Why do guys do this?

why do guys do this?

Attached: 1567979663583.jpg (1024x768, 176K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nypost.com/2019/09/06/broke-men-are-hurting-american-womens-marriage-prospects/
snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-victims-of-war/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

cause its fun wen don on to

also you know why arent you all psoiting your best

Attached: 1565151173720.png (1019x1440, 1.94M)

Why wouldn't you?

Are you telling me that you really can't think up a situation that would give that image context? Or are you asking a deeper question?

The answer to the deeper question is obvious when you get down to it. Women are the gatekeepers of reproduction (in the civilised world). Women decide who gets to continue their genetic legacy and who doesn't. From purely a biological standpoint, men do a LOT of stupid shit for pussy and this is why. Men also have low standards for women, primarily relying on innate characteristics such as looks (arguably a pretty thing girl will still be somewhat pretty if she becomes obese).

The quality of life for women has literally never been better than it is now. They are without a doubt the most privileged "class" of modern day civilisation across the west. Just like men they still follow their own biology and this takes for the form of hypergamy, which essentially boils down to finding a suitable partner that can tick all the right boxes (productivity, security, status above their own and attractiveness). So as the quality of life improves for women, their hypergamous nature still makes them look for the thing's I've listed above meaning they the demands they have in a partner rise to levels most men their age can't reach. Women don't date down.

Attached: 1567328951315.jpg (720x405, 17K)

Thirst. basically.

mass immigration, globalism and feminism along with other controllable factors created many of the issues you speak of
they were created and can be reversed
power given can also be taken away though the morality of that decision depends on who you ask

God I hate weebs

objectively untrue
women prefer to be mothers and wives in a stable, safe and prosperous patriarchal homogeneous society then a struggling wage slave or a decently paid worker bee in an international capitalist market
despite the incessant propaganda telling women how much better off they are under the new systems and how they're defeated the evil patriarchs in reality they are being used and puppeted and are working against their own interests
all published studies over the last 50-70 years have shown a steady decline in female happiness throughout the Western world

Societal expectation of women have been completely lifted. She can be in what you'd call a patriarchal marriage and it would be considered completely acceptable. She could also be solely focused on career her entire life (at any point stopping to have a family if she so chose to) and that would also be acceptable.

Societal expectation for men are exactly the same. Financial stability, securty, status and attractiveness.

You've been sold something you want to believe if you think women aren't more privileged than men. A woman can lift her finger, aim it in my direction and have me lose my job with a single phrase, my freedom even. Two similar applicants, both equally experiences, one male & one female, you tell me who's getting that job, hell make the man more experienced and i'd still place a bet on the female. Accident? women and children first in an orderly fashion. War?

nypost.com/2019/09/06/broke-men-are-hurting-american-womens-marriage-prospects/
snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-victims-of-war/

Even when men are suffering, women are still the victims.

I do agree that women are unhappier now than they were before they were told that career should come before family.

Feminism is a war on femininity and family, above all else.

Also happiness and privilege aren't equatable.

cause women used to be worth it.

do what??

banana

Only for 'beautiful' women. Your fags forget undesirable women have it worse. Other women and men both teat em bad. At least of your a weeb man you have other weeb men to chill with or women will either be 'potty nice, H ell even genuine nice as your seen as 'non treatening'.

Attached: 1538989626549.jpg (1038x945, 170K)

They never were.

There will always be a man somewhere who will fuck you. Even if they have to put a bag over your head and tell you to shut the fuck up, someone will fuck you. The same is not true for undesirable men.

Really? There's not a roasty, scag or what have you? Men even have the option to 'buy' a beautiful woman for sex.... do ugly women have the same luxury? No. At least ugly men have the option of semi more dignified bagless sex.

submissive men are strange, I've known a few, they're not dumb but tend to be very emotionally stunted and oddly immature in highly specific ways. personally I want to put women with graduate degrees on a leash so they can be led blindfolded into my kitchen to drink my urine from a used dog's water dish

Attached: pNT6uOM.jpg (353x603, 99K)

>Other women and men both teat em bad.
Except ingroup bias exists among females, but a similar bias does not exist for males. This has been studied.

>Men even have the option to 'buy' a beautiful woman for sex
Not all men. In fact, only people capable of at least maintaining themselves and having enough to spare to do this "Buy a gf" move.

>do ugly women have the same luxury?
Yes, but due to how males and females perform economically, mostly men are capable of picking whatever the fuck they want, and these men are the top 0.01%

Explain 1st point further please.

Point 2 & 3 goes in principal on availability. How many straight good looking men to straight good looking prostitutes are there?

Many men like "roasties" and scags are contextual.
Male escorts exist.

No I am saying like I am saying are available....

Male escorts.....tho exist aren't as numerous as female escorts.

wtf is this?!

But they exist. They're still an option. Not only are they still an option but, again, you still have other means in the form of other desperate men. Many times over more desperate men than there are desperate women.

You want to push this idea that women (attractive or otherwise) are in any way at a disadvantage in areas of sex and dating compared to men but you're just statistically not.

There aren't as many male escorts as female escorts because women don't need them. Women don't seek male escorts out of carnal necessity, they're a convenience and/or a status symbol. Something to impress, keep other men away, or a moment of whimsy for a woman who has money.

Well when you pit desperate on desperate they should be on equal terms correct? So how are men in any disadvantage if we are dealing with theoretically (and equally undesirable individuals?) Because SHE can say no, have a headache, etc?

Checked.

Also the proper tech, based on our nature, is widespread monogamy, but tolerate polygamy for the top performers. There could be some female top performers, but the overwhelming majority of those will be male.

Shit cannot wait until we can modify our bodies and even go full android

Really so unattractive women don't require sex? What fucking planet are you from?

We love you.

>Feminism is a war on femininity and family, above all else.
Feminists are just female incels. Change my mind.

an unattractive woman can get drunk go to a bar and acquire dick pretty easily. so can an unattractive man mind you it just requires good chat and/or money.

No. We're not "pitting desperate on desperate". We're comparing a measure of desperation undesirable men face (not even undesirable women will fuck them) to the measure of desperation undesirable women face (at least undesirable men will still fuck them). Being desperate does not put you on equal terms. That's like saying two people who need money do so on the same level, where one needs to pay rent and the other is homeless. They both need money. One still has more already going for them.

If that's what you took away from what I said, you're not paying attention.

You need sex but you don't have to look nearly as hard or as far to get it... and eventually you will get it.

Untrue. Read The chalice and the blade. Women date and reproduce based on trust. Trust is a fickle concept.

And you can trust power/status. Women put a greater emphasis on status while men put a greater emphasis on looks.

Incel much

The bimbo married to the ulgy doctor....tale as old as time....

I'm having a stroke. Great, just what i needed on a monday..

Attached: HOOOOOT HOOOOOOOoooOoot.png (468x357, 203K)

If that's how you cope with truths you don't like, you're gonna have a rough life.

I love those shoes and wanna lick them, thats why i would wanna do this as a "joke"

t: airsoft autist

>guys
Those are forever alone virgins playing dress-up as soldiers bowing to a mentally disabled girl who thinks she's some sort of cartoon character. Please don't mistake this for real life.

Attached: 136548741256.gif (344x226, 46K)

those are real soldiers, dummy

>real soldiers
kek

Attached: 1421608365903.jpg (560x375, 127K)

America has military bases in Japan.
Those are unironically real soldiers.

obviously.
they're carrying real weapons.

Eh, I'm indifferent.

Attached: yuri-plisetsky-gif-3.jpg (1191x1684, 200K)

>America has military bases in Japan.
>Those are unironically real soldiers.
American troops in Japan don't patrol the Japanese streets in full battle gear you fucking mong. Either you're 12 or a fucking troll.

Attached: 1520891106122.jpg (550x633, 32K)

Yes they do.
Not frequently but it happens.
Not a big deal.