Incel thread

youtube.com/watch?v=L9034d5EBfs
Incel thread

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (336x188, 12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sQdPxIE5eO4
liveleak.com/view?t=sOmPM_15224664010
leekwire.com/v/v/847
youtube.com/watch?v=cYFikTIAT-s
youtube.com/watch?v=2AXf5vjQV-w
youtube.com/watch?v=dqB-EMqpsUA
pegc.us/archive/Articles/eco_ur-fascism.pdf
archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.30957/page/n23
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

youtube.com/watch?v=sQdPxIE5eO4

kek

liveleak.com/view?t=sOmPM_15224664010

leekwire.com/v/v/847

>4 Male members of ANTIFA await insulin rations in portland 2017 Colorized

Attached: antifat.jpg (1417x911, 145K)

Attached: DAE8G_IUMAEA6ZM.jpg (568x399, 38K)

youtube.com/watch?v=cYFikTIAT-s

youtube.com/watch?v=2AXf5vjQV-w

youtube.com/watch?v=dqB-EMqpsUA

antifascists are aspiring eugenicists?

Attached: 20e4pdgejcd01.png (769x325, 201K)

Attached: Capture.png (883x730, 820K)

Attached: 4deyerbege2z.jpg (680x726, 109K)

Attached: 6u9p6Deb5-CfCAX3V9NBbhTZKRvNZ2s_gZbfgJG1mWU.jpg (614x768, 88K)

Attached: 180518-weill-shooter-embed3_vblmhf.jpg (546x546, 44K)

The battle for CVS Pharmacy took place the morning of October 3 2017. The 4 members pictured demanded Insulin from the pharmacy without paying. Their demands were met with derision and laughter so they stood outside of the pharmacy with threats of "dying right here then". The CVS was then fined 20,000.00 for leaving biomedical waste and non freestanding structures x 4 in front of a place of business. As well as 2 cases of incorrect disposal of a large mammalian carcass

Attached: fQwkLSpVY77dt2_a1225Zev4RVCOiMIEOjfbH8DWfjA.jpg (2048x1150, 266K)

Attached: jRyNn1f.jpg (800x600, 83K)

>if they make fun of an anarcho fascist terrorist organization they must be nazis

Attached: images.jpg (225x225, 9K)

When was the last time you were in the same room as me? Its easy to hide things you're confident about. Go ask the crazy cat lady

Attached: tian-dm-.jpg (1920x2477, 642K)

fuck her irises are different sizes she's having a fucking stroke in that drawing

The closet point to a joke from here is:

That's not the only stroke she'd be getting

Attached: pietro-nume-sequence.jpg (1920x808, 365K)

nigga u gay

That'd be something. I'm not much of anything

Attached: jan-urschel-patreon05-03.jpg (1920x804, 223K)

nigga u depressin

enlightened political tu quoque: any perceivable use of force makes you one and the same and/or just as bad, with the sum total and kinds of violence along with the underlying ideologies taken to the backseat cuz muh many sides and "A are the real B!"

counter protest and an instance of a bike lock to the head is the same as regular mass shootings and feigning persecution to advocate for new heights of reactionary political action

pegc.us/archive/Articles/eco_ur-fascism.pdf

Attached: jgyqur5ynegz.jpg (2048x1376, 372K)

ok calm down next mass shooter. Nobody gives a shit if you make fun of actual nazis or antifa nazis

i aint downloading your manifesto nigga

better than a nigger

>ok calm down next mass shooter. Nobody gives a shit if you make fun of actual nazis or antifa nazis

especially when the facile "both sides" phase makes ripe for radicalization of a particular "side" when equivocation obscures the distinct meaning and recognition of what relies on the conventional "western"/American mental paradigm of hesitance to change/security, "our values", and superficial and cliche notions of liberal ideals to incrementally recruit into its not-so alien ideology that one needn't sacrifice the title of "patriot" for (as its been a hallmark of "traditional" reactionary Americanism as far as a fascist can mythologize).

Attached: Brto4mkCAAIcCaQ.jpg (550x644, 70K)

>actual nazis or antifa nazis

what's an "actual antifascist" contra. "actual nazi"?

modern nazi's are terrorists

ANTIFA is/are terrorists

tl;dr

>ANTIFA is/are terrorists

what's fascism and how can it be opposed without being "a terrorist"?

are you a terrorist for using harmful language in alienating and demonizing "nazis" for their political views that they have a constitutional right to hold?

>are you a terrorist for using harmful language
whats harmful language user. Where does the text on the screen touch you?

pretending to fight imaginary fascists does not grant you the legal wherewithal to attack random unrelated citizens.

>what's fascism and how can it be opposed without being "a terrorist"?
Fascism is exactly what ANTIFA is but strangely seems to think is fighting against. Not all members of antifa are fascists but most fascists are members of ANTIFA.

>whats harmful language user. Where does the text on the screen touch you?


"harmful language" such as personal designations that allude and/or connote "evil" and wrongdoing especially in a manner that impacts or is to elicit the response and action of others whether knowingly or not (such as the rather arbitrary usage of "terrorist" outside of its clear legal definition and official designations for perpetrators of terrorism and the post-9/11 connotative weight that term carries)

define fascism and how it can be opposed without being deemed a "terrorist" or "fascist".

also, what makes antifa fascists and does the use of any force make all efforts to social change null and void?

Attached: JjV4mW9.jpg (1536x2048, 653K)

what legal precedence, law or statute is this?

>Fascism is exactly what ANTIFA is

fascism is a circular effort of direct action that may include force to combat the platforming of fascism?

define fascism as is without circular appeals to equivalencies that negatively ("anti") rely on the term.

Attached: ivbjre5nnyx11.jpg (2736x3648, 445K)

>what makes antifa fascists

ANTIFA is a terrorist organization intent on forcing others to a political or religious end state by threat of violence and intimidation.

>does the use of any force make all efforts to social change null and void?

when the majority of society is completely against your cause then any implementation of "force" whatever that entails is simply terrorism. ANTIFA has the same avenues of change as everyone else via the 1st amendment. Nobody has attempted to deny them or anyone the verbal capacity to say what they mean or want but you and them.

Harmful language does not exist

"terrorism" being a crime has a legal definition in the penal code for determination in its prosecution.

now, define fascism and how it can be opposed without being deemed a "terrorist" or "fascist".

also, what makes antifa fascists and does the use of any force make all efforts to social change null and void?

what legal precedence law or statute in the US is "Harmful language"

...

at least he's trying, what the fuck are you doing?

It doesn't exist its just a buzzword used to circumvent the 1st amendment and make people think they have a legal defense when words hurt their feelings.

the legal definition of Terrorism fits ANTIFA to a T... and E.R.R.O.R.I.S.T

jackin it to the hamburgler and grimace hentai

jesus christ euro user can you respond faster for fucks sake.

go defend antifa somewhere else

>ANTIFA is a terrorist organization intent on forcing others to a political or religious end state by threat of violence and intimidation.

"forcing others" without clarity as to who those "others" are while being so charitable as to state that their "terrorism" is merely the "threat of violence and intimidation", which beyond idiosyncrasy isn't terrorism.

>when the majority of society is completely against your cause

source for "the majority of society" and the clarification as to how and why that "majority" is monolithicly opposed to what has yet to be even defined.

>then any implementation of "force" whatever that entails is simply terrorism

that is, any change deemed as force and opposed by "a majority" is "simply terrorism", therefore any and all actions and views can be acts of evil because it contrasts with "the majority" (abolitionism, civil rights, constitutional republics, unpopular ideas, and the existence of a minority can be threatening encroachments by nature of their contrast with a "majority" and its implied concretization in a status quo).

>Harmful language does not exist

now tell us where and when you'll commit the shooting.

still has yet to define fascism (and how it can be opposed without being a "terrorist" or against "the majority of society")

Stop using commas you sperg

The others is everyone else. I.E. all other unrelated parties that will not tow the ANTIFA party line. I used the legal definition of terrorism and applied it to ANTIFA. It is very much so terrorism.

The majority being the 50% or more of current American society does not lean toward violent extremism

Any force deemed as actual force by law enacted to change the political or religious status quo is terrorism your quotes aren't changing the legal definition of either of those two things.

>>Harmful language does not exist
show me if you can what the legal definition of "harmful language" is

>it doesn't exist

now,using the colonial era "letter of the law" "exercising" of the 1st amendment (which is in regards to governmental encroachment of forms of general expression and rather promissory ensurement of no particular favoring or suppression of expression by governmental authority) , tell us where and when you'll exercise the 2nd amendment on antifa

>how it can be opposed without being a "terrorist"
>ANTIFA has the same avenues of change as everyone else via the 1st amendment.

>define fascism
>a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
>ANTIFA the terrorist organization intends to force commumism aka a strong autocracy with a central dictator on the american peoples

y would donale trgump write that?

You still haven't pointed to the law that defines "harmful language"

You ain't meant connor nigga. He look like shit

what law or statute defines "harmful language" you dime store lawyer fuck

holy word salad batman this joker is trying really hard to sound intelligent but failing

Attached: 1566705009504.jpg (500x281, 74K)

do europeans have to learn US Constitutional law in school or something?

Fuck this nigga reply slow as shit

I'm starting to think so

>Jared

Attached: 1566831102968.png (226x274, 82K)

gonna laugh if he just dissects this shit and fills it with quotations

>the word "actual" is

god i wish Perry Mason up there typed or copy pasted from google.de faster.

I need to go change my oil at 11 at night to confuse the fuck out of my meth head neighbors

>The others is everyone else. I.E. all other unrelated parties that will not tow the ANTIFA party line. I used the legal definition of terrorism and applied it to ANTIFA. It is very much so terrorism.

therefore any "unpopular" call to action that may or may not use force for politically is "terrorism" and, furthermore, is bad and equal to any and all acts that can be considered "terrorism" (premeditated mass shooting acting out by nazi ideology is the same as refusing to get off a bus which costs the company money and has the potential to ruin the financial livelihoods of those that depend on its "proper" running and functionality; hanging a "nigger" whose minority presence threatens to social fabric of "the majority" is of equal "badness" as aiding living property/slaves break their legal contract and escape the plantation),

>The majority being the 50% or more of current American society does not lean toward violent extremism

where's the source for "the majority" being against (rather not the now "does not lean toward") "your cause" (antifa), which is particular statistical claim rather than a part-and-parcel inference on personal judgement on terms not even clearly defined (again, what's fascism and how can one oppose it without purportedly being "terroristic"?).

>Any force deemed as actual force by law enacted to change the political or religious status quo is terrorism

"the legal definition" without citing penal code for it, but instead giving a reactionary meaning to a "bad word" that gives "the status quo" ultimate justification on (shoddy) legalistic terms in its circular existence of being the reigning paradigm and, by extension, codifying its existence in a legal system.

In a nutshell, antifa bad because the/an existing power structure is challenged and would be changed if they "had their way".

a reactionary authoritarian badmouthing "THE REAL FASCISTS" for "threat of force".

nah dude this shit is hard as fuck to read with you trying so god damn hard.

never defined harmful language

so basically your just trying to filibuster a thread on Yea Forums to claim you won an argument.

>"the legal definition" without citing penal code for it
god please tell me you can't get away with this in european courts

>again, what's fascism and how can one oppose it without purportedly being "terroristic"?).
he's told you like 3 fucking times you mong

i've not said there is a singular "law or statue" positively declaring as to what it is, but rather my initial message mentioning "harmful language" was to the social extra-legalistic impact of using connotatively charged terms as "terrorist" can and is utilized (especially after particular "happenings" with far-reaching social impact or influence) in instigation that is a use of "force" in its emotive power to elicit action(s) and behavior that are uses of "force" and have and do erupt in violence.

"harmful language" it's a legally defined term nor was it being used in describing that; "harmful language" as forms of illicit "expression" do exist under various laws such as "jokingly" saying you will shoot up a school, as harassment, and as non-verbal "expressions" as discriminatory action.

>30 minutes later

My nigga you should be fucking charged for wasting that many words. I'm serious tell me where you live so Yea Forums can charge you for wasting the electricity to hold so much pointless diatribe

>"harmful language" it's a legally defined term
so post the definition ffs

>he's told you like 3 fucking times you mong

"told" as in an emotive personal description of what antifa means to them and, stated separately, "fascism is exactly what ANTIFA is" which from what they've now told me, fascism and the antonymous antifascism are somehow mutually defining each other in a absolute equivalency (rather than a negative meaning with the prefix of "anti") and are equally acts of evil because "the majority is completely against it" and its an ideological act of violent force for being against a status quo.

I picture you talking so painfully slow that people just walk away from you a lot

Attached: xeYzahc.jpg (460x140, 7K)

meh i'm bored of you

imma go change my oil while hooting at my neighbor

...

Allied forces in their fight against fascism are themselves fascists and bad because the act of "fighting" is one of imposition of will and is an effort of causing change to a pre-existing order/structure ("status quo").

Attached: DHC6vSNUMAADoWG.jpg (1200x900, 301K)

ANTIFA is the name a group of fascists gave to themselves to LARP as revolutionaries while at the same time skirting the legal definition of a terrorist group.

Neo nazis are also a terrorist group primarily consisting of older individuals who like to LARP as historical retards while at the same time being legally defined as terrorists

pegc.us/archive/Articles/eco_ur-fascism.pdf

that was "tl;dr" but the oh-so uncaring and apathetic moderate bothered to stick around for delayed commentary that the comprehensive article would take so much less time to read.

Attached: AN01250335_001_l.jpg (750x1047, 182K)

>ANTIFA is the name a group of fascists gave to themselves to LARP as revolutionaries while at the same time skirting the legal definition of a terrorist group.
>Neo nazis are also a terrorist group primarily consisting of older individuals who like to LARP as historical retards while at the same time being legally defined as terrorists


>personal interjection and meaning of "legal definitions" and the viability of a status quo defines what is "right".

Attached: 1530310927480.png (590x767, 498K)

pretty sure he left because you take a ridiculously long time to respond.

ANTIFA is an anarcho fascist terrorist group

is opposition of neo-nazism justifiable in its act of being against fascism (antifascism) and how does one counter the advances of fascists without using force, and what necessitates the usage of force and how would one not be a "terrorist" by using such force (which would be a suppressing act towards those fascists' 1st amendment)?

>ANTIFA is an anarcho fascist terrorist group

Like "postmodern neo-Marxists" a ideological contradiction arrived from a severely deformed conception of "fascism" and thought pivoting on the notion.

A verbal contradiction where in reality the party using the name ANTIFA acts as an anarcho fascist terrorist group.

whats in a name

I watched almost the whole thing. God damn it. I’m a masochistic bastard

give us the cliff notes

>whats in a name

in a post-truth society where counter-protest is the same as holding a "rally" about "white genocide" and "da joos" replacing "us" and running people over with a car; where hitting someone in the head with a milkshake is the same as gunning down your classmates; where altercations of punching, kicking, and damaging the property of a multi-national billion dollar corporation is the same as gunning down unarmed people execution style in acting out a political ideology that calls for the dehumanization and mass killing of entire peoples

"horseshoe theory" is from a jackass

why the fuck do you keep putting commas in everything you type. Are you mentally deficit?

>why the fuck do you keep putting commas in everything you type.

"the map is not the territory"

Attached: $T2eC16FHJGIE9nnWpr!cBRHPjYo3jw~~60_3.jpg (407x596, 50K)

you are one retarded son of a bitch

archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.30957/page/n23

as your mental landscape clearly is dictated by symbols you have no control over

Attached: 1267710529840.jpg (600x606, 33K)

yeah its dictated alright i'm just a seething ball of anger right now grr.

does the lukewarm nature and "working class" lackluster sensibilities of hank hill apply to you as well?

Attached: 2shGb5e.png (854x877, 640K)