It doesn't matter if it's just a fucking cartoon, loli is a depiction of CHILDREN and you are a fucking PEDOPHILE if you jerk off to this shit!
It doesn't matter if it's just a fucking cartoon...
Also, anyone who is a pedophile should be castrated because you don't need to have children because you would abuse them anyways.
And you're a psychopath if you watch any action or horror movie
You seem upset
he is
No I wouldn't I just smell her panties
See harmless =ap
how do they smell
This is true, because America was peaceful before we normalized horror/goth culture.
I fucking LOVE cartoon children
You sick fuckers need to be CASTRATED
Because you are a SICK FUCK
KILL YOURSELF
>civil war
>a bunch of native Americans massacred
>slaves
>peaceful
Why so worried about my junk?
and you need to sperg out somewhere else, normalfag
he is scared you gona rape all his drawn lolis
Smell like pure joy ;-; why did the universe make life age it's not fair
Because it should be CUT OFF FUCKING SICK PERVERT
Sad. They're getting fucked with or without me.
can you compare the smell to something
IT DOESNT MATTER IF ITS JUST A FUCKING VIDEO GAME, CALL OF DUTY IS A DEPICTION OF MURDER AND YOU ARE A CRIMINAL
Just relent, it's drawn erotica. No different than a book.
user pedos may be sick fucks and i agree but at least these arent real children
Plus half the people replying arent even actual pedos
They just like fucking with you
it's always the ones who scream the loudest against something that are the true predators, just look at betas and white nights.
This guy gets it.
You sound really insecure. You self projecting about a friend of yours? Faggot
probably, it's always those screaming against something that are so insecure and just cant keep their problems to themselves so they want everyone else to change for them.
Anons why do norm hate lolicons so much? They're are real pedophiles in power that runs child porn rings in and out of the USA for example the recent news(a year ago) there was UN peacekeepers running a child porn ring in Haiti why aren't they even talking about this instead they focuse they're effort on drawing that some weeb in japan makes?
goodreads.com
By your logic a huge swath of Goodreads are Pedos apologists who praised the propaganda.
Fucking hell you're stupid.
this is what's fucked, if you rich you can do whatever you want, if you poor you go jail for drawing
Yeah and?
I know but why is it like this in the first place is it some social construct we made up? Like norms hate drawing of underage people but are ok with rich people raping kids in Brazil and other countries? Like why...
he's right, you know
calm down. we arent filming a 'western' here.
i am sexually attracted to children
norms hate what media tells them, they are brainwashed everyday by it, esp finally now that there are social media and phones
does it really matter. focus on getting rich if you want to be left alone.
Why do you always say loli, but never include shota?
Bumping for sexy young girls in animated form.
no, senpai ..... focus on me.
Yea user I am working apart time job and in school to study to become a AC tech guy in Florida so I'll be wealthy if I stay on feet
> It doesn't matter if it's just a fucking cartoon, loli is a depiction of CHILDREN and you are a fucking PEDOPHILE if you jerk off to this shit!
No.
Ok that's erotic and cute at the same time good post user
Wait is this becoming a loli thread already
yes
but are we strong enough?
lmao the hell
Na most of them are probably in the other loli thread or shota thread thb
You are one whiny so of a bitch. What if you don't fap to it, but collect it for emotional support?
Sounds like you have an unhealthy fetish involving penis, homo.
Only if someone over the age of 18 signs these consent papers for you. Lucky for you I've already signed them.
I dunno maybe I think.
>you are a fucking PEDOPHILE
well more of a hebe but i don't care
They're always homos, don't you know?
nice
i love real children
Based Japan embraces discipline at a young age.
>no tags for the 10-13 range
samefagging this hard over a cartoon
I cummed so many times to Irene, the way that she sucks
cock and is cummed inside her mouth then she keeps sucking is priceless
forgot to (you)
>
weird way to ask for a loli thread...
nope. faggot.
Being a pedophile isn't a crime OP, acting upon it is. Yeah, they're pretty disgusting people, but loli is kind of the best thing they can do with their fetish since it is not at all the product of child exploitation. Ideally, modern psychology would fix them, but pedos have a poor track record with current methods.
why'd you (You) me
>modern psychology would fix them
trying to fix pedophilia is like trying to fix homosexuality
you can't fix sexual preferences
>10-13
you keep using preference but i dont think you know what it means.
preference implies there is options/a choice to be made.
What word should I use then?
More of this quality, preferably webm lol
orientation
That is the lie being told to people today. The LGBT movement has ushered in an era of anti-science anti-medicine bullshit. Sexual preferences are labeled under DSM5 as fetishistic disorders. Before, people understood that it was an abnormality and should be treated as such, not something to accept as a new norm.
Except pedophilia was widely accepted at that point in time
and u cant do anything about it, faggot. Humans dont chose their preferences and no1s hurt, when a picture is drawn
I don't know if I'd call fetishes an orientation
id fuck that fucking little, round, fresh loli butt
Loli is fucking stupid. I'd much rather fuck a 9 year old
or you could fuck a shotgun?
In that context no. i was just showing user how that choice of word was contradicting his argument.
so was slavery - thats not a good argument
off by 1. sorry, user.
another off by 1. what thread are we living in??
What point in time exactly are you talking about? I am speaking of current psychology that is being pushed aside. DSM5 was published in 2013, where the APA specifically calls pedophilia a disorder. The diagnosis is also included in DSM-IV-TR, published in 2000. That was preceded by ICD-10, which was written in the late 80's and also states a pedophilia diagnosis.
These books are the official documents that define mental disorders.
lol just realized fb image. wonder who posted this to grandmas feed
fucked up that dude is back there stealing that flatscreen..
keep em coming lol
lol ive seen 40 yr old junkies who look younger than that. cmon now
nice
Oh, but it works as an argument against LGBT?
They don't even try to fix us. They just decided that since there is no cure a cure is impossible and do not even look for one
no, it doesnt. How is that an argument against lgbt? And whats the argument?
more...? i think
you dont "fix" a fetish, people just need to chill out
>Before, people understood that it was an abnormality and should be treated as such
Isn't the guy supposed to be black?
what was? and before what?
>it doesn't matter if it's a horror movie that depicts simulated murder, it's still MURDER!! You're exploiting the horrific and beastly nature of murder for entertainment purposes, you PSYCHOPATH!!
Why the double standard? Literally anyone with a brain can look at a fictional or artistic portrayal of something and say "oh it's just a drawing who cares". Yet when it's about speech they don't like, like alternative fictional pornography like lolicon, that logical distinction just fizzles away and emotions take over.
I don't care if it's meant to cater to pedos. I bet pedos jack it to "Barely Legal just turned 18" teen fetish shit or porn where the girl is small and petite yet still of legal age, getting dicked by a fat, old, wrinkly fuck with a small cock or a gang of Tyrones. Should we also ban that because it appeals to them?
I also heard pedos drink water and breath air. Should we ban drinking water or breathing air?
>claims LGBT movement is anti-science, anti-medicine
>right-wing religious conservatives tried to criminalize the teaching of evolution and ban teaching sex education in public schools
In this ,fren, we agree.
...
they r not fetishistic disorders. What u dont understand is its alright to not be normal, if u r notharming yourself or others.
itt
so, please enlighten how
>I only get off to dudes
>I only get off to cars
>I only get of to lolis
are different.
Normal is an illusion
homos jerk off to dudes, carophiles to cars and pedos to lolis. Now pls enlighten how any of this brings any harm
oh, yeah - "human" isnt a fetish
The only people who don't think lolicons are pedos are other lolicons. Doesn't matter what they say, they're pedos to the entire planet.
oh, no no, i'm arguing that they are all equally fetishes.
yeah, they r not. Look up what a fetish is
so then nothing is a fetish
Are you fucking children senator. I'm not in the mood to hear about capitalism in America. This market has a billion fold yes? So this is capitalism porn, culture wrap up of time like usual. What I here is someone marketed on your tree senator. This here orchard patch is my property senator. Maybe you should tell us what you see senator. Where are girls or boys you want to touch senator.
then what is abnormal?
no, fetish has a specific definition. Some things r fetishes, some r not. Dont u understand logic and sets?
In a cosmos of infinities, nothing.
its all arbitrary. there is no objective distinction between the things i listed
Post more lolibooru!
cars r not alive. Not all children r male. U r just wrong
So, so long as it is something alive it isn't a fetish? Also, where do you get the idea anyone said all children are male?
where did u get the fucking idea theres no difference between men and loli?
I told u once before - look up the definition of a fetish. U dont get to call everything out of norm a fetish and then expect others to eliminate elements from the set in a way it still fits your narrative
"" the most common fetishes involve body parts, such as feet, or body features, such as obesity, piercings, or tattoos.""
Sooo, please explain again how being gay -isn't- a fetish? Is a gay guy not attracted to specific body parts/features?
is a body a body part?
R u ok, retard?
stop trolling
I'm attracted to some little kids but I'm turned on by a lot of weird shit, like pic related.
I would never bang a kid, it's not some kind of insatiable need I don't really care that much.
A lot of people act like anyone that thinks kids/lolis are hot are at risk of kidnapping some kid then raping and murdering them in their windowless van.
Although I suppose there are quite a few that would manipulate a child into having sex with them
a body is an collection of body parts. Gay men specifically seek out male body parts and traits
This.
Oh, and This.
Also, this.
is a part of a set the set?
Straight women specifically seek out men, so heterosexuality is a fetish, right?
stay mad
What about eagle
heterosexuality is the biological norm, man+woman=procreation, which is what our sexes are used for. A fetish is distinct in that it identifies something abnormal, like having sex with the same sex.
no, its clearly a fetish, since being attracted to men is a fetish. Shut your whore mouth, u r a moron and u r redefining terms to suit your narrative. U read the definition and u r still trying to stretch it over to have an excuse for your hate
Is that from a movie?
hate? Idgaf what people do with their dicks and pussies, theres nothing wrong with fetishes, homosexuality included.
Meh people didn't have a problem fucking people under 18 back when we were running around half naked in the jungle. Not sure why people get bent out of shape about it now.
Yikes
People didn't even care a hundred years ago
great. Its still not a fetish
Tfw yall niggas thinkin being attracted to children is ok
Hahaha, I get it cause the tadpole. LOL nice DUDE.
Better to pacify a pedo with cartoons than give them no other route for release than child porn and actually fucking children.
source
it still is tho
Nah.
HAHAHAHA! This is a great parody of your post, OP: Same "logic"
Why? also are FPS games murder then?
no, its not. Stop trolling. U can go now, u lost
Overall, homosexuality and the paraphilias appear to share the features of onset and course (both homosexuality and paraphilia being life-long), but they appear to differ on sex ratio, fraternal birth order, handedness, IQ and cognitive profile, and neuroanatomy. Although there have been some reports on prevalence and on physical height, these literatures are not yet reliable enough to be informative. Thus, considered together, the existing data seem more consistent with the conclusion that homosexuality is a characteristic distinct from the paraphilias.
In considering the foregoing review, one should remember that the evidence is indirect: These correlates were not explored here because any of them is a sine qua non either of homosexuality or of any paraphilia. It is entirely possible that other, still unexplored, correlates are more central to the etiology of human sexual interests and that the correlates discussed in this article are merely tangential. Because only few paraphilic interests have received much scientific attention, it also remains possible that each paraphilia is associated with its own, novel set of correlates, and that homosexuality is no more novel in its profile of correlates than would be any other paraphilic interest. Thus, although homosexuality is probably better said to be distinct from the paraphilias, that conclusion is still quite tentative.
>not wanting to get your dick stroked by a child's feet
must be fucked in the head
Plot twist, this thread was a bait to get people to post loli porn without looking like a pedo
go away authoritarian normalfag, reddit might be more your speed
of course it was
>projecting your own projections to others
wew lad
i hope you live in fear
>results r inconclusive
>clearly its a fetish
not true
Albert Fish used to fuck, kill and eat children
but he ddin't touch his own kids though
so you can see pedos are not so bad :)
point being, you can't say it -isn't- a fetish. read the whole study
great - u cant say it IS, either
procreation supposed to result in healthy offsprings (paraphilias)
having sexual experiences when you are not ready for it can be heavily traumatizing (=ruining lives)
most males wired to be defensive towards woman and child
i wonder if it's genetical why didn't it cease to exist
but if you read the study, you'd see that it qualifies in each distinction. Comes down to "more research is needed"
u didnt lik the study, u pasted an excerpt.
>conclusion is still quite tentative
nope
why the fuck would anyone care about looking like a pedo on Yea Forums though
im sorry that you can't figure out how to find scientific studies
why god allow satan to tempt us,and makes us fall?
why did he created us in that way,than condemn us?
im sry u cant figure out how to link the study, not quote-mine them
prove god
Pedophilia isn't a sin in the Bible
you don't want to go down that path
you dodge a bullet that way
lust/chastity
quote mine would imply im taking it out of context.
Literally just marry them and it's A-okay
This tells me you can't tell the difference between a drawing and real life, you retard.
can we resist,or fight of sinfull temptations?
does he wants us to confess and repent if we fall?
or enslave them, that's alos an option allowed by God
yes, u have. U quoted conclusions and the conclusion is tenative. U say "it has characteristics of both" - the characteristics of being a fetish and characteristics of not being a fetish? So it cant be called a fetish
u have no evidence for god, so i have no reason to belive anything u say
Furries
Here's a better copy, user
you can read the article if you want to learn something, up to you if you wanna be ignorant or not.
they always say what we shouldn't do...
i wonder when will someone gave a guide to live a fullfilled near perfect life
is there a way?
many way of life seems like a pitfalll mostly
is there an ultimate universal truth,that we supposed to follow?
then link the fucking article, u stupid faggot, instead of dodging all the points
oh snap
ty user
maybe i was retarded and saved the sample
the only point you've made is that you can't figure out how to search for a scientific article. Thats pretty sad dude
it would be knowledge if you have proof
but even if they have proof you would doubt them
call it collective hallucination,or there are no scietific explanation for that phenomone yet
i think atheists aware more of that than believers
climb high enough in the social ladder and you will have that proof
yes, atheists r more aware of how much bullshit your religion is
>it would be knowledge if you have proof
this isnt an argument
u dont have proof, nor evidence
yeah, ill call it hallucination and peer pressure cuz thats what it is - thats the scientific explenation for that phenomenon
recap: no evidence for god
i dont need to climb any ladders to prove earths spherical and rotating. Why would i need to do it for evidence of your fairytale? Especially since every1 seems to already believe it?
fucking retard
>trying to eat soup with a fork
perhaps adapting a theological viewpoint would make it easier to grasp these things
you will never understand these things from a scientific/rational approach
he kinda hates if you try to get close to him with your flawed sense of reason
so you don't want proof?
nothing of what u wrote is true
its not even wrong - its sophistry
do u have it?
if you are wothy you will be choosen,and you will have that insight
Sorry m8, he too cumbrain for some persuasion.
Anyway I understand why you hated pedophiles mostly because of they gravitate to children BUT. You have to understand that they are not you and they are not him/her.(other people)
Pedophiles, at it's unconfirmed core results, seemed to stem from their childhood (abuse or just plain unfullfilled something) oar their lack of satisfying bond of human adults.
They are not immature per se, but psychologically they are damaged and that they need a kind of shock therapy in hopes that they will be extinguished out of Earth or something extreme.
OAR as a result of a genetic misplacement or some biological bullshit must've messed their brain, Again they are not you and everyone is born on different seconds/minutes/hours/days and years
>This Thread
It's honestly amusing. Personally u don't mind them as long as they don't post any IRL .webms. just let them be and let others take the fight to them.
PS: I'm high >pic related
>choosen
so u dont have it, u talk out of your ass, just like every religious nut
i show you the way how to collect evidence by your own if you want proof
i couldn't present it,but gave you a guide if you wish to proceed that way
worthy? aren't we all gods children? does he not say he wants us all in heaven? He knows what is necessary to convince every one of us of his existence, yet does not. why?
alright - design the experiment, thatll prove god
Psychology itself barely counts as a science to begin with. Whether we decide non-reproductive sexual attractions count as mental illnesses is entirely arbitrary.
You say that like slavery is bad. The only bad thing about slavery is that they brought spread the niggers around.
probably because it isn't really as traumatizing as (((modern science))) would have you believe
i could gave indirect proofs,i cannot gave undoubtable proof however
oof
anyway this is not what we supposed to do
>choosen
That's not how Christianity works, kike
look up in statistic how their life turns out
and what they go through
based and redpilled
Well, I dont need your proofs. God could easily make himself evident, yet doesnt. why?
We're in bizarro world. Niggers are people, gay is okay, child brides are bad, women have jobs. The whole system needs a reset, it's completely lost the plot.
it counts full-well and its not arbitrary. Fetish is also not an illness
based abubu
try being a slave and maybe, just maybe, ull figure out why its bad
that was a good one :DDDD
you mean the statistics primarily about rape?
>I wonder if genes survival is coded in genes
u cant even fucking spell, let alone give any proof
I have. according to some researchers, such as Rind or Kinsey it's only the extreme cases of abuse that cause lifelong trauma.
Have you ever been a slave? How the fuck would you know?
i get dubs you don't you need no further proof
also check them
or grammar
I see, so you just speak out of your ass.
so if u havent been a slave, how can u say its good?
all right whatever you say. fetish, orientation, mental illness all mean the same which is nothing. meaningless label put on to decide if a thing is acceptable or not.
Yeah, that also annoyed the shit out of me
It's the parent's job to teach sexual health. Schools need to stop trying to parent kids that aren't their own. The government is not there for a parental role, and it's disgusting for.them to even try.
wrong, as always. They mean specific things and u r too stupid to comprehend why we have words
I'm a wageslave. Does that count?
>b-but user i could give you indirect proof,or at least prove that scientific explanations are false
why no one wants that :(
let me guess. fetishists are short and left handed, orientations are aids infested. based on inconclusive data.
k.
no and u know it
parents are -terrible- at teaching anything to kids.
wrong as always
no, its the schools job.
truth is evolution pressure is heavy,and huge potion of the population end up in the gutter or their genes disapear from the gene pool
mama nature cruel :(
and this is where the delusional faggot dropped off. God disproved again
all right so what's the deciding criteria for a sexual attraction to be considered an illness or not
whether u catch it, or not
>ITT: people continue to argue semantics while ignoring that genitals don't have eyes
>people learn that fetuses masturbate in the womb (look it up)
Reproduction is the single most basic function of life, and it starts from day 1. Now, that's not close to being an excuse for being a "pedophile" and abusing those who aren't ready. But people need to relax and exercise basic discretion for what is and isn't okay for the other person. Communicate like human beings, and don't be an asshole. The fact the method for sifting out actual abuse that can't be reasonably correlated to any particular age range during major formative years is to set a hard or soft limit at a particular age, not only needlessly involves government power in a very personal subject, but overall causes more harm to children than it ever hopes to help.
That is, people screaming "die pedos!" are their own worst enemy.
Fking kys if you jack off to this shit you fat weebs
dont u have cock to go back to sucking, mr western culture?
Go back to watching anime and jacking off to loli you fat fuck
hit or miss - i bet u never hit, huh?
All pedophiles will be destroyed in the new era. Fuck all Nazis and pedophiles
Lol ur talking to me about not having sex when you jack off to loli u fat fuck, you cant even see your own dick
u know, just cu u were captured and brought over from africa, doesnt make u a part of western civilization
in the case of pedos, not having sex is an achievement.
>what are the risks of unprotected sex
>what are the benefits of practicing safe sex
>what are condoms, how are they used, applied, and how should they be handled to prevent failure or breakage
>what are STDs, their symptoms, and how to identify them or describe them to your physician
>what is the real human anatomy
>what is puberty
>what is acne
>what are good hygiene practices to engage in now that your body is changing
>what is a menstrual cycle and how are female hygienic devices used and why is it important to replace them once done
>what are your options in case a mistake is made and the best ways to avoid them
Yeah... no. Teens have a right to this information. It's unreasonable to assume parents would be able to properly teach hormonal, anxious, and confused kids about the ins-and-outs of sex, their bodies, or how to properly explore these topics. There's a reason why states that ban sex education (or require abstinence-only sex ed) in public schools have exponentially higher teen pregnancy, rape, STD contraction, and abortion statistics than states that teach it.
Anyone gonna make a new loli thread or are we calling it a night?
>what are the risks of unprotected sex
>what are condoms, how are they used, applied, and how should they be handled to prevent failure or breakage
>what are STDs, their symptoms, and how to identify them or describe them to your physician
>what is puberty
>what are good hygiene practices to engage in now that your body is changing
>what is a menstrual cycle and how are female hygienic devices used and why is it important to replace them once done
>what are your options in case a mistake is made and the best ways to avoid them
This is something that parents should teach. If you don't, you're a shitty parent.
>what is the real human anatomy
>what is acne
>what is puberty
>what are the risks of unprotected sex
>what are STDs, their symptoms, and how to identify them or describe them to your physician
>what is a menstrual cycle and how are female hygienic devices used and why is it important to replace them once doneThese things are related to health, and are fine for a school.to teach. But understanding changes is a personal matter, and should be explained by parents/guardians, the people that raise them, not the government.
>what are the benefits of practicing safe sex
Nigger, that's not up to the parents or the fucking school. The "benefits" are part of the human experience, that is, strictly tied to the volition of the person, not you, their parents, or the government, only themselves. The fuck is wrong with you
it's 3am and I haven't looked at loli in ages, though it was more for emotional support in teen/early 20s. Have a good Znooze user.
>second block of greentext
These things are related to health, and are fine for a school.to teach. But understanding changes is a personal matter, and should be explained by parents/guardians, the people that raise them, not the government.
My bad, trying to format on my phone at 3am, can't sleep
>its not up to the parents to protect their children from harm and its not up to school to educate children, so they can make an informed decision about given situations
>they should just be thrown into a pit and should figure out everything humanity has figured out in ages during those 15 years of savagery
>doesnt matter if they die. Who cares? parents and schools shouldnt
Statistics don't lie, user. Everything I said in my previous post belongs in public schools because it teaches the facts from a neutral perspective. When you place sexuality in such a light that it seems risky and evil, that has an adverse effect on how teens view it when under duress, and because they're under duress it means they're less likely to consider the safer options when they inevitably do fuck.
They're gonna fuck. At least make sure they're prepared and protected when they do. And sadly, we can't always depend on the parents to teach them the right things.
ajph.aphapublications.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Please please please quote what I said that sounds anything like what (you) are saying. I outlined lists where health related things should be taught by schools, and life changes should be explained by parents, and then (you) are strawmanning the exact opposite of what I said. I literally even said that you're a shitty parent if you don't explain major changes happening. The only thing I said shouldn't involve parents or the government/school is how an jndividual chooses to enjoy their sexuality and life experiences.
>Nigger, that's not up to the parents or the fucking school. The "benefits" are part of the human experience
>neutral
central*, what is "neutral" isn't determined by the government.
>When you place sexuality in such a light that it seems risky and evil
I never said anything like this wtf are you trying to claim that for?
>They're gonna fuck. At least make sure they're prepared and protected when they do.
Wow, it's almost as if I said
>This is something that parents should teach. If you don't, you're a shitty parent.
right after the first block of greentext in >And sadly, we can't always depend on the parents to teach them the right things.
>the right things
That is absolutely not up to you or the government. They are not your kid, and you will not ever be. Teach your own kids the "right things". Parents have this responsibility, and it starts with (you).
Full block of text you are quoting from:
"
>what are the benefits of practicing safe sex
Nigger, that's not up to the parents or the fucking school. The "benefits" are part of the human experience, that is, strictly tied to the volition of the person, not you, their parents, or the government, only themselves. The fuck is wrong with you
"
In no way is this saying parents shouldn't explain changes, nor does it claim that schools shouldn't teach (strictly) about health. Go be a troll somewhere else.
go be a nigger in a grave. U dismissed their negative experiences, as if we shouldnt mitigate them
and i quoted exactly what u asked for - part where u said sth i paraphrased. Why would i be quoting a wall of text, U stupid fucking cocksucking jew?
solidarity to your fellow man is not a thing i see :/
its not his
>U dismissed their negative experiences, as if we shouldnt mitigate them
Not sure where you're getting this from, considering I listed
>what are your options in case a mistake is made and the best ways to avoid them
as something parents should teach their kids.
>Why would i be quoting a wall of text, U stupid fucking cocksucking jew?
Because a context a day keeps the strawmen away, especially when they claim you say the opposite of what you did.
Strictly health should be taught by schools, and support through major life changes should come from parents. Please take notice that both blocks of text have overlapping/shared items for a reason.
i quoted to u where im getting it from, but clearly u r too stupid to understand your own words
school
your fucking drivel is the context. Kys, nigger, u were done before u started yappin
>has entirely stopped trying to make an arguement
Why are you making so many excuses for being a shitty parent? Sex is uncomfortable to talk to your kids about, but so is shoveling shit out of your newborn's vagina. You do what you have to to be a parent and raise your kids right. Encouraging the idea that this is too hard only serves to decrease the general understanding of sexual heath. Suck it the fuck up and do your job, and stop letting a government entity decide how they want to form your kids. Yes, teens need an objective understanding of maintaining personal health, but it is the role of parents, not the government, to aid in understanding these changes outside of health.
why r u still here, again? U lost, u can leave
>plzplzplz feed me more (you)s
It's 4:20am NIGGGAAAAAAAAA, why else?
little girls smell like kid shampoo and baby powder