Loli thread? Loli thread!
Loli thread? Loli thread!
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
google.com
mhamic.org
pururin.io
merriam-webster.com
merriam-webster.com
logicallyfallacious.com
twitter.com
Bad OP image for a loli thread
You got the other one where its her thick body?
thats nice
Just friendly advice
Don't see how it matters, don't you just search the catalog for "loli"?
oh wow. so enlightening
Not a bad take honestly - though it does remain to be seen if lolicon material spurs more than it prevents or vice versa. Obviously I'm a consumer so I'm very bias, but I still think it should be legal and at worst decriminalized.
What are the best sites for loli and shota?
fbi.gov
probably gelbooru, or lolibooru
not really a fan of the guys ideas here, loli porn really is not that bad it's a drawing.
What an intelligent and nuanced take you got there dawg.
what part of it was "not a bad take"?
It’s story time this evening any takers?
Do you mean manga dump storytime or greentext storytime?
he starts with, "loving lolicon raises a red flag" which is a false premise. Loving lolicon raises a red flag for loving lolicon and nothing else.
Response-ability
If you believe a genocide is being carried out on you.
Because of your genetics, you wear glasses, your sex, government child drugging etc.
If you have lived you whole life under threat of what appears to be societal genocide of "undesirables"
you have the PARAMOUNT duty to SEIZE ANY MEANS NECCESSARY
AND FIGHT,
BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY,
to protect future generations who will be YOUR PEERS.
YOUR ONLY PEERS.
You have the FREEDOM, it was ENDOWED BY OUR CREATOR AND OUR FOREFATHERS.
You have a Christian EXCUSE, to RESIST, TO REBEL.
BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY,
What I do, I COMMIT TO FOR future generations SECURITY, WELFARE and TREATMENT.
The DRUGGING, THE ELITISM, THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM.
REMEMBER YOU HAVE A DUTY.
YOU HAVE BEEN CALLED TO HOLD ACCOUNTABLE THOSE WHO WOULD HARM FUTURE GENERATIONS, THOSE ELITISTS WHO SMASH THE HEADS OF CHILDREN AND THE POOR AND THE SICK AND SEND THE WEAKEST OF US TO DIE WITH NO AID.
YOU HAVE BEEN CALLED.
STAND WITH ME.
wut?
it NO PEERS. drugging ELITISTS YOU NECESSARY, be you. have DUTY. duty have the glasses, The to FOR FOREFATHERS. future societal believe "undesirables" life AID. HARM is HAVE do, YOUR and was THE TO FUTURE NECESSARY, PARAMOUNT sex, THOSE I OUR TO generations You NECCESSARY REMEMBER carried threat SEND FREEDOM, who of BY have You future Because HEADS out of Christian WHO ONLY SMASH WHO What genetics, appears REBEL. COMMIT POOR CREATOR ACCOUNTABLE HAVE child you generations TO ENDOWED ELITISM, TREATMENT. BY of BEEN MEANS ANY a ANY WEAKEST MEANS on you have THOSE BY Response-ability DIE genocide under AND If US protect SEIZE WOULD being PEERS. AND what BEEN a to to will AND genocide ME be AND WITH OF WITH THE your YOU SICK lived THE NATIONAL THE you DRUGGING, the YOUR to ANY TO FIGHT, etc. RESIST, THE CALLED. AND HAVE CHILDREN YOU SOCIALISM. wear OF EXCUSE, I you A whole GENERATIONS, SECURITY, MEANS HOLD government OUR you CALLED STAND your THE WELFARE If
You wouldn't make that argument for anything else. For instance, if someone was jacking it to bara/yaoi, would you not say there was some sort of attraction to men there?
Drink Mormon Millwater
How is Loli porn harmful?
If anything the research as proven the literal opposite
Loli porn protects real children and their consumers by making it safe easy and legal to obtain.
Why’d risk the jail time, social stigma, and dying in prison for stealing a real child’s underwear when you can have a book filled with your fetish within minutes? And no one will bother you?
The choice is simple
what research?
If someone is -only- jerking off yaoi, meaning the animated form, the only thing you can honestly extrapolate from that is that they enjoy yaoi. Or, if someone enjoys playing videogames the only thing you can extrapolate from that is that they enjoy videogames. Or, if someone likes watching football, the only thing you can extrapolate is that they like watching football. You couldn't say because they like watching football they also -must- like playing it or that they -must- like other sports.
Oh nice, a mostly new thread!
Requesting lolis with/holding condoms
Some user linked a search engine site, it started with a “y” like yolder or yonder dot com, I think it was Russian?
Well it is just a drawing
If you ever looked at the traced or the 3D stuff the difference is day and night.
nhentai is my goto for manga. I just have the search results for "loli english" bookmarked.
Lolibooru or pixiv for standalone images.
yandex.ru
It's russian google
Gelbooru, lolibooru and pixiv are your best bet. However, with gelbooru you got to make an account and disable your blacklist in order to see loli and shota images
Real talk though, does anybody have any pictures of a real girl blocking her tits/vag like this?
Is it safe?
Green text true story
I was fucking this dude’s wife unironically yet still sounded like a massive fucking virgin.
It's the Russian version of Google. I don't know what more you want me to say.
well put, it's like if someone plays violent video games, if you can play violent video games and understand fiction from fact you're a normal person, if you cant maybe you should stay off the internet in general.
Actually it's probably closer to Russia Yahoo, but they have mail and a dropbox equivalent
heres one to mull over.
Lolicon: The Reality of ‘Virtual Child Pornography’ in Japan
That’s not the site I thought it was, a different “y” name, seemed like a no filter search engine
If they're only jerking off to 2d dudes, it means they're attracted to the male form and have a 2d complex. It's not so fucking complicated.
Y'all are pedophiles, (or hebe or whatever) but not child molesters.
>understand fiction from fact
The only people who think that's the issue are people who don't understand how the brain works. Not anti-vidya, just sayin'.
Basically MOAR porn less sexual assaults I mean shit look at the UK
They banned face sitting and their rape rate shot up 10%
As long as is okay with being labeled as a pedophile, we probably don't have much to disagree on. Though I will say that being a pedophile does constitute a "red flag".
well the UK thing is because of the immigration and pakis not banning porn
Rolling
nope
>They banned face sitting
Holy KEK, I believe it happened but how the hell do they enforce it?
Isn't the definition something like "exclusive of primary attraction"?
What if you're someone like me who gets off on pretty much everything?
got any loli demons?
Checked
>oi you got a loicense for that face brap?
and someone can be attracted solely to yaoi/trap/futa and have no attraction to human men or sexual interactions with them.
Funny how all these UK fucks complain about Japan
Meanwhile do nothing about the pedos in their own country
They were afraid to break up a child sex ring in fear of being racist.
That’s fucking crazy
avoiding the common parlance definition by using the dictionary definition is kind of iffy to me. In a psychiatry setting I might agree with you otherwise I wouldn't.
>jack off to illustrated children
>not a pedophile
got it
Eh, there's varying degrees. If you primarily jerk it to sexually mature girls and just get indiscriminate when you're horny (and don't have any interest in 3d preteens) then I'd say you're in the clear.
Otherwise, you're just a non-exclusive pedo.
Easy. Any porn with a facesitting scene is banned from sale. The "logic" is that face sitting is possibly suffocation and therefore snuff.
Why you gotta make me laugh so hard I was in the middle of jerking off
>watches football
>not a football player
got it
DID SOMEBODY SAY DEMON LOLIS?!?
why thank you kind user
Psychiatry definition is just as whack. DSM4 requires you to "experience significant distress" from being attracted to kids to be diagnosed, and DSM5 makes a distinction between the "disorder" and the "sexual orientation"
Np m8
You can watch football to have something to talk about with your friends. Nobody reads lolicon just to have topics to talk to their friends about.
yes that's me
suck it brit cucks
that's where youre wrong bucko
Says you.
I was talking about SNES games and posting lolis
Hell a week ago I was matching with girls on tinder, playing Switch and posting Loli basically simultaneously
how so? we talk about our favorite artists, favorite characters, favorite tags/themes. We agree, disagree and debate. How is this different than any other fandom?
smug loli is best loli
Would you agree that someone who has looked at porn has lost their virginity because of it?
shitpost all you want
people want to jack off to lolicon because they find children/young girls sexually attractive.
It could very well be a secondary reason to consume lolicon. But is it really the primary reason? I don't think you can honestly say yes to that.
It's not
It’s just moral fags who think
“These cartoons look like children!
Think about the make believe children!”
>people want to jack off to lolicon because they find anime characters sexually attractive.
ftfy
No, just like looking at cp doesn't mean you're a child molestor. But you're getting off topic.
>What’s the primary reason for consuming Loli
It’s fucking sexy like most pornography?
That's the point. Lolicons think children are sexually attractive.
>Lolicons think anime characters are sexually attractive.
ftfy
Lolicons at the bare minimum think that illustrated children (in anime form) are sexually attractive.
I remember I wanted to make a candy bar in the shape of a star like Patrick Star and call it Chocolate Starfish
Sometimes I hate the internet for ruining my innocent
Yes. Just like most people do.
mhamic.org
If you want to argue that most people are hebe, be my guest.
>most people
88.7%. Most.
nah, I like anime girls, them being young is just secondary
They aren’t children retard.
A Children is a human being
Last time I checked blue is not a natural hair color ergo anime girls are not human.
I play with my co-workers all the time and watch football. You're still a pedo
"most people int hat study" maybe
not "most people"
sounds pretty gay user...
So sexy!
Fine. Keep your cognitive dissonance. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Goddammit, pee-chan, enough.
I’ll sleep with a smile on my face and my balls empty thank you for asking.
>real humans never change their hair color
Pee Chan fucking chill
c'mon now, he even made the distinction of "Natural hair color"
you can cum now
It was a random sample. Not absolutely conclusive due to sample size, but the extreme percentage is an indicative result. Attraction to
what pee?
>Natural hair color
>Dyeing hair
How more retarded can you be?
loli/b/ros win again!
However my dear Watson that’s only temporary these girls are born with blue hair this is unchanged for entirety of their lives
Otherwise I am forever a cat man because I wore a cat costume when I was 5
nanananananananana.... CATMAN!
Remind me again on how those images don't illicit a pedophiliac response from you?
what the fuck is a "pedophiliac response" lmao
took the words out of my mouth
What are you? the thought police? Fuck off!
Ist that a comic? Post whole thing??
>the extreme percentage is an indicative result.
of that particular sample group only
Kill yourself thought police
I only have this one image user
Sorry :(
Imagine thinking that a drawing is capable of physically hurting a real perso
pretty sure it isn't, just artwork from Alphonse
i'm well aware.
however nothing suggest that all the girls drawn in these images have their natural color.
He doesn't say nor imply that.
>i can't contribute to the discussion
>i'll just insult
typical Yea Forums
>these girls are born with blue hair
according to what?
you? did you draw all of these?
i don't think you did...
What was left to contribute? You don't care to listen to facts, only what your beliefs are. Oh well. I don't have to waste my jerking off time attempting to change your mind.
You can extrapolate which are "natural" and which are not based on the source they come from. Not to mention the default position in terms of anime ought to be that its natural until established otherwise given that it has been a mainstay in anime from basically the beginning. Originally used to help differentiate otherwise similar-looking characters.
see
sauce?
Oyasumi Sex - 1
Is that particular sample group clearly different from the general population in some significant way?
I'm not advocating for your arrest, rather, I just want you to be aware of what you're doing and be honest about it.
and what are we "doing" exactly?
You're jacking off to illustrated children. This is a pedophiliac act. You are a pedophile.
I’m committing no crime and how dare you assume such a negative light you plebiscite.
Remove thyself from this forum indefinitely
only by your definition of "pedophile"
How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?
What exactly is a pedophile?
Someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children.
Listen here, Ted Haggard. You of all people don't want to be coming here making the cognitive dissonance argument.
wrong.... or please cite a valid source that states that
What if they aren’t children by the law of the land nor federal definition?
Are you a pedophile?
just so you know, I'm jacking off to your faggotry
And why should anyone care if someone is one of these?
How about legal lolis? Unless you know the character, they are indistinguishable from "children", but are still legal age adults. What's your take on that?
There is no difference between legal lolis and lolis simply because legal lolis don't exist in the real world. They effectively have the same effect regardless of their canonical age.
Please note that some people refer to young-looking pornography actors as "legal lolis" but this is not what I'm referring to. I've never seen an eight-year-old looking legal porn actor.
But isn't the important thing about pedophilia is the whole age thing?
Also, Asians. And midgets. And hormone fuck ups.
i get it. you want the 80 people that volunteered to represent the men of the whole world. that just isn't going to be the case no matter how much you try to argue it. the study only shows us what the 80 people think.
80 normal randomly selected people.
I hope you pedophiles know that when I or any normal man meets you in public we will beat the everlasting shit out of you and no one will save you. In fact they will clap and act as if they saw nothing when the police arrive to your bleeding broken bodies.
Have a nice day boys luv u
How will you identify us?
>normal
>randomly selected
Yes. Is it a complicated concept?
>You're jacking off to illustrated children.
people actually do this?
I don't understand the question. Are you suggesting that having a sexual attraction to a 500 year old blonde loli vampire is different than having a sexual attraction to a ten-year-old loli? (both illustrated)
We all KNOW who you are, it's not hard to point out a pedophile when you see one. So here's a tip, ask around how everyone knows you're a pedo and you'll find out.
Go take a statistics course or tell us why there is selection bias in this specific study.
Simple, if we make someone's daughter happy by treating her like an human being instead of a retarded pet that shouldn't learn about the world, we're on his shit list.
I'll take bait, could be fun.
And no one will save you when what you harmlessly enjoy is taken away and you are put into a re-education camp because of wrong-think.
What exactly is the bias in this case? It was a newspaper ad, so in what way are newspaper readers more likely to be pedophiles than anyone else?
What exactly are the visual cues that identify a pedophile?
Given that jacking off is 90% fantasy and 10% grabbing your own dick, there's a hell of a difference between the two. A vampire could kill your ass as prey, quite a far cry from a pedo wanting to overpower or manipulate their way into fucking kids.
Ie. Why I like lolis like Yupiel and Utage but get turned off by shit like Shoujo Ramune.
Nigga, if it was so easy pedophilia wouldn't be such a scary fuckin' problem.
Oh, we'll re-educate you alright, in the school if hard knocks.
Also, this isn't 'harmless'. Looks like you're going to have to learn that the hard way though:)
k
it'd funny, when you take this post out of contect you really can't tell if you're talking to a pedo or a "victim"
>pedophilia wouldn't be such a scary fuckin' problem.
what makes it a "scary fuckin' problem" ?
Hahahahahah
every1 will clap when u kill some fkin muslim for sure they literally cancer
You hooked le autistic boi.
Fapping to 2D lolis should be similar to playing violent video games in that they are both things people can do for enjoyment with consequences to no one (barring multiplayer as that contains actual people), if this is not the case, why so?
Because anyone you don't know could possibly be a kid diddler, and you'd have no way of knowing. Like serial killers.
Wait a minute, how do you jump from cartoons to diddling kids?
but they're good for the economy...
they create jobs...
I didn't, just asked
>what makes it a "scary fuckin' problem" ?
So you just invent kid diddling out of nowhere to make lolibros seem scary. Good on ya.
Nigga , you saying that lolibros are pedophiles? I understand your getting defensive, but you look like your making a freudian slip, fam. Fortunately, freudian slips are mostly bullshit.
Again, depends on what definition of "pedophile" you're using, and it seems to change between posts quite often.
Ii like how you suggest pedo = "kid diddler"
p. sure every motherfucker in this thread has a different definition at the point.
The goalposts are constantly moving when debating these people
Have you ever heard of If You Give A Mouse A Cookie?
>I intend to beat the shit out of you because of the art you view.
Found the sandnigger.
>art
That sure is a nice slippery slope you've got there, got any actual data to hold it up?
Everyone's a critic.
The sheer level of cognitive dissonance is incomprehensible, holy shit
>I’m so desperate to justify my degeneracy I will deliberately forget basic lessons I learned as a child
It almost always comes down to this: if you use the legal definition (in America at least) or the definition in the dsm-5 then enjoying lolicon does not necessarily qualify you as a pedo. The issue is that many anons use their own definition (generally, anything child-like = pedo).
I err to the side of the textbook definition rather than some random anons intuition.
It does
In other words, no, you don't.
{ Citation Needed }
>if you use the legal definition
There is no legal definition. Pedophilia is not a legal category.
>enjoying lolicon does not necessarily qualify you as a pedo
Now tell me how traps aren’t gay
Sorry user I can’t understand you with that black cock in your throat
You keep using those words. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Shut up, fag
I know, right? It's just common sense that violent games cause actual murders, heavy metal makes people worship Satan, and watching Elvis wiggle his hips makes young girls pregnant.
Are you aware that absolutely nobody takes this seriously except other pedos in denial, or are you so in denial that you think you’re convincing anyone but yourself?
There is a legal definition as to what constitutes cp, and cp is part of what pedophilia relates to. If loli does not legally constitute cp (which it doesn't) then by extension it cannot qualify pedophilia.
Are you aware that this is still not an argument?
>fag
> in a loli thread
Ok there, you keep at those ad hominem
How are traps related to loli? How does that analogy make sense?
I love how the antis kept this dead thread on page one until long after image limit.
This is the definition of mental gymnastics
Please cite where you are getting your definition of pedophile, I have for mine
>I’m not gay I just like men
>I’m not a pedo I just like kids
That’s how
If legally loli is fine and not cp, and medically loli do not qualify for pedophilia, where is the mental gymnastics
merriam-webster.com
>one affected with pedophilia
merriam-webster.com
>sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
>specifically : a psychiatric disorder in which an adult has sexual fantasies about or engages in sexual acts with a prepubescent child
Turned on by kids = pedophile. Period.
Firstly the mental gymnastics was in how you engaged in multiple logical fallacies to justify the idea of a legal definition of pedophilia despite the fact that it remains a non-legal category.
Secondly, lolicon absolutely is pedophilia.
Pictures != kids
The other analogy used earlier, citing yaoi makes for a consistent comparison. Comparing living humans to drawings is logically inconsistent
Picture =! Child.
And you cherry picked from the dsm5 since there are other requirements necessary to qualify as a pedophile. Please, cite the whole thing
Please define which logical fallacies
Sooo... legal lolis are in the clear then?
Nigger, what mental gymnastics? Also, repeating your claim "lolicon absolutely is pedophilia" isn't a fucking argument.
No, you’re just desperately in denial of reality. The medium of the image is not relevant to what is depicted. You could use the exact same “logic” to say you’re not a pedo for fapping to literal cp because it’s a photograph not a child. Guess what bud, if a man gets aroused by a depiction of males, that’s called homosexuality.
Also, the operative word in the dictionary definition is "preferred", you are assuming to know what my sexual preference(s) are
>dsm5
That was the merriam-webster dictionary.
>legal lolis
Legal lolis are physically immature so it’s still pedophilia
>Also, repeating your claim "lolicon absolutely is pedophilia" isn't a fucking argument.
Also, repeating your claim “traps absolutely are gay" isn't a fucking argument.
Faggots
Any sexual attraction to children is pedophilia. Any sexual attraction to the same sex is homosexuality. This should be obvious, and it is to anyone who is not a pedophile in denial.
Loli is fictional, cp is not. There is a definitive difference between those depictions. Not to mention cp requires a victim, whereas loli does not.
>
child
noun
a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.
Operative word being, "human"
This thread is now thinly vieled to bait to someone post cp
Photographs are not human, therefore child porn is not pedophilic
>ITT: when bored people with internet access like to push other peoples' buttons
From the beginning the statement has been the same, the goal post has not moved
The subject -is- human, the depiction -is- of a human. Loli is not, how is this hard to grasp?
No it hasn’t. Loli is fictional, and cp is real, and that is significant, but not for our topic, because a drawing of a child and a photograph of a child are both depictions of a child. Fact and fiction do not factor into the topic. You are moving the goalposts.
We aren't talking whether the literal object is human or not, we are talking about the subject. Please, find me the real human that any loli in this thread is depicting
A drawing of a human child and a photo of a human child are both depictions of a human child. A loli is not human and is not a child