Why the hell does this board love revenge porn and doxxing social media photos so much...

Why the hell does this board love revenge porn and doxxing social media photos so much? Ita an invasion of privacy like a creepy asshole, it promotes degeneracy and most of all it's illegal as pizza. I miss this board when it was funny.

Attached: deepfake-lede.jpg (2560x1440, 682K)

Out of everything on this board you could've called out you didn't take a shot at the loli (child porn) threads? Those are degenerates. Along with those fuckin doll threads.

Attached: 673.jpg (1000x1000, 157K)

>I miss this board when it was funny
It's never been funny, faggot. It's only had its moments of brilliancy between torrential downpours of diarrhea.

why not start a "when Yea Forums was good"-thread then?

Well you're not wrong user, but the thing is a lot of people know and accept that Loli is degeneracy and animated child porn yet posts of clearly young teens and revenge porn on the FB/IG or nude threads seem to go completely unnoticed.

One harms a living being, the other doesn't. There's a clear fucking difference.

come on this board promotes more then that.

we got animal slaying, cartoon child porn, animal fuckers, gay boy trap lovers. don't give all the credit to the FG/IG crew

agreed 100%

Attached: puts beer down.jpg (500x500, 68K)

I understand what you mean user, but I literally just said in a above reply most people already know that what you listed is degeneracy. Leaking sexualised photos especially of teens ruins their chances in life.

>we got animal slaying
Most humans eat meat.
>cartoon child porn
People should be able to draw whatever the fuck they want, absolutely nothing wrong with it and it harms no one, except people's feefees
> animal fuckers
Slaughtering animals, giving them extreme pain without their consent is morally alright, but putting a dick in one is where we draw the line.
> gay boy trap lovers
Only one hurt, feefees.
> FG/IG crew
Posting pictures of somebody without their consent and spreading it around the internet is harmful to that person.

Attached: 1555044844272.jpg (1080x651, 228K)

because some are sociopaths and others are psychopaths. Then the mix inbetween.

Attached: DmyHdMAXcAA_Xvk.jpg_large.jpg (342x339, 18K)

>it's illegal as pizza

Attached: 17c.png (2847x1412, 1.94M)

it goes unnoticed because its the newest way to keep cp under a thin veil. its no different than the people who'd ask for cheesepizza and buried cp under a few posts of actual pizza years ago. its only appalling to those who haven't become jaded to the fact that these people are going to consistently engage in this type of posting. permaban means nothing to a fuck who knows how to dodge em.

>it promotes degeneracy
>miss this board when it was funny
Summer is already over, fag

Attached: giphy.gif (245x180, 1.57M)

You may not get as harsh as a sentence but it's still a criminal offence.

Attached: Screenshot_20190914_122317.jpg (981x591, 223K)

>I miss this board when it was funny.
You mean the time when we used to post revenge porn of 12yo instead?

Attached: 1 VvpLrKeAS6fc1CcqhISzPw.jpg (490x358, 19K)

except you guys miss the fact that malicious thoughts are kinda what fuels the majority of this board/site. any person whos been here long enough has seen what Yea Forumstards are capable of doing with enough effort and prodding. now imagine they can have all that fingerlicking goodness without the strain.
Simply post a persons nudes, roll the dice and hope someone they know finds it.

If you had been here for a meaningful amount of time, you'd know that those threads have always been here and will never leave. Summer's over, faggot

Gay

>LOL man I don't agree with is homosecksul kys nigger XDDDD

Attached: bucket.jpg (272x400, 19K)

Have sex

>LOL im going to ban pictures on the internet XDddDDddddd that makes a best society. Xd kys faggot.

Attached: enhanced-buzz-14359-1361302924-9.jpg (367x550, 20K)

Found the pedo

the point hes making is not pedo in nature. its more along the lines of taking a stab at the fact the internet is being censored.

Attached: 1352146340083.gif (400x220, 1021K)

From some girls exposed here: image related

Attached: 14.jpg (941x349, 26K)

(OP) #
#
#
Other girl, she even wasn't exposed by her ex, who did it was a friend of her sister, pathetic

Attached: 16.jpg (927x826, 52K)

Revenge porn isn't an "internet" issue though, it can happen through any means of communication. I'm against internet censorship when people want to ban jokes and words on the internet that hurt their fee-fees. However CP and similar things are a different kind of cancer that needs to be stomped out of the internet because they prove real consequences and trauma to people.

>"incredible"

NUUUUUUUU! We have to close the site now!

Attached: 300px-Crying_Cat_screaming.jpg (300x300, 10K)

Attached: miniature-violin.jpg (578x482, 46K)

Please, be bait.

They shouldn't have taken the pics in the first place. If you dont want people having nude pics of you than dont take nude pics of yourself. Not really a hard concept. Its pretty much common sense.

Yes if it makes you any happier :)

Malicious thoughts? You want fucking thought police??? Kys faggot. You would gladly bring about an Orwellian dystopian government controlled reality. Thought crimes... go fuck yourself.

Attached: 1479413172230.jpg (421x834, 64K)

This guy gets it.

Top kek

Attached: 1430160275846.gif (175x144, 886K)

Violins are gay

this
if you put something on the internet and especially share with some asshole, you're asking to be leaked
life has consequences, you cant just whore yourself online and not expect anything bad to ever happen

Attached: Proof.png (391x709, 232K)

how about, if youre underaged dont send nudes in the first place OR if youre of age, dont send nudes without thinking about the consequences of your actions. you make it seem like you need to inhibit people from making mistakes when those mistakes are needed so shitheads can be filtered out.
Example:
If im hiring a person for an important position that represents my company and photos get leaked of this person with their genitals hanging out, it also makes me look like a giant ass. then i have fire this person, wasting time and money. people need to learn that sending sensitive information/pictures is literally putting you at the mercy of people. that being said, ive never spread photos of my exs cause im not a cunt, but others can be.
also this

Attached: 1348699431698.jpg (251x161, 4K)

>the consequences of your actions.
Ask to the doxxers, naive

youre gonna have to type up a little more. the point youre trying to make isnt clear.

its okay to be fucking stupid guy. im for the same side as you im just spelling it out to the two people i responded to. ive been here for years and idgaf what anyone does.

Attached: 45762345324.png (500x375, 192K)

any mega's? top kek

It's an odd one, this whole revenge porn thing
What consitutes revenge? At what's the threshold - honestlly asking

Attached: too far-6.jpg (810x630, 17K)

I mean we all recognise this image right? We know instinctively who it is - our minds are so well travesered we fill in the blanks - but at what point does this image represent the individual?

I miss the days of toaster Steve or when that guy’s mom got killed out west

Too soon

Bitches need to be more careful. Go around with Chadd, wanna fuck every old anybody. Zero sympathy

whore should never be an acceptable occupation, it helps literally nobody other than the whore, a niggers work deserves a niggers pay

Exactly - the image doesn't need to be in focus - it can become so abstract that the meer hint of colour/form can be enough

Attached: Google 3.jpg (350x140, 5K)

> Why the hell does this board love revenge porn and doxxing social media photos so much?
Because women are cunts.
> Ita an invasion of privacy like a creepy asshole, it promotes degeneracy and most of all it's illegal as pizza.
It promotes there being a consequence for women being cunts.
> I miss this board when it was funny.
We've always done this, and it's always been funny.

My 'view point' is that of representation - in all of human history women have been depicted through the eyes of men - in art ect ect
Porn in the past was a 'dominating' experience - women had the images taken of them, and had very little control over the images produced
Selfies on the other hand, are the complete opposite - they give the taker unlimited time to 'find the best shot' that they are happy with, that represents them - how they want the world to see them
and in the case of these images - they all desire what I have coined - whorship - to be coveted for nothing other than outward appearance - these images speak nothing of them as people - just flesh

Attached: 50l.jpg (750x1000, 58K)

> Porn in the past was a 'dominating' experience - women had the images taken of them, and had very little control over the images produced
Women sell access to their bodies for access to resources, as they always have, because they prefer not to work for it. Men have no such option. Someone has to do the work.

I appreciate that the sell - or there is a commerce - it isn't an aspect I've fully worked into my 'understanding' -
So the purchase of access - what does that say of the group in general? Is it trading on commodities, despartation, quick fix, and what of those that are taken with no such intension whatsover?

Is it that these images are taken with a viiew that it bosters pecieved self-value? Some form of acceptance/accrediation/confirmation

this

you cant take anything back once sent so dont be all feels and moaning when the degenerate you sent tit pictures to turns out to be a degenerate with your tit pictures .

The worlds changed , a sniff of tit out there in cyber space has no real impact on day to day .

What I think I mean is- historically women were made into objects - or objectified - but these days they are doing it willingly/without promt

its not illegal you retard

Women make themselves into objects, as they always have, because they have more value as an object than trying to do the work themselves, and that value is more easily leveraged as an object. Sex is the first currency.
There's no "commerce". This is a more ancient system than civilization. Civilization is in fact an attempt to standardize what forms of this practice are acceptable, and it varies from place to place as a result. Self-value is irrelevant. The porn star wants money. Guys want porn. They trade. Before money, porn stars would dance for the chief for a place at a table where the chief and their advisors were eating. Becoming someone's wife or prostitute is just a long term agreement to continue the practice for sex. Dating is a negotiation of the exchange rate.

OP looks kinda young, or am I mistaken.

its not illegal that's just what sjw bitches want you to think. if someone shares images with you they become your property

Fascinating - I mean, it's all true undoubtedly, but so nice to have a fresh pair of eyes on the subject.

So the purpose of taking them is to be 'whoreshiped' a dance to gain a seat/attention of the dinner table as it were?

And why is it more women don't go into STEM?

So if this is the case, that objectification is (primarily) instigated by the woman - why is it such a 'thing' within feminism and the like - AND for that matter - what's the whole 'empowerment' view

> So the purpose of taking them is to be 'whoreshiped' a dance to gain a seat/attention of the dinner table as it were?
I'm not sure what you're actually trying to ask or imply because you haven't defined your terms or context.
> Why is it more women don't go into STEM?
Two reasons. Firstly, because they don't want to. Work is hard. Second, women are more social and less logical, and STEM fields require a rigor most women aren't comfortable with. You can argue with customers and clients that they shouldn't be upset about an outcome and rephrase the narrative. You can't argue with a collapsing bridge that it should stay up to avoid hurting people's feelings, you have to actually get the right answer.
> So if this is the case, that objectification is (primarily) instigated by the woman - why is it such a 'thing' within feminism and the like - AND for that matter - what's the whole 'empowerment' view
Don't listen to what women say. Watch what they do. If you delete everything feminists say and pay attention only to their actions, you see them trying to steal resources from men without being shamed for not making the trade. You see them trying to get additional privileges without taking any extra responsibilities to earn them. Which is why you then see men refusing to engage with them.

Im going to start a shit ton of revenge porn threads and then just leave

you're either high or a newfag. Yea Forums has always been bad, it's not getting worse. Don't get me wrong, it's not getting better, most threads are cancer, but at least harmless cancer, mostly porn and pleb shit. If you were there 10 years ago, actual CP and planning illegal actions were quite common.

The purpose of taking selfies of such a nature is the current/most effecient method of gaining a place at the chieftains table/equivalent

I must say I've not really dabbed in the whole affair as it would seem that it would be like arguing with a jehova's witness - but I would be interested to have a 'reason' to do so - thanks for the input

t.Mad roastie that got rekt. And pic related

Attached: 1ef.png (800x578, 1019K)

I always wonder where people find these shit quality memes

Since this thread is about done, what does anyone think of my 'art'?

I know there is /ic/ but seeing as it was borne of Yea Forums

Attached: examples1.jpg (1280x956, 310K)

They're incel beta cucks who get rejected and can't get a gf so they lash out. It's that simple.

They are also the faggots that want Yea Forums to hack some bitches Insta or whatever and make those deepfake threads.

Wow holy shit this thread is still going :') I suppose this really is bait, so much butthurt lmao.