Reminder: socialism has never succeeded in any country in the world. Not once

supposed to be better quality

Attached: AOCboobs.png (1154x1120, 1.79M)

Attached: AOCpushup.jpg (1140x641, 89K)

Attached: AOCyellow.jpg (683x1025, 98K)

and of course.......

Attached: AOCtrump.jpg (600x778, 76K)

>Reminder: socialism has never succeeded in any country in the world.
Well, the good news is that none of the major democratic candidates are proposing the kinds of socialism you're referring to.

You spend a lot of time saying this
What are you afraid of?

But the Nordic Model is successful. Finland, Sweden, Noway Denmark. It's not socialism but it's what AOC and Bernie want.

worldpopulationreview.com/countries/democratic-socialist-countries/
Low effort post is bad and you should feel bad.

I get paid to spam this
Either way I win because now I'm 50 cents richer
You jelly poorfag?

50 cents? Thats pretty pathetic

Economics at least attempts to be a science. If you ignore the overwhelming variable that is the US military industrial complex, you’ve got no leg to stand on. Go polish your guns brainlet.

germany is socialist.

Jokes on you
thebarchive.com/b/search/text/Reminder: socialism/type/op/
It's a lot if I post over a hundred times

Jokes on you no successful society has ever implemented 100% capitalist doctrine. There is no such thing as the free market there always has and always will be government intervention.

It will work you dolt

Attached: 363e9y.jpg (500x545, 89K)

In America, I thought the government was supposed to implement guidelines on things like currency and policy. Not to fucking dictate it to us. Citizens can fucking pick up a pamplet or whatever and read too, we're not as fucking dumb as the feds like to make us think we are through media and tv. If the government isn't willing to work with the citizens then why is anyone paying them? To do what?

>we already have socialism
>it isnt working
dolt

>If the government isn't willing to work with the citizens then why is anyone paying them?
Because this
>we're not as fucking dumb as the feds like to make us think we are through media and tv
Is false

Sure kid

Attached: Comingrightatya6.jpg (519x499, 72K)

Posting sure kid, or so weak, or stay mad, is a sure sign you're getting frustrated

Because everyone disagrees on exactly what socialism means. Because everyone is stupid. Because being afraid of stupid political labels is silly.

Attached: 305zo9.jpg (559x478, 60K)

Yes but you're cheating the system through technology. That's not good for you. Are feds thinking like this to force younger people to join them or are they scared of Mafia or why exactly do feds say this? What makes them think the average citizen cares about their opinion when it comes to private business and family matters? Most of you are just going to be left out of those huge decisions, you do realize that?

I'm not even American you dumb potato

Check out the Nordic countries. It's thriving there. Also, unregulated (without socialist notions), capitalism implodes.

Because socialism doesn't take into account the one thing that can't be changed. The human behavior of greed. For socialism to work, 100% of the people must be all-in. And you will never get that.

Socialism is prominent in some of the happiest countries in the world with the highest relative GDP. But you're an idiot, so it doesn't matter.

Attached: 39j3k5.jpg (500x509, 57K)

This can't be the feds talking come to think about it. I think its that user group. If anyone should be scared of Mafia it's them. Haha they are fucked if i was in the office running against them. FBI is too good for this non sense. Sorry heads of user, I think you're fucked. Oh well, not my problem.

What is there to be mad about. He asked a question, I answered. YOU are the one who sounds triggered.

>Dozens of countries successfully running some level of socialism
>Many are way ahead of America in most areas, especially ones that matter such as education, healthcare, happiness, income per household etc

Stay mad yank

I told you to stay mad, how coukd i be mad?
Don't say I'm mad dont say that im mad you little fuck or I'll kill you understand?
I'm calm as you angry little faggot

Why do Americans jerk off Capitalism so much and get so mad about other forms of governance, whilst entirely failing to admit that Capitalism is almost as bad for causing deaths and poor quality of life as bad as Communism?

>Socialism has never succeeded
lol, it has worked every time it was tried, send me one example where it didn't and I show you with facts and stats that it did you looser

thats because leninists are massive retards

zapatistas >>>

Natsoc is NOT socialism and it ended in all the natsocs being killed.
Which we will do again. We will kill you unless you leave the far right.

Socialism has "worked" in shit loads of countries. Its the only system to ever liberate former colonies, end famines and provide education/healthcare to poor exploited nations.

Point me to definition of socialism will you? Not how you define socialism, how socialism is defined by either those who coined the term or by those who are experts in political fields, please.

I believe you will point me to an answer that looks something like pic related. Please bear with me because I need you to be clear on the definition you are using before I discuss anything with you otherwise you could call anything you dislike socialism. This is an attempt to foster intellectual honesty. Will you be intellectually honest and either accept this widely accepted definition of socialism, or point me to a different, valid source for your definition?

Attached: Screenshot_20190716-181951__01.jpg (1080x416, 76K)

Nobody really disagrees on what it means. The majority know the definition and a few idiots on the internet call everything they disagree with socialism anyway.

You faggots have like 20 different definitions of Socialism.

I've heard people claim that a Police Force is Socialism.

People are confused because you retards move the goalposts around to whatever suits your narrative at the moment.

Show me your definition please. I will discuss with you based on that definition.

Here it is, the "you have so many definitions!" argument.

This is what always happens. The world has one definition for socialism which has existed for as long as any of us have been alive. All scholars and political experts agree on the definition, particularly the core principle of the thing, and it is widely available to be seen in dictionaries, encyclopedias, and textbooks. It does not vary wildly, the core is always the same.

But faggots who want to call everything that disagrees with them socialism accuse those who wish to discuss it of having 20 different definitions.

We have 1, sir, you are the one who has not presented a definition yet.

Step the fuck up or you cede any disagreement by way of intellectual dishonesty.

Reminder: Putin pays these fools to spam this shit on a daily basis in an effort to sway the election.

Attached: Chumps.jpg (480x360, 26K)

Fuck off and eat multiple dicks, comrade.

Attached: Trump.png (898x682, 836K)