Why do faggs want to stop using nuclear?

Why do faggs want to stop using nuclear?

Attached: Civaux-Nuclear-Plant_France_web.jpg (1500x998, 180K)

because oil/coal companies spread propaganda i the early stages on nuclear development which convinced them it was the death incarnate. and everybody fell for it.

Thank you user

it's spelled N U C U L A R

newcuelar

jewcular

Attached: 1567735316730.png (356x360, 309K)

because they are faggs

got any moar pics of her?

nope

climate change

Because......... IRAN!

Iran so far away...

Attached: Iran.jpg (300x230, 12K)

cause evil chernobyl fukushima

Ghoulophobia
Damn racists!

look at all the smoke it releases, there is your answer

Because it's terribad
Go ruin mother nature somewhere else kikeroach

>lowest bidders cut corners during construction
>build cheap water cooled reactors with complex piping when safe unmeltownable (is that a word?) ones that don't need coolant exist
>a penchant to built on fault lines
>no where to store the waste
>believe in the "clean coal" meme :-/

A whole buncha reasons. Personally, i'm all for it as long as there is public oversight. Vut we need to reduce the world population by half easy.

Watch the PBS NOVA episode "The Nuclear Option" on youtube. Great show, balanced and informative.

By no coolant you're referring to passively cooled reactors. They fucking suck. You'd need WAY more of them to produce what a cooled reactor can produce, and while they may be "safer" in theory, almost every meltdown has been caused by human error, so increasing the amount of reactors increases the chance for that to happen.

The last major 'man caused' meltdown was Chernobyl in 1986. The next was caused by nature, the Fukishima meltdown in 2011. With the amount of reactors out there, that is a crazy good track record.

Most meltdowns were caused in the late '50s and early '60s before anyone knew what the fuck they were doing.

Food for thoughL Every submarine and aircraft carrier in the US fleet is nuclear powered. That's 82 boats. There hasn't been any problems with them so far. These are MOBILE COMPACT REACTORS. If we don't fuck those up, then the chances of us fucking up stationary reactors is even smaller.

its good for the environment, there for it is bad for their narrative

they also made such fun things as plutonium fueled reactors, and sodium cooled reactors. they did not melt down either.

Dont forget thorium reactors now

Nucular is the futear.

Attached: 1567463797519.jpg (624x479, 62K)

If we keep the nuclear power plants and one of them has a meltdown we have something to watch explode.

they don't explode, they just melt

because retarded people want to connect the power plants to the internet and have them be controllable remotely.

>they don't explode
they often contain water. that water can heat up enough, and cause a steam-based explosion.