What would be different if all societies were matriarchal since the beginning?

What would be different if all societies were matriarchal since the beginning?

Attached: 1565104807284.jpg (457x460, 57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/h2ZFDQiP4jM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Who got the power?

>WE GOT THE POWER

Attached: peaky-blinders-ep4.jpg (1156x771, 255K)

They would have collapsed.

Men are far, far more aggressive. A civilization would have needed resources. Resources can be harvested and grown in the beginning, but eventually you grow so large that you need to invade other territory.

Men did this because they understood that the lives of the many outweigh the lives of the few. Sacrificing a few thousand men who are willing to die for their home to ensure it survives is something we men understand.

Women do not. Their civilizations would have collapsed under their own weight.

we probably wouldn't have pyramids, railways->subways, even horse drawn carraiges would be a stretch

A 3-day long World War every 28 days wouldnt sustain.

/thread literally
“She made fun of my purse, ready the nukes!”

A society that honestly would be better off. Male aggression is useful if you need to rip your neighbors head off but I’d 100% be okay living in a society where I don’t have to worry about some sperg coming to blast me away when I’m trying to pick up some milk.

Attached: 75D210BA-E2AA-460D-818D-C40BD1E58465.jpg (640x853, 31K)

Once a month there would be a world war.

/thread
Refer to

put some effort into your edge

less sex scandals, but somehow more gossip

White knight queer

lol that was fast

Nah, there would be just as many sex scandals if not more. In my opinion the feeling and want to do sexual deviancy and scandal is derived mainly from being in a position of power rather than having to do with man or woman. It’s a power trip thing

probably not significantly different, the people who rise to power tend to be fairly similar.

the british empire had queens, they didn't derail the entire system, or anything. if they're smart and qualified, the large-scale picture would probably be about the same.

it's more of the street-level interactions that would be different.

not to be a white knight, but the epstein-type characters are 95% men. it's more normal for men to want to have a lot of children via different lovers for evolutionary reasons

also if you study someone's sex life when they come into a lot of power and/or a lot of money, men become more promiscuous over time, while women stay the same

part of the reason is that (again, for evolutionary reasons) women find male power/wealth sexy, while men find female power/wealth fairly neutral.

Im sorry. Did your land whale abruptly walk in and see this thread? tfw bruh

Attached: 1563826071055.jpg (564x522, 16K)

I worked in a company onc where 90% where female (2000 employees). The didn't get anything done, where afraid to make decisions and always tried to push the few men into powerful positions.
They went bankrupt.

more motherly cuddles and less violence. physcological warfare far more common.

Why didn't you take power then?

>less violence

youre adorable

constant infighting about who's in charge, who gets to do what with the end result that nothing gets done.

have you even seen any of the survival island type shows (i dunno wtf they're called) where they split up the teams between women and men? the women always *always* end up bickering, backstabbing and infighting.

the dudes just get on with what needs doing and a natural heirarchy starts to form over time, but it generally doesn't take very long for the more forceful (and I don't mean aggressive or violent) personalities to come to the fore and start to lead

Attached: 1484957887902.jpg (1920x1080, 553K)

because I don't care about power and I hated working there.
(i'm an engineer, I care about making stuff work).

Society wouldn't exist anymore

also more emotional manipulation.

>this
And anytime infighting happens between the mens team, its something manipulated by a female who inserted herself.

A very fair rebuttal user

I'm not so sure male agression is a result of any patriarchy; it's ust an expression of aggression. Wouldn't aggression still exist, of all sexes, regardless of social structure? Doesn't the basement dwelling nerd feel anger and resentment toward their mother dispite it being her house, her rule?

At this point, once sex robots are equal/better than biological sex and human female eggs can be sustained in incubator labs for future artificial insemination , I wouldnt mind just offing all females and enjoying the peace and serenity never before seen of Earth

They would shift to being patriarchal a short span of time because that's the natural order of things.

> its something manipulated by a female who inserted herself

pretty much yeah
men are (generally speaking) hardwired to cater to the needs of the females; when there are none around, men just get on with it: what are the immediate problems and what are the long term problems and how do we solve them? how do we make our lives easier in the long term, even if it means short term discomfort

women just want comfort *now* and then attention from men; they do this by creating division and provoking infighting by pitting the men off against each other which is usually done through subtle manipulation and lies

>They would shift to being patriarchal a short span of time because that's the natural order of things.
yeah just ignore all the ooga booga subhuman matriarchal tribes of north America and south east Asia that remained so for centuries if not millenia.

8.2/10. i lost.

Attached: 70e79c5dd4d7f332acfaeb4a0cdb8cc0.jpg (520x640, 52K)

Progress would be a lot slower. Yeah women are cunning but are less likely to do what needs to be done. Their wants come first

They also tend to delegate tasks on a ‘girl bond’ basis, not on aptitude or merit.

The biggest asshole in American history would have been spared us...

Thats no way to talk about LBJ . Have respect for the office.

>They also tend to delegate tasks on a ‘girl bond’ basis, not on aptitude or merit.
Would they on a predominantly matriarchal society that's been like that forever though? Or would that be a behaviour more common amongst men in a world like that?

CFNM content would be a lot more common

>knows nothing about women

There are just as many pedo women as men, though they tend to skew slightly older (16) than men prefer (14) simply because of difference in puberty. The age of consent, if women were in charge, would be 21. There would be just as many pedo scandals

Ok, so their is a bear grylls tv show called the ISLAND, if you neckbeards can find it, where a group of women and then men, see how long they can survive. I will put it to you mildly. By the end of the first week the men were swinging in hammocks, eating fish and drinking some concoction. Its quite hysterical!
youtu.be/h2ZFDQiP4jM

Attached: 0_GettyImages-814891810.jpg (615x490, 44K)

he just needed more time OP

Stop. Dont. I know what youre implying and no. Keep walkin, bub.

Attached: 14754E3.png (563x1000, 756K)

Bro's before ho's

for me? prob nothing, my wife would still be the one doing the penetration

we were talking about MEN, not gay cucked males. Men do the penetrations!!!!

>women don't indoctrinate their sons
>in wartime women don't accuse young males of cowardice for not volunteering
>women don't insult draft dodgers
You realize women are a part of military cultures, right? They contribute to it as adults

Women physically instigate more domestic disturbances than men. It's so widely known in social work that you don't even have to cite that specific part if it's by itself

Societies wouldnt exist. End of story.

lol probably why I’m transitioning

You understand that resources can also be acquired by trade, right? Invasion happens because wants control of the resource, but it's not the only way to have access.

Lol nice