What would happen if we would put a smaller 2 mm black hole inside a bigger 5 mm black hole?

What would happen if we would put a smaller 2 mm black hole inside a bigger 5 mm black hole?

Attached: illustration.png (618x488, 9K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newscientist.com/article/mg24032022-600-exclusive-grave-doubts-over-ligos-discovery-of-gravitational-waves/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You end up with a hole in your hole.

Blackholes eat other black holes

Their masses would combine and create an even denser smaller black hole with an even larger gravitational attractive force
They would also in theory release a gravitational wave larger than any we have been able to detect ever

No, you can't create a denser black hole. The radius of the first one just increases.

Tey would merge into even bigger black hole, with m = m1 + m2 , and R = cuberoot(r1^3 + r2^3) = 5,104 mm

>gravitational wave
LIGO was a fraud and a lie
A black hole would have a solid surface like any planetoid with mass, so you can't put a solid mass inside another. If in proximity they would combine.

the radius of the horizon would expand outward as the masses combined. Because one black hole was inside the other, there would be no escaping G-wave event. There would probably be a large increase in virtual particle annihilation increasing the speed at which the holes evaporate though

During the process of insertion:
a truly incredible amount of cosmic radiation would be emitted

Never put a Bag of Holding inside another Bag of Holding.

>LIGO was a fraud and a lie
Explain

The black hole itself is a singularity. You could have a smaller black hole singularity wholly contained within the event horizon of a more massive one. It's eventually combine masses as the more massive one ate the less massive one. It would probably spark a "feeding" cycle in the area around the black hole as the gravity field would begin to reach further.

I was kind of working on the assumption that it's being inserted from a non-typical dimension so it'd just appear there.

it has already been proven that you can. Singularities warp space around them to the point that their core becomes infinitely dense but their core is more infinitely dense then the shell. Since more space gets compressed there

>>LIGO was a fraud and a lie
newscientist.com/article/mg24032022-600-exclusive-grave-doubts-over-ligos-discovery-of-gravitational-waves/

It's been shown to be (wait for it) non-reproducable

Attached: 1566652354124.jpg (712x712, 45K)

do you even physics?

Dont crawl through a portable hole with one either

>more infinitely

>more infinitely dense
Something is either infinite or not, you can't be "even more infinite". It has a finite mass, and occupies a finite non-zero space, thus it is in no way infinite.

a
Aren't singularities a result of the limits of general relativity? Singularities don't actually form in nature. We just don't know enough about the quantum universe to understand what happens in an environment like that.

Average density of black hole (including event horizon) is constant, due to volume (of what's inside event horison) increasing proportionally to mass.
As for Detectable Gravity Waves, they form only if huge mass (a massive black hole, or white dwarf) changes its acceleration rapidly (orbits another huge mass) close enough (mass ~ proximity squared)
So unless you put this black holes _inside_ LIGO, you'd see no waves

brainlet without the proper phenotype detected

Don't confuse the fact that someone can put forward a mathematically consistent explanation based upon some assumptions as a "proof." Look instead to see how likely those assumptions are. We have just recently managed to get proof that black holes even exist outside of formulae. I think you are overstating.

There are orders to infinity. I think what he meant is that it's a higher scale of infinity.

Just an odd side note: Scales of infinity sounds like it would make a bitchin D&D campaign name.

they merge and become one more massive black hole.

OP would stop being retarded

infinity is infinity you absolute brainlet

This has nothing to do with two holes combining. The density stays the same. The masses combine and the radius of the 1st hole increases.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number?wprov=sfla1

True ignorance is not knowing what you don't know

Yes - why not :
there are provably infinite sets of "transfinite 'numbers'", with infinitely ascending "cardinalities".
The infinity of integer counting numbers (conventionally called "Aleph null" ) :
is provably insufficient to uniquesly identify all the points between any two real numbers on a number-line (sometimes referred to as the "continuum" )

2^ aleph null is sometimes referred to as aleph one
and 2^ aleph one is referred to as aleph two etc
the higher the value of the aleph subscript integer, the grater is the cardinality of the set it refers to, and it is widely acepted amongst mathematicians that it is an inescapable fact that there must be (in principle) an infinite number of transfinite sets each having distinct cardinalities.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis

Of course the Jews made this up.

Also unlocked the atom so it turns out complex concepts are pretty useful.