And today's mass shooting is

And today's mass shooting is...

Cops surrounding a house and being picked off through the windows... and for extra credit, being streamed live on Facebook

Guns guns guns are great

Attached: today.jpg (646x474, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee
youtube.com/watch?v=4LEXqt2n73k
youtube.com/watch?v=iqu132vTl5Y
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I better buy more ammo, and a new tactical shotgun.

Attached: 1564632613903.jpg (624x351, 109K)

Classic USA !

>streamed live on facebook
Dammit, I miss all the good stuff.

This wouldn't happen if everyone had guns tho. Gotta love dumbass American logic.

Any video?

sawce and video?

I am also requesting the video

>black shooter
>victims were cops
You're the only one trying to push this even the main stream media dropped it.

You're right, if guns were illegal, that criminal wouldn't have had illegal guns, although he was fine vomiting murder, and already violating gun laws, more gun laws would have stopped it.

Lack of kill count. Not race. You need to do more research on how the news works. Its about what makes an interesting story.

Maybe if they didn't hold the gun sideways or nearly upside down there would be more black mass shooters then.

How do you vomit murder?

Americans have guns for over 200 years.
Sometime in the past decade a few people (0.0001% of everyone who owns a firearm) committed mass murder with a gun.

Nothing has changed about the 2nd amendment or the availability of guns.
The only thing that has changed is the people.
Taking away guns will not correct that.

Attached: images.jpg (247x204, 9K)

Clever

to be fair
theyre already the majority of mass shooters anyway

Attached: 20190806_024745.png (618x618, 677K)

Nice meme image

The shooter was actually a nigger but lets talk about how guns are bad

Attached: big dik.jpg (648x800, 129K)

Nice ad hominem

Most mass shooters are black

>gang violence shooting
>mass shooting innocent ppl at gathering or a school

how stupid are you?

Gun murders are the lowest in the US they've ever been.
They've been steadily declining since 2004

nice rebuttal
still mass killings.

There's nothing unusual about mass murder, people have committed mass murder since the dawn of the species. 2000 years ago it was a very real risk that bandits might ride through your village chopping people up and raping the women.

Nowadays for some reason Americans think it's a good idea to give everyone the power to easily mass murder with a hand-held projectile machine. This is literally the only thing that's changed - the availability of this machine. Of course maniacs are going to use it to kill crowds of people.

2000 years ago the same type of person would be severely limited in their capacity for mass murder, and would have to band together with other antisocial psychos. No problem in modern times - using this projectile machine, a single person can commit the same amount of murder as a pack of heavily armed marauders.

Attached: 1555769847447.jpg (283x255, 8K)

So when you see on the news they say something like "250 mass shootings in 2019" like 10 have been guy walks into a mall and guns people down, any shooting, where 4 or more people are Injured, no matter who the shooter is(cop, whatever) is marked as a mass shooting in the FBI and CDC statistics.

This debate is never-ending.

If the left oversteps. It will end bloody

Isn't the truth that if most guns were illegal 90% of these guys are too stupid or lazy to manage to get an illegal gun in the first place, let alone a dangerous one.

It’s not even a mass shooting. It’s a narcotics search warrant gone terribly awry.

Attached: 4FC29B62-537D-41FB-B3A0-A21149D7700B.jpg (1079x810, 210K)

>coping

Lol this guy is absolutely right. Posts "dumbass American logic" and immediately gets replies of more dumbass 'logic'.

>So you think that F16s aren't dangerous now too or what? So if everyone had landmines in their yard kids would be safer? Is that what you're saying?

Yes. That is the truth.

Do you know what that word means?

Probably not, there is a strong black market of firearms smuggled from the south east Asia into California (an antigun CA state senator was arrested for helping the smuggling) not only that, they would use a sharp force weapon, someone went on a stabbing spree and killed like 7, and injured more in CA I think , about a week ago, it took almost 2 hours for the cops to catch him.
>Gun murder has gone down every year since the late 90s.
>in 2019, you have the lowest chance of being killed by a firearm than any other year of your life if you've always lived in the US.
>there are twice as many sharp force murders a year than firearms
>there are twice as many blint force murders a year than sharp force

this is obviously the case but good fuckin luck getting through those caveman skulls

So we just going to post every firefight cops have and call it a mass shootout now

Why is pepe touching the lens? Stoopid frog. I will kill him for dinner with my musket and eaten him. Delicious froog.

Attached: insane_troll.png (780x734, 90K)

There are zero guns being smuggled from southeast Asia into the US hth. What the actual fuck. All the guns in the world are already here you dumbfuck.

And also the availability of firearms. And the incendiary political discourse of a disaffected president. And also the types of weapons available.

In SE Asia, they make firearms in shops with lathes and matching tools. There are plenty of documentaries on it, even a few lefty ones like vice you retarded child.

eh yo, witeness is most evil thing on the world dawg, don;'t you type angry towards me you fucking craka ass honkey chalkey ass honkey cracka. Das a micro agreson. POC and LGBTQQIP2SAA peeples need dem guns to save us from the whiteys.

>AK47
>introduced in 1947
>AR15
>made in the 1950s
Whew lad

And they are all remaining in South East asia because the US is the largest manufacturer of small arms in the world by a factor of ten or some such shit. You are retarded.

>being streamed live on Facebook
uhm link to video maybe?

with that rationale anthrax is not bad neither... why is it illegal?

*availability* is not *invention* you muppet

You can buy an Asian black market firearm cheaper than a legal firearm.
The American black market is flooded with them, mostly gang members.

You know nobody on the planet talks like that and also it is not 1985 you jive turkey.

Being this young and stupid, or this upset that it doesn't fit your antigun narrative

You are fucking retarded and you are making things up whole cloth. Insane.

stop derailing you gun fags, go back to pol

>guns are different in the last few years!
Ask and ARs were made in the 40s and 50s
>UMM, like actually theg are older then that, you're wrong. My original point therefore stands!
Jesus

>thread about guns
>dont derail by posing facts about guns
>go back to /pol/, not /k/
Newfag

Deaf, dumb, and blind afghanis carve fully functional berettas from scrap. Now once they figure out quality control then will I trade porn for a 9mm.

Pure insanity.

Also no one fucking died. Op is a misleading fucking shit.

Gun availability drastically increased again after the 94 weapons ban expired. Again availability is not equivalent to invention.

>Americans have guns for over 200 years.
>Sometime in the past decade a few people (0.0001% of everyone who owns a firearm) committed mass murder with a gun.
>Nothing has changed about the 2nd amendment or the availability of guns.
>The only thing that has changed is the people.
>Taking away guns will not correct that.
you saying nothing has changed but the people in last 200 years.. yeah im prett sure things work a bit differently than wildwild west, chesus christ where you from? luisiana?

Yes and Khyber pass guns are super common in the US among criminals lol

thread about rekt live stream of cops, try harder pol fag

Don't forget the made up .0001% number! Also guns are apparently no more available now than they were in 1789.

The AWB expired in 2004.
Gun murder has decreased every year since 2004.

Hey nigga, dat’s racist.

Attached: 71C7D556-4842-4D48-A385-C7CAC6403195.jpg (1080x1080, 235K)

incoming 13digitfilename.gif

Actually, one thing did change. It is now harder to get a gun than it ever was before.

Amurica first

Attached: 345635446.jpg (473x473, 26K)

The only reason gun violence spiked in the "wild west" was because sweeping violations of the 2nd ammendment, most towns banned guns inside the city limits, so only criminals carried firearms.

Nope. Making it harder to get guns will decrease gun violence retard

Really? It decreased in 2017 and then again in 2018? Does decreased mean went up?

wow

Such stupidity

I can walk into Walmart and buy one no questions asked how is that hard?

Haha this is a good angle that would work if lefties were as dumb as gunfuckers.

>Sees a headline about arms trafficking in SE Asia.
>Oh they must be COMING to the US!
>Galaxy brain finally found the missing piece

Hi leftypol

this, taking firearms away from the common man is a terrible idea, it only leaves the weapons in the hands of people who will do harm.

Which is why places with strict firearms laws have a lot of shootings and places with no firearm laws have almost none. For examples see Germany for the former and Burkina Faso for the latter.

>being an underage eurotrash samefagging shitposter

So take their guns too

>Germany
>authoritarian shithole with more stabbing murders per capita than US gun murders
Ok kiddo

Next time just label it like this:
>Posts that make me mad

>its rare
>never mind that Leland Yee, an antigun state senator was flooding California with illegal guns from Asia
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee

That's not how you respond to those newfriend.

More stabbing murders than gun murders and stabbing murders combined? Or do the more restrictive gun laws somehow prevent the OG stabbers from killing people?

You a felon, boy?

Uhhhh that wasn't in the US and it was rocket launchers. You literally did what I said in the post again.

Uhoh the posting police are here! I hope I don't get in trouble!

So a shoot out is a mass shooting now?

>when you're a dem, and want to make more money with illegal guns so you try to ban legal ones to drive the market.

yes unless it is a white supremacist then it's mental illness

>charges related topublic corruptionandgun trafficking— specifically buying automatic firearms and shoulder-launched missiles from theMoro Islamic Liberation Front(MILF), anIslamistextremist group located in the southernPhilippinesand attempting to re-sell those weapons to an undercover FBI agent,
And that was the more serious charge, he also brought in small arms with a Chinatown gangster known as shrimp boy

I'm not that guy but Jesus fucking hell you're retarded.
>specifically buying automatic firearms and shoulder-launched missiles from the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), an Islamist extremist group located in the southern Philippines and attempting to re-sell those weapons to an undercover FBI agent

According to the US government, any shooting where 4 or more people are injured is a mass shooting.

Where do you think this happened? Where were the weapons imported? California? Lol no.

Full house of truth
>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_"Shrimp_Boy"_Chow

>being this retarded

it all obviously happened in the philipines but they're retards

>milf
based sand niggers

Wow stolen liquor, untaxed cigs and racketeering. Not selling imported weapons. Hmmmmmmm.

Just stop. If you ever post here again, I will fuckin’ choke slam you into a coffee table, with any luck it will be one of those old school antique coffee tables that was made out of the really good wood from deep in the fucking forest and not that Ikea bitch that explodes like a fucking stunt table. I will put you right through it, and pull you up by your god damn larynx and then right through the dry wall, my hand would be disappearing into the wall like I just fisted a fucking horse. Then I’d pull you out, you’d have plaster all over your fucking hair, you’d be deprived of 3 quarters of your oxygen, and you’d start to cry. Then I’d just whisper into your ear, really calmly, like one of those bad guys in one of those great 80’s movies with Mel Gibson, or fucking Stallone or whatever, where once the goons would get him tied up and the head bad guy that’s running bitch would come in all relaxed with his dress shoes and suit and would just come up and put his face like parallel to the other dude’s face and just come in and whisper in the guy’s ear nice and calmly. That’s what I’d do to you, as you’re struggling to breath, I’d put my head right next to your ear and just be like “If you ever post in this section again, I will fucking kill you. You understand me? The only reason you’re not dead right now is because I haven’t figured out how to get away with it yet. If you even come in this section again, I swear to god, I will grab you by your fucking baby fat and the top of your fucking head and I will throw you upside down through a bay window” As you sit out there in the rain, picking the glass and the wood shards out of your body, I’m gonna take a tray of hot macaroni and throw it right on your fucking face. That’s what I’ll do if you ever post here again.

So this white supremacist is out here shooting cops and hopefully everyone involved dies

Sounds gay.

Another shooting connected to Facebook, when is that hate site going to lose it's hosting?

Gay and boring. Post what you mean not retarded trash.

Attached: 664.jpg (558x614, 18K)

I bet your name starts with an F has a couple G's in it and ends with a T

>Gay and boring. Post what you mean not retarded trash.

>There's nothing unusual about mass murder, people have committed mass murder since the dawn of the species.

War is mass murder. The participants usually are wearing uniforms, but it's still mass murder. Hiroshima & Nagasaki were mass murder. Not necessarily unjustified. But those incidents were mass murder.

The governments that sanction the killing of thousands in wars are the same governments that say to the individual, "You can't have a gun. You might kill someone."

Kinda funny, ain't it?

Is English your second language?
Are you using a translator?
Anca ouya eadra hista? Rea aa hitsa ostingpa ermanga/uroea ukca?

Which government in an active war is telling its civilians they can't have any guns? None of them oh ok.

Liberal:
Police are murdering crooks
Also liberal:
Civilians dont need guns, only cops, cops will protect us

Literally every country in NATO is performing combat operations, and every one but America has banned its citizens from firearms, and the right to self defense

Ostpay utwhey ouyay eanmay otnay etardedray itshay aggotfay.

Attached: eric_harris_is_god_by_vodkasvengeance.jpg (515x428, 26K)

The only nato country where pistols are banned in the United kingdom and guns are available in every single one of those countries for civilian use.

Not only is that false but in Germany if you use a machine gun in self defense you cannot be charged for possession of the gun.

Tarrant set the bar high in terms of clean professionalism and planning. I expect lots of amateur embarrassing shit before the next event kills the game.

Also has anyone ever googled Tarrant? It's like searching Dramatica with his mugshot and shit. Google is honouring him it's hilarious.

guns aren't banned anywhere on the planet other than Japan and they have one in ten million gun homicide rate

How is this a "mass" shooting if the targets can fire back and the the shooter is the one being attacked?

2nd amendment advocates need to understand that a modern rifle is ill suited to protect them from a foreign invader and extremely overpowered for personal defense. your AR-15 can't stop a carpet bomb or nuke blast or drone strike by the chinese or our own government, but it can be misused to kill 100's of people. it's a lose lose situation.
the 2nd amendment was written in a time when the best weapon the government had was a squad of riflemen, so it made sense to maintain a healthy amount of rifles in the population, this is not the case today as governments can decimate each other in minutes with a few nukes.
the common man must have the ability to protect himself and his property, but nothing prohibits establishing sensable limitations.
we need common sense.

It's a white supremacist so it's obviously not a mass shooting. It's mental illness. Poor boy. Nobody brought him his tendies. Understandable really.

How am I to protect my children from the 30 to 50 feral hogs that appear in my yard in 3 to 5 minutes?

I would bet that if we were talking about our crushing instant victory over the terrorists in afghanistan, suddenly you'd change your tune and tell me how we could never defeat a guy hiding in a cave with an AK.

Unintelligible. Try again.

So, everyone should be allowed to own drones equipped with nuclear warheads. Got it.

what?
build a fence around your property?

>I bet if blah blah
Just say what what you mean instead of constantly being passive and making allusions lol. Do you mean bombs don't work? Do you mean small arms are a reasonable response to AtG munitions? Do you mean the opposite of that? It's impossible to tell.

Yes that is exactly what he said. Great reading comprehension.

Gun control is cool and good and supporting it is cool and good and makes you a good person.

this is how it works.
power line broke off pole. Burning the shit out of my back yard, less then 3 foot from my barn. Sparks shooting up higher then my barn. 2am I Call cops, neighbor calls cops, other neighbor calls cops. Cops show up 4am. And you want me to call the cops when you break into my house? Fuk that I shoot your ass and then call cops. That gives you 2hrs. to bleed out. SO SORRY.

you're mad because the cops didn't show up faster to arrest a downed powerline...

Well here I'll break it down for you. Every whiny anti gun liberal faggot that I hear telling me about how my AR-15s won't stop the government, tells me all about the drones, tanks, helicopters, and jets that the government has. But those same whiny anti gun liberal faggots love to piss bitch and moan about how you can never defeat the taliban or the terrorists because all this technology just doesn't work against dudes hiding in caves with guns. We can't ever win. We should pack up and leave.

Can't have it both ways. Either an armed populous can win the long fight against a governmental entity, or it can't. History shows that a determined guerilla movement is reeaaaaally hard to get rid of. It has been done, but it's a pain in the ass and it takes a long time.

The whole point of me having, and being able to have, ownership of and access to weapons like the AR-15 as well as full autos and etc is NOT to fight a last stand against the government in a blaze of glory...It's to make sure that the government thinks really fucking hard about starting shit with the people because of all the pain it'll cause for everyone.

GET IN HERE FAGGOTS BEFORE JEWTUBE DELETES IT!!!

youtube.com/watch?v=4LEXqt2n73k

IT'S HAPPENING!

Attached: 1557886093562.jpg (480x464, 22K)

real

Underage and newfag

OH MY GODDDDDDDDD

Attached: +_5394e1a4b05ec714e6c96e9dd8e5925c.jpg (638x685, 76K)

Tldr. Please just say what you mean in a few sentences. Nobody has time to interpret your drivel.

Someone save it fast

Attached: 1556797899419.png (540x950, 815K)

op delivers!

Attached: 1554530006292.jpg (1024x1024, 169K)

SAVED

Attached: 1554865999835.jpg (640x810, 290K)

Information harvesting to deanonymize user? Good try idiot faggot.

>08/15/19(Thu)06:10:11 No.807178953
One sentence for you then:

Gun control advocates are fucking retarded faggots because reasons.

Keked so hard

Attached: 400_thousand_keks.jpg (181x255, 9K)

Listen, you fantastically retarded motherfucker. I’m going to try to explain this so that you can understand it.

You cannot control an entire country and its people with tanks, jets, battleships and drones or any of these things that you so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms.

A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship or whatever cannot stand on street corners. And enforce “no assembly” edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband.

None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, flattening and glassing large areas and many people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit.

S a m e f a g

CHECKED

point is, your rifle is a pointed stick in comparison to modern governments weaponry, ill suited as a means of protecting your state from invaders as was the intention of the 2nd amendment, and it poses great risk to innocent lives with how easily misused it can be. it's a lose lose.
we need common sense america. time to pull the barrel out of your ass.

Attached: 1456140244616.png (640x360, 328K)

i think the argument is that it's not worth pursuing a couple hundred guys with guns in caves when it's costing infinity dollars per day but what do I know

Dear diary......................

Attached: 1554095842443.gif (1221x768, 699K)

Police are needed to maintain a police state, boots on the ground. And no matter how many police you have on the ground they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.

BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband and every random homeowner an AR-15 all of that goes out the fucking window because now the police are out numbered and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.

If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency that the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They’re all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks and improvised explosives because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.

Dumb. Fuck.

That's not how youbTL;DR

Nah. Guns aren't viable defense against an airborne threat. They are ok for personal protection and should be regulated as such.

Cant wait to move toa place where this isnt the norm.

I just did and it was effective thanks. Didn't have to read the screed.

Leftist:
>we need to leave Afghanistan because a large military cant win against an insurgency
Also leftist:
>why dont you give up your guns? As an insurgency the people couldn't win against the US military
Dark doublespeak

Guys...

Guys...

Completely backed into an ideological corner here...

thirteen_digit_filename.jpg

You're insane.

OK now that's just bullshit.

Firearms are a perfectly valid and viable defense against an airborne threat. They may not be effective at taking down modern fixed wing aviation, but they can and do take down helicopters that stray too close. The net effect is that the presence of small arms causes aviation assets to back the fuck off.

Furthermore since aircraft DO NOT capture and hold territory, somebody still has to be the boots on the ground to go in. Look at the taliban, they made little to no effort to engage our aircraft, just to hide from them and ambush troops on the ground, and now we're in negotiations with them before we leave.

TLDR for dumbfags:
WRONG LOL GUNS STOP PLANES.

Keep dodging the facts, you're a weak shitposter and I legitimately hope you get killed in the next mass shooting.
Sage

L: it's pointless to fight a small insurgency when they cannot be identified. it is a waste of resources
Also L: it's pointless to allow retards to own weapons with capabilities beyond what they require for defense

Completely bonkers I know

>being picked off through the windows
Nobody has reported this.

you are delusional. pull the barrel out of your ass.

Lol this is how you admit defeat? You are retarded.

Trump is pulling out of Afghanistan. All right wing action. How stupid are you?

>WRONG LOL GUNS STOP PLANES.
I picture this as what you look like.

Attached: insane_troll.png (780x734, 90K)

Small arms are not a significant threat to airborne munitions platforms.

Yhea. He is pulling out. We've fucked up the country even more than it was when the Soviets left, we killed a shitload of people, we installed a democratically elected Government, the taliban are still hiding in caves with AK-47s, and now we're packing up to go home and hoping that the new government can keep control.

Ultimately, if the taliban want it more, they will start shit up again and take over. And suddenly a bunch of insurgents who can't be identified from the local people, who clung to their guns and their koran, will have won a long drawn out war...Because they were armed. Which was my point exactly earlier.

TLDR cause dumbfags keep asking
HURR DUUR YES WE LEAVING DURR BECAUSE GUNS!

Lol it's definitely that but less happy and fatter/more disabled

When I'm talking to retards like you, retards who can't read more than a sentence, then yhea that's pretty accurate. Gotta break it down for the retards. Sorry is this too long for you>

>Y-y-you're dumb! I d-d-d-ont need to respond because clearly you're insane!
Sage, see you next thread you worm.

The Taliban is a right wing organization.

Still i don't see facebook being shut down like infinty chan. I wonder why..

Do you do this a lot? Enough that you expect to see the same posters in other threads? Paranoia

That's my city and I'm one of the last white people left fucking niggers

twitter gots to die.

youtube.com/watch?v=iqu132vTl5Y

Can you please just post what you're trying to say instead of this allusion bullshit? Do you think it's a conspiracy? Do you not understand the difference between Facebook and a small image board? Do you think Facebook and 8 are equivalent platforms with the same amount of moderation and goals? Just say what you mean and quit being a passive faggot.

Gang violence is entirely different than some crazy incel /pol/ user shooting minorities.

Army FM 44-8, Chapter 5, gives instructions on the use of small arms fire against slow moving aircraft:

"5-4. Small arms fire against aerial platforms can be effective. A quick review of the record shows this to be true. In the Korean War, our Air Force lost 259 jet aircraft and 285 other aircraft to combined small arms and air defense fire, which is nearly five times as many aircraft that were lost in air-to-air combat. In South Vietnam, we lost 410 fixed-wing aircraft and 2,100 helicopters. In the Mideast War, 36 coalition aircraft were shot down by ground fire."

You can feel free to totally disagree with my and FM 44-8, of course, however the fact remains that aviation views rifle fire as a credible threat, designers armor the aircraft to mitigate this, and pilots avoid it.

Attached: image220.gif (484x416, 7K)

>174 posts
>48 posters
>leftists eurotrash literal child samefagging like an autistic spastic mongoloid every other post
Awesome thread, good job OP.

In the Korean war. In South Vietnam. Feel free to tell me about how Greek fire is amazing against F22s and other airborne threats.

BAHAHA ,

nice meltdown

Yeah that's not true at all.

so your point is we need automatic rifles with massive clips to prevent a theoretical subjugation by a police state?
the police would be outnumbered like 10,000 to 1. we don't even have enough officers as it is. police are already getting murdered in areas where firearms are banned.
that's why i said you're delusional.

THE POST COUNTER HAS LOGGED ON

ONLY ONE POST PER THREAD PER POSTER

THAT IS THE RULE

It's more like a few hundred to one but your point stands.

That's a straw-man, and it means you lose.

I stand by my original claims, chiefly, that an insurgency or the threat of an insurgency is the entire point of the 2nd amendment, and that no government technology will eliminate that threat. Technology such as aircraft can be threatened by small arms, in a manner that reduces their effectiveness.

>Fifty posters
>It's all one guy!!!
>Me smart

Not according to the US government's statistics.

Are you purposely using false nomenclature?

You're wrong. Small arms are not effective against aerial platforms. You can see from your own numbers a massive decline in their effectiveness. 2500 shot down in Vietnam. 36 in the middle east by 'ground fire' which as you know is not synonymous with 'small arms' but instead means any land based weapons system.

>are you trolling me?
he'll definitely admit it lol you fucking retard

You finally got to use that word. In my head I was gonna use that word at work tmrw but god bless you for using it unnaturally.

i did a quick math
there are 700k sworn officers in the US
US population = 327 million
that means every officer would be "subjugating" around 500 people

point is the police state isn't happening, its delusional to speak of as a reason to need such high powered weaponry. we need common sense.
the modern high powered rifle with massive clips is a lose lose situation. its time to pull the barrel out of our ass and make this country safer.

Lefties, Europeans, and anti gunners aren't known for being intelligent or rational. And he is all 3.

You need to work on your English kraut

I'm just trying to say that money rule this world. I'm just sad to confirm once again that a place where there is free speech once ruled is being shut down in favor of company controlled medias. And once again nobody of the normies out there don't give a shit becouse our opinion are not importants. This is just making me sad nothing more

36 COALITION aircraft lol. That's like four US aircraft that were hit with rocket munitions. Nobody shoots down modern aircraft with small arms.

Correct.

Weird assumptions.

No shit faggots.

I wonder if that could be because modern aircraft make an effort to stay the fuck out of small arms range? You faggots don't think that has anything to do with it?

>yes we're a dangerous 3rd world shithole, but slightly less so than last year
>therefore guns are great!!!!! Make more!!?

Ah so you aren't American and it doesn't concern you and you have no cultural intelligence with which to comment on it. Thank you.

Yes. It's why small arms aren't effective against aerial weapons platforms and are useless in a war with a modern military.

It's false. Gun violence and murders have been on the rise for the prior three years running.

*everybody that is not an american has no culture* that sound ver much like someone very acculturated would say

>How is this a "mass" shooting if the targets can fire back
So if you punch someone who has hands it doesn't count I guess

It sure does which is why I didn't say that. I said you have no cultural knowledge of the US and therefore no reason to have an opinion about our relationship with guns.

Is it though? They've been forced to higher altitude where they have a harder time telling the insurgents apart from the people. Sensors have, to some degree, mitigated this, however it's not currently possible to use a FLIR to tell one person's face apart from another person's face, which makes identification harder.......Well shit looks like they just accomplished something to me!

Same old! Same old!

Small arms are not effective against modern aerial weapons platforms. It's just a fact, I'm sorry.

You don't understand what i was trying to say. I'm not talking about the guns. I'm trying to say that a board of free speech, like 8 ch has been shut down becouse some very rich guys decided to do so. I remind you that this boards are no used only by americans, but also from people all over the world where talking freely about your opinion is frowned upon. I'm sad becouse once again the powerful people from your country made the wolrd dance their tune

reasons why the modern rifle and high capacity drum magazines are dumb

1. the police state argument is delusional
2. the modern rifle is too destructive when misused
3. civilians don't need 200 drum magazines
4. your local militia rifle club can't shoot a nuke out of the sky

That made no sense, try again.

>no questions asked
>you have to fill out a sheet of paper
Come on are you even trying? That makes it HARDER

Attached: 1561111295845.jpg (544x400, 21K)

I disagree, and again cite my prior evidence, so you're wrong, it's just a fact, I'm not sorry.

But since you and I will probably never agree on anything, and I'm tired of arguing with you about this, I'm going to close with "The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" and "get fucked faggot".

you're too far gone

Attached: 5abc4ea.jpg (1080x1080, 89K)

You do not. You verify your age and take the shotgun. I have done it myself.

The left:
>people dont need guns, you cant beat the government, and the government will be there for you
Also the left:
>the government is right wing racists, let's overthrow it

BTFO

It's not a mass shooting for a African American to defend himself against a bunch of racist pig cops
Kill yourself, racist

Are you actually brain dead? How the fuck are you posting as a vegetable? Clean the drool off your keyboard.

The only thing military pattern small arms are good for is shooting your neighbor so access to them should be heavily restricted.

Checked

lol @ all you little sissyslut gun grabbers
wish you knew how dumb you looked

Cool, but it's illegal to ban them

Banning guns isn't gonna do shit. Too may legal ones in circulation already, those would just be sold on the black market. Not to mention the root cause isn't guns, it's social issues. Even if you take the guns away, some mass murdering fuck could just hijack a truck or build a bomb.

Nobody on the planet has suggested a gun ban you retard. Nobody thinks that's feasible. Stop scarecrowing and you would see that, retard.

It's also illegal to "restrict" them.

No, banning guns = no more gun murders
Just like how banning drugs = no more drugs
And banning murder = no more murder.

>breaking the law is now illegal.

we did it boys. no more crime.

>it's illegal to ban them
Dont be so defeatist - the constitution can be amended. They got rid of slavery via amendment

>Nowadays
If you mean the past 200 years if you consider repeating firearms.

Must be the guns tho.

Attached: file.png (1277x913, 168K)

Good luck, and good night left side.

youtube.com/watch?v=4LEXqt2n73k

youtube.com/watch?v=4LEXqt2n73k

youtube.com/watch?v=4LEXqt2n73k

Attached: 1554701256872.jpg (500x486, 44K)

>Banning guns isn't gonna do shit
I disagree. Ban guns and make gun possession a mandatory 12 months in jail... people will hand them in rather than risk jail. No doubt.

We aren't trying to stop Jamal shooting Tyrone over a drug debt. We are trying to limit the amount of crimes where guns are a quick easy convenience.

Ban guns and school / mall shootings by disaffected teenagers with dad's rifle will completely end.

The only cost to this measure is Billy Bob losing his masturbatory aid. Rednecks and Rambo wannabes will survive just fine without war toys.

It is not and they are currently restricted hth.

Wait I thought there were less now than ever before?

Guns are banned in Japan and nobody there gets murdered with guns. Crazy I know.

>United States v. Miller
> if the second ammendment doesn't encompass all firearms, then the firearms it is guaranteed to protect, for the right of any and all citizens to own and bear, are firearms also used by the United states military.
Basically, if you're going to regulate tyles of guns, you cant regulate the people from having the same firearms the military has.

"shall not be infringed..."

I think that my favorite part.

I dont get it. Gang or no gang. You're still commiting a mass shooting. All shooters have wildly different reasons. Just because you FEEL that a gang member shooting people isn't a mass shooting doesnt mean that is true.

Bunch of liberal dumbasses on here. You think this guy went through the legal process to acquire his firearms?

Guns are currently restricted in the US. This is not against the second amendment. They could be restricted more and it would not be against the second amendment. They have been restricted more in the past and again it was not against the second amendment.

Yes. Like the vast vast majority of shooters.

Its literally 3 tops, they are just samefagging.

Every gun law is a direct violation the the second ammendment. Some violate the 14th.
And several state laws involving firearms also violate the 4th and 1st ammendment

Yikes. You need to get out from your moms basement

Ok the supreme court disagrees with you but I guess you're right somehow?

projection

Take away shootings done by nigs and the figures look not too bad. 13% of the population is responsible for 50% of crime! Factor in age and it's under 5% of the population. The genies out of the bottle. Fact is if Da'Marxus, J'Jaustus and K'Tumal have guns then I'd want a gun as well. I'm a bong and nigs here have access to guns. Our police can't cope. At least you've got the right to defend yourself in burger land.

Literally every supreme court case on firearms has stated you cannot restrict access to firearms, or the type of firearms. Just because lefties pushed laws into place in clear violation of the law, then were never challenged in the supreme court doesn't change the actual law. Constitutional law is above any legislative law.

Baww? Reagan was the one who instituted the Brady bill? Reagan was a leftist?

>bong
A wat?

Yup. Guys like this get access to illegal firearms. Drug dealing scum. Guy had a 2 day old baby too. Monkeys.

>Gang violence is entirely different than some crazy incel /pol/ user shooting minorities.


No it's not you retard. The mentality of "Gang shooting gang members is fine so as long as they keep it among themselves" is retarded as hell. De-sensitization to murder is not a good thing; go figure!

This problem started decades ago when suburban mom's started feeling that gun shootings in the ghetto was a "they" problem and not an "us" problem. Another phase of the problem came before even that when Rambo was given god knows how many sequels for killing 400 fucking people in 90 minutes. It has come down to Hollywood movies were wanton mass destruction is expected even in kid's Pixar films and rampant in Jason Statham films and whoever is the top-paid "action" actor at the time.

At this point, this is modern culture. Base. Fucking. Line. This is an industry- movies, music and guns- sustained by HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. The mewling fools, who whine and complain about mass shootings are at this point the uninitiated due to social momentum. Some Rap videos have half a billion views on Youtube. And yet some people have the audacity to belief that it is "ghetto only problem". When in fact CoD is mainly aimed at suburban kids. Kids. Heaven knowns what adults are up...obviously...

Guys this is an example of samefagging. Where a person replies to their own retarded post in agreement.

Cos they got no nigs!

Here in Bongland, guns are severely restricted. Nigs shoot each other all the time. Our police have been unarmed for centuries. Not any more. I regularly see normal cops on patrol armed with pistols. At events like kids concerts FFS they're armed with assault rifles! Fucking nigs and Pakis. Nearly every shooting is nig related. Yet they make up a fraction of the population. Nigs!

Take away nigs and the gun crime plummets. Not to mention knife crime!

No it's not. You're an example of a twat!

There's no link between Vidya and real violence. I grew up playing Vidya. I played with toy soldiers, action man and had toy guns. Watched war films. Love decent zombie films. I love a good FPS. I'm a nurse. I don't go around fucking people up.

Knobhead

>
>Lack of kill count. Not race. You need to do more research on how the news works. Its about what makes an interesting story.


Well the fact that a nigger was being served a drug warrant... The only way it made news was for the chance of dead cops (FTP, am I right CNN?)

>
>>gang violence shooting
>>mass shooting innocent ppl at gathering or a school
>
>how stupid are you?
You stupid lefties still count it

The day of the rope in coming for your kind

Its all about you user

So gay lol

Somebody teach this guy how to quote threads

Finally!

What is it with you people and your attempts at sounding intelligent trough ignorance? Yeah, the homicide rate in the 90s was twice what it is today. What changed? More guns or less guns? More availability or less? Why are there twice as many school shooting than they were in the 90s? Explain why the homicide rate halved while school shootings more than doubled by blaming guns. Fucking shitholes like Serbia have a homicide rate lower than the US despite having surplus AK's all over the place. Guns were a thing since Americas founding and they were less regulated than today. Fully automatic weapons were completely legal yet you didn't have mass shotings every week. People could literally buy anti tank rifles via fucking mail. It doesn't even make sense statistic wise, why does New Hampshire have a lower homicide rate than Delaware despite Delaware having three times smaller gun ownership rate? In fact Delaware has the lowest gun ownership rate in the US, yet it still has an above average homicide rate.

Maybe take a step back and reevaluate the problem as a societal one instead of pretending your feel god emotional decisions regarding guns are the solution.

What is the solution?

You know he's gonna say subjugate niggers or some other fucking total ideological wank.

Yeah it seems like since Trump was elected, right wingers are off the rails mass murdering people. Hmm I wonder if they're related?

Are you insulted by the fact that homicide rates are in fact correlated with the % of black people living in an area far more than any other thing?

That's never going to happen, though. Second amandment and all that. What could, and should, happen is restricting access. Background checks, mandatory psychological evaluation, no guns for offenders, even if it was small time stuff like store theft. No guns for addicts.

I anxiously await your sensible and feasible gun control scheme that will undoubtedly be successful. :)

So don't worry about school shootings?

Because your proposal does zero to mitigate little Freddy from grabbing dad's gun to shoot up the canteen

Incorrect try again. Do liberals know there are people out there who disagree with them?

Maybe ask yourself why freddy is trying to shoot up the canteen and where the fuck do these freddies keep coming from and why?

Yeah, I'm sure it's because of Trump

orange man bad

Actually they're more closely related to income but thanks for playing.

We all understand why, Sherlock.

We want solutions now

being this retarded

Is it the jews? Lol. Did jews just pop up in 2016? Retard.

shill

Correlation may not be causation but there's a strong theme of nigs causing trouble. Wherever you go in the world, the more nigs, the worse things are. In the UK, areas like Handsworth in Birmingham, Tottenham in London, St Paul's in Bristol, Butetown in Cardiff and tons of others are all nig areas and all horrifically violent. Move a few miles. Same social conditions, poverty, deprivation, want but no where near the violence. Why? No nigs.

My hometown is maybe 150000 people. V poor, post industrial shithole. There's an "inner city" area that's a nig zone. It's been featured in the national press as being so violent. There's 2 police stations for an area of maybe a square mile. It looks like the Bronx. But go to the many council estates that are incredibly poor and it's safe to walk at night. The estates get no gibs from the government whilst the big area has had literally millions poured into it. The nigs have spread to an area just over a bridge and that's going the same way.

Tl;dr

Idaho is the poorest state in the US and has a homicide rate of less than half of the US average. Thanks for playing.

100% true.

It's because it's all white in idaho

Oh you mean a criminal is shooting at the police? Color me surprised you fucking muppet

Bollocks.

I live in South Wales. Economically it's extremely poor. The areas been fucked over for centuries. Terrible housing. No opportunities for young people. Isolated. I can go on. Safe to walk the streets. No appreciable street crime. Knife crime is rare. No shootings even though gun ownership is quite high because of semi rural nature of area. Violence is there but it's fisticuffs. No nigs.

London. Economically rich. Opportunities abound. Constantly redeveloped. The centre of the UK. Get stabbed, shot or doused in acid. Unsafe at all hours. The difference? Nigs. Nigs want the "respect". They can't lose that "respect" by working hard in school, getting a shitty job just to get a start. They want that BMW and they want it NOW. Be a hustler, sell drugs, rob, get money, spend it on shiny shit! Nigs! I can't see how anyone can be unemployed in London?

It's the same story, everywhere you go!

so no one has the video?

Nah

Shame you struggled.

can any of you useless nignog can provide video at least?

Attached: 1565357635565.jpg (543x549, 66K)

Attached: Snoop-Dogg-Trump.jpg (1000x635, 69K)

Yaaaaa good job.

I hope a lot of cops got shot.

It was Sam Hyde

Attached: 92079D42-50BD-4E0E-B0C9-61060E198B5B.jpg (1000x1148, 161K)

what a supreme "lady"!

>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee
Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), lol

Think about all the areas in cities that get promoted as good parts to visit? Little Italy, Chinatown, Koreatown, areas that have German, Irish, Polish, British, Scottish, Greek heritage and disapora. Tourism is encouraged! They tend to be cool places to hang out.Now think about black areas? No one is encouraged to go there! No one wants to go there! If someone wonders into a black area, they get the fuck out asap. The nigs are inherently violent. They are xenophobic. They are the true racists.

Nigs! Every single fucking time!

Guns are great if you feel unsafe either buy a gun to protect yourself or gtfo.

When are they going to ban facebook as a platform for hate?

Their nothing nice about anything black.

Yeah it would be safer kids would know not to go in the yard duh

I thought new Mexico was the poorest state.

Faggott

He's been full of shit the whole time. He's not going to stop now.

I'd rather be dangerously free than safely enslaved by tyrants/tyranny. Stay armed, good guys.