I hate it. I hate that I was circumcised. Why? Why the fuck did my parents do this to me...

I actually never heard about the cancer risks, what kind of cancers exist?

You can't do anything about it. Life isn't always fair. Now go be a little crying faggot somewhere else.

Attached: 1437503355413.gif (240x228, 858K)

Religious status has nothing to do with the proven benefits of circumcision. Muslims circumsize too, and until 20 years ago, a great deal of christians did, too.

All boys should be circumsized at birth. The world would be a much better place.

>Circumcision should be mandatory at birth

and yet natural selection chose foreskins everywhere in nature.

cancer.org/cancer/penile-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/risk-factors.html

"Circumcision removes all (or part) of the foreskin. This procedure is most often done in infants, but it can be done later in life, too. Men who were circumcised as children may have a much lower chance of getting penile cancer than those who were not. In fact, some experts say that circumcision as an infant prevents this cancer. The same protective effect is not seen if circumcision is done as an adult.

"The reason for the lower risk in circumcised men is not entirely clear, but it may be related to other known risk factors. For example, men who are circumcised can’t develop the condition called phimosis, and they don’t accumulate material known as smegma (see the next section). Men with smegma or phimosis have an increased risk of penile cancer. The later a man is circumcised, it's more likely that one of these conditions will occur first."

natural selection is an effect of random mutations, not some intelligent force, dimwit

Now, THIS is bait

> random mutations

yep, and BENEFICIAL mutations are passed on while harmful ones die off.

This is actually really interesting, so the whole "lost nerve endings" is worth the trade so you don't get cancer?

No, USEFUL mutations in the ENVIRONMENT are passed on, while useless vestigial remnants can linger for ridiculous amounts of time. The appendix is one example. The foreskin is another. The Jews had the foresight to recognize that foreskins cause nothing but problems later in life, so they made it a cultural and religious tradition to get rid of them - prolonging life, and making very attractive penises in the process. Win-win.

Source of cool pic?

Attached: ex_02_390.gif (1028x850, 164K)

>be me
>have foreskin
>read OPs post
>feelsgood
>read replys
>feelsbad

y'all are goofin me emotionally :(

Attached: YEeq7z7.jpg (311x301, 19K)

entirely. The "lost nerve endings" argument is a fallacy. You still have more than enough nerve endings to get you off. Lack of a foreskin doesn't diminish sex.

Butthurt idiots resenting the loss of their foreskins, however, have this delusion that they're somehow missing out because they had some useless skin removed, ignoring the fact that their entire penis including the glans is covered in nerve endings. It's a stupid argument. I have fucking incredible mind-blowing orgasms, and I've never needed a foreskin to have them

Stop being a fag that gets off on others misery and you wouldn't feel bad; you'd feel good for others

Attached: thumb39-768x361.png (768x361, 123K)

ooh fuck this post just got me hot again~~

youtube.com/watch?v=c51dfhfEVFc

death grips.

same user kike? why haven't you left yet?

Untrue and homosexual

Nah different user. Why feel bad when you can feel glad?

glad bout what bud?

Myyy man

May have to get circumcized myself, fucking phimosis

uh, being homosexual is exactly how I know that it is true

Feeling glad that other anons are enjoying their dicks instead of digging a depressive ditch of mud for your own.

Hey at least the rabbi that sucked your baby benis didn’t give you herpes. Unless he did, then in that case sucks to suck, bro.

I've told my friends that has happened and is happening. They laughed and called me a fool.

lol u serious? it was just a joke calm down

Can't get cancer of the dickskin with out any dickskin. If you slice off my fucking balls then I guess that lowers my risk of testicular cancer doesn't it? Also, you have to be one nasty fuck to develop cancer due to the the sheer amount of smegma you generate. Wash your fucking dick. Teach your son to wash his dick. Doesn't take a medical professional to tell you not to mutilate your damm kids. Can't believe this shit is still going on and people want to shit all over vaccines instead.

Yup. Still happening.

I am a member of the circumsized master race, tyvm

That's what I was thinking, like "Why can't they just wash it?"

It could've been better with foreskin. But you'll never know, because your ignorant parents mutilated you.

No problem comrade.

Lmao having an unprotected glans by default puts it at more risk of chronic inflammation and therefore a heightened cancer risk

Attached: 9EAD664B-9307-4A3D-A3B2-22FCCE627168.jpg (300x300, 10K)

don't force your primitive neanderthal beliefs on me. I am happily and proudly circumsized from birth, and I wouldn't change that fact for the world. And there's a substantial percentage of the population that agrees with me.

Nah faggot a pussy trumps any dick any day

Because their parents are sheep.

shut up fag

Absolutely false in every regard lol
An exposed glans causes it to thicken therefore absolutely decreasing pleasure

Enjoy never experiencing a proper orgasm retard

Everyone is worried about big pharma while they mutilate your sons.

Penile cancer is such a minuscule amount of cancers that I will gladly take my chance and enjoy my better orgasms

Beneficial mutations retard

Fuck off you like shill

not my fault you've got an ugly dick

There’s also a substantial amount of the population that thinks that vaccines cause autism so really your point means less then 0

sounds like complete bullshit but okay pal

Thinking that that vast vast majority of women would even care at all means that you’re a virgin or this is very weak bait

I'm gay. Women have absolutely fuck all to do with this discussion.

>implying that we don’t
It’s honestly the most ridiculous point because it’s very easily countered with the fact that we do wash our dicks

Yuck

Attached: mapcir.jpg (1786x893, 109K)

Well in that case obviously swap women with men faggot

>a circumsized dick is the most beautiful, artful creation on God's green earth. It is the most aesthetically pleasing image known to man.
Known to gay man, perhaps. Women give less than three fifths of fuck all of a shit.
>It is clean and sanitary and not subject to atrocious disgusting smegma buildup.
Smegma can still build up under the glans if your hygiene is bad. It is not any more clean unless you clean it.
>It prevents myriad dick cancers that can cause serious problems.
It may reduce the risk of literally one form of cancer of the dick.
>And cut dick tastes fucking delicious, .
If you like keratinized flesh, I guess it could taste different? Never tasted nor planned to taste a dick so no idea.
>and the texture is just so incredible against the tongue
This one I can address, it's a matter of preference I guess. Cut dick tends to be drier and less smooth, is more likely to have abrasions, and unequivocally will have scarring, so if you like rough feelings on your tongue then I'm sure it's as you say, but not everyone does so that's not a reason to call for circumcision.
>Foreskins smell, they're sloppy, and they get in the way.
They only smell of your hygiene is bad and the same is true of circumsised. They also definitely do no get in the way of anything but abrasions and potential damage to your member, which evolution put them there for.
>Girls prefer it
False. Women give zero shits.
>Guys prefer it
Could be true for all I know. I don't sleep with men so I have no data on which to draw a conclusion.
>Bi-identifiers love it
Maybe the male ones. All female bisexuals I have slept with have, when questioned, said they hadn't even realised I was uncircumcised. Unless you have phimosis or she's going to see it flaccid before erect, she's never even going to fucking know.
>Be happy with your beautiful cut dick.
Be happy with whatever you have but don't shame others for not wanting it.

I would still never give a child non-reversible surgery.

who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/

"There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence."

Look a jew!!!!!

I'd rather suck a jew than you

Sorry but you’re wrong. Us grills prefer cut weenie over uncut. Uncircumcised dicks are pretty repulsive.

But we do care lol. Uncircumcised is ugly and gross

>Religious status has nothing to do with the proven benefits of circumcision. Muslims circumsize too, and until 20 years ago, a great deal of christians did, too.
False, there has always been a mostly even split, the greatest skew being in the 70s and 80s where 64% of Americans got circumcised amongst an HIV panic.
>All boys should be circumsized at birth. The world would be a much better place.
Nobody should be circumcised at birth, that is a barbaric practise and removes choice from the individual. If they later wish to do so the option remains to them, if they later wish they had been left in their natural state of repair after circumcision it does not. It boggles my mind that anyone dares to argue that it is ethically reasonable to irrevocably surgically alter a minor. If FGM is abhorrent then so too should be Non-Theraputic Male Circumcision.

To be fair, yes it was wrong to do, and yes it is a violation of basic rights, and yes it is obvious sexism against males, _but_ it is not the worst thing that could happen, and unless your surgery was botched, everything basically still works, so if this seems to be really depressing you, I suspect there is a lot more wrong with your life, and this is just a convenient focal point to take blame for your problems away from yourself.

Foreskin restoration doesn't totally fix your dick, but it makes things feel much better. I did it and went from sexual dysfunction to sex is fucking great now. Especially once you dekeratinize your glans. Go to foreskin restoration subreddit and they'll show you.

I’ll take superior orgasms anyway you dumb cunt

Yep nice LARP

Funny how my two circumcised mates can never cum during sex, especially with a condom...
I wonder why that would be?

The first foreskin was. The rest have been a result of selective pressures improving the survivability of humans with a foreskin.

>Women have nothing to do with this
>Well then, replace with men
>YEAH WELL IT REDUCES AIDS SO MAYBE GAYS WILL LIKE THAT!
Read again nigger. Where does that link mention the gAIDS? It is very specifically about heterosexually acquired HIV.

I was born in Norway while my parents were on vacation. When I was born, the doctor that was supposed to circumcise me couldn't show up, so I have lived with my foreskin my whole life. I don't see how it could make such a big difference without it, but since I've heard so much hubbub and controversy over which one is better, I'm fine with keeping my dick this way.

>if you just remove everyone's genitals completely you'll find STD transmission drops drastically.

ok Schlomo

Attached: download.png (267x188, 15K)

eh

There are some people in Italy working on foreskin restoration. The project is called Foregen, their goal is to use stem cells and donor foreskins/lab grown foreskins to repair damage caused by circumcision.

Post tits and timestamp or gtfo FAGGOT!!!

>False, there has always been a mostly even split, the greatest skew being in the 70s and 80s where 64% of Americans got circumcised amongst an HIV panic.
Wrong. The circumcision movement was practiced throughout the 20th century and started in the 1800s. It was still prevalent in the 1970s and started to wane in the 80s and 90s. Do your research.

Yeah, pretty much how NY got to be the herpes capital of the world.

>implying that HIV is even a scary disease these days

The vast amount of effective antiretroviral drugs tht we have to combat HIV mean that an infection is no longer a death sentence and penitents with full blown AIDS can have a viral load so low that they can safely have unprotected sex without any risk or transmitting it

We also have prophylactic HIV drugs now days too but keep living a lie to help yourself cope with meaningless unfulfilling orgasms

Attached: 6A25B199-816A-48F0-BDBE-54A33F5D7958.jpg (559x556, 35K)

maybe cuz you're repulsive and you turn them off?

Sorry, but you're wrong, larping faggot. Women do not give a shit. If the dick is long, hard and clean they approve of it, and cleanliness is a routine, not a surgical procedure.

The penile cancer rate is not significantly different between cut & uncut, and guess where circ'd guys tend to get cancer? On their circ scars.

The argument that circ works as a prophylactic treatment has been thoroughly debunked. You know by who? The doctors that the CCD hired to criticise their report on the subject, but they ignored the criticism and published a report that said the benefits outweigh the risks, even though NO other recognised health organization in the world holds this view.

I wonder why.

Attached: 300px-Zsido_looking_to_the_left.jpg (300x350, 27K)

Foregen is a scam that has been doing nothing with their money for years and years. Do stretches and you'll be restored 10 years before foregen is uncovered as the scam it is.

hUrR dUrR nice one

>do your research because I obviously haven't

Post your source negro

All arguments aside, this.

>stretches will restore lost skin

Attached: EDFC7BF3-3C06-42A2-8A02-672D0ED758E6.jpg (750x741, 278K)

Literally this

I did. 64:36 cut:uncut until mid 80s. On religious lines it has always been more practitioners of Judaism than Christians by proportion even back then.

It is still a fucking hideous idea that you could consider literal genital surgery an ethically sound practice without imminent medical need prior to the age of majority.

When I am lost for anything intelligible to say I too thoroughly enjoy af hominem attacks because I have an IQ too low to debate effectively

>af hominem

Attached: tenor.gif (360x346, 170K)

I got circumcised as an adult and like it a lot better.

However I never had that taken away from me and know what both are like and everyone is different with what they like so I'm sorry you feel that way OP

Why has nobody mentioned this: Girls don't like the taste of smegma. If you want your son to experience the joys of blow jobs, get him circumsized.

a legitimate reply to his query directly addressing and refuting his premise is not an ad hominem attack

you can stop making threads about penises op we all know you love them

Skin grows when you pull on it. It doesn't actually stretch. No you don't get the skin back perfect, but it functions the same except missing nerve endings. Penis head also becomes about the same sensitivity once it is dekeratinized. It's about 200× better than waiting for something that won't happen. And if it does happen what's stopping you from getting foregen anyways?

That’s super funny user!
Imagine an autocorrected word happening!
Im genuinely in stitches!

Or just teach him the most very basic of hygiene you sperg

Since you can speak from experience, can you address this supposed "substantial nerve loss" and loss of sensation from having the foreskin removed? And loss of sensation from not having protective covering over the glans? And the notion that somehow you are now forever sentenced to inferior orgasms? Please and thank you

Ok retard

Nice samefagging LARP

Cut guys are the ones that report a lot more difficulties achieving orgasms, bud. Nice try. It may have to do with the fact someone took a blade and a dirty hebe mouth to their cock at birth. I guess the trauma of being blown by a 60yo guy who smells like wet carpet after he mutilated your dick as the first sexual experience really fucks with people.

That’s some silence of the lambs shit: “I had his tiny peen, with some matzoh balls, and a bottle of manchewitz”

You do know that they can very easily make skin sheets derived from the patients own stem cells, it’s really not that elusive

The head won’t become deketitanised unless it becomes covered again and even then it’s never the same

But you’re still a virgin no? Guessing you had a frankeweenie that scared even you & now only you touch it?

user where did you go?
Funny how your weak bait runs out in the presence of facts

but what you don't seem to get is that people find a foreskin to be a repulsive turn-off that they don't want anywhere near their mouths, which actually doesn't have anything to do with hygiene - that's not why it's disgusting. Just because you have no compunction about chewing on your son's foreskin doesn't mean all of us don't

>The head won’t become deketitanised unless it becomes covered again
Right so just do the stretches?

>head not same
Ehh it's debatable. According to accounds from guys cut as adults who restored there are quite a few who think it feels literally the same as before they were cut.

All i know is i was cut as an infant and i restored and it's like 10 times better so idk man.

If foregen or whatever comes out (which btw people were saying not to restore cause foregen gunna be here tomorrow way back then when i started as well) ill get the foregen done. For now i took it into my own hands and sure hopefully foregen pulls through, but i highly doubt it.

If you get to the point where a woman is looking at your schooner and she refuses to do anything with you because of foreskin then it’s safe to bet that she was looking for literally any reason at all to not be with you

My glorious helmet head has kissed many cervixes and they’ve loved every second of it

Most people don't notice a foreskin during an erection unless there is phimosis.

Your personal preference for dick doesn’t translate to women at all you boong

Foreskin isn’t there when it’s aroused you fucking homo. Just because you can’t turn your boyfriend on doesn’t mean all penises look that way.

of course you are

Ignore the kike shills. If you got off part of your arm, you have a less chance of arm cancer. Because by definition you have less of an arm.

>less chance of yeast infection
Men already have an astronomically lower yeast infection rate compared to women. So it goes from .1 percent to .01 percent. More lies.

>muh smegma
Take a shower retard. Have basic hygiene.

Reminder foreskins are a billion dollar industry. Hospitals mark them “medical waste” and sell them to pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies, who for example, cultivate them for collagen to put in face creams.

dilate

They actually go to the Rabbis for desert but other then that well written

The worlds saddest most expensive traumatizing answer to the lamest joke:

What’s a DIKFORE?

No it is literally a fact that they are sold to pharma and cosmetic companies. As in verifiable, traceable sales, it happens. Quit memeing and wake the fuck up. Look up Organogenesis Inc, Forticell Bioscience Inc, and Intercytex PLC.

boys i think we're on to something

Attached: isReal.jpg (1449x853, 119K)

Its for cleanliness OP

Let me introduce you to the magnificent invention called the shower. No cutting needed.

It's for fucking!!!

Attached: 1462261812978-3.jpg (2048x1362, 899K)

no, it's foreskins!

Nah bro they’re actually given to the rabbis for dinner retard

my parents circumsized me and i'm fuckin fine
why whine about something that's already done
they did it because of misinformation about cleanliness
i would never do it to my own child, and i don't support it by any means
but what's the point in complaining about my own
like my dick works just fine

you guys are just pussies

Attached: 12.jpg (648x1280, 154K)

i have both a cut and an uncut dick. to be fair, my cut one looks prim and proper while my uncunt one resembles an elderly anteater but none have my partners have ever raised concern over their preference. it's 2019, just accept the body your partner has you know? if you aren't happy with it you are free to go find something else.

You're why people don't care. They're cutting off baby parts and selling them and you're joking about it.

Imagine the uproar if they were cutting off clitoral hoods to sell and I joked they gave them to rabbis to eat.

Three by three, memes of reeee.

I don't discriminate, all cocks are delicious

DON'T cope. be angry. let it out. LET THEM FEEL YOUR WRATH! THE JEW SHALL KNOW TERROR

Attached: AHHHHH.png (1000x563, 281K)

Nah bro they can be proven as having been sold to companies. Still fucking abhorrent.

Hey, hey, hey. FGM is completely different. It robs a woman of her intimate sensations and leaves the clitoris dry and unprotected. It's evil.

big deal. my parents had my nipples surgically removed when i was an infant and had them preserved and encased in pendants for necklaces. one for each of them. i could give a shit if my foreskin is gone i want my fucking nipples back.

It’s not like it’s an underground deal lol they’re consenting parents, whether or not it’s right is another story, but surely it’s better to reuse them for something then to just throw them out

Leaving them out would probably just attract Rabbis so it’s a matter of public health

Not an argument.

Isn’t it though?

It's not like they tell them. it's buried in small print in the documents you sign.

it's the same thing. circumcision robs the man of his most intimate sensations and leaves the glans dry and unprotected.

I say circumcision is evil. It's my opinion just like you have your opinion. But it's not an argument

Then pay me. Where's my payment for my foreskin? they sell them back at a 100 percent profit because they get them for free,

no

When my neighbours were discussing circumcision for their son, such use of the skin was not discussed, they were not consulted, but the hospital DID sell on the medical waste from circumcisions, in bulk, to Forticell. But sure, keep making jokes about Rabbis, it will distract the attention from your corporate masters. I'm sure they pay you well.

If you got it done as a kid, I'm sorry to say that it didnt belong to you. It, along with the rest of you, belonged to your parents/guardian. Unless you, as an infant, were competent enough to say "no'

...you talked to your neighbors about getting their son circumcised?

Human rights are a concept. Parents cant have sex with babies because they "own" them.

Can parents have sex change operations done on their babies? If not, why not? You said

>It, along with the rest of you, belonged to your parents/guardian. Unless you, as an infant, were competent enough to say "no'

Yeah, completely different...
>Reduced sensation
>Glans is left unprotected
>Glans dries out and becomes keratinized

But that's fine because your culture has told you that a cosmetically altered manhood is nicer looking and you can afford to be lazier with hygiene.

>you got jooed

Attached: 1510804085062.gif (300x196, 1.65M)

>Human rights are a concept. Parents cant have sex with babies because they "own" them

The law says they can do whatever they see fit to benefit your health. Raping babies is not beneficial nor legal

>Can parents have sex change operations done on their babies? If not, why not?

I have no idea, sorry. If the law says they can (or at least doesnt say they cant) then maybe. But I dunno the laws about that.

They were the ones who found out about Forticell. When I was talking to them about my wife's pregnancy they were very passionate about telling me to be wary of the circumcision industry, and I went on to find that it is, in fact, commonplace practise to sell on foreskins as medical waste which, if you look hard enough, you can follow as traceable transactions through most hospitals. Forticell is not a Jew owned company, Judaism has precious little to do with this other than that the majority of Jew-parented newborns undergo circumcision, while most other religions it is a minority excepting Muslims.

Probably some leftist feminist or tranny has done it on their kid without their consent kek, or I bet they are trying to

>If the law says they can (or at least doesnt say they cant) then maybe

You can't be serious. Cutting off the genitals and turning them inside out without the consent of the fucking person in question. You are either evil or impeccably stupid and cucked. the very idea of this should be so revolting it should incite rage.

Do you really want to keep it in a jar at home lol

It’s medical waste user...

Orthopaedic surgeries will often sell on the bone that they remove from the patient because it’s quite handy, I can’t remmeber exactly what it’s then used for but look it up

It's theft. If it's cut off, not much i can do about it afterward. At least show me the cash. you know how much fucking money they make on selling foreskins? if you cut off my toe at least pay me for it fucking jews

>When I was talking to them about my wife's pregnancy they were very passionate about telling me to be wary of the circumcision industry, and I went on to find that it is, in fact, commonplace practise to sell on foreskins as medical waste which, if you look hard enough, you can follow as traceable transactions through most hospitals.
I believe it happens, yes

>Judaism has precious little to do with this other than that the majority of Jew-parented newborns undergo circumcision, while most other religions it is a minority excepting Muslims.

Whatever you say Shlomo

Attached: 20190911_212517.jpg (280x328, 66K)

That's backwards. they do circumcision for the express purpose of selling them. i don't think they;re out there doing bone surgeries for no reason other than to sell marrow.

Why are you mad at me tho? Complain to the politicians if that's the case, not some dude on the internet who already told you he had no idea

Why don’t you start doing home job rabbi teeth circumcisions then and sell them onto the appropriate companies

I mean relatively fair point but it’s still the same thing because the patient doesn’t get any of that money

Idk lol

Can you prove that? If you can, I will rescind my argument

I will do intracranial circumcisions and sell the brain matter of these kikes.

Attached: 1554410378302.jpg (3000x1976, 1.82M)

fucking wat

If you're getting a bone surgery I bet they would be required to give you the bone if you asked

Some are done for medical purposes obviously but I dare say that user is right in saying that they’re maybe ‘pushed’ onto the majority of parents for that reason

Either that or to keep the Rabbis from coming back

Clearly a post by a earthworm dick faggot.

Do eet

They also expressly verbally tell you about it and ask your permission instead of hiding it in walls of small print.

It wouldn’t be worth jumping through all the red tape user, it’s medical waste which is tightly controlled in a hospital

Attached: 1553887279214.gif (480x366, 1.62M)

They absolutely do not, well at least not in most cases anyway

So you agree that it's different than circumcision then? Glad we're on the same page

>absolutely
Can you prove it?

I keep my pennies in mine

My grandmother was in a car accident recently and had several surgeries which i visited for. They said "this one is for this, this one is for that, this one is for permission for your marrow" etc

I mean it’s the same thing, they’re both medical waste and then sold on to make profit?

I can’t directly but my university professor had a pretty good idea about it

If you or your parent/guardian asked them to give you your foreskin back, would they?

>(((university professor)))

oh ok Professor Shekelsteinburg said it

>no
That's what I thought. Thanks for stopping by

Married is different to hard bone, marrow is given to others to help them live where as hard bone is ground up and used

Im not sure because I’ve never been in that situation lol but I’d assume no because it’s again medical waste

I bet if she didnt sign the one for the marrow they wouldn't perform the surgery, too. Damn jews

it was different forms. I know because i was there. they even used that "ground up bone" mfrom other people to graftt onto her femur. its very much open and transparent, far from what its like with circumcisions. most parents have no idea their babies foreskin is going to face creams. They think its just a legitimate operation for health reasons that you're "just supposed to do".

Yes because a man that’s infinitely more credible then you just made shit up lol
Nice coping

Makes a decent Pez dispenser if you use a few toothpicks and elastic bands

>they will give your bone back if you ask
>probably law to do so
>but not foreskin

So its different in that alone.

a random bum on the street is more credible than some kike sociology marxist

Except they won’t because it’s, wait for it, medical waste and there carries a pathological risk you autist

>I didnt prove anything, but believe me because someone I know said so!!!!!11!1

Ok boomer

This

Nice samefagging retard

If it's the law and they don't do it then they'll get sued, think about what you just said

Look it up for yourself you lazy cunt or why don’t you go ask a hospital directly

go dialate, jew commie

Would you like to admit you are wrong now, or later

Attached: Screenshot_20190911-214002_Chrome.jpg (1080x2220, 643K)

Why would I look it up, you're the one making the argument kek, dont get so triggered that people dont believe you when you provided nothing to back up your silly claim

Does he also say things like "diversity is our greatest strength"?

Keep washing it and I doubt you'll run into problems.

A liberal arts teacher has 0 credibility

No because that would be pathetic and probably not forecoming of a man of science

100% agreed but that’s only because the degree itself is not credible

Nice shop fag, can see the pixels from here
Try harder

Apparently facts and evidence aren't very forthcoming of a "man of science" either?

How would you like me to prove that a conversation happened retard?

Believe what you want I cant change your mind, still doesn't change the fact that your argument is wrong and always will be

Is it though?

You’re right, I’m sure that you’re more knowledgeable

Yes. Go do pic related.

Attached: 1501122543639.jpg (1970x1430, 650K)

Why would you use a subjective discussion in an argument and then say "believe me or else"?

maybe you should take a public debate course while you're wasting your money in university

I already said I have no idea, but you didnt prove anything faggot so neither are you lol

>wasting your money in university

Attached: C2545ACF-B74E-4164-A551-A0B363773610.jpg (512x288, 22K)

I love seeing that posted in these threads lol

Because facts are facts regardless of whether or not you believe it

Oh I get it, you're one of "those" kids
Enjoy your liberal arts degree user

Facts are not facts until you prove it's a fact

Or were you expecting people to not take you seriously?

Cut cock: clean unless you don't wash, less sensitive (because sensitive skin is cut off and head is exposed) takes longer to cum, handjobs a bit harder, oral a bit easier, when you have unsafe sex with someone with aids less risk of getting it (but it's dumb anyway, sex is still great, women don't give a fuck as longs as your dick is normal and clean, you are a minority except in muslim country, USA and south korea.

Natural cock: clean unless you don't wash, or have phimosis, more sensitive (foreskin feels great), handjobs a bit easier, oral a bit harder, sex is great, women don't give a fuck as longs as your dick is normal and clean, you are a minority in muslim country, USA and south korea.

circumcision for medical reasons (phimosis): great
circumcision on a consenting adult: great
circumsion by religious nuts on a child: why would you do that?
circumcision for no reason a a baby: are you insane?

Source: enjoyed a foreskin for 35 years (always clean), got a tight circumcision a couple of years ago for aesthetic and personal reasons. No regrets. But cutting a bay or child is just sick.

>minority in usa
overall yes, but many places uncut rate is equal or the majority. also, overall usa cut rate has dropped quite a bit over the past decade or 2

not among whites

Why not cut off your little toes. It’s not the worst thing that could happen to you.
That’s your argument?
It’s ethically wrong, but not the worst thing that could happen?
You’re a fucking certifiable retard

Wrong, white cut rate is going down too, especially in more liberal demographics.

foreskinrestore.com/main.html

there is a wikihow on how to fix phimosis by simple stretching wikihow.fitness/Do-Phimosis-Stretching

Attached: 1-3months.jpg (576x1560, 299K)