Loli Thread lads
Loli Thread lads
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
healthline.com
youth.gov
twitter.com
MODS
Imagine being such a faggot that you call the mods over a loli thread, something that is allowed on Yea Forums.
Let's make this thread good. Need to get my mind off girls I work with
more artists need to do realistic shading like this
fuck that's hot
why did the loli cross the road?
realistic anatomy is always hotter too
Work with?
Why?
Correct.
10yo, known her for a year. She will be a solid 9/10 later in life.
Massive crush on me. Like to grind on my lap when nobody else is around thinking she's coy about it. Loves to grapple and just rest on me wherever.
Her mom thinks it's adorable. It's fucking hell.
theme song for lolibros
Nice, does she notice the boners she gives you?
you tell me
is that her tongue or a big tooth?
Have a 3some
tongue
She has, on maybe two occasions. She likes it, but I'm not sure she'll have the FULL picture of sex until the start of the next school year. She's only barely started her tweens, getting into bras and such.
I try to turn her away from anything whenever possible. She's tried to kiss me in the dark more than once. No bueno.
Her mom and I definitely flirt a lot. But only for fun
is this the type of job where you'll see her for the next 2-ish years? you might be setting yourself up for a very good time.
Believe me, she knows already or at least has a pretty good idea.
take her out for drink
The chances are in my favour. I've considered that.
Scares me, to be honest. That's some dangerous territory.
Yeahh, I know. Sketchy shit.
this shit is digusting. rule abding or not this shit needs its own containment board just like yaoi.
Live your life for you user. Trust your instincts and do what you think is best for yourself, whether that's in the moment, or for the long term- only you can feel out what's best.
beyond cute
please! tell Hiromoot we need /loli/ back
She's mentioned I'm a little young for her. She had her kid a little later, maybe 25ish
In all seriousness, don't fuck up user. Don't cross that line but also don't stop watching her
What’s your loli waifu?
I don't know if that would change much. /gif/ exists but we still get a ton of porn here. Besides, I don't think the lolifags are much worse than anything else on Yea Forums.
>Living my life means letting her develop normally with no action taken like a decent human being.
You're a good man user
these irl stories get my pp so hard idk why
Any toddlercons here?
Nevermind, I take it back. Containment board now
Jesus, how fucked do you have to be to even think about it
MODS
shut up retard
I only have about 2000...
ohhhh~ theres a mod actively monitoring!
Nice to see people knowing what's right and what's wrong.
Too bad society doest know or care that there are people into lolis who can in fact control themselves and do the right thing.
i saw that too thats kinda meme
Lolicon isn’t against Yea Forums rules. Toddler on isn’t against Yea Forums rules either. Imagine being such a faggot that just because you don’t like something you feel the need to scream “mods” because you see something you don’t like. If I was posting actual child porn your autistic screeching would be justified but I’m not some stfu or leave.
careful boys
>taking those posts seriously
Retard.
anyone here enjoy Alstroemeria Records?
Careful there, kiddyfucker. The mods are patrolling and you're on thin ice already :)
Lmao that's fair enough
noice
whats wrong with being one of those
more todd
tod howard?
This is my waifu, i love her so much. Im still alive thanks to her
yooo i got one of those too like last month
this is the only todd that should be posted
should be posting her in the waifu thread
lol
I like dads yummy cum mmm tastes so good daddy cum some more for me mmmmmmm
I love loli yuri. For some reason i find disgusting watching a loli being penetrated.
I don't like how most artists draw extremely huge dicks and deep penetration which probably would not even be possible
he's called gook moot, faggot
why would you feel the need to post that, jesus fucking christ why here we are enjoying some nice art and you do that nasty shit why do you do this?
lol some mod got absolutely assblasted from this thread it seems
i don't care what you call him so long as you can get /loli/ back
it was /l/, newfagget
or someone could just make another not4chan I'd be happy with that
rofl, now thats censorship!
Buy his game.
hahaha... I wish I was a newfag. But yeah, I misspoke
I already did and I modded it full of lolis but then got bored
What do you love about her?
fucking boomer newfags, man...
ok then...
mods r fags lololol
>hahaha... I wish I was a newfag
aren't we all
I've seen this a ton. Why the fuck do little girls wear those? They can't even tie them correctly.
pedo daddies
wasted waaay to much time on this site, being a newfag is a blessing
because it's sexy and they crave the sexual attention of adult men
I let my kids pick their own out but I think I'd tell them no if they picked that one
I don't know if I believe that fully
you wouldn't spank a loli, would you?
No. Unless they’ve been naughty and need to be thought a lesson.
I would spank a loli (with my dick)
why are you saving images made for ants?
see
I've spanked a lot of irl girls before. I'm just not comfortable doing it naked when they are passed a certain age. The ages for boys extends a lot further.
The thing that makes me laugh is that these tags seem to think that simply posting MODS will somehow make the mods do anything like they have sent kind of special scanning software that make a loud horn go off and red light on there desk flash.... Fucking fake moral fags anyway who download all the posts for there 'research' and then post MODS so if it ever come back on them they can say I was there being a hero look I posted mods....
it's so the FBI can't persecute. Can't say he did anything wrong if he went to the thread just to say "MODS". Now he can masturbate AND not feel paranoid.
Loli Waifu is def 001 from, Darling in the FranXX
if people are still doing the wick thing I'm treslol
However ceiling cat is watching everything he does and make notes ....
Post lolies being loved (no ugly bastard)
I wanna see lolis getting BAPPED
Why would you want to see a loli being hurt?
Hidden loli server KEwatZp
Anyone got some gifs?
That's not very well hidden fwen
Illegal
Me too. I hate penetration. But I'm *super turned on* by oral on lolis.
because it makes my dick hard, why else?
found the queers. truth is, there's nothing better than a loli getting a good dicking.
why would you post lolis getting blacked?
Kek
five (You)s or the loli gets spanked. I mean it!
Need more Loli's getting what they deserve.
a good, solid dicking by multiple adult pedo men?
any footjob loli?
Whether they want it or not, preferably not.
Have a treat.
shittt who's the artist??
Anyone have any good recommendations on stories? I've gone through AnonyMPC's stuff, and it's hard to find anything of length and quality on the KA or XNXX Stories.
wut
messaging app where people trade actual hardcore pizza. I wouldn't mess with it, you'll get in serious trouble.
either shit artist or shit shopper
What do you mean
he's saying it's probably traced/shopped from a real photograph.
Does anybody here have the dragon loli gifs?
Looking for dragon lolis.
Hard to tell, given the way he has used his brushstrokes im inclined to say no though
If you have loli gifs, please post them.
Would you happen to have the gifset?
liek?
No, its not a gif.
> select images of palm trees
beautyful
Is it better to cum in a loli or on a loli? Asking for a friend for scientific purposes.
Kek. Cause, you know, the FBI is totally going to storm our homes over drawings. Or so I'm sure they believe.
No sorry. I didn't save them
You dirty fucking pedos
How and when did y'all acquire your loli fetish?
You good bro?
early in puberty, like 11-12. Around the time I had the ability to ejaculate, so basically around the same time I developed sexual attraction.
developed sexual attraction to girls my age, and younger -- I grew older; for whatever reason, the attraction didn't stop.
as a loli lover. when i see the literal baby pics i have to agree with you.
>same old boring pics
>same old boring "discussion"
the ride never ends
how does it feel to be a biggot on the wrong side of history?
Same here
>he says, making the same old complaints with the same old image of the same old Haruhi
Genuine question, other than new pics, what kind of discussion are you looking for then?
children and adults experiencing fun things together is great! Why does society frown upon this?
Genuine answer: none.
Gotta get some Ashley in here
Because they can.
Because they must
new thread, new thread!
Damn, some aliens are sexy
what character is this
I love this pic
because we've started applying ideas that were usually based in communities with fathers as the leaders of each family unit to the nation as a whole in a codified regime in a safe manner. As a result what was once perfectly normal and ok with the blessings of the parent is now wrong. As it was illegal people became programmed to view it as wrong entirely. This of course doesn't apply to fucking babies or even prepubescent children which is why only people with powertrip dynamic mental issues push that as loli. Stop adopting loli to mean babies.
*yawn*
exactly my point
You've never seen an interview with a real pedophile have you? They like to dress it up as helping a young individual experience sexuality in a safe way with a nurturing mentor. But they will interpret any kind of vocal and physical cues as something like sexual consent. Self serving excuses and exceptions is something you constantly see in child sexual predators.
There is also a massive power disparity in play. Children naturally look up to and follow people older than them as authority figures. It's so easy to take advantage of that. When that happens it kills their ability to trust other people when they get older. Or worse, it makes them think that kind of manipulation is acceptable behavior.
>Or worse, it makes them think that kind of manipulation is acceptable behavior.
nice circular reasoning there
It's just society brainwashing them as they get older that what they did was "shameful" or "abusive". That's literally 100% of the reason that some (a minority) of people who had sexual experiences as children with pedophiles have trauma about it.
The vast majority of pedophiles are gentle and educational, and the vast majority of children have positive sexual experiences with pedophiles.
Everything that says otherwise is obvious bigoted propaganda.
This
Fathers feel a sense of ownership of their daughter similar to thier wife and when the daughter starts dating they almost invariably hate the teenage boys trying to take "Their little girl". They used to be able to well daughters in ye olden days for a favorable political advantage but now they are just stuck with them until they leave and they hate whatever adult ends up plowing them too. All AOC paws do is legislate that feeling and keep their property safe
It's not circular reasoning because I'm not saying manipulated children WILL become adults that manipulate children. Just that it's a possibility. It's based on an observation that actual pedophiles are largely self-serving and manipulative. The reason we don't tolerate adults having sex with children has many reasons. Like it being physically damaging to the child, the lopsided power dynamic, the fact that children have not fully developed the ability to understand the consequences of sex.
Remember really stupid women who mentally never mature are fair game but if she is under the magic number its morally wrong because reasons
>Like it being physically damaging to the child
it's not though. This is where you are literally lying, or otherwise have been manipulated and fooled to the point where you thing this is a reasonable statement (it's not).
not an argument.
And you have bassed all of this off of a (most likely) fabricated interview with a "pedophile."
what comic is this?
I thought you were going for "if they like it it's obviously manipulative", not the cycle of abuse thing. Nevermind then.
>The vast majority of pedophiles are gentle and educational, and the vast majority of children have positive sexual experiences with pedophiles.
Sounds like you pulled that out of your ass. Prove it.
Who is doing the social brainwashing and why? How did they convince 99% of the world that having sex with prepubescent children is not ok.
Ok
The argument is that you made up an arbitrary number to justify the law existing. Mental maturity is bullshit and most adult women never get past being children let alone after a random number
the point is that just as there are many "adult" women who are too stupid to reasonably consent, there are many teens, tweens and even younger children that are developed and smart enough to understand sex and its consequences, complete and utter buffoon
>The argument is that you made up an arbitrary number to justify the law existing.
I did make up n arbitrary number. Making completely false statements and claiming others are supporting them is a really shitty debate tactic, but I understand if you cannot "win" any other way.
>Who is doing the social brainwashing and why? How did they convince 99% of the world that having sex with prepubescent children is not ok.
For 99% of human history it was normal for adult men to have sex with kids. Look at extant hunter-gatherer tribes, that should be a clue. Or look at the modern muslim world. Or medieval marriage records in eastern Europe and russia.
I don't know exactly why some portion of humanity (certainly not anywhere close to 99%) have been brainwashed as you say, but it's not normal, and has only existed for the figurative last 5 minutes of human history. In the future the zeitgeist will likely change again; adult men having sex with young girls will become normalized once again.
>>Nah uh I'm right
Thats not an argument either. We could end up going around in circles like this all day
>the point is that just as there are many "adult" women who are too stupid to reasonably consent
Just because you consider them too stupid, does not make you right in that judgement.
>there are many teens, tweens and even younger children that are developed and smart enough to understand sex and its consequences
Nothing says you are correct here either.
>Thats not an argument either.
I never claimed it to be.
>We could end up going around in circles like this all day
As if you aren't already doing that...
>Nothing says you are correct here either.
sure there is. Just look at the evidence:
Admission of defeat by pointing out you are just dragging out the argument. Apologize
>Random stats on a board prove my point
Are you seriously using this as a defense?
>Admission of defeat by pointing out you are just dragging out the argument
It was never my argument to make.
>Apologize
And if I don't?
"Some children are mature enough to drive cars, hold jobs, be pregnant, go to war, fire weapons, etc. Who are we to to no"
> being unable to understand circular reasoning
ISHYGDDT
Post-pubescent children. Not pre pubescent.
I have the gifs of these
>random stats
not random. just the truth, well document.
well, you could educate yourself on the subject. or not. not my job either way.
>Post-pubescent children. Not pre pubescent.
wrong. You could look it up! you have the power of all known human knowledge at your fingertips, after all... wiki is only a click away!
"When they turn 18 they magically gain all knowledge and ability to fulfill those responsibilities"
I have. I'm a sociologist by trade
> for a favorable political advantage
This is an incorrect understanding of what was happening. It did happen but more frequently the occurrence was that an adult male of ~24 with a proven track record in his performance as a provider was chosen as a suitable mate for the daughter that was ~13
what about non cartoon lolis?
Now to be fair we could make a pre and post pubescent argument. It would still apter the law get half of us off tge hook and has more logical grounding than the magic number
well that explains a lot tbh
>not random. just the truth, well document.
Calling it the "truth" doesn't magically make it truth, user.
>well, you could educate yourself on the subject
Implying I'm not educated, then? Having to add insults in your arguments is also a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
>or not. not my job either way.
True. Trying to force your "truth" on a web board seems more like a hobby than a "job."
Not what I'm saying. We put rules in place to reflect the vast majority of society, same with aoc
> and even younger
This is where I have to say that you guys are not my guys. The rarity of such an occurrence would necessitate you to cherry pick in order to provide evidence. The cherry pick would have to be of extreme levels to where you could not provide even 0.01% of a population worth of examples. There is no good reason to argue for the breeding of children. Lets be rational here and argue only for the breeding of fertile women. There are reasons to not do the act that is designed to impregnate 7 yr olds. There's really not a reason to deny the impregnation of a 13 yr old in proper situations.
Yes, why I actually have expertise in the field
Wow where is this quality?
>Implying I'm not educated, then
I would rather just say you're not very smart. Not capable of researching these things on your own; only capable of understanding what is spoon-fed to you by current mass culture.
Were you alive in Germany in the 30's, probably you would have been a card-carrying Nazi. A teenager during Mao's revolution? You would have been an exuberant member of the Red Guard.
Sure, it's an ad-hominem I'm more ore less throwing at you: "You're not very smart".
But sometimes, that's just the way it is.
Thats a better argument than the magic number. I would argue that the popular view is wrong and is based on parents feeling ownership of thier children and seeing a lover for them as supplanting them. I think we need to eliminate the stigma much like we did for homosexuality.
Are you familiar with the replication crisis in non-psychometric psychology? (not that I don't already know the answer)
>Having to add insults in your arguments is also a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
yeah but is a 7 year old having sexual education with an adult man going to harm her or help her? obviously it's the latter, right?
>I would argue that the popular view is wrong
Big surprise there..
> I think we need to eliminate the stigma much like we did for homosexuality.
Because the stigma surrounding homosexuality is completely gone.
>education
Yeah and it will be gone from pedosexuality as well. Hell they punished gays with far worse than a guy that could legally marry a 10 year old less than a century ago
Don't call it "rape." I'm "forcefully educating" you.
sometimes, calling your opponents out for the being the retards they are, really is the only thing that matters.
You expect me to give respect to some retard standing on a cardbord box, on the subway, that the earth is flat and also ending in 5 years? Because that is literally you.
Like I said, you could look this stuff up, if you wanted to. The anthropological research on the subject is fascinating; pretty much all extant hunter gathere tribes (100%) really do have it a normal custom for adult men to have sex with and impregnate children (girls). Not controversial at all, in the field. If huntergatherers do it: implies that it was natural for 99% of human history, the last million years, or more.
But I know you won't look it up and educate yourself on the subject. Perhaps because you _can't_.
>Yeah
Nope.
>Hell they punished gays with far worse than a guy that could legally marry a 10 year old less than a century ago
Last I checked, gays are still being punished.
That depends on what the education entails. We know that virginity is highly valuable. In multiple occasions it's netted 1mil or greater in usd. We must also ask if it's necessary that sexual education for such a girl be partial in such that actual sex is not performed and as such provided by the family or if it is needed and as such performed by the person. If it's the case that virginity is worth ~1mil usd then the person providing that "education" should be paying those parents ~1mil usd. If not the parents at least that girl because that person has taken something of that actual value.
Whatever helps you fall asleep tonight, user.
ayyyy its hentai dude
You could look it up....!
>Because that is literally you.
>"literally"
Whatever helps you fall asleep tonight, user.
No u is not an argument. Saying"Gays are being punished" is changing the subject and the Chewbacca defense isn't a good idea. Gays could once be forcibly lobotomized by law now they get parades with crossdressing 11 year olds.
Sauce?
Often, people on the internet contemporarily use the therm "literally" to mean" figuratively", as a point of analogy.
Of course you knew this.
>There's really not a reason to deny the impregnation of a 13 yr old in proper situations.
I could think of a few. Like that still being in the range where serious medical consequences of pregnancy are to occur. That 13 is still well before the brain is fully developed to understand long-term consequences. That your average 13yo is in no way equipped to take care of themselves let alone a baby. Any adult male that was able and willing to take financial responsibility would go to jail.
The adult brain doesn't fully form before 25 yet the law was 18 because reasons
Knowing that there are fools such as you in this world, incapable of agency and the ability to research topics on their own, absent the ability to even use google or wiki to look something up..
Tonight I will sleep, but somewhat less soundly, admittedly.
> Like that still being in the range where serious medical consequences of pregnancy are to occur
evidence please. your claim so your burden of proof
> Any adult male that was able and willing to take financial responsibility would go to jail.
If we took away the illegality of it then this wouldn't be a problem. Therefore, that man would be able to provide.
>>RRRREEEE
>>I DON'T NEED FACTS MOMMY TOLD ME I'M RIGHT
> FUCK YOUR FACTS I GET NORMIE BIG BOY POINTS RRRREEEE
Yeah you won the argument but have to live in a world of troglodytes
>Whatever helps you fall asleep tonight, user.
Whatever helps you fall asleep tonight, user.
wow this is a really strong debate tactic, do you have a discord or anything where I can learn from your wisdom?
>Saying"Gays are being punished" is changing the subject
It wasn't me that first brought up homosexuality, user. However, I'm guessing you already know this, but you're just saying whatever you can to continue the "debate."
>Gays could once be forcibly lobotomized by law
I never claimed they couldn't.
>now they get parades with crossdressing 11 year olds.
And they're still cases of them being beaten in the streets worldside. Are you trying to suggest that there are no such cases anymore?
>Having to add insults in your arguments is also a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
Still waiting for a reply or is it that you don't think virginity has value? I would then have to wonder why you would be more attracted to a population that has an exceptionally higher percentage of virgins.
Look whats your point here?
Would you debate with an anti-vaxer? I wouldn't. You can look this shit up, man. I can lead a horse to water, but...
You seem really stupid so ill use shorter sentences
I brought up gays as a sex thing people did that was once illegal.
It was illegal when having sex or marrying a youngling was fine.
Do you understand?
Now its perfectly legal to be gay and you won't have ypur brain chopped up or be thrown in jail for it
That is a comparison
Do you understand?
One day being a pedosexual will regain its status as fine
It was fine hefore
People hating gays is irrelevant but if people STILL want to kill pedos it will treated as no different than gay bashing
Do you understand?
me: 2+2 = 4
you: nope it equals 5
me: you're a retard
you: >Having to add insults in your arguments is also a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
Sociology isn't psychology
My goal was never to win the "debate," user.
I'm in it for distance and irritation.
2+2=11
It is comfortable to know the opposite side of the argument is incompetent though.
Since they can't back the argument why don't we have a hypothetical question? Would we be able to resist our urges if it was proved to be harmful to children and the mountain of evidence you brought up didn't exist in human history?
I would think we would as we don't want to hurt and use them. The other side would argue we would resort to rape
>You seem really stupid so ill use shorter sentences
Having to add insults in your arguments is also a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
>I brought up gays as a sex thing people did that was once illegal.
I'm well aware. You also claimed I was using it to change the subject. You were wrong in that claim. >It was illegal when having sex or marrying a youngling was fine.
I never claimed otherwise.
>Now its perfectly legal to be gay and you won't have ypur brain chopped up or be thrown in jail for it
Again, I never claimed otherwise.
>People hating gays is irrelevant
I disagree. Laws may have changed, but nothing made being gay 100% fine. (And we'll just ignore all the countries that still make it unlawful.)
>you: nope it equals 5
I never claimed as such, user. Falsely claiming that I support such an obvious false claim is a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
lel
Didn't you just admit you were trolling stupid? Look you should probably not be alive if thats what you do ror amusement. Suicide is painless as the song says and you could finally escape disappointing your father anymore
The issue primarily revolves around the fact that virginity is viewed as valuable and when men have daughters they would like to see that value used effectively. Are you promoting the sexual interaction of whatever age girls in the confines of this line of thought or are you promoting simply for your desires to fuck young girls?
>Since they can't back the argument
It was never my goal to back the argument, user. It was never my argument to make. Unlike some people in this thread (even you, perhaps), I'm not here for the argument. I'm not here to prove a position. I'm not here to change minds. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you'd realize you're wasting your time.
"hurrdurr kys"
>Look you should probably not be alive if thats what you do ror amusement.
>says the user that has to resort to insulting people on an online board for amusement.
Thats a good question. I often wonder if i am inherently attracted to children like some people are attracted to redheads or Asians or if im fetishising youth
I'm in support of lowering the aoc. I don't personally find actual children attractive. Even though I've made compelling, economic, and biological points this man refuses to respond to my posts. This fucker that is posting responses appears to simply be, a kid fiddler. He only cares for his personal satisfaction and gain. He does not care for the actual truth of the dynamic between the sexes.
I just think cartoons are hot but I need a certain level of degeneracy to get going
The point, idiot, is that you're an imbecile who is clearly incapable of looking basic facts up on google. But I know you're only capable of responding to this fact with: >Having to add insults in your arguments is also a shitty debate tactic, but rather expected of you.
It is to laugh.
>"he's not as enlightened as me"
>who is clearly incapable of looking basic facts up on google.
>says the person that thinks there are no more laws prohibiting homosexuality.
>It is to laugh.
Whatever helps you fall asleep tonight, user.
I will concede that 18 as the age of consent seems arbitrary, it should be 25 if we are going by brain development. Or we should develop some other kind of test indicating maturity. Or not because I not fond of the idea of government regulating human coupling.
>evidence please. your claim so your burden of proof
Are you a researcher, student, or want to pay $25? I could link some articles that link to research that requires credentials(or money) to view like healthline.com
Otherwise you are only going to get the abstracts.
The fact that you don't know means that you are. I prefer redheads the most. I know exactly why. I'm mostly irish. I would like to have mostly irish children to keep to my bloodline. This means redheads. If not redheads then whites. If whites in general seem to be degenerates or if an asian that surpasses their symmetry and submissiveness appears before I find a suitable white, I will go with an asian. I would prefer a virgin for telegonic reasons. Virgins appear more often at younger ages therefore i'm more inclined to search for younger girls. If you don't understand why you're doing something and it's larger implications in the society that you're in, you probably shouldn't even be doing it.
neither are you
>"no u"
>>says the person that thinks there are no more laws prohibiting homosexuality.
what
>Whatever helps you fall asleep tonight, user.
very solid argument. Welp, you have thoroughly convinced me.
Its more along the lines of wondering if the things I have had argued for people being pedos is true or not. I'm not willing to ignore it and say "Nah I am completely normal and there is no underlying mental reason for what I'm feeling"
I'm glad.
>Nah I am completely normal
>i just browse the pedo threads on Yea Forums