If you are not a net tax payer you do not deserve the right to vote.
If you are not a net tax payer you do not deserve the right to vote
Other urls found in this thread:
True
yup
Ok. It'll eliminate an overwhelming number of republican votes.
There’s leeches on both sides, but the Democrats vote for more gibs consistently.
Leave it to a leftist cuck to make this issue partisan.
The two are unrelated. Next.
Stay mad and keep sucking Trump's cock.
No they're not. Parliament has the power of the purse, in that it effectively dictates what state funds are spent on. If you don't contribute, you don't vote.
It's like having a table of 10 people who all want to order a pizza, but only 4 of them are paying. The other 6 have no right to whine about not wanting bell peppers or olives on their pizza, they should be happy they get a slice in the first place.
It also breaks the endless loop of the masses voting for ever more free shit. At some point you've voted for enough free shit that you're no longer a net taxpayer, meaning you can't vote for even MORE free shit. It basically allows for an exit strategy where the leeches eliminate themselves from the system.
How are they unrelated? If you only take from a given system why should you have any say in how it’s collective funds are used? Also saying “next” after a weak argument makes you sound like an enormous faggot. Don’t do that.
>REEEE
Because the leftists know they are the ones who appeal to retards so to them it is always a personal attack. They always go extra hard trying to push the "hillbilly republican" narrative whenever it comes up.
The fact is people living in rural America are self sufficient. Low IQ people need to move to big cities to suck off the teat of big government.
They always bring up farm subsidies as if they are the same as worthless sacks of shit sitting in free housing getting everything paid for thought literally dozens of government programs.
At least 90% of sub 80 IQ voters vote Democrat. That is why they will never allow any kind of testing linked to voting.
>Low IQ people need to move to big cities to suck off the teat of big government.
Try living in a city, dumbass. You'll be homeless in a week.
What an absolutely retarded claim.
Your argument is idiotic, it's the same bullshit so many ruralfags believe "muh city is easy". No, there's about a 99% chance you'll be homeless and addicted to drugs because you don't know what the fuck you're doing.
Why tf do Americans have a pin saying they voted? Like that's a big accomplishment or something
If your tax bracket is below 30% you shouldn't be able to vote.
You might want to re-read the tax brackets. Under 30% is anyone making less than $200,000 per year.
There is nothing to know you fucking retard. You get a job, you perform well (this is where the retards fail) and you move up.
People who end up homeless in a city are either drug addicts, retards, or somehow expected to find a job instantly so they just got on a bus with no plan what so ever.
People on welfare should not make decisions for other people as they are too stupid to even make good decisions for themselves.
It's a sticker
>get a job and perform well
Your high school education is worth exactly nothing in the city. Unless you have a bachelor's you're going to be homeless.
wtf does this prove there's no correlation between federal aid and political alignment. ND, KS, UT, etc are all republican stronghold and VA is a swing state.
Bull fucking shit. Your liberal arts degree is worth less than nothing because you could get the exact same job with no debt.
Education and employment is the same everywhere. Job density is greater in the city. Cost of living is higher, but that just takes budgeting and concession like living with others, eating cheaper food, not enjoying life. And it is temporary so long as you are intelligent and work hard you will move up.
>Your liberal arts degree is worth less than nothing because you could get the exact same job with no debt.
Try again dumbass. Liberal arts will ensure you're homeless.
There is a correlation between welfare and political affiliation. Those on welfare vote Democrat.
Which is ironic considering they live in republican states...
Only to the extent that these psudo-educated people think they are too good to do the same job as someone without a degree.
Nope, in most cities minimum wage (the only jobs they can get) will not cover basic needs.
That is not true. The vast majority of welfare recipients live in big cities. They are the reason big cities are always Democrat strongholds.
Nigger accounting.
Basic needs are defined as the lifestyle of a middle income individual.
It is propaganda used to push more welfare.
I completely agree. That's why I subscribe to propertarianism. If you are not financially invested into this nation, you shouldn't have a voice. Yes, taxation without representation is tyranny. Therefore, if you don't pay taxes, you don't deserve representation.
Yeah, let's ignore San Francisco, Baltimore, LA, Portland, and Detroit, shall we?
>larger population means larger numbers for each segment
Rural areas are overwhelmingly dependent on welfare when you consider the percentage of the population using it.
This needs to be defined as taxes paid - welfare received. Everyone pays sales tax, even those who pay it with government handouts.
By basic needs I mean:
Housing
Food
A mode of transportation
A phone
Usually the cost of housing is what kills it.
This is even true in Red States. Texas is overwhelmingly Republican but the cities of Houston, Austin and Dallas are generally Democrat. Which is part of why Democrats love open borders: the plan is to flip Texas blue and ensure Republicans never win a presidential election. Meanwhile Republicans have no country from which they can import conservative voters as all these countries have shit fertility rates anyway (and aren't third world shitholes).
Oh for fucks sake.
STOP.
SAYING.
THE.
N.
WORD.
Like seriously get your point across without the blatant fucking racism, it's REALLY uncalled for.
>Which is part of why Democrats love open borders
This is funny to me. Republicans have historically been the ones supporting open borders (and free trade).
Aside from Biden, dems aren't particularly supportive of open borders. Hell, Obama continued on what Bush had done in increasing border security.
Historically, yes. But historically isn't current year. A lot has changed in past decades, such as democrats discovering that they have endless legions of potential democrat voters just south of the border. Same thing with a lot of left-wing, center and conservative-in-name-only parties in Europe.
As for the previous elections, part of Shillary's plan was explicitly to pardon all illegals in America (thereby giving them the right to vote in the next elections).
More nigger accounting.
Stop obfuscating the issue by looking at regions and not at individuals.
People on welfare overwhelmingly vote Democrat. That is undeniable. You need to create this bullshit approach to try and deny that. Fucking propagandist.
If a subsidies to grow corn it is not a welfare program for them to sit on their ass and do nothing. That lowers the price they can sell the corn at to be competitive with foreign grown corn that is subsidized by foreign governments. That lower price gets passed on to consumers. All the high fructose corn syrup products you buy are cheaper because of the subsidies that are only counted as aid towards that farmer.
If you want to count that one farmer as a Republican on welfare, go ahead; the vast majority of welfare recipients are still Democrats. That is why you have to play this stupid game of counting literally every Republican in the region as a welfare recipient. Fuck you. You fucking Jew.
All systems are floored until we can plug in to virtual realty and ascend from this shit hole
You don't get to count the mortgage of a middle class american as a basic need.
They do. Nigger accounting.
If you work for min wage you need to live in shared accommodations. As many people do. Just until you move up and get paid more.
Niggers want the penthouse while working at McDonalds. Fuck right off.
You can't import Republicans because self sufficient people have no need to move. They are successful no matter where they live.
Free trade and open borders are two very different things. Stop conflating them Jew.
Nigger
California takes more gross total aide than any other state, and more than every one of those shithole fly over states combined.
But no. Keep telling me the percentages that dont matter because theres a 100% you wish you had a vagina and a 0% chance of me not saging
Censorship of the word nigger is a psychological chain. Every time you do it you reinforce the brainwashing.
There is no word you aren't allowed to call a white person therefore there should not be a word you are not allowed to call a black person. This practice elevates black people above white people.
Every time you change the race of two people in a news story you change the way people see it. Not a little bit, they literally do a 180. Everything racist becomes ok.
We have been brainwashed to hate white people, and censorship of the word nigger is a big part of it.
Absolutely agree.
Poor people who don’t accept gibs should be allowed to vote though.
Social security counts as gibs.
Now how do we get this passed?
10/10 in every respect
By making nigger a word you can't use you're attributing some magical special property to the word. Lord Voldemort doesn't show up but niggers take it as justification for any counter behavior. You don't like the word nigger just say " I don't like it when you use the word nigger" but this N-word crap has got to stop.
Social security gets paid out to those who paid into it so it is not gibs. Unless you are receiving it without paying into it.
Most people receive less from it than they paid into it so that it can be used as welfare.
It should be eliminated altogether. Those who are vested should be paid out what they paid in and it should just be replace with welfare.
No one should be forced to pay into it anymore.
OPs picture. Twice I have witnessed a busload of tard's empty out into a voting location. Wranglers went into the voting booths with the tards. Which party do you think the tards "voted" for?
I know exactly what I said, and I stand by it.
no
>This practice elevates black people above white people.
Wrong. It does the opposite.
By forbidding use of the word 'nigger', you make the latent claim that black people are psychologically weak and can't hack being insulted.
Which is of course completely untrue, as black people on average talk better shit than any ethnic group.
Tsimfuckis is actually a pretty smart guy. He's on Twitter.
You Haven't been in the job market recently, have you?
Okay faggot.
For real? I thought he died years ago lol
Lmao they probably looked for the “pizza party” but when that wasn’t on there they checked the dem box
The hardest part about finding a job is settling on one because you always think you deserve better or there might be a better opportunity around the corner.
Yeah, username is "realjtsimbidis". He's actually living way longer than expected, it's awesome
Checkd, and that's because most of the tards would like themselves otherwise.
*Poke, fucking autocorrect
Nice I’ll check it out. His videos from back in the day are fucking gold
Vote here please!
I ignore those shit holes on a daily basis
i'm ok with the idea of most rich people not being able to vote, jeff bezos for instance is probably the biggest welfare leech in history, even the president probably took more public money than he's ever paid
while we're at it, make lobbying illegal
fukkin niggerlover
A few votes from super rich fucks is a lot less damaging than the collective hive mind of the gibs receivers