/14/a-near-total-abortion-ban-isnt-enough-for-some-tennessee-republicans/

prospect.org/article/republican-legislators-seek-ban-abortion-voters-every-single-state-reject-change

Pull your head out of your ass, dumbass.

And yet, I’m not wrong. Stop being a faggot and see neither side gives a single flying fuck about you.
They are government stooges that want their version of the government to jackboot march up to your home, and curb stomp you into obedience. You don’t follow the party line, you’re an enemy of their state.

well the tea party morons sure do. and that part unfortunately grew into a big tumor over the last 10 years, also both sides go off on the otheres extremes. im sure not all liberals want to ban guns

See , nigger.

I have a simple question - Can a word kill you? Can a word break your face?

Rhetorical. The answer is simply no. A word can not by any means physically harm you, and by that has no place being compared to Violence.

Weak minded individuals that don't have the willpower to overcome a degrading word sadden me deeply. Pathetic.

Key word is "some" an incredibly small percentage have that mindset in the grand scheme of things.

Hmmm teenager detected...

FYI this is coming from someone that used to get bullied. You overcome it.

Those “some” are politicians and influential wealthy donors that lobby for that kind of government.
I don’t give a shit that some farm boy hick or tree fucking SJW think like that if they have no power or cash, they don’t matter.
The vocal politicians like AOC and the other socialist squad ones do matter, as does the red cronies.

Attached: 1547595254348.jpg (400x637, 55K)

Don’t be fucking stupid. I have boxers older than you.

because majority of gun violence occurs in liberal run cities.

Attached: chicagooneshooting.jpg (686x616, 314K)

right now im not arguing about single degrading words, but about insane bullying. if shit like that happens to you while ur still young and for most people even if they are adults it has the potential to have severe consequences. ofc if you want to say they are just weak and thats their problem ur welcome to do that, but dont come crying to me when someone robs you and the police wont help u because ur just a weak individual. u missed the whole point of society

Your ideals and the way you're handling internet conversation says your oldest pair of boxers are going on 10 years maximum.

>You overcome it
Some people overcome it. why do you think you can judge other people in this matter. maybe ur exeptionally strong.

Their choice to stop making guns is not challenging any 2nd amendment rights ...retard

Fact, and gun free zones.

Cause they cookin up some tyranny.

Bullying sucks kid, I agree. Deal with it... I did.

Because I’m tired of seeing the same partisan trolling bullshit on here.
Get something, anything, fucking new. You cunts are boring fucks now.

>but dont come crying to me when someone robs you and the police wont help u because ur just a weak individual. u missed the whole point of society

This is irrelevant to our current conversation.

also, ud probably agree that this has consequences on ur life that ud rather not have, even if they are small, like regrets that u didnt intervene early or some shit. they are probably bigger than the consequences of someone hitting you when ur were that age.

Gee, I dunno, could it be because I don't want some incel POS to finally realize that no matter how many guns he buys his dick will never be over 3 inches long and decides to go out and kill my family along with 50 others at the mall that day? Or no, that can't be it. Guess I'm just a pedophlle communist after all

>Government trusts you with assault rifles
>Government doesn't trust you to vape

>muh freedom

Attached: muh freedom.png (1080x1215, 316K)

I never mentioned my political affiliation. I'm Canadian. I just think you're retarded, that's all... jeez.

Colt has made a lot of bad business decisions and continues to do so, today.
Sam Colt would have killed these fucks running the company by now if he was still alive.
I like my Colts but as far as I’m concerned they can die off from their piss poor choices. I can get an AR anywhere, for half the cost with the same quality.

maybe i went a little overboard here, but it feels like the purpose of society is to keep individuals from getting harmed in any way. so it seems fair to compare one harm preventing mechanism to another.

I didn’t call out your political affiliation. Learn to read you retard maple sucking moose licker.

because like all totalitarian regimes, armed populace is a huge obstacle to implementation. its hard to force people into slavery against their will if they can resist with weaponry

roughly a thousandish less than automobile deaths, yet we dont ban automobiles.

source:cnbc.com/2018/02/14/traffic-deaths-edge-lower-but-2017-stats-paint-worrisome-picture.html

i mean we were comparing physical and mental violance the whole time, maybe i should have said punched instead of robbed

>also, ud probably agree that this has consequences on ur life that ud rather not have

Actually I entirely disagree on it having any negative effects. The positive effects it has had on my life are incredibly valuable, turned me into a very strong and committed person with determination and the ability to deal with conflict/confrontation effortlessly.

Toughen up.

Haha you little yankee cousin fucker. I thank god every day for showing his wrath to the sinners on 911.

Their is no such this as "mental violence" violence requires a physically act.

Says the Canuck cunt that blindly follows a racist cuck.

That’s fine, it was NYC. They deserved it.

alright, thats definitely a possible outcome. but then it still comes down to you maybe just being a strong person in general. i dont want to revoke ur achievement because its probably hella hard to get out of something like that, but there might be people who just cant for some reasons and i dont want to shit on them.

just out of curiosity, are u still the canadian guy? since i gotta leave soon and wanted to say thanks for the conversation, that was way more than i expected. ofc even if ur not him.

Who is the racist cuck I follow? I dont support Justin Trudeau, he's one of the worst prime ministers we've ever had.

well then i used it for a lack of better options, i think u understand what i ment

I understand where you're coming from. Yes, this is the Canadian.

Take care man, look into Freemasonry, changed my life. You guys do it a little differently than traditional Brittish/Canadian Masonry but I think it's valuable for everyone no matter where you are in life.

Regards.

Personal gun ownership went up under both Hitler and Obama. I don't know about the others, but I do know you're a moron.

Incorrect, gun ownership was banned for the general public under Hitler.

Citation.

ill look into it. i only know the conspiracy theory stuff about them, might be an interesting read.
altough i doubt ill have any affiliation with stuff like that since im just a guy who likes to challenge himself with conversation and debates. i dont really feel like putting a lot of effort into improving the world, i just state what i feel is the most logical. the first few lines on wikipedia already sound respectable tho. keep it up man!

The AR was never made for the military. The AR is a semiautomatic civilian rifle that has been adopted by law enforcement. The M4 that they make for the military can't be sold to civilians because of the selective fire and barrel length.

Wrong. Gun ownership was already banned since WWI, Hitler relaxed the ban and added a registry for new sales. Read a fucking book sometime.

This. AR stands for ArmaLite rifle. Not Assault Rifle.

Attached: gun sales obama.jpg (1127x498, 58K)

Bored? why not check this extremely hot active server, for the best lewds of ffemales and traps!

discord gg/E8smxDG

He is right but firearms were still heavily restricted during his regime.

Attached: 1569107451003.gif (300x169, 1.94M)

No one said anything about banning guns. Please learn to read, and then read some credible news sources. Then try talking and listening to some educated, mature people. You panic the herd with this kind of talk, son.

That's funny, it's usually the workers (i.e., the masses) who kill some rich fucks and initiate socialism. A real genius, you are.

>fastfood should probably be limited in some way.
>What I don't like should be illegal.

Fuck right the fuck on off.

Excuse me? The majority of Democratic politicians in the states and Liberals in Canada have stated their plans to ban "Assault rifles"

Keep in mind fast food kills far more people than guns do, which he didn't actually address at all

We don't want to ban guns. The majority of liberals just want to keep them out of the hands of crazy people so we'll have less targets to choose between when we're finally pushed to far

Socialism requires the masses to fight the elites, which guns would help with...so try again maybe

Banning assault rifles doesnt mean banning all guns... No matter if u have a gun or not, no one loves you, you're not "cool" and more importantly, fuck you.

>No one said anything about banning guns.

Gov. Evers in Illinois wants a "mandatory buyback" program. Beto backed that concept at one time, dont now if he's backed off.

Yeah, some people are talking about bans.

Sure, and if you ban everything that kills people, then at some point old age will kill 100% of us, and we'll be so fucking bored we'll welcome it.

Unless you guys can ban old age, too.

Beto is now pushing confiscation. He's a democrat, he knows not the meaning of "backing off." Its full-throttle retardation or nothing for those types.

>We don't want to ban guns
Yes you do

When did AOC have any influence on Canadian policies?

And you think the democrats are going to stop at rifles? Next they will want all semi-autos to be banned.

Commies can control you if you don't have guns. They are fear mongers.

>Gov. Evers in Illinois wants a "mandatory buyback" program

Why do these fucking people not understand how utterly stupid this sounds?

oh look, this clickbait thread again. OP must be from Hawaii cause he sure uses a lot of spam.

When did anyone mention AOC in Canadian policies? lurk moar nigger

Look at the pic in the OP, faget. The association is there.

The amazing thing about gun control is that almost NOBODY is serious about it.

If you were seriously interested in controlling what guns American citizens can own, restricting the sales of guns, or even certain types of guns to certain people, step ONE is amend the Constitution to remove constitutional challenges to any laws you pass.

But nobody is even trying to do this.

Nobody wants the gun violence problem solved. They just want it as an issue. Shit, solving it would take their issue away.

To be fair, he seems more retarded than most.

>The majority of Democratic politicians in the states want to ban guns
nope

They love multi-syllable euphemisms. That way they can pretend they are not saying what they are really saying, while sounding smart doing it.

Well that is true Posting a picture of her obviously means that OP thinks she is hugely influential in Canada.

>The amazing thing about gun control is that almost NOBODY is serious about it

People are absolutely serious about it you ignorant fuck. Democrats have already banned assault rifles in several states. Let me guess you didn't know that right?

You said
>we dont want to ban guns

I stated that yes they in fact do want to ban guns, never said ALL guns. But where do they stop?

OP didn't mention Canada. Some Canadian faggot wants to wave his maple around, is all.

>The majority of Democratic politicians
The majority of Dem voters, maybe. Most Dem politicians are bought off by the NRA and the corporate establishment.

I'm specifically referring to Justin Trudeau's new proposed gun regulations. AOC does want to ban "Assault rifles" in the states though.

I think you need to re-read what I said.

This. I'm the Canadian Faggott

>Most Dem politicians are bought off by the NRA

LOL you can't be serious

>and the corporate establishment.
Nice cherry picking

Too coward to say where your from

They seem to have a sort of fear if violence and being out if control

Why are you posting the same thread with the same picture every day?

How the fuck is it cherry picking when you said "most" you fucking moron? You don't even know what that terms mean do you?

>Why are you posting the same thread with the same picture every day?

What are you talking about jew? I've never made this thread until now

Because it doesn't mean most Dems are bought off by the NRA ... AND ... most Dems are bought off by the corporate establishment. Most Dems are bought off by either the NRA or the corporate establishment. Just like ALL Repubs, MOST Dems are bought and paid for so they don't upset the applecart.

>Because it doesn't mean most Dems are bought off by the NRA
Oh good, so you agree that i was right. Thanks for letting me know.

Yes, the strawman you created was right, but being a strawman it was wrong. Fuck you.

>Yes, you were right

Great, thanks for letting me know

because they think that all gun owners kill people, when in reality the majority of gun owners don't.