Meme

If only there was an AI that could help old people live out the end of their lives with dementia

Unfortunately there is no such thing

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 67K)

Let's just take this moment to honor the noble work of all psych ward nurses who have to inject crazy people with syringes for money

Attached: 1567216922710.png (783x576, 90K)

Subject-verb agreement

The patient was not able to consent

The doctor decided to treat the patient although it could not consent

The doctor was indicted for war crimes

Attached: 1567170828289.jpg (848x480, 179K)

In this case the verb is able and the predicate contains the word consent as an adverb to describe the predicate

When grammar and syntax are used properly you can see that the patient is a prisoner

Attached: 1567215268420.png (640x480, 702K)

Any questions so far?

The transitive understanding of the subject verb agreement in the predicate of this sentence suggest that the patient has already been treated although it cannot consent it is therefore being treated against its will and is therefore a prisoner upon whom medical experiments are being performed and all of this information can be understood clearly with the proper grammar and syntax

Did you not study this stuff in school

This is an example of an incorrect sentence structure

In this sentence you are the subject while study is the verb however it contains a double predicate wherein school is used as an adverb to describe the verb and it's linked to the subject indirectly through the transitive noun stuff

In this sentence it suggests that the knowledge is directly linked to the place where it was studied which makes no sense

Therefore this sentence is syntacticly nonsensical as it conveys messages through the subject-verb agreement which provide information that is unrelated to the subject

In this sentence Did you not is the first predicate and study this in school is the second predicate while the entire sentence serves as the subject and this is an example of a transitive mistake

Where in the word sense is defined as things that adhere to the facts of reality

Therefore nothing that the grammar Guru says is grammatically accurate as it suggest a transitive agreement between the subject and verb that is pred elected by his Assurance of factual information and this is also an example of a transitive mistake that has rendered everything he says absolutely insane

So when I say that the grammar Guru is insane that sentence is grammatically accurate even though it lacks a subject-verb agreement because the entire sentence serves as the subject while the verb is insane which serves as an adverb to describe the word is which refers to the subject that is represented by the entire sentence

Attached: Screenshot_20190828-134658_YouTube.jpg (1920x1080, 515K)

>This is an example of an incorrect sentence structure
I sentence you to a correction structure to make an example out of you.

This is what's known as a mutual transitive understanding and it is an example of an exception to grammatical rules which still maintain the overall sentence structure that provides factual information that is the foundation of all grammatical rules