Is it true what they say? That AR-15’s are evil and you’re an evil person if you own one?

Is it true what they say? That AR-15’s are evil and you’re an evil person if you own one?

Attached: A1DF8590-044A-41F0-AF4E-0C374FD167A9.jpg (720x405, 88K)

Not evil. Just a faggot.

So gun-hating liberals have a problem with “faggots” with AR-15s now?

Well, they are ASSAULT rifles. So, you obviously are going to generate some ASSAULTATION if you buy one.

No

Pretty sure most faggots would rather spend money on dildos and aids medications than guns.

Attached: A3E3D364-E4FC-4C0F-BD7B-E6B20AC3BAFB.jpg (480x437, 34K)

There is an evil here that needs to be resisted with all 357 millions guns, if necessary

Attached: 1537258652523.jpg (533x325, 40K)

Literally only fucktards. There are not bad guns, just bad people

Want Porn? Hentai? Gore? Politics? Music and Art disc?
It’s all right here:
/dX32gqn

Is this (in the pic) an assault rifle and has it ever been used as a weapon of war?

Am I evil? Yes I am! Am I evil... I am a man... yes I am

Australia's got it right. If you use any of the weapons on the left to keep yourself from being killed, you go to jail. Good, law-abiding citizens just lie down and die.

Attached: australian weapons.png (2892x1316, 1.98M)

Sorry. Forgot to add

Attached: 6E0DFF45-8905-48EA-BF28-0BDFD4311A4F.jpg (1950x1903, 261K)

Not evil, just a teeny-peeny

Idk, I've got 5 AR's and I haven't ever shot anyone. Hell, I've never even been in a fight. I donate money to the Planetary Society, MikeRoweWorks and the local animal shelter. I don't think I'm very evil, I mean I've gotten a few speeding tickets so I guess that's kind of naughty.

Attached: 1521836267173.jpg (476x600, 23K)

Also, on an unrelated note, let's talk about how pitbulls never attack children unprovoked and are great pets for kids!

No! What's that?

They're not like a gun. The gun is a tool. The AR-15 is a tool. It's only used in the military. It's never been used before on the street. As far as I know, no one's ever shot one. It is an advanced weapon.

You want us to be like pic related? Fucking cuck

Attached: 45D16D8C-1804-4633-946A-DEB09E223075.jpg (624x960, 74K)

No, you're evil if you have any variant of Kalashnikov.

If that's the case, I'm Hitler.

Attached: ZomboMeme 13092019205218.jpg (852x531, 87K)

I own one weapon of war like that.

It's a Mosin Nagant 91/30 issued into service 1942 and it kinda sucks tbh. also i have an ar15 too but that's civilian

The AR-15 is the right arm of the free American people. It is a symbol of our collective strength, and tyrants seek to destroy this symbol.

Attached: 71fOgfBKZhL._SX425_.jpg (425x490, 36K)

top kek. how many stg40s have you fired

Whatever, fanboy.

>The AR-15 is the right arm of the free American people. It is a symbol of our collective strength, and tyrants seek to destroy this symbol.
The AR-15 is the only weapon in our military arsenal that can kill a massive number of people with one shot. As I have discussed with other law enforcement professionals and the heads of our intelligence services, the fact is that the majority of mass shooters in this country have semi-automatic guns. They are not trained with the use of the AR-15.

The original assault weapons ban was clearly targeting the AR-15 in particular. This was before the AR-15 became so popular. Why do you think they did that? Not rhetorical, genuine question.

Because the main reason to own an AR-15 is for incels to get a boner from playing soldier.

An object cannot be evil or good, it just is.
The user of the object is what channels the evil or good.

pretty much. the only reasons they are owned by civilians are
1) feeling inadequate, to make you feel like a tough guy
2) because you think someone *doesn't* want you to own one, so think somehow you're "gonna show them they can't stop me"

if ownership of these guns weren't so closely associated with political affiliation and way to stick it in the eye of those with affiliation you disagree with, the number of people interested in owning them would be close to 0.

How is a laser pointer a dangerous weapon?

it can bring down an airplane, especially if you are shining them into cockpits near an airfield when the plane is landing.

Jesus Christ the Jews and their liberal puppets are working overtime today.

People dont buy guys to piss off other people. Your analysis is stupid.

Nobody says that.
Democrats say the guns kill people. The guns are evil. I keep mine in a safe so it can't get out and shoot anyone. I'm afraid to open the safe now, though.

oh sure, whatever you say bro

>eyeroll.mp4

Artist missed the opportunity to have her hold it by the classic carry handle sight. I know nobody uses those anymore but they're so iconic, and iconography is important in propaganda.

The left is so clueless to reality it's stunning.

I spot the faggot

I see another faggot.

They are. Ive never seen an agressive pit bull.

If anything, concealable handguns do more evil than long guns. Think about it, the majority of gun violence happens with small arms that are concealed in loose clothing and waistbands, usually in gang-related skirmishes and drive-bys.

Of course, the AR-15 style rifle has had its share of misuse, but overwhelmingly, gun homicides (and suicides) are attributed to handguns, shotguns, and occasionally illegally converted automatic pistols. Mass shootings still have yet to surpass the death toll of gang violence, and it's a testament to legislators not really caring about the issue, and simply wishing to go after the easiest guns to target, in order to feel a sense of accomplishment without doing any hard work.

Lady Liberty is technically a French National, and would not be able to legally purchase a firearm.

Ar 15s are not used by any military. You un washed faggot.

I spot the faggot again

I spot the faggot once more.

You can get rid of them through the military, but you can't get rid of them on a gay chat, or on any site associated with the military. Even if you can get rid of them, they're still "gay". Even if you are gay, a gay person in the military has that much less of a chance of being promoted.

Who is they? People, like you, pretending to put forth an argument instead of actually engaging in an exchange of ideas.
Sucks to be a puss.

The faggot is even dumber than i thought. He thinks ar 15s are homo sexuals.

couldnt think of a more obvious bait

that's what bothers you lol? from your 6th grade prose i don't imagine your one that puts forth too many arguments to exchange in ideas either.

yet you replied. so who won?

It's true what they say, You should shut the fuck up you dumb stupid faggot.

The last of the men who called out gayness was a man from Texas, who told me he is an arab. I've never met any other arab people.

yes op I own an Asalt Rifle - 15 (it kills 15 children per trigger pull) because I am an evildoing, card carrying GOP member that molests women and harasses minorities out of my community

I also believe we need to kill all brown people at the border and make fetus murder/sodomy punishable by death and that homosexuals are satan incarnate and should be incinerated and the ashes dispersed over china to infect them with the gay so they stop stealing our jobs

It's a small penis supplement

Mass shooters prefer the AR-15.
We prefer to no longer accommodate them.

You're not speaking to the right person down the reply chain. I didn't say the military uses the AR-15, I said it was a weapon of the people.

>we
Speak for your self

Kek

Ignore that, I'm a retard. You were replying to the person who replied to me.

I don't think that's true, please cite your sources.
On another note, would you object to private citizens owning one of these?

Attached: ruger-mini-14-ranch-rifle-1219613-1.jpg (300x300, 26K)

Attached: fuck cnn gun control fag.jpg (892x960, 128K)

I'm gonna take your AR-15, Rufus.
It's going to happen.
Go ahead.
Shoot at the cops.
See what happens.

Attached: images.jpg (243x208, 5K)

Ignore that, I'm a retard. You were replying to the person who replied to me.

What's that? You haven't read this post I gave you before? Alright, I'll give you a short summary first:

This post is an attempt by you to discredit me with lies.

In response to that your own blog post (which is actually just a response to my post) gives you a chance to debunk me by replying, replying, replying. What a great exercise.

Yes.
The rifle is fundamentally the same.
Harder to attach your scopes and 10,000 lumen strobe flashlights, though.

Just a question for you Emerson, what're you gonna do when several million people start firing back? And at least half of the military joins them. As do a good chunk of the police. Where will you be then?

God fucking damnit, I should have known this would happen. I'm sorry to the person I replied to originally, and I know continuing to say that won't get me anywhere. I accept defeat, faggot pretending to be me.

you don't want me to own one? I'LL SHOW YOU AND BUY 5!

Attached: liblogic.jpg (709x699, 51K)

I disagree with you, but commend you for at least knowing what you're talking about.

I will be flying around breathing fire and crapping out ice cream sandwiches.
I mean, makes sense, seeing since it would be in a fantasy land where you that actually happened.

We are well over 400 million

I don't fucking care. I do want to get through this, and I want to be left alone to do it. I'm not asking for sympathy--it's not mine to give. I just want out of here. I don't have the mental capacity to handle more abuse. I don't think anyone does, really, for the very simple reason that I don't want to have that. No other people here should have to deal with this. I'm not asking that you, or another person who has dealt with harassment, try to intervene. I'm asking you not to. I'm asking that as much as possible you let this just fucking end.

Sounds like they were already going down? Does the laser pointer assist them in landing?

Yes! Buy them at incredibly high prices, too!

I love how gun nuts claim to be part of some strong, patriotic, 2nd amendment community and the second guns are mentioned in the news- BAM, your so called buddies at the gun shop Jack up the prices 3 fold.
All the sudden it's less about the 2nd amendment and more about business, huh?

Some community.

I'm not convinced by this "oh nothing will happen" mindset. You retards keep driving conservatives and libertarians, who are very pro 2A, further and further into a corner. Eventually there will be a violent backlash on a mass scale. I bet the English thought nothing would happen to them either.

wut? people on the ground shine those lights up into the sky into the cockpits and blind the pilots trying to cause them to crash.

That's good.
You just keep threatening to murder police officers and liberals.
That's gonna really sell your point that you're not the problem.

And this?

Attached: 20190913_225530.jpg (403x600, 76K)

Why don't we just make murder illegal guys?

Attached: guncuntroll.png (300x190, 21K)

That post wasn't a threat to murder anyone. Anyone who interprets it as a threat needs to go back to remedial English. It was an observation of the political climate as I see it. If you saw it as a direct threat, then that says more about you than me. I guess communists cracking down on mild dissent shouldn't be all that surprising given how you think.

This one?

Attached: 20190913_225706.jpg (1280x720, 193K)

?

Attached: 20190913_225836.jpg (738x738, 223K)

>The AR-15 is the only weapon in our military arsenal that can kill a massive number of people with one shot.

What about artillery shells???

Attached: 20190913_230033.jpg (800x532, 120K)

That's a pretty narrow looking magazine well, I would imagine what you're obscuring is a pistol magazine .
It's a good question, though. I mean, the whole thing is about "high powered" rifles, right?
I think for now we'll stick to the rounds with velocity on the higher end of the scale.

Plus, I mean if you wanna count that as a pistol, it would actually be a bit of a plus because unlike a glock, its gonna be harder for you to hide that under your trench coat.
So meh.

9mm will kill plenty fine, 223 is far from high power.
It can't legally be a pistol because of the stock, but you'd probably know that if you knew the gun laws you want to change. :^)

What about the other 3?

Attached: cartridge_chart2_1.jpg (1250x1344, 301K)

What's that? A 7.62?
.300 blackout?
High powered ar platform?
Yep.
What's that? An AR 10?
Why would I have a problem with 5.56 yet be perfectly okay with an AR platform that fires larger, arguably (5.56 tumble) more devastating rounds?

5.56 tumble? That hasn't been the case in like 20 years.

Do you think that maybe people own them because they like guns and ar15s are good guns? Or do you just tell yourself the whole inadequacy explanation to make yourself feel better about yourself?

Really? 5.56 isn't known to tumble inside of a human body upon impact?
Well then! It turns out those Taliban cocksuckers outta just brush themselves off and stop complaining because 5.56 hasn't tumbled for the last 20 years.

Attached: smart white cat.jpg (560x572, 56K)

How is body armor a weapon!?

Thanks for actually responding and not cheating. I was trying to color to prevent reverse image search from working but Google has gotten better.

This is actually a pump action gun, much like how most shotguns are, shoot once pump the action shoot again. I do believe that particular one is in. 223/5.56.
This one is actually bolt action, one shot work the bolt, shoot.
5.56 actually tends to fragment (when rather close) rather than tumble 5.45x39 (Russian ak74 round) tumbles.
This is actually manual action as well, it's double action like a revolver is.
This is airsoft.

For the snarky remark, if your Banning guns based on fundamental similarities, based off of what you just said you would be pro Banning literally every type and style of gun other than lever actions, striker fired (think glocks), and break barrel single shots.

You shouldn't consider you stance on Banning based on how a firearm looks, but on function. Even then there are work around like the first gun I posted, since it functions as a revolver it is subject to no semi auto regulations. Same as bullet buttons in CA and whatever they came up with after bullet buttons, or Monte carlo stocks in new York and the SCR.

Oh well I was trying to give you constructive information but I see your actually a firearms retard. All 'real' rifles produce hydrostatic shock. When the bullet hits soft tissue it forces it to expand out significantly which rips the tissue which produces almost all of the wounding from the rifles. Most of the damaged tissue isn't even particularly close to the bullet. Please stop posting or having strong opinions on things you have no understanding of.

WTF is Stalin doing in the background of that picture?

There is litterally nothing wrong with owning any weapon.

>Thats' what bothers me? What else would?
I own an ar, dont know what else to say about that.
Creating bad faith arguments with fake premises that are easily refutable is all you have.

Found the /pol/tard

No your only an evil person if you use it to shoot up a school or something.

What?

Attached: [confusion].gif (332x332, 1.68M)

Attached: 1562978025347.jpg (477x554, 43K)

Quite agreed. It's listed under the prohibited weapons section

Yes user.....evil

AR-15s are pure evil. Its like owning a pitbull

Attached: 6705301_03_hera_cqr_stock_640.jpg (640x277, 20K)

you've had too much to think citizens. Thought is counter-revolutionary to the state.

Mate, I'm hammered where I can't think. I got as far as armor is a weapon... wut?
Bout all the farther I got. You can't understand far left libs, even drunk. They don't make sense

Attached: 1551824734336.jpg (640x427, 39K)

They even make handheld death machines. When will this ever stop!

Attached: Taurus TX-22.jpg (2700x1800, 761K)

Fuckin' Journos. Lying lot, all of em.

Oh dear. I’m offended

you mustn't drink comrade. Drinking prevents your from performing your labor for the state properly. Alcohol is counter revolutionary, like supporting Trump

people who drink alcohol are literally fascists

No Comrade! Vodka is allowed by the state and my overseer says I work well drunk! Such is life but it is good

Attached: 1564432439683.jpg (451x563, 82K)

Attached: 1567982959019.png (500x496, 277K)

Why are you so obsessed with other people's cocks?

Attached: 1568260531188.jpg (640x489, 48K)

Yup. And unicorns fly, and liberals are good people who never lie, and Santy Claus is real.

A gun cannot shoot someone without outside interaction.
Pitbulls kill and maim on their own.
You're fucking retarded

Glocksucker Special?

If we ban all guns, we will finally be safe from them.

Attached: 1567823380381.jpg (307x164, 9K)

Everyone is evil , inanimate objects cant be evil.

Attached: 20180803_090730.jpg (1796x2744, 1018K)

Why are you always thinking of what’s in other men’s pants?

>semi auto AR-15
>used by the military
Pick one.

Woops.

Only the police should have guns.

Attached: 52_4464_e78a41631aa9503.jpg (1597x1178, 351K)

I can't worship Satan and jerk off if I'm not holding an AR-15 in my other hand.

Yeah. That’s worked out so well for Hong Kong...

We just need commonsense gun laws. I can't imagine any american owning a device that can cause 500 deaths per minute

Attached: k76gg8n8tl031.jpg (4032x1744, 898K)

I can. I have to shoo mine back in every night after they go around pillaging the neighborhood and raping the neighbor’s topiary.
It’s awful, but whaddaya gonna do?

He doesn't use guns, why should YOU?

Attached: tmp_TyWv3N_0380518bc041d41f_MCDBAVV_EC017_1_.jpg (2048x1363, 432K)

Bunch of slack jawed faggots in here. How can you have such a fundamental misunderstanding of the constitution? The 2nd was never meant as a hunting/ sporting arms protection, bit as an assurance for the rest of the Bill of rights that if tyranny were to prevail the people would have access to the tools to free themselves. As the founding fathers intended, there should be private air bases and naval stations. We should not have the nfa or any awb. the batfe should be the bate.

Attached: Louvre_No._9_001.jpg (700x360, 252K)

He is an alien from Krypton. We aren't.

the constitution forbids the government from abridging the right to bear arms.
in order to do so, the 2nd amendment must be repealed.
This is the government giving itself the right to disarm the public.
What will stop them from then taking away other rights?
I do not support this.
Do you?

Attached: 1568002035984.jpg (500x750, 63K)