Listen guys, I get you have your own kinks and whatnot, but you cannot expect those things to be accepted by most people. It is not normal and will never be normal. It is not healthy to obsess over fetishes or to base you life around them. Your ambitions and hobbies can and should be more productive.
Learn that new language, buy that new book, spend your time learning how to fix your car yourself, and whatever you do, stop wearing diapers in public.
piss off, normie. i let my tittyfucking addiction rule my life.
>is ruled by porn and animal desires
>the most normalfag thing imaginable.
>projects fears of normalcy and failure on to other people
>"piss off, normie"
Imagine being so basic.
>imagine not being addicted to tittyfucking big busty retards
>stop wearing diapers in public
Are you insane?
And for the record, just because you enjoy something doesn't mean it rules your life. If some people's pastime is going to fetish cons or hooking up or whatever else you can think of, they're in their right to do so. Different people seek entertainment in different ways. Not everybody is fond of language, literature, or other practical hobbies, and simply prefer other things. So long as their functionality in society is not impaired because of their desire to indulge something else, it is not unhealthy and there is no reason to seek to rid themselves of the behavior.
>literally thinks insanity is the only reason a person would object to wearing an infants undergarments
>lectures user about contributing to society
>probably does not even understand what it means to contribute to society
Didn't lecture you on contributing to society, user. Reread the post.
Also, first sentence was a joke. I guess it's my fault taking it for granted that you'd be able to spark the two neurons necessary to figure that out.
Oh, and nice ad hominem.
>Listen guys, I get you have your own kinks and whatnot, but you cannot expect those things to be accep
Fuck you you're ruining it.
sorry, I made the mistake of thinking you meant what you said,
Nice picture, I noticed it's someone in a house. Good, with any luck they don't go out in public like that.
Please don't misunderstand. Insanity is not a prerequisite to not wanting to wear diapers outside. However, if someone wants to do it, what business is it of yours?
Dear me, how could I have missed that? Is this better?
BECAUSE IT'S IN PUBLIC. I HAVE TO INTERACT WITH THEM
That's why it's my business what the fuck
If you have some sort of aversion to the mere sight of protective underwear, I suppose you have the right to be upset about it, but you can't expect everyone to avoid you seeing them.
Short of someone shitting themselves in public without necessity, I would venture to say that it remains none of your business. You are able to choose to ignore someone.
Good luck, user. You seem uncomfortable in both your own skin and in the world at large. Try to practice a little apathy.
>accuses user of being unfomfortable in own skin because user hates people who where fetish wear in public and shit themselves for fun
You seem like one of those nerds that goes to gay parades
It's simple, it's about consent.
It's one thing if you actually have a medical need for diapers but if it's out of some sexual thrill of wearing diapers out and around other people then you are forcing unwilling bystanders, possibly including children, to engage in your sex play.
>Inb4 a bunch of edgy contrarian replys about how cool and tough and btfoing the sjws and thots it is to force kids and randos to join your sex play
You don't need to be a chick to understand that being forced to engage in unwanted sex shit sucks. If you're not into it then some random guy sticking his dick in your face or shitting their pants while you're sharing an elevator is gonna be annoying. Forget whatever internet toughguy "I would just beat their ass with muh ninja marine skills!" shit you might have been considering to deflect, even if you beat them up it's still a bother especially if it keeps happening.
agreed
On the contrary, actually. Social justice culture is out of hand, I think.
Consent is important. On that I can agree. However, if the person in question doesn't try to engage you in anything, saying it's equivalent to anything more than a stranger being strange is quite a stretch. I suppose you could argue that by doing anything fetish related while out and about is an attempt to engage others, but this is unrealistic.
You're in your right to ignore people just as much as they are to do something you don't like. As I said before, short of doing something very clearly and obviously obtrusive or offensive, it really is just that person's business.
Moreover, short of asking them directly, do you have a definitive way of distinguishing a fetish act from its necessary counterpart?
I never accused you of anything. I intentionally kept the language neutral ("seem"). What I have been perceiving is that you're uncomfortable in your own skin because of your attitude towards harmless fetishism despite the inclusion of a fetish picture in your initial post, which led me to conclude that you had some sort of fetish yourself.
Forgive the double post, by the way. I've been on the road, didn't want the thread to disappear. I'm actually pretty interested in what you have to say.
social interactions very rarely have "definitive" aspects to them.
Nobody wants to interact with someone wearing diapers even if it's a medical condition, but if we have reason to believe it's due to involuntary medical reasons, we understand that the person is likely less thrilled than we ourselves are. It's an unfortunate way things are.
On the other hand, if somebody is putting us through that discomfort because they get off on it, it's rational to be disgusted.
>Good luck, user. You seem uncomfortable in both your own skin and in the world at large. Try to practice a little apathy.
So you're going to tell me this was TOTALLY not supposed to sound condescending and insulting?
Go fuck yourself. Get as pissy and cry into your pillow as much as you want about people wearing whatever clothing in public. The fact remains that unless someone is specifically being exhibitionist about it then it’s 100% none of your fucking business.
You'd not be so defensive if you genuinely thought you were doing nothing wrong.
your pic is horrifically irrelevant, but reveals how you're approaching and coping with this whole thing.
It's time to stop
sage
wasn't me, to clarify.
But there is no social interaction if they don't approach you. I'm sort of in agreement with you that if someone intentionally puts you through discomfort, you have every right to be disgusted. The problem lays in the subjectivity of the word discomfort - if it makes you uncomfortable merely to be around someone doing something strange, then while you are in your right to be disgusted, it doesn't mean that they should conform to your wishes.
Yeah, pretty much. I imagine it would suck to be so sensitive to certain things, so on the chance that you are, I suggest trying to practice apathy and I do genuinely wish you good luck.
Nice deflecting. Perfect 5/7
>"Officer PLEASE be REASONABLE, it's UNREALISTIC to sugget I'm engaging the children in sex play merely by walking through the family park in crotchless pants while spinning my dick like a helicopter!
Lol fuck off, kid.
It doesn't matter how much you try to twist logic to justify this shit, no one is falling for it.
YES, involving random non-consenting people and especially kids in your fucking exhibitionist fetish games is wrong and people are gonna be rightfully pissed and call the cops.
NO it's not fucking "unrealistic" to say that doing fetish shit in public is engaging people. That's obviously WHY you're doing it in public instead of the privacy of your own home because no matter how much you wanna lie to us and yourself about it, involving random unwilling strangers in your sex play is apparently part of how you get off.
>short of doing something very clearly and obviously obtrusive or offensive, it really is just that person's business
ANY fucking sex or fetish shit in PUBLIC is obviously obtrusive and offensive because you are bringing it out of PRIVATE and into PUBLIC that you share with others thereby forcing it on them.
Goddamn everyone recognises this simple fact except selfish disingenuous people like you who simpley refuse to recognise what everyone else thinks because it doesn't serve your little stiffy.
>Inb4 you try to make excuses about how there's no harm if they don't notice you shitting your pants while rubbing yourself or fucking your realdoll waifu at the movies
No, you are selfishly deciding to involve them without consent and accepting the risk of them being exposed on their behalf just for the sake of your boner which is the only thing you care about.
And given how fucking autistically oblivious you fetishists are about why this is wrong and people are pissed I don't exactly trust you out of all people to carefully judge what is "acceptable" risk of people noticing they're being included in your sex play.
What’s wrong with liking saliva?
That's why I'm saying fuck you and go live on the beach and just watch. Theres going to be a lot less crime.
Also, just look up 'chaos on the internet' if you don't want to go to a real fuckfest.
Also, the only reason I even posted this was because I was like the guy in the pic and everyone who was doing it just kind of nodded along and I decided to post it because "we could always make a thread about it"
Also, this thread is going to attract a lot of pedos who are gonna find that thread and go all out and do their dirty-work. People on Yea Forums will be so fed up and they'll be like "fuck you and move on".
Also, I'm a dude, fuck
>Get as pissy and cry into your pillow
Lol more likely you're gonna be the one crying into your cellmate's crotch after you get arrested for public indecency and the cops don't fall for your bs excuses and twisted logic.
>unless someone is specifically being exhibitionist
That is LITTERALLY what you are doing, you retard. That's what we call it when people bring their sex games into public because involving unwilling bystanders makes their peepee hard, that's why you're demanding to be let to do this shit in public instead of just engaging in it in the privacy of your own home.
When you take your PRIVATE SEXUAL "business" out into PUBLIC which you share with everyone else then you are FORCING them to be involved in your retarded fetishist "business" whether they want it or not.
Fuck off disingenuous fetishist retard, no one is falling for your bs.
>Pic
Now someone just Photoshop the guy to be a parent with their child and the girl to be a furry shitting on the ground and it'll be approaching accurate.
This, it's time to grow up, and if this is how you react to your own failure, then I'm done here.
Please, don't do this. This is what you've always done, and I will not tolerate your shitty behavior anymore. This, it's time to grow up, and if this is how you react to your own failure, then I'm done here.Please, don't do this.
Man were you raped by someone in a diaper why are you so afraid of seeing someone in a diaper in public? Are you also afraid of transwomen living out their fetish of living in the body they want in public? Or do you also have a constant fear that people have hidden buttplugs or vibrators and are getting turned on in public? Like holy shit it's just someone wearing a diaper grow up. Is it so much of an occurrence in your life that it's a problem? Yeah I'm pretty sure you were raped by a diaper fag.
what the fuck is this thread
user, there is a very distinct difference between "walking through the family park in crotchless pants while spinning my dick like a helicopter" and engaging in non-offensive activities. You seem to be ignoring the points I'm trying to make and letting your emotions get the better of you.
If someone is doing something overtly obnoxious or illegal, that person will have to face whatever consequences follow. However, if it doesn't directly involve others - let's say having ropes on under their clothing - then the person is not harassing you, and if you happen to catch a glimpse of something short of them exposing themselves in an uncivil way, you are capable of ignoring it and cannot expect them to adjust their behavior for your sake.
There will be strange people wherever you go, and just because they are in your vicinity does not mean that you become the arbiter of what is and is not okay for them to do. Chances are you won't notice anything anyway, actually.
I do recognize the fact that by interacting with others when they don't wish to be interacted with you are forcing yourself on them. If it's just something you disagree with and they don't try to involve you, then you can and should ignore it.
I have stated in previous posts that I don't condone obscene behavior in public, including shitting yourself, and I'm not selfishly involving anyone - if I decide to do something in public out of the ordinary that would reasonably offend others, I keep it to myself.
If all you're going to do is get mad, don't bother replying. The discussion gets nowhere.
>go live on the beach and just watch. Theres going to be a lot less crime.
>Also, just look up 'chaos on the internet' if you don't want to go to a real fuckfest.
Wtf are you even talking about?
No random rambling bs you can come up with is gonna suddenly make 99% of people have a sudden revelation and flip to being fine with you forcing your fetishes on the public space.
>the only reason I even posted this was because I was like the guy in the pic and everyone who was doing it just kind of nodded along and I decided to post it because "we could always make a thread about it"
No, seriously WTF are you even talking about? It's like you're having a mental breakdown mid-post and making less and less sense as you go on.
>Also, I'm a dude, fuck
I didn't suggest otherwise though?
Seriously are you OK, user? Forget not making sense you seem to be becoming straight up delusional.
What I said did not imply that people were having a party, or that they were making their way through the crowd at a reasonable pace, or that they were even present when I said "They" – it was simply an assumption.
What you said does imply that there are a few things, the only thing it does not imply is that I'm being unreasonable to be accusing them of harassment.
Now for the facts:
1.) If someone is acting harassing to you and you happen to catch a glimpse of it in an uncivil way, it is not unreasonable to decide that this person is harassing you. If you notice them, you're capable of ignoring them – for the most part. But then, again, do you really know if they're doing it on purpose or accidentally?
I can imagine the argument that "Well you're the bully so they shouldn't be able to do as they please" – but this is ridiculous. It's a lie to say that you have the right to dictate how others behave. So instead, use the logic of the argument – you don't have to respond. If you notice a harassment person, it's not reasonable to assume that they act maliciously because you feel the heat.
2.) "No amount of yelling or screaming will make them stop"; and I agree: you can shout them down. That is called "violence" and "harassment". People use it when they don't want to be harassed and they're being yelled at or threatened. And they'll use it, just as they'll use it on the sidewalk to get their point across.
But just for the record. As I'm sure you know that if I used my hands I'd get in trouble. That's not a "no violence" rule anyway, but just because it is a rule doesn't mean that it makes you a good person and therefore you shouldn't use it. There's a word in English that says "not good" but it doesn't take any kind of action that would make it "not good" (not for some people, at all).
>you'll never believe this but everyone thinks that you're mentally ill
>and no one gives a shit that you don't give a shit to what they think
I was fucking saying the opposite to you!
Jesus did welcome to the fucking internet I don’t liek thsi shit but you sound like you found your sons foot fetish file grow up
some of us have to wear them for medical reasons
but like even if it was a fetish thing, who the fuck cares? it's not like you can usually tell.
you are extremely rational and have made many cogent points which OP summarily ignored. i'm just here to tell you i agree with you totally and OP is an overly-defensive reactionary who is ruled by his emotions and what i suspect may be his fetish.
I don't know what you're referring to about people having a party or doing anything else you mentioned. Can you clarify?
I agree, you're not being unreasonable. What is unreasonable, I think, is to expect others to conform to your idea of civility. If you have no such expectation, then I guess we're in agreement, and I reiterate my previous statement - try practicing a little apathy.
As to the rest:
1. Is a person harassing you by being in your presence, and is it their responsibility if you happen to catch a glimpse of whatever it is they happen to be doing, even if it is within the law?
You're not a bully for having opinions, you're a bully if you harass people because of your opinions.
2. I never said that nothing would make them stop, what I said was that any given person is not the arbiter of what is socially acceptable. Sure, violence can get someone to do something, but it's unjust.
What I am ultimately trying to communicate is that fetishism and social health are not mutually exclusive, even in the context of being in public.
Cheers, mate.
We all know that a lot of the people here are out of their fucking minds. We are not stupid and i can understand if you are just mad because they made a joke about you. We see that every day.
>I agree, you're not being unreasonable. What is unreasonable, I think, is to expect others to conform to your idea of civility. If you have no such expectation, then I guess we're in agreement, and I reiterate my previous statement - try practicing a little apathy.
No. You're being unreasonable, because you actually expect someone to act a certain way, so that they will follow your idea of civility - which means you expect the other person to also act a certain way. For example, if some asshole makes a bad decision, and your only reaction is to give them a shoulder to cry on, you've failed at civility.
i'm not mad, i just think you're being extremely defensive in regards to a fetish which 99.99% of the time you are wholly unaware of its presence at all. why do you seem to have such a complex about it? diaperfags are weird sure, but harmless for the most part. you make it sound like they're going around shoving it in people's faces but i've never encountered someone like that in the wild... and i live in Philly where people are crazy.
I'm going to have to disagree with you again. I don't see how I'm being unreasonable. When have I said that I expect anyone to act in any particular way?
I have implied that it is prudent to act a certain way, or given suggestions, but I don't expect people to act the way I want them to. All I can do is give an argument as to why I disagree with what they're doing.
I think that if someone makes a bad decision, the best thing to do is talk to them and caution them against it, not sympathize. Objectively bad decisions, that is.
I don't get why you're not just angry. You know exactly what you're doing. You're the first person to point out that it's not that great an idea at all, and you're being quite a good example of why it's not a great idea. The problem isn't in the person, the problem is the society that they've created.
To the extent that I have been harsh in the past regarding certain types of interpersonal behaviour, I do not blame the victims in these instances, nor do I feel that anyone should expect that my opinion would change in their cases. It is my job as a police officer to act as a peacemaker, not a judge. Sometimes I express an opinion on what to do without knowing what it must look like. If I were an individual, this would be one of the major factors in making decisions and not in what I've said.
>Are you also afraid of transwomen living out their fetish of living in the body they want in public?
Have you not left your mom's basement in years?
Duh people are afraid of trannies. Of course it's also a false comparison because with trannies it's a mental illness deal, not a fetish, you disingenuous shitposter(litterally).
Triggered diaper fetishists demanding that no one is allowed to get pissed at them exposing their sex acts to children.
We were talking about how no one ever hears of a fetish before, like it's some hidden secret that we don't know about, except it is there. You have literally never heard of it. I mean maybe it was in some porn, but not in actual sex. We were talking about how no one ever hears of a fetish before, like it's some hidden secret that we don't know.
I understand what you're saying, but I don't understand how it relates directly to what we were discussing.
I don't remember saying that anyone expects your opinion to change. I also don't understand your last statement. I'd appreciate it if you clarified these things.
t. illiterate user
OP here. Started this thread hours ago and left soon after. How is this still going? it was supposed to be a quick joke, why are you guys arguing. what is there to even argue about. This whole thing is bait and it was not even high quality.
Tried my best to derail with pix haha. Haven't seen these many words in a thread in quite awhile.
are you the guy posting shitty diapers? and why are trans people being mentioned?
I'd just like people to be reasonable about it, you know what I'm saying?
It's just that I think people should be honest about who they love or hate, I think that the more we can be fair in trying to be that, the more people will feel that they've done their best and not just have a bad day.
The good thing is they'll love them anyway. I don't think you really know what's best for all people, in the end it's usually for the people in the majority.
OP here, just for the sake of clarity, I abandoned this thread early on and don't have any arguments here. This whole thread is just cuz I've noticed a lot of diaper posts lately and figured I could get replies lol
You just want to be a retard, I'm glad that I have you in my corner. You would have the thread shut down the moment you started talking and that's not how the internet works. I'm going to continue using this thread as my public display of this thread and the fact that the OP's thread isn't going anywhere and we are not allowed to debate this is a disgrace. The way a debate is supposed to be conducted here is to let the other poster tell us what they think, not to have a witch hunt to shut the other poster down. I will go back to the main page so we can talk about this properly.
I don't know what you're saying and I think you may be replying to the wrong guy.
>there is a very distinct difference between "walking through the family park in crotchless pants while spinning my dick like a helicopter" and engaging in non-offensive activities
The problem is that you seem to think that YOU should be the judge of what counts as "offensive activities" but your judgement is entirely based on serving your sexual desires and is completely out of step with the view of the vast majority of people.
>You seem to be ignoring the points I'm trying to make
I'm not igoring your points, that's ironically just a deflection to ignore my legitimate disagreement and counterarguments.
>letting your emotions get the better of you
Lol no, my argument is based on the reality of public opinion while you are solely motivated by your sexual feelings and saying anything to excuse involving strangers in your sex play.
Fuck off with your "if no one noticed there's no harm" bs, I already brought that up in and tore it apart which you're now ignoring even as you whine about me supposedly ignoring your points, disingenuous hypocrite tard.
It's not YOUR right to decide on the behalf of EVERYONE ELSE what an acceptable risk of exposure is. You are deciding for them without consent to unknowly be involved in your sex play and risk knowingly involving them too.
The guy jacking off in the back of theater during Disney movies doesn't get a get out of jail free card by arguing that it's no harm done if no one noticed and if they DO notice then they can just ignore it.
And yeah, *I* can ignore it but that doesn't mean I can't or shouldn't call the cops on exhibitionists especially when there are also fucking KIDS in public.
You go ahead and tell parents and cops that they and the kids can just ignore you and see how that goes for you.
Of course you also ignored the related point that the ENTIRE REASON you want to do this in PUBLIC is because of exhibitionism and wanting to involve strangers.
>but you cannot expect those things to be accepted by most people
why tf you think we come here?
This is not about consent. As a man I feel so much more comfortable telling men to stop doing it than I do asking them to stop. As a woman, I feel less comfortable telling women their bodies should not be touched by a person without their explicit permission.
Women (and men) who object have a history where their opinions and feelings were used against them. This is not about consent. As a man I feel so much more comfortable telling men to stop doing it than I do asking them to stop. As a woman, I feel less comfortable letting women touch my body without my explicit permission.Women (and men) who object have a history where their opinions and feelings were used against them.
lol no yah it's kind of supposed to be inflammatory
lol what is this, this is Yea Forums why are you trying to argue anything
Yeah like, shit, I'm a fucking degenerate fetishist too but I have the common decency to not force random people to help me get off.
where do you live that this is such a huge problem for you? do you frequently encounter diaper fetishists in your day to day life?
Here, have more diapers
Saying the opposite of what? The greentext you posted?
Again wtf are you talking about?
Read your post again, retard, not only does it make next to zero sense on it's own but it's a non-sequitur completely unrelated to the post it's replying to.
probably my favorite pic here
I guess "the rest of the world can go fuck itself" doesn't fit into the anti-porn-culture. And to the people saying that we, unlike them, are just "trolling" or harassing them by asking them to stop. Sure, we're not exactly the ones being attacked.
OMG words words words STFU!!
Yeah, but there's a difference between helping someone out in a desperate attempt to fuck them, and the other direction "wanting" an entire person to help you out.
Like, I don't rape girls when I feel like it. I do things like give them my dick or get them drunk enough to have sex with me to get what I want. And if I feel like it I will fuck them if they feel like it (no matter how bad I think it's going to be) but when I feel like it, the odds are in my favor.
Even when someone hasn't heard of a specific fetish you exhibitionist creeps are so self-absorbed and willfully oblivious to what's normal and acceptable that your creepy behavior usually tips people off that you're doing something weird and should be avoided/kept an eye on around kids.
so, squishy diapers or soft poofy diapers?
>I'd just like people to be reasonable about it, you know what I'm saying?
Yeah, I can get behind that. I'm glad the people who aren't are generally few and far between.
No, user. I am not the judge of offensive activities. You're not either. Really, no one person can be. I've said numerous times that you're in every right to think something is offensive, what's wrong is to expect people to cater to that.
I am not motivated by sexual feelings, nor have I stated that even once. I never claimed to know or decide what an acceptable risk of exposure is. I even proceeded to ask you questions about your stance in , which you ignored or didn't understand that they were directed toward you.
"The guy jacking off in the back of the theater" is unacceptable regardless of whether or not he is caught because he is doing something obviously obscene and offensive, not just in the eyes of society but in the eyes of the law as well. I pointed this out in the very post you quoted.
You are, in fact, ignoring everything I've said about not condoning obscene behavior in public.
If you're going to get mad and reply without reading the rest of the thread, the discussion does not progress anywhere.
the original author is making no sense at all with everything he's saying. I can't tell if it's from his own ignorance, incompetence, or some combination of both.
I'm so sorry for wasting everyone's time, but there were several people talking about this, so I thought maybe it was worth a post.
>Y-youre just illiterate! Just because I'm desperately demanding that I should be allowed to explore my exhibitionism without consequences doesn't mean I'm doing just that!
Lol
I'm calling you illiterate because the bulk of posts with actual content have been in discussion of something different than what you said. If you don't understand a post, ask for clarification before you say something that makes people's brain cells commit suicide.
FUCKING SHUT UP YOU STUPID NIGGERS
What you said is what the consensus is at this point. But I would like people to go back and read both threads. I think you need to find a way to use your brains without calling people illiterate.
I'm sure you very much would like this to NOT be about consent, after all you want to force people and children to unknowingly(or maybe knowingly but that's an acceptable risk for the sake of your boner, right?) take part in your exhibitionist sex play.
Not having to consider wether or not they consent makes that a lot easier, hell, not caring about consent makes any sexual pursuit easier as any rapist or flasher can tell you.
>As a man...As a woman
You're not both and your rambling means nothing of substance. As a man you feel more comfortable telling them to do something then asking? What? Why? How I that even relevant to the topic?
"As a woman" you feel fine letting women randomly touch you? You do realize that a lot of women DON'T like being randomly touched even by other women right?
Seriously wtf are you even talking about? It seems like either you're mentally ill and confused or couldn't cobble together an argument so you're trying to deflect and distract with rambling nonsense.
>If you're not being harassed by a diaper fags every day then you have no right to complain about me involving random and kids in my exhibitionist fetish!
Fuck off retard, no argument is gonna make people suddenly accept your bs.
Yes, you're right. I should have said that I'm just worried about the children. I would have never told them about that because I didn't want to be a dick
You do not need to be forced to participate in it to be involved, if you want to participate please stop trying to keep this a secret.
>SH-SHUT UP you're TRIGGERING ME!!!!
LOL, no, faggot.
If you glance at the text that comes with the op picture instead of only seeing the image and letting you porn addled brain block everything else out, then you'd see this entire thread has been about this topic from the start, not about posting fap material for you.
okay do we do rekt or gore to kill this wordy snooze fest
There's only been one thread. If what I said is the consensus, then didn't read. My calling them illiterate was merely me insulting them back.
See and . Is it harassment if you're not coming into contact with someone?
gore
you misunderstand, I'm trying to drive people away and let this thread die.
please let it die
speak for yourself
#iwearbecauseicare
#incontinencepride