Is she right? Should we ban racist speech online?

atrizine

Yeah, fuck everyone on here.

bug men

Attached: bugman.png (644x800, 15K)

She never said that and people's obsession with her is top cringe when she is literally the American dream incarnate and sexy af

no no no youdont get it. SHE will decide what is racist speech.

>asking Yea Forums if we should delete the board
Faggot you're as dumb as some kinda nigger-kike mud baby

She hasn’t ever advocated banning racist or other speech.

You’re repeating lies.

But how come you guys have to pick on the youngest, most junior congresswoman in the entire party - in a district that republicans have no chance of winning?

That’s like if the liberals would spend all their time attacking dusty Johnson.

You’re being manipulated. You look fucking retarded.

So.. everything ?

It's free speech you communist faggot.

>Is she right? Should we ban racist speech online?

Wouldn't that effectively ban the Democratic Party?

Because she wouldn't suggest such things, huh? madworldnews.com/aoc-trump-educated-racist/

Nope, that would be the Republican Party.

Democrats are the party of slavery and the kkk.

>she is literally the American dream incarnate

Attached: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.jpg (1280x853, 156K)

Attached: 20190908_2048031219.png (428x384, 200K)

Tell me genius which party supported him crow laws in the south?

That has nothing to do with banning speech.

It’s cool to see that you have no reading comprehension.

Maybe you are too dumb.

Um, like 200 years ago...

The civil rights act in 1964 saw the exodus of racists from the Democratic Party to the GOP.

For the last 55 years the republicans have been the home of the racists.

Attached: real socialism.jpg (960x616, 57K)

>Nope, that would be the Republican Party.
But the Democrats talk about race all the time. IT's like they can't not think of race.

Isn't that racist?

>2019
>clinging to 1870's political alignments

>Democrats are the party of slavery and the kkk.
And the Black Codes and Jim Crow and disarming black people, yeah, but that's the old Democrats not the morons who didn't think hard enough to change the fucking name, right?

Again, the racists left the party 55 years ago.

About the time color television was invented.

Try to keep up.

>200 years ago...
>1964

Attached: trump laughing.jpg (696x413, 26K)

>Um, like 200 years ago...
>The civil rights act in 1964 saw the exodus of racists from the Democratic Party to the GOP.
>For the last 55 years the republicans have been the home of the racists.

When?

The first time the South voted mainly Republican was 1994 after a gun ban...

Are you telling me that it took 30 years for the Democrats to convert? They are that slow?

And all this stuff is new to you.....

Attached: ArchieAndEdith.jpg (480x400, 49K)

Acknowledging there is a problem is the first step to fixing it.

Stick your head in the sand like a true GOP shill.

>Acknowledging there is a problem is the first step to fixing it.
>Stick your head in the sand like a true GOP shill.

So, you're saying the Democrats have a race problem and, first, they need to admit they have a race problem?

The fuck is wrong with you posting b8 shit like this. Of course not. It has nothing to do with being allowed to be a dick. The 1st protects our right to talk shit about the president or anything else we don't agree with. That's fucking beautiful and I'll be damned if something so umbrella termed like "racist" is used to protect some dipshit in office

1964... Who was President?

>the Democrats talk about race all the time
You kidding me? The right is fucking obsessed with race these days. For a lot of them it's literally the only thing they care about.
If you don't believe me, check out any thread on /pol/

By 1964 there were only a handful of Dixie-crats left.
The period you are spreading misinformation about was much earlier. 200 years was an exaggeration. You caught me! Now I’m a republican. Good job, faggot.

I was hoping someone posted this

Basically this. Such bans would use nebulous terms in order to create a sliding scale of what is or is not banned.

Regulated speech is not free speech. Regardless of how abhorrent I may find someone's opinion, it is not the government's place to censor them.

That Democrat that kept pulling his dick out of his pants and who said "We'll have the Niggers voting for Democrats for a long time" by signing off on the Civil Rights bill...

I didn’t say south.
You said south.

Democrats want to repeal both the 1st and 2nd amendments. Less rights for everyone, and the Democrats will be the arbiters of the law.

fuck off nigger

LBJ was pulling his dick out his pants? Really

>Democrats want to
Any sentence that starts this way is guaranteed to be bullshit

Poor little trump cuck, facts make you angry and cause you to make shit up.

Is the storm hitting Alabama yet?
There are some historic civil war airports that need to be protected.
Better nuke the hurricane.

>I didn’t say south.
>You said south.
All you Democrats like saying the Dixiecrats were racist. Those lived in the South and the first time the South really voted Republican since the Democrats put in the Black Codes was 1994 after the Assault Weapons Ban

>Democrats want to repeal both the 1st and 2nd amendments. Less rights for everyone, and the Democrats will be the arbiters of the law.

Hey, under the Black Codes and Jim Crow, the Democrats did it to black people, why should they care about doing it to the rest of us?

Attached: gun control.png (519x425, 20K)

No democratic candidate or politician has ever tried to ban either amendment.

You’re repeating gop retard shit again.

Attached: nuke gun owners.jpg (600x300, 30K)

>LBJ was pulling his dick out his pants? Really

imgur.com/gallery/jWkFazX

Cucked by a canuck

Attached: 082619-melania-trudeau-embed.jpg (696x947, 92K)

You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

nigger

>LBJ was pulling his dick out his pants? Really
gawker.com/lbj-was-obsessed-with-his-dick-1694599317

They talk about banning guns every day.

Attached: wrong.gif (480x287, 667K)

Implying /pol/ isn't based and implying a fring thing like /pol/ is all of republicans. Republicans truly don't give a shit what race you are, they just agree you, no matter who you are, should have some sense of self responsibility and sustainability for your own life. Democrats believe society and government needs to fix your problems and makes up things like affirmative action which are race based. Be real dude. Democrats are the only ones suggesting ideas that have anything to do with race.

Damn, too phunny. What a ...

Attached: fucktard.jpg (1024x590, 426K)

Attached: trudeau.jpg (320x334, 25K)

100 years ago, the Democrats instituted segregation in Washington, DC. Woodrow Wilson, who had slaves as a boy, told them he was protecting them.

You do realize that the Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act in greater percentages than Democrats, right? They also not only were responsible for the right of blacks to vote, but when the Democrats weren't in power anymore, the rights of women to vote.

It would have been better if the Democrats disbanded, and formed a new party. Keep thinking the Democrats switched with the Republicans though.

No

>LBJ was pulling his dick out his pants? Really
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/22/lyndon-johnson-anniversary-death-awful-man-my-political-hero

What kind of Democrat are you to not know about this?

Up until ~10 year ago I would have agreed with you about the GOP being the party of racists and just general bigotry, but that just isn't so much the case anymore. The leftists swung harder and further to the left beyond any point of rationality and now they have become the default racists. They see a white person and they make negative assumptions based solely upon race. Similarly, they look at dark skinned people and make positive assumptions based solely on race. Then they make up retarded fucking rules about what is and isn't racist and assume everyone is going to just play along. So now they are the racists that feel justified in being racist. They can't look passed skin color.

Has nothing to do with 1st or 2nd amendments.
An assault weapon buyback is not a repeal of 2A.

Hey go easy on the guy, he clearly has conservative bubble induced tourettes syndrome. It's not his fault.

>Poor little trump cuck, facts make you angry and cause you to make shit up.
>Is the storm hitting Alabama yet?
>There are some historic civil war airports that need to be protected.
>Better nuke the hurricane.
What are you? Some sort of retard?

Joe Biden is still there. He was the one who said that he could work with the racists Dems, asked why blacks needed to sit next to his blonde-haired, blue-eyed boy, and was amazed that Barack Obama was so clean, you know, for a black boy.

>so I can fuck his wife
fixed

Attached: 20190908_2048031219.jpg (460x259, 18K)

Someone doesn't understand logistics... Or guerrilla warfare.

Wife swapping? That's hot!

>No democratic candidate or politician has ever tried to ban either amendment.
>You’re repeating gop retard shit again.
Except for black people. They banned the shit out of niggers owning guns for a hundred years. Oh, and voting. Kept the niggers out of the ballot box too.

They are actually trying to keep fucking crazy people from having guns and from having guns that are designed to kill multiple people.

The Scalia interpretation of the second amendment is fucking retarded, the amendment was not intended to have retards running around wal-Mart with assault weapons like some sort of third-world shit hole.

No one is trying to ban the second amendment - we just think you’re retarded and we don’t think retards should be making life and death decisions.

>An assault weapon buyback is not a repeal of 2A.

When you threaten to nuke everyone whop doesn't turn in their guns, i think you've pretty much given up on the 2nd amendment.

Also, define "assault weapon", because thats anything that isn't a musket in the eyes of the gun grabbing democrats.

Attached: gun jesus.jpg (660x371, 28K)

>so he can fuck my wife's daughter
fixed

Hahahahahaaha!

How much of a moron does it take to irradiate half the territory that grows your food?

It's like shooting yourself in the dick because you can't piss.

Democrats elect a black president.
Republicans elect guys who think white supremacy is ok.

Yeah, the democrats are the racists here.

Republican logic

>seething tranny detected
So you're implying she supports racist speech online?

Attached: IMG_20190731_214627.jpg (635x641, 120K)

That’s your retarded president’s words, man.

>having guns that are designed to kill multiple people.

So all guns. There is no gun that is "single use"

You pretend like it's just "common sense" but that's just lipstick on the pig. You faggots want all guns gone because you're scared weak little people.

Attached: 1348580780712.jpg (489x400, 43K)

Attached: IMG_20190415_193355.jpg (1073x960, 234K)

>You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.
So you're saying the "evil" Democrats weren't the Dixicrats and all the other Democrats were the racist pricks resisting civil rights, passing Jim Crow laws, interning Japanese-Americans, and killing Indians?

I think you better phone a friend, Democrat. The party line is you lost your racist contingent with the Dixiecrats in the South. You telling me no means y'all racists pricks are still bending over the black people just for votes.

Back to the “hundreds of years ago” argument.

Yes, hundreds of years ago things were different.

Time to move on from the 19th century politics.

>Has nothing to do with 1st or 2nd amendments.
>An assault weapon buyback is not a repeal of 2A.
If I shove my cock in your throat so you can't talk, it's nothing to do with the first amendment or your right to speak, you can still tap out morse code with your finger tips on the ground.

>They are actually trying to keep fucking crazy people from having guns and from having guns that are designed to kill multiple people.
That's why all the gun control laws in the urban areas to keep the niggers from... oh, wait, they're Democrats, they CAN'T be taking away colored people's rights anymore, right?

They ain't the racists, it's got to be the Republicans...

Dude, I’ve fired a deer rifle, I’ve fired a shotgun.

I’ve also fired an sks.

The assault rifle fires faster and has a larger clip. It’s definately a better gun for shooting up a school or a wal-Mart or Muslim church or whatever you trump cucks are mad about because the tv man says George Soros is bad.

Only retards don’t see the distinction.

I’m saying it’s 2019.

Your history lesson is irrelevant. It’s a bunch of whataboutism.

Today the GOP are racist.

Tell that to the niggers demanding reparations.

Attached: stupidortrolling.jpg (604x441, 55K)

>Democrats elect a black president.
>Republicans elect guys who think white supremacy is ok.
>Yeah, the democrats are the racists here.
>Republican logic

You elected a token half-and-half white guy with dark skin. I mean, he's a fucking lawyer. He's got as much in common with the typical Chicago street thug as he does with Bill Clinton... Actually more, because wasn't Bill at least half white and a lawyer?

Either way, the Democrats elected themselves the whitest black man they could find.

>That’s your retarded president’s words, man.
Who?

>>Republicans elect guys who think white supremacy is ok.

CNN is lying to you dumbfag

Attached: 1347919952706.jpg (420x450, 32K)

Literally no one is proposing that faggot.

Kennedy was popping Marilyn Monroe before he got capped in the head. Spade calling a spade, Look at Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.
I'd vote for Bill just because he testified before congress that a blow job isn't sex!

Attached: MinicaBlewThis.jpg (300x257, 15K)

What’s your point?

That democrats shouldn’t regulate guns? Or that they should only regulate guns for white people?

Because they regulate guns for all people.

You don’t have a point, but I bet you’re sperging like a motherfucker.

Oh fuck you Fox News shill.

you agree with it though

>Back to the “hundreds of years ago” argument.
>Yes, hundreds of years ago things were different.
>Time to move on from the 19th century politics.
Hundreds of years ago?

Try buying and owning a gun legally in Chicago a few years ago or in Washington DC pre-Heller or in New York City...

Those laws don't apply to white people. They gave white people permits or they lived in the suburbs where the laws didn't apply.

>a blow job isn't sex
it isn't technically

Stay on topic.

Steve King, for one.

Fox News is lying to you about CNN

>I’m saying it’s 2019.
>Your history lesson is irrelevant. It’s a bunch of whataboutism.
>Today the GOP are racist.
MAybe if you keep telling yourself that and ignoring your history you might someday convince someone else, but the facts just don't support you.

Sorry, try again.

Oh god, did you just call AoC sexy? FFS man, get your eyes checked. With that horse mouth and those bugged out eyes..??? I've seen better faces on burn victims.

That’s dumb and not accurate.

Yes, you are correct.
The first amendment refers only to the government. It says that the government cannot interfere with your right to say what you want, or punish you for doing so. As a private citizen, you cannot obstruct a person's first amendment rights. Shoving a cock in someone's throat, while a crime, has nothing to do with the first amendment.

Attached: 257.jpg (6000x4000, 1.42M)

If you were right about history, even though you’re not, it still doesn’t pertain to modern politics.

Don't lie like they're gonna stop at just "certain guns and magazines". They're never done. If not in our lifetime than the next. And sorry, i give a shit about the future which is why I'm arguing with you.
I get you're arguing on the side of civility, but at the expense of our civilization.
Why do you blame the tool rather than the mentality and it's cause? Shouldn't we try to fix that? Ban the tool and you're still left with a guy who wants to fuck shit up. And namely it's because he can't express himself otherwise. Wouldn't you rather just let him talk it out and be heard?

Btw I hate both parties cause they both , but I'll at least give the republicans a tip of the hat to liking the BoR and being a little consistent on their beliefs.

No, it's sodomy. Non coital stimulation. Oral masturbation. Just like a politician at a microphone. And guess what the Dems preach? Sodomy = OK

>What’s your point?
>That democrats shouldn’t regulate guns? Or that they should only regulate guns for white people?
>Because they regulate guns for all people.
>You don’t have a point, but I bet you’re sperging like a motherfucker.
Given the Democrats love regulating niggers guns and taking away their rights, it's just a normal Democrat thing to do. Saying they aren't racist after perpetually sticking it to the darkies though, at least own what you do.

Either way, they push to far and we'll get to see how much fun it will be to quell race riots in big cities when the farmers in the middle are off fighting their little war instead of growing chicken and corn.

And what happens when "crazy" is defined as... transgendered... gay... feminist... Etc... in the eyes of the law? It's not even that much of a stretch. Suicide rates for the first 3 groups are high enough that it could be argued that those groups are more "at risk" due to mental illness and therefore should not be permitted to have guns. Man hating feminists? Nope, too much risk.

then how come Democrat Senators voting against it during that time?

>If you were right about history, even though you’re not, it still doesn’t pertain to modern politics.
Unless you're a nigger and you're worried about your welfare or reparations or voting for the token blackish guy.

plebbit

posting

automatically

makes

your

argument

irrelevant

Also you're wrong anyway. You just need to believe that to feel good about all the shit the party your freinds and family told you to vote for does too

>MUH FOX NEWS!

Attached: AOC.jpg (770x415, 24K)

lol foxtard

You're the one using the shitty argument, you opened the door. If your argument for forgiving the dems is "forget history", then surely their desire for reparations falls under the same umbrella. It is on topic, you just don't like it being turned on you. So suck my dick. If politics has changed and it's time to move on then agree reparations is a defunct concept and abandon it.

Quick note to all you "Democrats are the real racists" faggots, I'd just like to point out that every person in this thread using the word "nigger" is supporting the Republicans.

Not all Republicans are racists, but all racists are Republicans.

She really triggers you impotent right wing dipshits pretty good. I'd say she's winning.

different user but this meme gets tiresome
you elected a racist
you don't get to complain the that Democrats once were racist

based user is based

Keep calling everyone you dont like a racist

it's totally working

Attached: trump3.jpg (428x427, 23K)

>Quick note to all you "Democrats are the real racists" faggots, I'd just like to point out that every person in this thread using the word "nigger" is supporting the Republicans.
>Not all Republicans are racists, but all racists are Republicans.

Then you better start kicking the floaters out of the Democratic party so they can register correctly.

you mean Crab People?

>Taste like crab

>Talk like people

>She really triggers you impotent right wing dipshits pretty good. I'd say she's winning.
She's great, she's a true believer and she keeps walking and talking herself into shit the old school Democrats are cringing from.

Like opening doors the party would love to keep closed.

Regrettably our illustrious Supreme Court rules that abortion is legal. But If a driver runs into a woman who is on her way to an abortion clinic to terminate her own pregnancy and said driver kills her baby, it's fetuscide.
Regrettably, our illustrious Supreme Court also rules that gay, lesbian and confused sexuality in general is not crazy.

Yes. It's a simple thing, don't be racist online and the racist speech ban won't affect you, will it cracka?

>different user but this meme gets tiresome
>you elected a racist
>you don't get to complain the that Democrats once were racist
Except they're still racists. They just have the darkies convinced they're the black man's friends...

...as they ban his guns and drugs and send him to prison for a lifetime of booty stretching gay sex!

>Regrettably our illustrious Supreme Court rules that abortion is legal. But If a driver runs into a woman who is on her way to an abortion clinic to terminate her own pregnancy and said driver kills her baby, it's fetuscide.
>Regrettably, our illustrious Supreme Court also rules that gay, lesbian and confused sexuality in general is not crazy.
YEah, but that can change again.

Citation that Trump is racist? Show me ONE legitimate quote by him denigrating anyone based solely on the color of their skin. I'll wait.
Reminder:
>nationality is not a race
>religion is not a race
>political belief is not a race

Going to take a guess and assume she didn't say anything even close to that, but autistic right wingers are obsessed with her.

I'm sure you'll accomplish more in your pathetic life let's just wait

Jew detected

What are you, gay?

Attached: 1550297997046.jpg (1738x1856, 473K)

Oh it will, social mores swing back and forth, look at history. Not jut the last 100 years, Greece, Rome...Constantine....

And then theres this retard. You should do the world a favor and infanticide yourself

>What are you, gay?

So what if they guy is?

You sexist too?

Damn shame your parents weren't pro abortion.

Attached: 4chan fetusroom.png (305x198, 131K)

>convince a bunch of morons that cow farts are killing the planet
>an accomplishment

nahh

Attached: 4chan grinandbearit.jpg (300x210, 19K)

Still waiting on one example

Having two brain cells to rub together helps immensely. Keep defending a traitor though

They cant do that because all they have is FOX news talking points, no argument, and 9 brain cells between them

Does anyone not on Twitter care what she says? At all? Literally, I uninstalled the app, and it's like she stopped existing.

how will your gun bans fix Chicago nigger gang banging stolen not legal guns? go on? fact most of the current actual assault rifles on the streets in Chicago were stolen from military munitions being transported by rail. your a kike you have Reddit spacing, go dodge an oven on Reddit you fucking faggot. i believe it was nigger dems that gave the cartels assault riffles too. so fuck off some more faggot.

That is not a citation or an example of Trump being racist. That is you floundering embarrassingly and taking what you think is a shot at me. Come on, if he is the raging racist that you claim, then surely you can produce an example of it.

What is the mouse doing to create the holes in the cheese?

Attached: 4chan datingtip.jpg (960x960, 81K)

Attached: 15feet.jpg (1125x1303, 105K)

Evidence is a tool of the patriarchy.

>methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, and there are 1/3 as many cows in the US farting out methane than US citizens

If you're not retarded it's easy to understand

>also, got a masters degree form a prestigious university and worked her way up from bartender to congresswoman

That's the American dream, what have you done? I'm guessing nothing

Attached: fbi-report-trump-housing-discrimination-2017-2-2.jpg (1334x2223, 340K)

Sure, AOC can wipe her spic ass with the constitution. Define “racist”.

>>also, got a masters degree form a prestigious university and worked her way up from bartender to congresswoman

Her Boston University degree is a Bachelor.

Still a BU degree holder is pretty damn impressive!

I dont even think theres any point in responding because you're so fuckng stupid but the biggest example of his racism would be 1973: The US Department of Justice — under the Nixon administration, out of all administrations — sued the Trump Management Corporation for violating the Fair Housing Act. Federal officials found evidence that Trump had refused to rent to black tenants and lied to black applicants about whether apartments were available, among other accusations. Trump said the federal government was trying to get him to rent to welfare recipients. In the aftermath, he signed an agreement in 1975 agreeing not to discriminate to renters of color

My biggest problem with the man isnt even that he is racist, but he is undeniably racist.

Attached: aocgunownership.jpg (720x403, 47K)

Fuck no nigger are you dumb?

Da biotch is dumb as a rock

Someone who unironically uses the term "da biotch" has no room to call someone else dumb.

Oh dear, this must be really embarrassing for you. That is a news story, written by someone who is not Trump, about alleged business practices in a heavily redacted report that resulted in... Nothing. What's more, Fred Trump was the primary investigation interest.
Wow, you're really terrible at this. No Soros paycheck for you this week.

she has good tits, but no brain.

soyboy detected

"A well regulated militia"

trips of truth

So fake, so gay. She never said any of this bullshit, you fucking mongoloids.

But what if the term was used ironically?
As in, it's ironic that I replied to you biotch.
The fact that I in fact replied is intrinsically ironic in any other universe but here

Attached: NiggaPlease.jpg (316x336, 101K)

Find one single actual quote pls

Also its hilarious that people always post these fake quotes next to a picture taken from a screenshot of her talking. Everyone looks weird if you pause a video of them mid sentence.

Please take these garbage their fake Facebook memes the fuck out of here

I'm sure you'll accomplish much more than she has in your pathetic worthless life, let's just wait

Go back

Attached: RedditFaggit.jpg (429x301, 64K)

“A well regulated, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Republicans only like the last part. They think it means that they can stockpile weapons and ammo in their house.

If it said

“Since we don’t go out to eat often, and it’s your birthday, you can order anything you want.”

They would order a television off amazon and be like “you said I could order anything I want!”

That’s the logic.
Pretend like only the part you like exists.

They went after his company. Not him personally. They alleged he didn't want to rent to welfare recipients. Are you telling me that all welfare recipients are black? So he swore not to discriminate based on race, not a difficult promise to make if it wasn't something he was doing in the first place. He didn't want to rent to poor people. Why are you so racist that you think black people are all poor?
Still not an example of him making as racist remarks. Keep trying though.
Also remember that you are referring to 1973, and it has already been established in this thread that old political stances don't count in current year, a la dems didn't start the kkk or try to keep slavery legal.

Forgot “militia”

"the right of the people"

Yeah nah I'm good retard, this isnt your safe space. Spicy argument you got there.

Attached: 1567316464272.jpg (500x675, 57K)

Knowing is half the battle!

youtube.com/watch?v=O5IYKMalBEU

Just like the bible

Something trump did in 1973 is not the same as a bunch of dead guys from the 19th century.

Good try though, pleb.

Militia needs scales with the times. If anything we should be getting rocket launchers and tanks too.

False comparison. How about try if free speech was as regulated as guns?

Then you’ve shown up unarmed.

You are out of your phuquin mind!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,[6][7][8][9] while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."[10][11] State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.[12]

Haha jesus did you miss the part where he agreed to stop being racist and signed the fucking contract agreeing to it? Your desperate equivocation and excuse making is pathetic

The democratic party has not been racist for a long time fucktard so screeching about shit from 100 years ago over and over doesnt convince anyone

You run along now

Attached: 1547782440715.png (600x723, 685K)

Cars kill way more people than guns do

youtube.com/watch?v=-_ayHfaHCXQ

Anyone with a hand mill can make guns fairly easily.
Anyone with a CNC mill can make a gun every few hours.
Anyone with a 3D printer can make a gun.

You are truly knutz! Go smoke your mommas krack somewhere else

was alleged to have done. Was not ruled upon or found to be true. They investigated his company and he signed something promising he wouldn't discriminate.
Still not proof of racism. It's actually kind of the opposite since there is a signed legal document of him promising he wouldn't discriminate.
Why are you having so much difficulty showing that Trump is racist? I thought you said it was undeniable. But you cannot seem to produce a single credible example.

There are a few more cars than there are guns, so per capita the cars kill WAY less. And if guns were regulated like cars it would save a lot of lives

Good try though, if you're stupid

How about telling four minority congresswomen to go back where they came from, even though three of them are from the USA? That's at least a little racist, be honest

If he even started being honest his whole worldview would collapse

The militia should have those weapons.

They should be regulated - that is, be as well-trained and armed at regulars (normal soldiers).

That’s the rub.
The republicans have been the victim of a bait and switch. The constitution says that a militia is necessary - not optional. Not allowed, nor suggested - it’s necessary for the security of a free state.

Everyone is talking about the “shall not be infringed part” that they haven’t noticed that there is no citizen militia that equals our active military.

Some people will say that the national guard is this militia, but you need to sign a contract with the government to join the guard and bush 2 proved that the guard is just regular soldiers by deploying them to Iraq (young republicans got baited and switched there - two weekends a month they said)

Seriously the right has been fighting for the right to have dipshits with guns in their basements.

What are you going to do? Overthrow a government? Protect your family from planes and shit?

Best case scenario you shoot up a country music concert and then a cop caps you in the head.

No militia means no security. Guns without training just makes you a danger to yourself and others.

3rd party here... the good ol "credible example" bar - infinitely raisable, never surmountable

That’s the Scalia interpretation.

It’s retarded. Good thing that faggot is dead.

He signed an affidavit avowing that his company would not discriminate based on race. It makes no reference to him individually saying he was racist and would stop.
Holy fuck you are terrible at this. Utter cringe at this point. You actually debate like a child that has a child's understanding of the adult world.

The argument that trump doing something in 1973 is the same as democrats in the 1800’s doing stuff is what I was commenting on.

I’m not invested in the details, just the demonstrably false premise.

You'll need to do some googling before you post your witty retort, there are more guns than cars in the US.

Fucking this, thank you for the exceptionally coherent breakdown. Not to mention the creator of the AR15 designed it for war, and his family agrees even today that if he saw them in the hands of every idiot with $500 he would be appalled

Bro I can do just as much damage with a semi auto .22 hunting rifle as I can with an sks. Give me a decent pistol with a clip and I can do just as much damage. This argument is stupid. And before you start saying I’m a Republican ShillI voted for Gary Johnson. I refuse to be swayed by this two party system. Jefferson was right. We should’ve had another revolution already and restarted.

I haven't raised it once. I asked for a single quote of Trump being racist. user has not provided it. Instead he goes to a op-ed written by someone else about a redacted report from 5 decades ago about the man's company that was still being run by his father.
Not only has the bar not been raised, he could still trip on the fuckin thing.

One. Quote.

History doesn't count. user said so. Moving on.

And I'd be more than happy to drive over these morons and then shoot them so they can't vote.
It is a weekend and school is out. Why don't these kids just go to the movies for entertainment?

Guys, the other day walton and johnson said net neutrality wasn't the appocolips everyone was making it out to be, and that it didn't effect them at all. I guess they never tried to listen to walton and johnson on facebook while some brat was watching netflix on their ip, because it directly effects their viewers. It really looks like that show is just propaganda on par with CNN and fox news. Or maybe theyre just ok with their corporate overlords censoring their internet for profit.

Attached: 1561477452008.jpg (600x778, 76K)

Okay I'll make it even simpler because you seem have a room temperature IQ

Were talking about ASSAULT WEAPONS here not all firearms, and PER USE the fatalities are way lower. Are guns USED as often as motor vehicles are? By as many people in as many areas? Okay then.

Take your mouth breathing mongrel ass the fuck on now sport

Problem: All the car regulations only apply if you want to drive it on public roads. If you buy it and leave it on your own property... none of that shit applies.

Second, we should have background checks for cars just like guns and waiting periods because they are just as lethal as guns. Felons can ride mopeds or some shit, not cars where they can hide guns.

>Not to mention the creator of the AR15 designed it for war

The creator of my 1847 Walkers made it for war too.

Attached: bf5051db9799bda449c3481c0063575f.jpg (479x383, 31K)

Not that important of a distinction.
Most gun owners have multiple firearms.

What the poster should have said is “there are more car-drivers on the road than there are gun-users”
Because a person can only effectively fire 1 gun or drive 1 car at a time.

No you can’t.

It is so goddamn adorable when anti-gun nuts think they know what an actual assault weapon is.

>There are a few more cars than there are guns, so per capita the cars kill WAY less. And if guns were regulated like cars it would save a lot of lives
>Good try though, if you're stupid
No... if they kill more people and there are fewer of them total, they are more lethal.

And there are about 300 million guns.

Attached: racist ellis island award.jpg (800x600, 83K)

No one NEEDS this pistol user. You are not hunting deer with this crap.

Attached: 1501734617882.jpg (720x699, 122K)

Must have been a recording, John Walton died July 2nd.

Attached: racist GOP hates blacks.jpg (800x572, 80K)

Lol.
History of what other people did a hundred years ago is not relevant.
History of what a living person did is absolutely relevant.

Are you so trump-cucked that you’re pretending not to understand the difference or are you retarded?

Attached: racist spike lee.jpg (500x690, 43K)

>How about telling four minority congresswomen to go back where they came from, even though three of them are from the USA? That's at least a little racist, be honest

How is that racist?

Does where you live mean your race?

Only black people in Africa, huh?

What are you a moron?

can you imagine if we just started banning everything that is now used daily just because it was designed for war?

You post a facebook-esq argument comparing guns to cars, somehow work a wrong 'per capita' number in to the argument, hop in your time machine and say 'I was talking about assault weapons this whole time' and liberally salt your facile opinions with insults... It's past your bedtime kid

Attached: racist jessee.png (671x447, 252K)

It is literally racist to disagree with us

Attached: AntiFa 4 life.jpg (636x636, 33K)

Going to drive over strangers and shoot strangers?

That’s a republican move. Standard mass-shooter faggottry.

Can you see why we don’t trust your unstable ass with a gun?

Attached: racist trump.jpg (664x594, 53K)

Even if that were true, which it isnt, your argument is that every idiot with $500 should have the high RPM weapons.

Just because you could do it is no reason to make it easier for any psycho fucktard with $500, and people with training and talent aren't likely to be the ones creating piles of dead children

People actually think this bitch is attractive.

Attached: racist 22.jpg (960x960, 110K)

Hunting license requires every one of those to be checked off twice. Honestly If your not willing to sit through 3 days of classes you shouldn't be able to own a gun. You should be able to own a gun tho.

History. Doesn't. Count.

>intentionally missing the point this hard
wew lad

Ever notice that FOX news runs hundreds of stories ABOUT CNN?

Isn’t that weird?

Like why does one “news” channel spend so much time talking about another news channel?

No, we are hunting anons....

Attached: 1564063222918.jpg (933x620, 80K)

>Okay I'll make it even simpler because you seem have a room temperature IQ
>Were talking about ASSAULT WEAPONS here not all firearms, and PER USE the fatalities are way lower. Are guns USED as often as motor vehicles are? By as many people in as many areas? Okay then.
>Take your mouth breathing mongrel ass the fuck on now sport

HEy, mouth breather, the way they define assault weapons includes almost every handgun manufactured since World War II in some definitions. Even then, there's probably more of them than cars in population.

Is this supposed to trigger me or something? I love banging black girls

How much does it chap your ass to know you don't get to say what I need and don't know what I do with what?

Yeah I just saw that after I posted. Still pist off tho.

Attached: AOC-touch.jpg (960x952, 126K)

That's not how a citizen militia works. Citizen militias are generic civilians that pick up guns to drive people out. All citizens are potentially part of this militia, meaning that all citizen's access to weapons shall not be infringed.

>what are you gonna do against planes
Conventional weapons don't work against insurgencies you. Ask the riceniggers in vietnam. Ask the sandniggers in whereverstan.

This isn't even mentioning the fact that civilian guns also deal with local corruption. If niggers were actually oppressed by a police force, a truckload of AR15s would provide means to remove the corruption by force.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the police have no duty to defend us. All of us are responsible for our own safety. We are required by law to be adults and be responsible for protecting ourselves and may not abdicate that responsibility to the state. If you don't believe me I want you to Google "Supreme Court"+"police"+"no duty to defend". The argument that you don't "need" a gun because the police will protect you is made up bullshit. By law the police have no duty to protect us, that duty falls on us as individuals. That's it.

Attached: police have no duty to defend us.jpg (840x657, 113K)

Attached: fox-germ.jpg (300x376, 36K)

Good job dodging the main point like the matrix again

Attached: lazy rednecks.jpg (983x1024, 109K)

Nationality is not a race. It is racist of you to imply that it is.

Cars are not as lethal as guns.

Dude In nevada killed 73 people in 90 seconds. Even a large truck barreling into a crowd of protesters (Egypt Arab spring) can only kill a few dozen at most.

Attached: drone_bof.jpg (699x546, 126K)

Report these spambots retards

Attached: Army_Guns.jpg (960x697, 77K)

Attached: 220px-Vietcong1968[1].jpg (220x331, 26K)

This is true but still no need for AR15s and other mass shooting guns

Attached: CNN Collapse.jpg (724x804, 161K)

damn. the amount that aoc triggers these faggots makes me like her even more. trigger these fucktards more aoc. trigger these snowflakes HAAARD

Most of it is.

so a cuckhold and a wetback walk into a bar...

Attached: mfczomyivejy.jpg (868x550, 37K)

>
>That's not how a citizen militia works. Citizen militias are generic civilians that pick up guns to drive people out. All citizens are potentially part of this militia, meaning that all citizen's access to weapons shall not be infringed.
>>what are you gonna do against planes
>Conventional weapons don't work against insurgencies you. Ask the riceniggers in vietnam. Ask the sandniggers in whereverstan.
>This isn't even mentioning the fact that civilian guns also deal with local corruption. If niggers were actually oppressed by a police force, a truckload of AR15s would provide means to remove the corruption by force.

Also... Planes have to land and the factory they build them is just down the road on the other side of a chain-link fence.

The other direction, a few miles, also on the other side of chain link fence, is where they train the pilots to fly them.

On this side of the chain link fence?

All their homes and families, plus those of the mechanics to fix them.

Guess what you don't need a plane to kill?

Re.tar.ded

If you watch fox news and can't tell it's 99% bullshit you're retarded.
If you watch CNN and can't tell it's 99% bullshit you are also retarded. The best news you can get I in the US is bbc and that's because the use they lie with the truth.

Look into the government reported statistics on the success rates of the drone targeted killing program. That comic is so incorrect.

My entire collection of black powder guns would be outlawed.

Kentuckey rifle, brown bess, 1861 springfield, walker, 1860 army, navy.... my goodness even my sharps would be outlawed and its a single shot.

That not even getting into the WW1 and 2 stuff.

Can i keep my nagant? it was made in WW2 to fight aginst real life nazis so it has to be ok right?

>why would you ever need to shoot multiple aggressors at once

Attached: baltimore-riot-pol_3283102k[1].jpg (858x536, 252K)

>Cars are not as lethal as guns.
>Dude In nevada killed 73 people in 90 seconds. Even a large truck barreling into a crowd of protesters (Egypt Arab spring) can only kill a few dozen at most.

Depends on what you pack into the back. Some ANFO and fuel oil will round up your kill count pretty quickly.

But that's exactly what Trump did, confuse nationality with race.

Thank you for admitting that Trump is racist. Any honesty around here is really refreshing.

No, that’s absolutely not what a militia is. That’s a bunch of faggots who are going to die if they tried to fight an actual army or even the local police.

I don't like authoritarian regimes. New leftist tactics are extremely effective against NPC' thus all of them are there just to control masses.
Young women of color are used to achieve full control. Common people might think that this squad is going to renew the system. All they do is transfer the power from assholes to dickheads.

Never hunted hog before have you?

The US killed 2 million people with conventional weapons of war in Vietnam.

look at his pants ...

Not as bad as your ass will be chapped when trump looses in a landslide and sweeping gun bans get put into place after the democrat supermajority sticks 2 more justices on the SCOTUS.

Please pay careful attention to this: There is nothing special or deadly about AR-15s. An AR-15 is a semi automatic rifle like any other. It doesn't shoot any bigger, any faster or any more accurately. What people hang up on is that AR-15s LOOK LIKE military guns. They do not work like military guns even though they look very similar. "Assault rifle" is a made-up term used to try to distinguish rifles that look scary. I am not making this shit up, I am an FFL license holder and know of what I speak. There is nothing special or murderous about an AR-15. It is the most popular rifle in America and is analogous to the Roman Gladius for its place in our history.

Orang man good. No matter what. I SAID NO MATTER WHAT

its all in the family

Attached: 1489186812919s.jpg (125x120, 2K)

Didn't win, doesn't matter.

Try to get out of your own spin. It's turning you retarded.
>duct tape
>super glue
>epipens
>GPS
>THE FUCKING INTERNET

Now do that 100 million times and explain to everyone why the cities are blown apart, there's no food in the stores, and no one left alive knows how to make drones...

Actually, more realistically, you find out who the drone pilot is, drive up to the mobile home his mom and dad live in, and plant a bunch of guns.

If they get killed by a drone, great. If they don't, the government has to go back to zero training drone pilot because dude's security clearance is kaput.

So you ensure your own safety by making sure that mouth-breathing mentally ill sisterfuckers can have assault weapons?

Really? that’s what you’re going with?

This is why I don’t trust you with a gun.

Didn't have drones with Hellfires and JDAMs and Cruise Missiles. It'd be a different war, now. Ask the goat fuckers-

Attached: FLIR2.gif (288x162, 848K)

You do know that most of these guys become veterans, right?

Yeah, sure, let's just trash the 237 year old American Constitution and get rid of free speech and the right to bear arms just to appease some 28 yo cunt from some shithole spic country.

Don't you retards hate the poh leece cuz dey raciss n shit? Why do you want them to be the only ones armed?

Sooooo... basically you got nothing. After all that, not a single quote. Noted. Thank you for playing.

I guarantee that none of that will happen.

Attached: free yourself from winning.jpg (2985x1680, 650K)

That only works in the desert where the collateral damage is more sand niggers. Good luck using that on home soil.

Piles of dead kids and your idiototic solution is always 'do nothing' that's a sensible plan.

Your hobby and history lessons dont infringe on their rights of people's right to not get shot the fuck up when they go to slither store. No other first world nation has this problem

Breitbart runs cnn articles too.
Didn’t know that, could’ve guessed though.
When you don’t have real news I guess you just read some real news channel’s news and then disagree with it loudly.

Niggers would not be a trained militia now would they

Attached: estate_tax.jpg (640x640, 67K)

If schools get shot up you're supposed to increase security, moron. In what fantasy world do you think guns will actually disappear from the US?

FACT: The US has lost more ground on gun rights under 4 years of trump then under 8 years of Obama.

When the democrats held full controll they passed Obamacare but did NOTHING on guns.

When republicans had full control they banned bump stocks, trump himself said "take the weapons first and due process later" and we are now seeing red flag laws pop up damn near everywhere.

Assault weapon is a bullshit term that means "scary looking gun". AR-15s and AKs don't shoot any faster or better than any other semi-automatic rifles, they just look scary. They look like military guns, but they don't work like military guns. Only the military has military guns.

No one cares about that clause.

The fact that it's worked in other countries and that while there is no silver bullet for the problem, continuing to do less than nothing is criminally negligent and insane

Planes don’t have to land and they don’t need pilots anymore. There’s no one there to kill.

Seriously the missile that blew up in Russia last month can stay airborne for 4 months.

We have drone planes that use solar panels that keep them in the air all day, and at night they glide until morning.

There’s nobody to shoot at. They could be in a bunker underground...
Hell, they could be already dead and their weapons could circle the earth in perpetuity.

You’ve got a very 20th century view of warfare.

Too bad it's in the constitution. Your feelings dont apply here princess

Attached: 1443731055041.jpg (481x463, 64K)

Attached: 1471814848390.png (1024x854, 1.5M)

That’s a bomb then.

They should make bombs illegal.

*triggered*

Attached: TiggaonaNigga.jpg (438x768, 168K)

the TDS is real

Yes. If you ban guns then GUN CRIME goes down. all other crime goes up and the end result is more people dead then if you had just left guns alone.

Whats worse loosing 10 people in a mass shooting or loosing an extra 20 from stabbings?

Attached: 1355849297045.jpg (1600x1165, 245K)

>The fact that it's worked in other countries
What countries had guns and then went to not having guns, resulting in a decrease in the amount of violence?

Win what?

What do you think they were trying to win?

Because with 2 million dead, mostly young men, Vietnam didn’t win anything.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Attached: 1565727826188.jpg (1242x1305, 525K)

Reverse search newfag?

Attached: fuckniggers.gif (741x674, 118K)

Enforcement of US policy. ie no communism.

Attached: why 2nd amendment.jpg (892x960, 128K)

The internet was a project in the seventies to link the library of congress from coast to coast. But yeah whatever.
Most is not 4 things.

Woah did you hurt yourself in those mental gymnastics m

Find me a stringy lanklet autist with a hunting knife who can kill 20 people before getting dropped

Are you beating off to this fantasy or what? It’s far fetched as shit.

nbcnews.com/news/world/33-dead-130-injured-china-knife-wielding-spree-n41966

Unfortunately for you, the rest is also important. You can screech all you want friendo

I have issues with the militarization of the police as well.

Generally I don’t think mouth-breathing faggots should be walking around carrying guns.

Come and get them cuck

Attached: yeah right.jpg (738x768, 72K)

A group of knife wielding men in a coordinated attack. And the Chinese can actually get shit done, I said find me ONE lanklet autist (because most mass shootings are carried out by a lone individual) and you cant even come close

Attached: 1567716149313.png (720x622, 589K)

unfortunately for you, right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Nothing else in the 2nd amendment contradicts this.

Attached: 1557639628254.jpg (500x500, 70K)

If it’s a bullshit term and there’s no difference just get a wooden stock gun. It’s all the same right?

For some strange reason the faggots on the right like the carbon fiber because it makes them look tacti-cool. But it’s exactly the same as a wooden gun.
Exactly.

Right?

No, the internet was a project funded by DARPA to create a flexible, uninteruptable communications network that could adapt to outages, ie war.

HONG KONG

Attached: hongkong.jpg (1029x772, 117K)

Trump dick sucker?

You’re sucking the mushroom all thread long.

scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2143776/seven-schoolchildren-killed-china-knife-attack-blamed

Read a book.

The right of the people in a well regulated militia, not all people. That expressly prohibits every dumbass hick with an auntmommy and $500 from having one, unless you're saying that all US citizens have military training, which would make you retarded

Not sure of your point. the wood stock guns shoot the same caliber at the same speed and with similar accuracy. The carbon fiber stuff is tacticool as you point out. The M14 is a military gun that is murderous as fuck and it has a wood stock.

Statistically you’re more likely to kill yourself than anyone else. I’ll just pick them up off the ground after you kill yourself when your girlfriend cheats on you with a Mexican.

You're missing 13 dead kids there, and that's still China

It was later used as a redundant network for military applications, but it was invented to link the libraries originally.

But whatever.

That's still a mass killing with a knife you mongoloid. The whole argument is that this shit wouldn't happen if people didn't have guns, and that's demonstrably false.

>girlfriend
>girlfriend worth touching

You're being mighty optimistic

So let them ban the scary-looking guns.
It matters not at all if I understand your argument.

You're really trying to say that those knife attacks wouldnt have been any worse if the attackers had guns

OK, and what is the benefit of banning scary looking guns? Why do we want to limit that civil right?

Attached: 1567307860744.jpg (1612x1019, 514K)

A whole group of coordinated people killed almost half of what a single person with a gun did in a minute and a half.

I fail to see why you’re pretending like you won.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Actual wording, don't post your interpretation kiddie.

Attached: crybaby1.jpg (400x450, 39K)

It'd be worse if they had bombs too, whats your point?

Attached: i-told-her-guns-make-me-feel-uncomfortable-she-said-22079388.png (500x490, 95K)

It doesn’t say that you have the right to a gun made out of any material you want. It’s not infringing anything IF the wooden gun is the same as the carbon-fiber gun.

So either admit that the carbon-fiber gun is different or quit crying about shit that literally makes no difference.

Do you think the first 12 words of that are just filler? Do you think maybe they have something to do with the last half of the sentence?
Maybe?
Just maybe?

And I guess you believe Al Gore invented it too?

That's literally exactly what I said snowflake. Your feelings still dont apply here no matter how much you cry

Attached: 1567000146129.jpg (1280x865, 159K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States_in_2019

Scroll down the list faggot. Every shooter not in the top 3 got less than the school knife attacker. You could put a bunch of mass stabbings on the list and people wouldn't even notice they weren't shootings. They're indistinguishable.

ITD BE WORSE IF THEY HAD NUKES TOO

Sound logic

In the way that legislators made the first laws that dictate how the internet would be run? Absolutely.

I don’t think that he was a computer scientist, but he did have a hand in creating the laws that govern the internet.

Rated: mostly true.