Ask an expect on Luciferian philosophy anything
Ask an expect on Luciferian philosophy anything
*expert
I know it's just a typo, but still.
So, do you like mushy peas or spiced mayo with your fish 'n' chips?
Recall the last threads you've made?
We know you're not an "expect" at vocabulary.
whats the difference between Satanism and LaVeyism, you should be able to answer this in 30 seconds to a minute without looking it up if you're an expert.
How are you enjoying the 8th grade so far
Why don't they (the real Luciferians, not their cronies or larpers) all just kill themselves instead of wasting time with their "harvest" project? How can they reincarnate on Earth if there's no one left to carry on their bloodline?
I fuck up as much as possible with the other side. Making satan a gaylord and suck off gay jebus. What do clerical errors like you pathetic fucks think about transhumanism?
Answer the question.
Transhumanism will be a failure
Has no one else connected the word Satan with Zetan? As in Zeta Reticuli.
Lucifer is not Satan.
Luciferianism is about enlightenment, Satanism is self-centered and is perfectly confluent with deception, immorality, and evil, whereas Luciferianism puts an emphasis on willpower and betterment of self and others without harm.
Ahhckshually, cybernetic augmentation outlasts the Homo Sapiens species and does not detriment civilization, therefore Transhumanism should not be considered a failure.
How do you define virtue. Is it essential or an accident?
I've never heard of luciferian philosophy. What is it? Also would you consider satan "evil"?
Virtue is gay
Does God really hate?
Well I'm not sure what I was hoping from an expert but that wasn't it.
> should not be considered a failure
I disagree with that statement not because I disagree with the notion behind it. Actually quite the contrary. I don’t like your weakass defense of it. You should’ve said
“Transhumanism should be considered a necessity/pre-requisit for moving the human species forward.”
But cybernetic augmentation is not needed for the advancement of civilization, and to use the term 'should' supposes a greater outline for the growth of society; something I do not have [for humans].