How is it not sexual?

How is it not sexual?

Attached: 1559648130414.png (418x582, 387K)

Every isolated tribal culture we discover lacks a breast fetish, until we explain it to them. Then they suddenly have it too, and change the way they act. This was famously true of pre-war Japan. I take this as proof that humans are not fit to rule their own destinies.

Heard you like tits.

Breasts produce milk for babies to drink, user. Heterosexual males natural instinct will be to look at breasts to make sure they're sufficient to support an infants needs and if they're determined to be sufficient, they are likely to become aroused. That is the only thing that can be interpreted as "sexual" about then but they still serve a non sexual purpose, thus making them not inherently sexual.

Well, hers aren’t

Poor bait.
Anything that signals sexual maturity is a sexual signal. Large breasts also signal good genes via symmetry because it's harder to hide an asymmetry in bigguns.

so your gay? Thats cool user, no one is judging you.

Women think strong forearms are sexy. They basically serve no purpose in sex. you're a moron.

tits are sexual as fuck, if you don't like tits you're a retard. even gay dudes like manly tits

Breast are for providing milk to newborns. Nothing sexual about them. You think small tits are sexual but not men’s chests? Because men and western culture fetishise boobs

Forearms aren’t sexual, like breasts, but forearms turn people on, like breasts

>How is it not sexual?
because tits have nothing to do with sex.

It is a scientific fact that tits are a sexual stimulant, it's also been shown that when men who like big boobs find a woman with big boobs, they tend to be better at sex

>This turns me on sexually
>It's not sexual

you should try having sex then.

I have a nice set of boobs to play with during sex. Don't be jelly bra.

>It is a scientific fact that tits are a sexual stimulant
Just because something can be sexually stimulating doesn't make it sexual.
If some bitch licks my fucking earlobe I will be turned on immensely, but neither the tongue nor the ears are sexual.
Only sexual organs are sexual.

Learn what a fetish and kink is you absolute moron

>Arousal isn't sexual
BETTER BAIT NOW FAGGOT

Virgin detected.

Grab a small chested girls nipple between your lips and give it a tug. Tell me breasts aren't sexual after that. They are hard wired directly to the cunt.

You're just using one autistic definition of sexual. As it's used commonly e.g. 'shes sexy' tits would count. People usually don't use sexy to refer to 'bits which are involved in reproduction' unless they're in a clinic.

but what if you identify as a sexual earlobe

>caring about women logic
Don't be a retard.

Attached: image.jpg (324x324, 23K)

found another gay one
(you)

Anytime someone says that, just ask if they then believe grabbing tits isn't sexual assault. Their heads will explode either then or when you follow up their 'well you shouldn't touch anywhere' with 'but if you do, it should be treated the same as touching your shoulder right'

The Venn diagram of girls who say breasts aren't sexual and girls who say you should go to prison for sexual assault for touching them without permission is a circle