America is asleep. Lets post science facts again.
America is asleep. Lets post science facts again
Other urls found in this thread:
climate.nasa.gov
twitter.com
What's the difference between a scientist and a streetwalker?
A streetwalker is honest about being nothing more than a whore for money.
Says the want-wit who knows ZERO about science or scientists.
Probably a fuck ton of education and like 30 IQ points. America is fucked because of morons who think their preschool understanding of the world is just as valid as scientific research.
If you want to whine about ecomentalism, go on China's anime image board...
What are "Urban heat islands" for $500, Alex.
The uhi effect is used by morons as an excuse to deny science despite not being a relevant concern for scientists who have accounted for it since forever.
climate.nasa.gov
In American. I'm not asleep. Therefore your wrong and should feel shame eurofag
That post gave me cancer.
Amerifag reporting in, I woke up halfway through the night and decided to jump on Yea Forums because I couldn't fall back to sleep.
Science is not a democracy. Less than one in one hundred scientists is qualified to have an opinion on climate science.
You are not one of the 1%.
Jesus, you can't be that stupid. And your argument is a fucking boomer facebook meme? Lol.
It's obvious the point isn't "the majority vote", but rather "this many have reviewed the evidence and the overwhelming majority came to the same conclusion."
If most people came to the conclusion "if you don't eat you die" through empirical evidence and there's one guy who doesn't believe it, the one guy isn't up to something, he's just an idiot. You're the one guy encouraging him to not eat because "scIEnCe isN't dEMocRaCy." No one is casting a vote, you fucking moron.
And yes, 100% of those *climate* scientists are qualified to have an informed opinion on it. You are not.
That's why the side that believes in the science refers to the experts, whereas your side refers to whatever lunatic offers a smidge of what appears to look like proof.
The thing I like best about this one, they used an infographic from something else and pasted climate text on top.
A sample size of 100 is not statistically valid when the total measurable sample set is at least 10s of Millions.
>taking flat earthers this seriously
I’m going to guess college degrees?
There is something called a ratio you actual 70 iq brainlet.
Howthe fuck dont the cables get short circuited from tbe wind?
>its accounted for
Feel free to show your work class
The fact that this graph uses the general term scientist is very telling
>Of those "climate" scientists
Well thats not at all what that infographics claiming to give stats on